Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Agronomy
Volume 2016, Article ID 1848723, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1848723
Research Article

Fungicides and Application Timing for Control of Early Leafspot, Southern Blight, and Sclerotinia Blight of Peanut

1Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, 10345 State Highway 44, Corpus Christi, TX 78406, USA
2Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, 1102 East FM 1294, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA
3Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, 2500 Broadway, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

Received 18 January 2016; Accepted 19 September 2016

Academic Editor: Kassim Al-Khatib

Copyright © 2016 W. James Grichar and Jason E. Woodward. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. A. Besler, W. J. Grichar, K. D. Brewer, and M. R. Baring, “Assessment of six peanut cultivars for control of Rhizoctonia pod rot when sprayed with azoxystrobin or tebuconazole,” Peanut Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. W. J. Grichar, B. A. Besler, and A. J. Jaks, “Use of azoxystrobin for disease control in Texas peanut,” Peanut Science, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W. J. Grichar, A. J. Jaks, and J. Woodward, “Using prothioconazole plus tebuconazole for foliar and soilborne disease control in Texas peanut,” Crop Management, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Woodward and S. Russell, “Managing sclerotinia blight in peanut: evaluation of a weather-based forecasting model to time fungicide applications in texas,” American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. E. Woodward, S. A. Russell, M. R. Baring, J. M. Cason, and T. A. Baughman, “Effects of fungicides, time of application, and application method on control of Sclerotinia Blight in Peanut,” International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2015, Article ID 323465, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. K. Culbreath, T. B. Brenneman, K. Bondari, K. L. Reynolds, and H. S. McLean, “Late leaf spot, southern stem rot, and peanut yield responses to rates of cyproconazole and chlorothalonil applied alone and in combination,” Plant Disease, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1121–1125, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. K. Hagan, M. E. Rivas-Davila, K. L. Bowen, and L. Wells, “Comparison of fungicide programs for the control of early leaf spot and southern stem rot on selected peanut cultivars,” Peanut Science, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. W. J. Grichar, P. A. Dotray, and J. E. Woodward, “Weed and disease control and peanut response following post—emergence herbicide and fungicide combinations,” in Herbicides—Current Research and Case Studies in Use, A. J. Price and J. A. Kelton, Eds., InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. B. Brenneman, A. P. Murthy, and A. S. Csinos, “Activity of tebuconazole on Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani, two soilborne pathogens of peanut,” Plant Disease, vol. 75, pp. 744–747, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. K. Culbreath, N. A. Minton, T. B. Brenneman, and B. G. Mullinix, “Response of Florunner and Southern Runner peanut cultivars to chemical treatments for management of late leaf spot, southern stem rot, and nematodes,” Plant Disease, vol. 76, pp. 1199–1203, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Dutzmann and A. Suty-Heinze, “Prothioconazole: a broad spectrum demethylation inhibitor (DMI) for arable crops,” Pflanzenschutz Nachrichten Bayer, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 249–264, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. K. Culbreath, R. C. Kemerait Jr., and T. B. Brenneman, “Management of leaf spot diseases of peanut with prothioconazole applied alone or in combination with tebuconazole or trifloxystrobin,” Peanut Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 149–158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. K. L. Bowen, A. K. Hagan, and J. R. Weeks, “Number of tebuconazole applications for maximizing disease control and yield of peanut in growers' fields in Alabama,” Plant Disease, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 927–931, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. D. Branch and T. B. Brenneman, “Pod yield and stem rot evaluation of peanut cultivars treated with tebuconazole,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 933–936, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. D. Smith, P. M. Phipps, and R. J. Stipes, “Fluazinam: a new fungicide for control of Sclerotinia blight and other soilborne pathogens of peanut,” Peanut Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Yanase, Y. Yoshikawa, J. Kishi, and H. Katsuta, “The history of complex II inhibitors and the discovery of penthiopyrad,” in Pesticide Chemistry: Crop Protection, Public Health, Environmental Safety, H. Ohkawa, H. Miyagawa, and P. W. Lee, Eds., pp. 295–303, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. A. Malandrakis, A. N. Markoglou, D. C. Nikou, J. G. Vontas, and B. N. Ziogas, “Biological and molecular characterization of laboratory mutants of Cercospora beticola resistant to QoI inhibitors,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 155–166, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Yanase, H. Katsuta, K. Tomiya, M. Enomoto, and O. Sakamoto, “Development of a novel fungicide, penthiopyrad,” Journal of Pesticide Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 167–168, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Dupont Fontellis Fungicide, “Realize the full potential of your peanuts,” K-28150, 2012
  20. W. D. Branch, “Registration of ‘Georgia-09B’ peanut,” Journal of Plant Registrations, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 175–178, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. “McCloud,” Florida Seed Producers, Inc. 2013, http://www.ffsp.net/varieties/peanut/mccloud/
  22. J. Beasley and J. Baldwin, “Peanut cultivar options and descriptions,” 2009, http://www.caes.uga.edu/commodities/fieldcrops/peanuts/production/cultivardescription.html
  23. Z. A. Chiteka, D. W. Gorbet, F. M. Shokes, T. A. Kucharek, and D. A. Knauft, “Components of resistance to late leafspot in peanut. I. Levels and variability-implications for selection,” Peanut Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Rodriquez-Kabana, P. A. Backman, and J. C. Williams, “Determination of yield losses to Sclerotium rolfsii in peanut fields,” Plant Disease Reporter, vol. 59, pp. 855–858, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  25. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Milled Peanuts: Inspection Instructions, U. S. Department of Agriculture Marketing Service, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  26. SAS Institute, SAS User's Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2007.
  27. B. Kemerait, T. Brenneman, and A. Culbreath, “2010 Peanut disease update,” in 2010 Peanut Update, J. P. Beasley Jr., Ed., pp. 57–80, Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of Georgia, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  28. A. K. Culbreath, T. B. Brenneman, R. C. Kemerait Jr., and K. L. Stevenson, “Relative performance of tebuconazole and chlorothalonil for control of peanut leaf spot from 1994 through 2004,” in Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Education Society, vol. 37, pp. 54–55, July 2005.
  29. K. L. Stevenson, G. B. Padgett, and A. K. Culbreath, “Sensitivity of early and late peanut leaf spot pathogens to DMI fungicides,” Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Education Society, vol. 31, p. 23, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  30. K. L. Stevenson and A. K. Culbreath, “Evidence of reduced sensitivity to tebuconazole in leaf spot pathogens,” Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Education Society, vol. 38, p. 62, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  31. A. K. Culbreath, T. B. Brenneman, and R. C. Kemerait Jr., “Applications of mixtures of copper fungicides and chlorothalonil for management of peanut leaf spot diseases,” Plant Health Progress, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. B. Kemerait, T. Brenneman, and A. Culbreath, “Peanut disease control,” in 2006 Georgia Pest Management Handbook, P. Guillebeau, Ed., vol. 28 of Special Bulletin, pp. 126–127, University of Georgia Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  33. G. M. Watkins, “Physiology of Sclerotium rolfsii, with emphasis on parasitism,” Phytopathology, vol. 51, pp. 110–113, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  34. R. F. Davis, F. D. Smith, T. B. Brenneman, and H. McLean, “Effect of irrigation on expression of stem rot of peanut and comparison of aboveground and belowground disease ratings,” Plant Disease, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 1155–1159, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Z. K. Punja, “The biology, ecology, and control of Sclerotium rolfsii,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 97–127, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. L. E. Sconyers, T. B. Brenneman, K. L. Stevenson, and B. G. Mullinix, “Effects of plant spacing, inoculation date, and peanut cultivar on epidemics of peanut stem rot and tomato spotted wilt,” Plant Disease, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 969–974, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Augusto, T. B. Brenneman, J. A. Baldwin, and N. B. Smith, “Maximizing economic returns and minimizing stem rot incidence with optimum plant stands of peanut in Nicaragua,” Peanut Science, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. K. J. Boote, “Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.),” Peanut Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. B. Martin, “A new strobilurin fungicide for turfgrass disease control,” Golf Course Management, vol. 71, pp. 188–191, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  40. J. Augusto, T. B. Brenneman, A. K. Culbreath, and P. Sumner, “Night spraying peanut fungicides I. extended fungicide residual and integrated disease management,” Plant Disease, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 676–682, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Augusto, T. B. Brenneman, A. K. Culbreath, and P. Sumner, “Night spraying peanut fungicides II. application timings and spray deposition in the lower canopy,” Plant Disease, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 683–689, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. P. Damicone and K. E. Jackson, “Effects of application method and rate on control of sclerotinia blight of peanut with iprodione and fluazinam,” Peanut Science, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. F. D. Smith, P. M. Phipps, and R. J. Stipes, “Agar plate, soil plate, and field evaluation of fluazinam and other fungicides for control of Sclerotinia minor on peanut,” Plant Disease, vol. 75, pp. 1138–1143, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. D. L. Smith, M. C. Garrison, J. E. Hollowell, T. G. Isleib, and B. B. Shew, “Evaluation of application timing and efficacy of the fungicides fluazinam and boscalid for control of Sclerotinia blight of peanut,” Crop Protection, vol. 27, no. 3–5, pp. 823–833, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. K. Culbreath, T. B. Brenneman, R. C. Kemerait Jr., and G. G. Hammes, “Effect of the new pyrazole carboxamide fungicide penthiopyrad on late leaf spot and stem rot of peanut,” Pest Management Science, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. P. Damicone and K. E. Jackson, “Disease and yield responses to fungicides among peanut cultivars differing in reaction to Sclerotinia blight,” Peanut Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar