Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Table of Contents Alerts

To receive news and publication updates for International Journal of Agronomy, enter your email address in the box below.

International Journal of Agronomy
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 287908, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/287908
Research Article

Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr

Nader Soltani, Christy Shropshire, and Peter H. Sikkema

University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, Canada N0P 2C0

Received 26 July 2013; Accepted 9 December 2013; Published 30 January 2014

Academic Editor: Silvia Imhoff

Copyright © 2014 Nader Soltani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. R. Arnold, W. M. Murray, J. E. Gregory, and D. Smeal, “Weed control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with imazethapyr combinations,” Weed Technology, vol. 7, pp. 361–364, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. A. Bauer, K. A. Renner, D. Penner, and J. D. Kelly, “Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varietal tolerance to imazethapyr,” Weed Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 417–424, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. E. Blackshaw and R. Esau, “Control of annual broadleaved weeds in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris),” Weed Technology, vol. 5, pp. 532–538, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. P. Urwin, R. G. Wilson, and D. A. Mortensen, “Response of dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars to four herbicides,” Weed Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 512–518, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. G. Wilson and S. D. Miller, “Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) responses to imazethapyr,” Weed Technology, vol. 5, pp. 22–26, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  6. V. S. Malik, C. J. Swanton, and T. E. Michaels, “Interaction of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars, row spacing, and seeding density with annual weeds,” Weed Science, vol. 41, pp. 62–68, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. G. Wilson, “Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris),” Weed Science, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 607–610, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. L. Zimdahl, Weed-Crop Competition, International Plant Protection Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Ore, USA, 1980.
  9. I. J. Bassettand and D. B. Munro, “The biology of Canadian weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dun., S. nigrum L., and S. sarrachoides Sendt,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 65, pp. 401–414, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. G. Ogg and B. S. Rogers, “Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev.,” Weed Science, vol. 4, pp. 25–58, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. W. Niekamp, Weed management with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin in no-tillage soybean [M.S. thesis], University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo, USA, 1998.
  12. J. W. Niekamp and W. G. Johnson, “Weed management with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin in no-tillage soyabean (Glycine max),” Crop Protection, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Taylor-Lovell, L. M. Wax, and R. Nelson, “Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin,” Weed Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. A. Senseman, Herbicide Handbook, Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, Ill, USA, 9th edition, 2007.
  15. J. W. Niekamp, W. G. Johnson, and R. J. Smeda, “Broadleaf weed control with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max),” Weed Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 233–238, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Hartzler, “Sulfentrazone and flumioxazin injury to soybean,” Iowa Stat University, 2004, http://www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/2004/ppoinjury.shtml.
  17. M. J. Vangessel, D. W. Monks, and Q. R. Johnson, “Herbicides for potential use in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) production,” Weed Technology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 279–286, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. A. Renner and G. E. Powell, “Responses of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown in rotation to clomazone, imazethapyr, bentazon, and acifluorfen,” Weed Science, vol. 40, pp. 127–133, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Hekmat, C. Shropshire, N. Soltani, and P. H. Sikkema, “Responses of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to sulfentrazone,” Crop Protection, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 525–529, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. H. Sikkema, C. Shropshire, and N. Soltani, “Response of dry bean to pre-plant incorporated and pre-emergence applications of S-metolachlor and fomesafen,” Crop Protection, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 744–748, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Soltani, S. Bowley, and P. H. Sikkema, “Responses of dry beans to flumioxazin,” Weed Technology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 351–358, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. G. Wilson, “Response of dry bean and weeds to fomesafen and fomesafen tank mixtures,” Weed Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 201–206, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Soltani, C. Shropshire, and P. H. Sikkema, “Sensitivity of leguminous crops to saflufenacil,” Weed Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 143–146, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Poling, Dry edible bean responses to dimethenamid and metolachlor [M.S. thesis], Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich, USA, 1999.
  25. S. P. Singh, P. Gepts, and D. G. Debouck, “Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae),” Economic Botany, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 379–396, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. P. Singh, J. A. Gutierrez, A. Molina, C. Urrea, and P. Gepts, “Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: II. Marker-based analysis of morphological and agronomic traits,” Crop Science, vol. 31, pp. 23–29, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  27. S. P. Singh, R. Nodari, and P. Gepts, “Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: I. Allozymes,” Crop Science, vol. 31, pp. 19–23, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  28. N. Soltani, C. Shropshire, T. Cowan, and P. Sikkema, “Tolerance of cranberry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to soil applications of S-metolachlor and imazethapyr,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 645–648, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Soltani, C. Shropshire, T. Cowan, and P. Sikkema, “Tolerance of black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to soil applications of S-metolachlor and imazethapyr,” Weed Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 111–118, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Sikkema, N. Soltani, C. Shropshire, and T. Cowan, “Sensitivity of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to soil applications of S-metolachlor and imazethapyr,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 405–407, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus