International Journal of Agronomy

International Journal of Agronomy / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 983414 |

Talita Bernardon Mar, Douglas Lau, Jurema Schons, Paulo Roberto Valle da Silva Pereira, Alan Johnny Carminatti, "Identification and Characterization of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus Isolates in Wheat-Growing Areas in Brazil", International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2013, Article ID 983414, 6 pages, 2013.

Identification and Characterization of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus Isolates in Wheat-Growing Areas in Brazil

Academic Editor: Kent Burkey
Received12 Jul 2013
Accepted13 Sep 2013
Published24 Oct 2013


Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV—Potyviridae, Tritimovirus), transmitted by the eriophyid mite Aceria tosichella Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae), was considered a quarantine pest in South America. Since the first report of virus in Argentina, the vector has been found in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil. The objective of this work was to determine the occurrence of WSMV in Brazil and characterize isolates from wheat-growing areas. Between 2009 and 2011, a total of 40 samples collected in wheat (Triticum aestivum) growing areas, where the presence of the mite was previously related, were tested by RT-PCR for virus detection. Six isolates of WSMV were obtained and characterized by sequencing. Two of them had their host range determined. The Brazilian WSMV isolates clustered in clade D are closely related to the Argentine isolate Arg2 (FJ348359). As expected, isolates were unable to infect dicotyledons plants. They caused mosaic in Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, Secale cereale, ×Triticosecale, and Zea mays, and they were also able to infect Avena sativa. The presence of WSMV in wheat-growing areas of the Brazilian state Rio Grande do Sul was confirmed, possibly having been introduced from a common source and/or direct vector bearing virus migration from Argentina.

1. Introduction

Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) is the type species of genus Tritimovirus in the family Potyviridae [1]. First reported, in 1929, in the Central Great Plains of the USA [2], currently it is common in most major wheat-growing regions of the world. WSMV is transmitted by eriophyid mite Aceria tosichella Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) [3], and low rates of seed transmission have been reported [46].

The virus infects several plant species of the family Poaceae [7, 8], causing severe mosaic, stunting, and necrosis. WSMV is considered the most important virus disease of North America, Europe, Oceania, and Middle East wheat-growing regions [3]. Annual production losses were frequently observed, in some instances severe local WSMV infection could result in yield losses up to 100% [5, 9, 10]. Divergent strains of WSMV occur in the USA, Mexico and Eurasia [7, 11, 12], and WSMV isolates, similar at those found in American Pacific Northwest (APNW), were detected in the southern hemisphere [5, 8, 1315].

Since a decade ago the complex Aceria tosichella and WSMV had not been found in South America, being considered a quarantine pest [3]. However, in 2002, the WSMV was detected in the central area of Cordoba province in Argentina [14], and in 2004 the vector, A. tosichella, was found associated with WSMV infected plants in Argentina [16]. In 2006, A. tosichella was detected in Brazil infecting wheat-growing regions in four municipalities in northwestern the state Rio Grande do Sul [17], and, in 2007, the vector was also reported in Uruguay [18].

Since the first report of the mite in Brazil, results of the surveys have indicated a wider distribution of A. tosichella in the northern and western municipalities of Rio Grande do Sul [3]. The presence of the mite in Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil and the virus occurrence in Argentina indicated a high level of probability that the complex might be in other places in South America. Due to the economic importance of WSMV, the expansion of the vector to new areas and the presence of the virus in a neighbor country, the objective of this work was to determine the occurrence of WSMV in wheat growing areas of the Brazilian state Rio Grande do Sul and to characterize the WSMV isolates.

2. Materials and Methods

Between 2009 and 2011 a total of 40 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) samples were collected in ten counties from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, where the presence of mite was previously confirmed by [3, 17]. From field areas (Table 1) 35 samples were collected with mosaic symptoms. In addition to field areas, five samples of wheat with mosaic and typical symptoms caused by A. tosichella (leaf curling or leaf rolling) were also collected in greenhouse at Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.

SampleLatitude Longitude Geographic originYearCP gene amplification*

329−28 24′57,20000′′−55 00′29,60000′′São Luiz Gonzaga2009
358−27 29′49,60000′′−52 54′07,40000′′Nonoai2009
363−27 17′′10,20000′′−52 43′25,60000′′Nonoai2009
451−28 24′57,20000′′−55 00′29,60000′′São Luiz Gonzaga2009
485−28 13′49,89000′′−52 24′15,99000′′Passo Fundo (Greenhouse)2010
486−28 13′49,89000′′−52 24′15,99000′′Passo Fundo (Greenhouse)2010948 bp
763−27 19′36,23677′′−52 46′18,55250′′Nonoai2010
765−27 19′36,23677′′−52 46′18,55250′′Nonoai2010
817−28 06′35,02305′′−52 54′29,57809′′Alm. Tamandaré do Sul2010
823−27 45′57,35304′′−53 27′29,49793′′Palmeira das Missões2010
837−28 23′59,00000′′−54 39′52,00000′′São Miguel das Missões2010
839−28 24′57,22000′′−55 00′29,41628′′São Luiz Gonzaga2010
852−28 23′00,40000′′−54 02′56,00000′′Ijuí2010
862−27 45′57,35304′′−53 27′29,49793′′Palmeira das Missões2010
879−28 24′57,22908′′−55 00′29,41628′′São Luiz Gonzaga2010
910−28 13′31,15000′′−52 24′19,31000′′Passo Fundo 2010
911−28 14′10,94000′′−52 24′26,67000′′Passo Fundo 2010
912−28 13′49,89000′′−52 24′15,99000′′Passo Fundo (Greenhouse)2010948 bp
913−28 13′33,99000′′−52 23′23,75000′′Passo Fundo 2010
914−28 13′33,99000′′−52 23′23,75000′′Passo Fundo 2010
915−28 13′49,89000′′−52 24′15,99000′′Passo Fundo (Greenhouse)2011948 bp
1211−28 06′35,02305′′−52 54′29,57809′′Alm. Tamandaré do Sul2011
1212−28 06′59,00000′′−52 57′02,00000′′Alm. Tamandaré do Sul2011
1213−28 01′08,80966′′−53 05′52,31161′′Chapada2011
1214−27 58′44,00000′′−53 08′53,00000′′Chapada 2011
1215−27 57′16,00000′′−53 14′58,00000′′Palmeira das Missões2011
1216−27 51′59,00000′′−53 19′31,00000′′Palmeira das Missões2011
1217−27 45′57,35304′′−53 27′29,49793′′Palmeira das Missões2011
1220−27 52′52,94114′′−54 26′02,50637′′Santa Rosa2011
1226−28 29′35,59530′′−54 33′37,15222′′São Miguel das Missões2011
1227−28 23′59,00000′′−54 39′52,00000′′São Miguel das Missões2011
1228−28 24′29,00000′′−54 42′15,0000′′São Miguel das Missões2011
1229−28 25′02,00000′′−54 49′21,0000′′São Luiz Gonzaga2011
1230−28 25′40,00000′′−54 57′57,00000′′São Luiz Gonzaga2011
1231−28 30′05,00000′′−54 57′08,00000′′São Luiz Gonzaga2011
1233−28 24′57,22908′′−55 00′29,41628′′São Luiz Gonzaga2011948 bp
1234−28 29′03,0000′′−55 13′12,00000′′Sto. Antônio das Missões2011
1251−28 13′31,15000′′−52 24′19,31000′′Passo Fundo2011
1254−28 13′33,99000′′−52 23′23,75000′′Passo Fundo2011948 bp
1256−28 13′49,89000′′−52 24′15,99000′′Passo Fundo (Greenhouse)2011948 bp

Amplification of a “948 pb” or “—” PCR negative samples.

Total RNA (40 samples), extracted using RNeasy Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), was used for the first strand cDNA synthesis with ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System Kit (PROMEGA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two sets of primers that amplify different regions of WSMV genome were used. The first one, WSMVF (5′TCGAGTAGTGGAAGCACTCA3′) and WSMVR (5′CCTCACATCATCTGCATCAT3′), designed based on WSMV GenBank sequences, targeting approximately 948 bp of the coat protein (CP) gene. The second one, WSMVL2 and WSMVR2, targets approximately 198 bp of VPg-NIa gene [19].

The PCR mixture contained 2 μL of first strand cDNA, 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200  M dNTPs, 0.4 μM of each primer and 0.625 U of GoTaq Flexi DNA Polymerase Kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) in a 25 μL reaction volume. The PCR conditions were set to 95°C for 2 min as initial denaturation temperature followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, respectively, and a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel by ethidium bromide staining (10 mg mL−1). Amplified PCR products were cloned in pGEM-T easy vector (PROMEGA Madison, Wisconsin, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Sequencing reactions were carried out using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and run on an ABI 3700 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). After proofing the sequence quality, sequence identities to both regions were verified by nucleotide BLAST National Center for Biotechnology information (NCBI, National Library of medicine, Bethesda, USA) search program [20].

Six sequences of 828 bp from CP gene (nucleotide 8368 to 9196 comparing with NC_001886), obtained in samples collected in Passo Fundo and São Luiz Gonzaga (Table 2), were aligned on CLUSTAL W program (European Bioinformatics Institute, EBI, Cambridgeshire, UK) and compared with 13 WSMV isolates available in the GenBank (Table 2) and an isolate of Oat necrotic mottle virus (ONMV; GenBank accession number AY377938), the most closely related species from the genus Tritimovirus species [21]. Neighbor-joining analysis was performed using CLUSTAL X (EBI, Cambridgeshire, UK) with 1,000 bootstrap iterations, gaps were excluded from the analysis, and all other parameters were set to default values. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using the TreeView program rooted with ONMV designated as the Outgroup.

WSMV isolate Accession numberGeographic originReference

486KC020196Passo Fundo*, BrazilThis study
912KC152462Passo Fundo*, BrazilThis study
915KC152463Passo Fundo*, BrazilThis study
1233KC152464São Luiz Gonzaga, BrazilThis study
1254KC152465Passo Fundo, BrazilThis study
1256KC152466Passo Fundo*, BrazilThis study
Arg2FJ348359ArgentinaStenger and French, 2009 [15]
CzechAF454454CzechRabenstein et al., 2002 [22]
El Batán3AF285170MexicoChoi et al., 2001 [11]
H95SAF511614Kansas, USAStenger and French, 2009 [15]
H98AF511615Kansas, USAStenger and French, 2009 [15]
ID96AF511618Idaho, USAStenger and French, 2009 [15]
ID99AF511619Idaho, USAStenger and French, 2009 [15]
IranAF454458IranRabenstein et al., 2002 [22]
Mon96AF511630Montana, USAStenger and French, 2009 [15]
Sidney81AF057533Nebraska, USAStenger et al., 1998 [1]
TK1AF454455TurkeyRabenstein et al., 2002 [22]
TypeAF285169Kansas, USAChoi et al., 2001 [11]
WA94FJ348358Washington, USAStenger and French, 2009 [15]

From Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo greenhouses.

The biological characterization consisted of a host range study of two isolates (915 and 1256) which caused symptoms in previous sap inoculation on wheat (cv. BRS Guabiju). The study was performed using Chenopodium amaranticolor Coste and Reyn, Nicotiana tabacum Linnaeus, oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.), barley (Hordeum vulgare Linnaeus), maize (Zea mays Linnaeus), rye (Secale cereale Linnaeus cv. BRS Serrano), three wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum Linnaeus) Embrapa 16, BRS Guabiju and BRS Timbaúva, and two of triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) BRS Saturno and BRS Ulisses. Each isolate was sap inoculated using 0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) in four plants of each host, and two negative controls were maintained (mock-inoculated and not inoculated). All the plants were kept in a greenhouse, and symptoms were assessed 15 days after inoculation (dai). The presence of virus was confirmed by RT-PCR 20 dai.

The possible back-inoculation to wheat was also tested for the isolate 915. Wheat plants were sap inoculated using extract (0.2 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7) from each host plants (except from N. tabacum) inoculated previously with virus isolate 915. The reinfection was confirmed by RT-PCR.

3. Results and Discussion

We confirmed the occurrence of WSMV in wheat-growing areas of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, where the presence of the vector has been previously reported. Two infected field samples were identified at Passo Fundo and São Luíz Gonzaga counties, these areas correspond to the first points of occurrence of the vector in Brazil [3, 17]. We also found WSMV in four greenhouse samples at Passo Fundo (Table 1).

Despite the geographic expansion of A. tosichella in Brazil at the moment, the populations found in the field are still small [3, 17]. On the other hand, in greenhouse conditions high populations have been found. In this condition, the symptoms caused by mite infestation were evident [17]. This may explain why few field samples were positive for the virus while the majority of greenhouse samples were positive.

The six Brazilian WSMV isolates found in this work (Table 2) are closely related and are similar to the Argentine isolate Arg2 (Figure 1). The sequences of CP gene and of VPg-NIa gene of WSMV isolates from Brazil exhibited 99% to 100% of nucleotide identity among themselves and showed 99% of nucleotide identity, differing at most by eight nucleotides to WSMV Arg2 isolate (FJ348359), from Argentina, recently reported [14]. The WSMV may have been introduced by a common source (seeds) and/or direct migration, through its vector, from Argentina.

Phylogenetic analyses of the CP sequences can indicate the relationship between virus and the genus Tritimovirus [15, 22]. The CP sequences of Brazilian isolates present between 97% and 99% of nucleotide identity with sequenced isolates from American Pacific Northwest clustered with clade D, including Argentinean isolates (Figure 1).

The clade D shares about 96% nucleotide sequence identity and includes species from North America, Australia, New Zealand, and two from Turkey [5, 1215, 22, 23], and the Brazilian isolates (Figure 1) differ by 8% from the Iranian isolate that represents Clade C [12, 22], which differ from Clade D genotypes by 8% [15]. The Brazilian isolates also differ by 9-10% from Czech isolates that represent isolates from Central Europe and Russia comprising Clade B [12, 22] and differing in nucleotide sequence from Clade C and D genotypes by 10% [15].

The Passo Fundo WSMV isolates 915 and 1256 were not able to infect dicotyledonous plants but did infect wheat, triticale, barley, rye, oat, and, at least, one maize plant (Table 3). According to [7], WSMV infects several plant species of the family Poaceae and no species of dicotyledons. Wheat is the main host of WSMV [13, 24], but the virus also infects rye, oat, barley, triticale, and some cultivars of maize [7].

HostWSMV isolate 915WSMV isolate 1256
Symptoms1Infected/inoculated (%)2Symptoms1Infected/inoculated (%)2

Chenopodium amaranticolor Coste and Reyn00
Nicotiana tabacum Linnaeus00
Avena strigosa Schreb.00
Hordeum vulgare  LinnaeusM40M47,6
Zea mays LinnaeusM14,30
Triticum  aestivum  Linnaeus (cv. Embrapa 16)M100M100
Triticum  aestivum  Linnaeus (cv. BRS Guabiju)M100M100
Triticum  aestivum  Linnaeus (cv. BRS Timbaúva)M100M100
Secale cereale  Linnaeus (cv. BRS Serrano)M25M47,4
×Triticosecale Wittmack. (cv. BRS Saturno)M47,6M41,7
×Triticosecale Wittmack. (cv. BRS Ulisses)M; LN100M95,8

M: mosaic; LN: necrotic local lesions.
²Number of infected plants/number of inoculated plants, verified by observation of symptoms.

All wheat cultivars exhibited symptoms that began as chlorotic streaks that later fused to form a mosaic. The mosaic was also observed in ×Triticosecale, but in a lower frequency in cv. BRS Saturno and with necrotic local lesions in cv. BRS Ulisses (Table 2). Similar mosaic symptoms, expressed on wheat, were also observed on rye and barley, but they were milder and with lower frequency. All these systemic infections were confirmed by RT-PCR and back-inoculation on heath wheat plants (Table 3).

Necrotic symptoms have been described in wheat [13, 24], oat, and barley [7]. But among the hosts tested and evaluated for up to 15 dai, only triticale cv. BRS Ulisses showed necrotic lesions. Oat was an asymptomatic host, because no symptoms were observed, but virus RNA was detected and the virus could be back-transmitted from this host to healthy wheat plants, which expressed mild symptoms.

The hybrid maize tested presented low frequency of mild symptoms but the virus could not be mechanically back-transmitted to wheat, similar to what is found in other studies [7]. Other varieties could be susceptible to Brazilian isolates. Maize genotypes resistant and susceptible to WSMV have been reported in other studies [7].

The results confirmed the presence of WSMV in wheat-growing areas of Brazilian state Rio Grande do Sul. The six WSMV isolates from Passo Fundo and São Luíz Gonzaga analyzed in this study are closely related, belong to Clade D, and are similar to the Argentinean isolate Arg2 (FJ348359). The WSMV may have been introduced from a common source and/or direct vector bearing virus migration from Argentina.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank CAPES for scholarship, CNPq PROC 578646/2008-0, and Embrapa for financial support.


  1. D. C. Stenger, J. S. Hall, I. Choi, and R. French, “Phylogenetic relationships within the family Potyviridae: Wheat streak mosaic virus and brome streak mosaic virus are not members of the genus Rymovirus,” Phytopathology, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 782–787, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. H. McKinney, “Mosaic disease of wheat and related cereals,” US Departament of Agriculture, Circular no. 442, 1937. View at: Google Scholar
  3. D. Navia, R. S. de Mendonca, A. Skoracka et al., “Wheat curl mite, Aceria tosichella, and transmitted viruses: an expanding pest complex affecting cereal crops,” Experimental and Applied Acarology, vol. 59, no. 1-2, pp. 95–143, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. A. C. Jones, B. A. Coutts, A. E. Mackie, and G. I. Dwyer, “Seed transmission of Wheat streak mosaic virus shown unequivocally in wheat,” Plant Disease, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1048–1050, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. I. Dwyer, M. J. Gibbs, A. J. Gibbs, and R. A. C. Jones, “Wheat streak mosaic virus in Australia: relationship to isolates from the Pacific Northwest of the USA and its dispersion via seed transmission,” Plant Disease, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 164–170, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. M. Lanoiselet, T. L. Hind-Lanoiselet, and G. M. Murray, “Studies on the seed transmission of Wheat streak mosaic virus,” Australasian Plant Pathology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 584–588, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Sánchez-Sánchez, M. Henry, E. Cárdenas-Soriano, and H. F. Alvizo-Villasana, “Identification of Wheat streak mosaic virus and its vector Aceria tosichella in Mexico,” Plant Disease, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. H. Ellis, G. J. Rebetzke, W. M. Kelman, C. S. Moore, and J. E. Hyles, “Detection of Wheat streak mosaic virus in four pasture grass species in Australia,” Plant Pathology, vol. 53, no. 2, p. 239, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. French and D. C. Stenger, “Evolution of Wheat streak mosaic virus: dynamics of population growth within plants may explain limited variation,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 41, pp. 199–214, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. A. R. Hadi, M. A. C. Langhm, L. Osborne, and K. J. Tilmon, “Wheat streak mosaic virus on wheat: biology and management,” Journal of Integrated Pest Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. J1–J5, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  11. I. R. Choi, J. S. Hall, M. Henry et al., “Contributions of genetic drift and negative selection on the evolution of three strains of wheat streak mosaic tritimovirus,” Archives of Virology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 619–628, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. C. Stenger, D. L. Seifers, and R. French, “Patterns of polymorphism in Wheat streak mosaic virus: sequence space explored by a clade of closely related viral genotypes rivals that between the most divergent strains,” Virology, vol. 302, no. 1, pp. 58–70, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. H. Ellis, G. J. Rebetzke, R. Mago, and P. Chu, “First report of Wheat streak mosaic virus in Australia,” Australasian Plant Pathology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 551–553, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Truol, R. French, M. Sagadin, and J. Arneodo, “First report of Wheat streak mosaic virus infecting wheat in Argentina,” Australasian Plant Pathology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 137–138, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. C. Stenger and R. French, “Wheat streak mosaic virus genotypes introduced to Argentina are closely related to isolates from the American Pacific Northwest and Australia,” Archives of Virology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 331–336, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Navia, G. Truol, R. S. Mendonca, and M. Sagadin, “Aceria tosichella Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae) from Wheat streak mosaic virus-infected wheat plants in Argentina,” International Journal of Acarology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 189–193, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. R. V. D. S. Pereira, D. Navia, J. R. Salvadori, and D. Lau, “Occurrence of Aceria tosichella in Brazil,” Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 539–542, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. Castiglioni and D. Navia, “Prospección de Aceria tosichella em gramíneas de Uruguay,” in Workshop en virosis de cereales transmitidas por el ácaro Aceria Tosichella—Wheat streak mosaic virus y High plains virus—en los países del Cono Sur: situación, detección y manejo, pp. 25–26, Libro de Resúmenes, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. Deb and J. M. Anderson, “Development of a multiplexed PCR detection method for Barley and Cereal yellow dwarf viruses, wheat spindle streak virus, Wheat streak mosaic virus and Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 148, no. 1-2, pp. 17–24, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, “Basic local alignment search tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. C. Stenger and R. French, “Complete nucleotide sequence of Oat necrotic mottle virus: a distinct Tritimovirus species (family Potyviridae) most closely related to Wheat streak mosaic virus,” Archives of Virology, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 633–640, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Rabenstein, D. L. Seifers, J. Schubert, R. French, and D. C. Stenger, “Phylogenetic relationships, strain diversity and biogeography of tritimoviruses,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 895–906, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. B. S. M. Lebas, F. M. Ochoa-Corona, B. J. R. Alexander et al., “First report of Wheat streak mosaic virus on Wheat in New Zealand,” Plant Disease, vol. 93, pp. 430–430, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  24. R. G. Kapooria and J. Ndunguru, “Occurrence of viruses in irrigated wheat in Zambia,” EPPO Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 413–419, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Talita Bernardon Mar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.