Varietal Evaluation of Potato Microtuber and Plantlet in Seed Tuber Production

Table 3

Interaction effect of variety and planting materials in field condition.

Treatments		Plant stand (%) at 45 DAP	Foliage coverage (%) at 45 DAP	Plant height (cm) at 90 DAP	Number of main stems plant^−1 at 90 DAP	SPAD value of leaves at 90 DAP	Number of minitubers plant^−1 at 90 DAP	Yield of minitubers (g plant^−1) at 90 DAP	Yield of minitubers (t ha^−1) at 90 DAP
Asterix	Microtuber	97.93	70.00	40.13	2.50	52.07	11.93	307.30	20.49
	Plantlet	87.50	62.50	24.38	1.50	51.03	14.30	142.5	9.50
Granola	Microtuber	95.85	65.00	35.38	2.50	52.85	12.46	299.7	19.12
	Plantlet	81.23	39.25	25.31	1.25	52.00	14.49	118.2	7.88
Diamant	Microtuber	97.94	82.50	39.78	2.50	51.30	13.39	286.8	19.98
	Plantlet	83.32	66.25	23.48	1.50	49.20	15.14	144.5	9.70

Means followed by same letter(s) in a column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5% level of probability.