International Journal of Analytical Chemistry

International Journal of Analytical Chemistry / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 256106 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/256106

R. Sankar, G. Archunan, "Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Volatile Metabolites in Bovine Vaginal Fluid and Assessment of Their Bioactivity", International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 2011, Article ID 256106, 7 pages, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/256106

Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Volatile Metabolites in Bovine Vaginal Fluid and Assessment of Their Bioactivity

Academic Editor: P. Haglund
Received07 Apr 2011
Revised06 Jul 2011
Accepted07 Jul 2011
Published25 Oct 2011

Abstract

The chemical profiles of vaginal fluid collected from cows in oestrus and nonoestrus were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to establish any qualitative differences that might have potential value in bovine biocommunication. Eight different organic compounds were detected using the two chromatograms. The chemical profiles of oestrus vaginal fluid were distinguished significantly by the presence of three specific substances, namely, trimethylamine, acetic acid, and propionic acid that were not present in nonoestrus phase. The oestrus specific synthetic compounds were rubbed onto the genital region of nonoestrus animals (dummy cows), and the bulls were allowed to sniff the genital region and observed sexual behaviours. The statistical significance was higher ( ) in bulls exhibiting repeated flehmen and mounting behaviours towards the mixture of acetic acid, propionic acid, and trimethylamine as compared to test these compounds separately. It was concluded that the volatile substances present in the bovine vaginal fluid during oestrus may act as chemical communicators.

1. Introduction

The role of pheromones in reproduction has been well documented in several species of mammals [14]. The pheromonal cues excreted through faeces, urine, vaginal secretions, saliva, and specialised scent glands play a significant role in sexual and social behaviour [5]. In cattle, it is known that bulls can detect pheromone odours and differentiate between oestrus and nonoestrus urine or vaginal fluid [68]. The physical and chemical properties of bovine vaginal mucus have been of long standing interest to reproductive biologists because the mucus enhances conception by facilitating viability and transport of sperm [9]. The oestrus female attracts the male and informs its receptive state by means of chemical signals deriving from vaginal discharge [10] and urine [11]. There is considerable evidence that olfactory components produced from vaginal fluid influence the male sexual behaviour in buffaloes [12], hamsters [13], sheep [14], and bovines [15, 16]. In addition, it has reported that vaginal secretions of heifers at oestrus stimulated sexual activity and mounting behaviour [17].

The individual animal may produce several volatile compounds from a single source but the influence of pheromone activity may be one compound or a mixture of compounds. Hence, it is necessary to analyse the bioactivity of individual volatile compounds identified in the bovine vaginal fluid. However, identification of the volatile compounds in bovine vaginal fluid and knowledge of how their biological activity may influence sexual behaviour remained to date. The present investigations were designed to analyse the chemistry of vaginal fluid and assess their bioactivity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Vaginal fluid was collected from twelve healthy cows, Bos taurus at the Exotic Cattle Breeding Centre, Tanjore, India. They were artificially bred, and the females were approximately 20 to 30 months old, and the males were 30 to 36 months old. The animals were fed a standard diet in which the presence of the chemicals has entirely differed from the identified compounds from the vaginal fluid. The same diet was provided throughout the study. Examination per rectum of each heifer was performed regularly at one- or two-week intervals to verify the normal morphological changes in the internal organ of uterus. Since the detection of vaginal fluid pheromones by bulls is more important for the success of oestrus detection under natural conditions, the samples were collected on the basis of bull behaviours such as licking, sniffing, flehmen, and mounting during oestrus and nonoestrus phases under natural conditions. The technique involved rectal massage of the reproductive tract or an infusion tube placed within the vagina prior to a.i. The samples were screened through cheese cloth or nylon mesh (60–120 μm) at the time of collection. Immediately after screening, the samples were stored frozen at −20°C and analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

2.2. Sample Analysis

The samples collected from the particular stage as per the experimental protocol were pooled to minimise the effect of individual variation. In a preliminary study, nine organic solvents, namely, n-hexane, acetone, methanol, ethanol, petroleum ether, diethyl ether, chloroform, dichloromethane, and benzene were used to extract the compounds from the vaginal fluid samples. Among the different solvents used, the bull exhibited maximum response (i.e., Flehmen) when exposed to the sample dissolved in diethyl ether. Hence, this solvent was used throughout the study. Triplicate 15 mL of samples were taken from the pooled samples and separately mixed with 15 mL of diethyl ether. The supernatant was filtered through a silica-gel column (60–120 mesh) 30 min at room temperature. The filtered extract was reduced to 1/5 of its original volume by cooling with liquid nitrogen to condense it.

The sample was fractionated, and chemical compounds were identified by GC-MS (QP-5050, Shimadzu). Two microlitres of extract were injected into the GC-MS system on a 30 m glass capillary column with a film thickness of 0.25 μm (30 × 0.2 mm i.d. coated with UCON HB 2000) using the following temperature program: initial oven temperature of 40°C for 4 min, increasing to 250°C at 15°C/min, and then held at 250°C for 10 min. The GC-MS was run under computer control at 70 eV. The solvent (diethyl ether) peak was seen at 4.0 min. The vaginal fluids were analyzed repeatedly six times and subjected to cross-checking and confirmation. The identified compounds were then compared with the standard run under the same conditions. These data were already stored in a compact library of chemical substance (NIST 6221B).

2.3. Behavioural Assay

The synthetic compounds were procured and individually applied manually onto the genital region of nonoestrus animals (dummy cows). The bulls were allowed to sniff the genital region of experimental cows for a period of 30 min. The synthetic compounds were soaked with diethyl ether on cottonwool. The diethyl ether was used for GC-MS analysis as well as dissolving the synthetic compounds in various concentrations for example, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 5.0%. Since 1% concentration of oestrus-specific compounds were found to be effective in eliciting the flehmen and other behaviours of penile erection and mounting, the same concentration was taken in the ratio of 1 : 1 : 1 and used throughout the experiment to assess the bioactivity. The duration of Flehmen behaviour exhibited by the bulls in response to dummy cows that received synthetic (oestrus and nonoestrus) compounds was recorded. Subsequently, other behaviour responses like penile erection, mounting, and act of copulation were also recorded.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The data were compiled using SPSS statistical software 10th version and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc comparison (one-way) using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

3. Results

The GC-MS profiles shown in Figures 1 and 2 are the representative of vaginal fluid obtained in the oestrus and nonoestrus periods. The vaginal fluid of oestrus showed five peaks and of nonoestrus exhibited three peaks. Eight different peaks were noted in the vaginal fluid of two different phases (Figure 1). A single volatile, that is, 3-hexanol, was found in both the phases whereas other two volatiles, cyclohexane 3,3,5 trimethyl and phosphonic acid, were found only in nonoestrus vaginal fluid (Table 1). Of these, trimethylamine, acetic acid, and propionic acid were unique in the oestrus phase but were absent in the nonoestrus. The peaks between 5 and 6 and after the peak 7 in nonoestrus are referred as contaminants and not matching with any related compounds. The volatile compounds identified in the vaginal fluid have the molecular weight range between 59 and 174 dalton (Table 1).


Peaks Molecular weight Identified compounds Oestrus Nonoestrus

1 59Trimethylamine +
260Acetic acid+
394Phenol+
4 130Propionic acid +
5 124Cyclohexane,3,3,5-Trimethyl +
6 174Phosphonic acid +
7 1023-hexanol + +

+ Indicates the presence of the compound; − Indicates the absence of the compound.

The statistical analyses showed that the flehmen behaviour of bulls was greatly influenced by the mixture of three synthetic compounds ( ) than that of individual compounds and control sample (Table 3). The number of mounting activity and flehmen (Table 3) was higher in response to mixture of the three compounds than that of individual and in combinations.

The results of Table 2 summarises the flehmen and mounting behaviour performed by the male responder on exposure to synthetic compounds. Among the individual synthetic compounds tested the combination of acetic and propionic acid showed higher sexual behaviour than that of individual and combination of acetic acid and trimethylamine; propionic acid and trimethylamine.


S. no.Oestrus-specific compoundsDuration of flehmen (seconds)Number of mounts

1Acetic acid5.52 ± 0.028.40 ± 0.46
2Propionic acid5.58 ± 0.228.80 ± 0.52
3Trimethylamine4.20 ± 0.085.85 ± 0.52
4Phenol2.63 ± 0.023.96 ± 0.40
5Mixture of acetic acid and propionic acid6.96 ± 0.528.84 ± 0.52
6Mixture of acetic acid and trimethylamine4.68 ± 0.546.08 ± 0.40
7Mixture of propionic acid and trimethylamine5.13 ± 0.335.60 ± 0.06
8Mixture of acetic acid, propionic acid and trimethylamine8.60 ± 0.0110.94 ± 0.87
9Phosphonic acid (negative control; non-oestrus sample)2.19 ± 0.333.63 ± 0.36

Values are mean ± S.E of six observations.
(a)

ANOVA
Sum of squaresdfMean squares

VAR 00001 Duration of flehmen Between squares189.995823.74976.8740.000**
Within groups13.90245.309
Total203.89753

VAR 00003 Mounting behaviour Between squares294.012836.752134.7790.000**
Within groups12.27145.273
Total306.28353

**Level of significance at ( ).
(b)

VAR 00001
DUNCAN

Subset for alpha
VAR 00002 123456

Phosphonic acid62.1917
Phenol6 2.6333
Trimethylamine64.2083
Acetic + TMA64.68174.6817
Propionic + TMA65.13675.1367
Acetic acid65.5250
Propionic acid65.5800
Acetic + propionic66.9600
Acetic + propionic + TMA68.6067
Significant 0.176 0.147 0.1630.1991.0001.000*

Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed comparison of means using DMRT. The DMRT test showed that the mixture of acetic acid, propionic acid, and trimethylamine was found to be significant ( ) compared to those of acetic acid, propionic acid, Trimethylamine, phosphonic acid, and phenol separately as well as combinations.
(c)

VAR 00001 DUNCAN

Subset for alpha
VAR 00002 1234

Phosphonic acid 63.6350
Phenol63.9683
Propionic + TMA65.6067
Trimethylamine65.8567
Acetic + TMA66.0817
Acetic acid68.4033
Acetic + propionic68.8467
Propionic acid68.8867
Acetic + propionic + TMA 610.9400
Significant0.2750.1440.1371.000*

Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed comparison of means using DMRT. The DMRT test showed that the mixture of acetic acid, propionic acid, and trimethylamine was found to be significant ( ) compared to those of acetic acid, propionic acid, trimethylamine, phosphonic acid, and phenol separately as well as combinations. Abbreviation: TMA: trimethylamine.

4. Discussion

The present results revealed that the acetic acid, propionic acid, and trimethylamine appeared during oestrus phase but were not found in the nonoestrus phase. Among the compounds identified in oestrus vaginal fluid, the acetic and propionic acids belong to fatty acids, and the trimethylamine is in amine group. The identification of volatile fatty acids in the bovine vaginal fluid is consistent with the report of the predominant presence of short chain aliphatic acids, acetic acid, prop-, isotonic, in vaginal secretion of rhesus monkey [18]. Such volatile aliphatics have also been demonstrated in the vaginal secretion of an inside range of primates, including human female [19]. Furthermore, [20] reported that acetic, propionic, and isobutyric acid can act as pheromone in chimpanzee.

In the present study the bulls exhibited high frequency of flehmen response when exposed to oestrus sample as well as mixture of synthetic compounds tested. It clearly indicates that these three oestrus-specific compounds probably act as sex attractants (Table 1). It has been demonstrated that the olfactory chemical signals produced from oestrus females are mediated through the vomeronasal organ (VNO) facilitating the matting behaviour through expression of flehmen response in many species [20, 21]. The present findings further confirm that the identified compounds in oestrus and to activate the bull to mount are the sex attractants.

It is reported that in some mammals, pheromones are not single compounds but a mixture [22]. Reference [23] reported that three oestrus-specific compounds, namely, acetic acid, propionic acid, and 1-iodo undecane of cattle (Bos taurus) were involved in the attraction of the opposite sex. Oestrus-specific bovine urinary signal, 1-iodo undecane, is identified successfully in our laboratory by gas chromatography linked with mass spectrometry [7]. Similarly, in the present study the mixture of acetic, propionic, and trimethylamine revealed high incidence of precopulatory behaviour. The oestrus indication may have been initiated through urine followed by vaginal secretion, and accordingly the bull responded. It is, therefore, possible that the chemical signals produced from urine and vaginal fluid may act together for initiation of the precopulatory behaviours and successful coitus.

5. Conclusion

Chemical signals are less likely to be based on the presence of unique chemical compounds than on the relative ratios of concentrations in a complex mixture [24]. This concept is commonly termed as “Bouquet effect” [25, 26], also proposed that volatile compounds in specific ratios and in the presence of unique components might confer pheromonal effects. Consistent with this suggestion, the present study also reveals that estrus vaginal fluid contains three specific compounds, which may be the basis of estrus odours. It is noteworthy that the present study on behaviour responses showed similar results using the mixture of synthetic compounds to that of oestrus vaginal fluid. We conclude that the specific volatile fatty acids present in bovine vaginal fluid during oestrus appear to be involved in sexual communication.

Acknowledgments

This paper was partially supported by UGC and DST- FIST, New Delhi. The authors thank the textiles committee, Bangalore, for GC-MS analysis.

References

  1. Z. T. Halpin, “Individual Odors among Mammals: Origins and Functions,” Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 16, no. C, pp. 39–70, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. J. Dominic, “Chemical communication in animals,” Journal of Science and Research, vol. 41, pp. 157–169, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. J. Beynon and J. L. Hurst, “Urinary proteins and the modulation of chemical scents in mice and rats,” Peptides, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1553–1563, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Archunan, “Pheromones: chemical signals for reproductive behaviour,” in Proceedings of the 28th conference of the Ethological Society of India, pp. 38–42, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  5. E. B. Keverne, “Pheromonal influence on the endocrine regulation of reproduction,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 381–384, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. H. Sambraus and Z. Waring, “Effect of urine from oestrous cows on libido in bulls,” Zoologie Saugetterkd, vol. 40, pp. 49–54, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. RameshKumar, G. Archunan, R. Jeyaraman, and S. Narasimhan, “Chemical characterization of Bovine urine with special reference to oestrous cycle,” Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 24, pp. 445–454, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. Sankar and G. Archunan, “Occurrence of flehmen reaction in bull towards bovine (Bos taurus) oestrus urine,” in Proceedings of the 20th National Symposium the Society for Reproduction Biology and Comparative Endocrinology, Tiruchirappalli, India, January 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. H. Foote, “Estrus detection and estrus detection aids,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 248–256, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  10. W. R. Klemm, G. N. Hawkins, and E. de Los Santos, “Identification of compounds in bovine cervico-vaginal mucus extracts that evoke male sexual behavior,” Chemical Senses, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Rameshkumar and G. Archunan, “1- iodoundecane. An effective sex attractant from bovine estrus urine,” in Proceedings of the 20th national symposium the society for reproduction biology and comparative endocrinology, Truchirappalli, India, January 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Rajanarayanan and G. Archunan, “Occurrence of flehmen in male buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) with special reference to estrus,” Theriogenology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 861–866, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. G. Singer, A. N. Clancy, F. Macrides, and W. C. Agosta, “Chemical studies of hamster vaginal discharge: male behavioral responses to a high molecular weight fraction require physical contact,” Physiology and Behavior, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 645–651, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. P. Signoret, “Sexual pheromones in the domestic sheep: Importance and limits in the regulation of reproductive physiology,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 639–645, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Ma, B. A. Clement, and W. R. Klemm, “Cyclic changes in volatile constituents of bovine vaginal secretions,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1895–1906, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. Sankar and G. Archunan, “Flehmen response in bull: Role of vaginal mucus and other body fluids of bovine with special reference to estrus,” Behavioural Processes, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Nishimura, K. Utsumi, T. Okano, and A. Iritani, “Separation of mounting-inducing pheromones of vaginal mucus from estrual heifers,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 3343–3347, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. M. Paleologou, “Detecting oestrus in cows by a method based on bovine sex pheromones,” Veterinary Record, vol. 100, no. 15, pp. 319–320, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  19. P. A. Brennan, “The vomeronasal system,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 546–555, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  20. D. F. Walker, “Causes of copulatory failure in beef bulls,” Modern Veterinary Practice, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 252–256, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. Kannan and G. Archunan, “Chemistry of clitoral gland secretions of the laboratory rat: assessment of behavioural response to identified compounds,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  22. T. Hoverstad, A. Bjorneklett, O. Fausa, and T. Midtvedt, “Short-chain fatty acids in the small-bowel bacterial overgrowth syndrome,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 492–499, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. Sankar and G. Archunan, “Identification of putative pheromones in bovine (Bos taurus) faeces in relation to estrus detection,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 103, no. 1-2, pp. 149–153, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. L. Gorman, “A mechanism for individual recognition by odour in Herpestes auropunctatus (Carnivora: Viverridae),” Animal Behaviour, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 141–145, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. J. Welsh, R. E. Moore, R. J. Bartelt, and L. L. Jackson, “Novel, species-typical esters from preputial glands of sympatric voles, Microtus montanus and M. pennsylvanicus,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 143–158, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. F. Flood, S. R. Abrams, G. D. Muir, and J. E. Rowell, “Odor of the muskox—a preliminary investigation,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2207–2217, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 R. Sankar and G. Archunan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1602
Downloads1068
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.