International Journal of Analytical Chemistry

International Journal of Analytical Chemistry / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 813591 |

Vildes Maria Scussel, Barbara Nantua Giordano, Vanessa Simao, Daniel Manfio, Simone Galvao, Manuel Nazaré Ferreira Rodrigues, "Effect of Oxygen-Reducing Atmospheres on the Safety of Packaged Shelled Brazil Nuts during Storage", International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 2011, Article ID 813591, 9 pages, 2011.

Effect of Oxygen-Reducing Atmospheres on the Safety of Packaged Shelled Brazil Nuts during Storage

Academic Editor: Charles L. Wilkins
Received31 Jan 2011
Revised06 May 2011
Accepted06 May 2011
Published07 Jul 2011


This work reports the application of oxygen-(O2-) reducing atmosphere methods on stored shelled Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) packs aiming to evaluate the degree of aflatoxin degradation, nuts lipid oxidative stability, fungi control, and hygienic conditions improvement. The methods applied were (a) ozone: O3, (b) carbon dioxide: CO2, and (c) O2 absorber pads with and without vacuum. From all modified atmospheres evaluated, the best performance was obtained with O3, either with or without vacuum. It was the only nut treatment that was able to degrade aflatoxins. None of the spiked (AFLs: 15 μg·kg−1) nut samples O3- treated had aflatoxins detected up to the LC-MS/MS method LOQ (0.36 μg·kg−1 for total AFLs), thus producing safer nuts. Also it kept the fatty acid oxidation indicator—malondialdehyde stable and improved the sensory attributes for consumer acceptance. In addition, the destruction of fungi and yeast was observed since the O3 application (from  cfu/g to NG = no growth). All other treatments stabilized and/or inhibited microorganisms' growth only. By adding CO2 gas also played an important role in the nut quality. Regarding cost, gaseous O3 showed to be of low cost for application in the nut packs.

1. Introduction

In nature, Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) that grow in the Amazon forest may get contaminated by fungi and aflatoxins [13], as other tree nuts. The aflatoxigenic Aspergillus species that have been isolated from Brazil nuts are A. flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. nomius [47]. Their growth is directly related to the climate conditions of that region and to the conditions during their storage, transport, and commercialization, if there is no control of moisture content (m.c.) and temperature. That can also occur if nuts are packaged in a microclimate rich in oxygen (O2) and m.c. enough to allow microorganisms to grow [1, 8].

Studies have reported the use of modified atmospheres (MA) in food storage, extensive to packaging, to reduce O2 concentration by adding gases such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide (CO2), and ozone (O3) which lead to microorganisms (fungi, yeast, and bacteria) inhibition, maintenance of lipid stability, and reduction of grains/nuts/vegetable respiration [914]. Vacuum also is an alternative for O2 reduction and in recent years the addition of O2 absorber pads (which contains a mixture of iron salts) have been the newest alternative in packaged food [1517]. Studies have reported O3 and CO2 effect on controlling microorganism growth in several agricultural commodities [13, 1821]. CO2 is a promising and efficient inactivating microorganisms’ gas for application on nonthermal sterilization process [22, 23]. Maeba et al. (1988) reported the destruction and detoxification of AFB1 and AFG1 in agricultural products treated with 1.1 ppm of O3 during 5 minutes [24]. Aflatoxin degradation in different food products, either fresh or processed at different O3 concentrations, has been reported by some authors [13, 2528]. An advantage of gaseous O3, apart from being a powerful disinfectant, oxidant, and aflatoxins degrader, is that it decomposes quite fast into O2 and does not have toxic effect [2931].

The degradation of mycotoxins by O3 is found to follow a pseudo-first-order rate, as long as a continuous supply of O3 is maintained [8]. For aflatoxins, the higher degradation rate for AFB1 and AFG1 was attributed to the presence of an 8,9 double bond forming a vinyl ether at the terminal furan ring (Figure 1), which is not present in AFB2 and AFG2. These latter forms require longer exposure due to a possible second mechanism, when the lactone ring is opened during O3 exposure [29].

High m.c., relative humidity, temperature, and environment rich in O2 are the main factors for tree nuts to get aflatoxin contaminated and so infected by fungi. During storage and commercialization dry shelled Brazil nut packs need to maintain their safety and quality. Considering that MA in storage (macroenvironment) and packaging (microenvironment) can prolong food shelf life by reducing O2 concentration, this work reports the application of O2-reducing atmosphere methods (vacuum, CO2, O3, and O2 absorber) on fungi reduction, aflatoxin degradation, and lipid stability during storage of snack packs of shelled Brazil nuts.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sample

Shelled dry (processed) Brazil nuts (25 kg). They were provided by the Renmero Factory from Cameta city, Para State, Northern Brazil. The nuts type and conditions were as follows: (a) medium size (40–50 mm length [32]); (b) initial m.c. and total fungi load of 6.5% and  cfu·g−1, respectively; (c) no aflatoxin contaminated (method LOQ: 0.36 μg·kg−1); (d) absence of coliforms, Salmonella and Staphylococcus. That batch was utilized for the aflatoxin spiking experiment. A special nut batch (10 kg) naturally aflatoxin contaminated (10.61 μg·kg−1) was used for further aflatoxin O3 degradation comparison. Its m.c. and total fungi load were 7.2% and  cfu·g−1, respectively. Nuts 260 g portions were prepared for the experiments.

2.2. Application of O2-Reducing Atmospheres

Shelled Brazil nuts were divided into two groups. (a) Group I: control: nuts packed (a.1) loose: only air inside and (a.2) under vacuum. (b) Group II: aflatoxin spiked (15 μg·kg−1): nuts were divided into subgroups and packed (b.1) loose: only air inside; (b.2) vacuum; (b.3) O3 treated (packed with and without vacuum); (b.4) CO2 gas added into packs; (b.5) O2 absorber pads (packed with and without vacuum). The series O3 (concentration: 10.0 mg/L, 90 min—[21]) was applied on the nuts separately and then aseptically packaged. The O3 concentration checking was performed by the iodine metric test [33]. (c) Group II: naturally aflatoxin contaminated (10.6 μg·kg−1): nuts O3 treated were packed with and without vacuum. The O3, CO2 gas, and O2 absorber pad application was carried out utilizing an O3 generator (MZ01, MegaZon, Pondicherry, India), a CO2 cilinder (White Martins, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil), and O2 pad (Ageless, New York, USA), followed by sealing and/or vacuum + sealing by means of a vacuum machine with heat sealer (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The snack packs (O2 and UV barrier polypropylene film, 20 × 25 cm length × width) filled with 260 g nut portions each and treated, were stored in an BOD incubator (Dist, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.) at 27°C during two months.

Sample Collection for Analysis
Individual packs of shelled Brazil nuts were collected at Day one (after each treatment) and every 30 days (triplicate ). See flowchart of the whole experiment in Figure 2.

2.3. Shelled Brazil Nut Analysis

(a) Microbiological methods: for total fungi count the method was of Pitt and Hocking (1997) [33]; the presence of Aspergillus species was checked utilizing the Aspergillus flavus and parasiticus agar (Fluka, St. Gallen, Switzerland) by Pitt et al. (1983) [34]; the identification of fungi in genus and species was carried out according to the keys of Samsom et al. (2004) [35] and Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., and coliforms (45°C) were checked by APHA (1997) [36]. (b) Aflatoxin determination: was carried out by LC tandem mass spectrometry [37]. Briefly, aflatoxins (Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) were extracted from ground Brazil nuts with acetonitrile : water (HPLC grade, Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy and MilliQ, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA, resp.) at 80 : 20 v/v, mixed, filtered, and injected into an Waters Alliance 2695 separation module with a 20 μL injection loop (Waters, Milford, USA) and a C18 column 150 × 3.2 mm, 5 μm (Alltech, Breda, The Netherlands) at 30°C. Separation was performed utilizing methanol (Carlo Erba) : water (both with 25 mM of ammonium acetate, J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) as mobile phase at 1 mL·min−1 of flow rate. The LC system was coupled to a Quatro Ultima triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, UK) and toxins were detected and quantified by using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization in the positive mode [M+H]+. For details on equipment settings, please refer to the method. (c) Moisture content was determined by gravimetry [38]. (d) Fatty acid oxidation was determined by the TBA method of Genot (1996). Extraction with 5% TCA (J. T. Baker) containing freshly prepared BHT in ethanol (J. T. Baker and Carlo Erba, resp.). After filtration, extract was mixed with TBA (J. T. Baker,) and immersed in a 70°C water bath (Dubnoff Q226D, Quimis, Diadema, Brazil) for 30 min, cooled in ice and the absorbance of the reacted solutions read at 532 nm (spectrophotometer E005, Hitashi, Tokyo, Japan) against a blank containing TCA and TBA reagents. The results expressed as mg of malondialdehyde (MDA) equivalents per kilograms nut sample (LOQ: 0.37 mg·kg−1) [39]. (e) Sensory evaluation was based on the descriptive quantitative analysis [40]. Eighteen trained panelists during four sessions ( ) described impressions perceived by the hedonic scale of 5 points (1: dislike very much, 2: dislike, 3: neither like nor dislike, 4: like and 5: like very much). Sensory attributes evaluated: nut appearance (AP), color (CO), firmness (FI), resistance to slicing (SR), rancid (RA), and strange (OD) odors.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as the mean values and standard errors. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and included the Tukey’s test to evaluate significant differences among the means ( ). Figure 2 shows the flowchart on the whole study.

3. Results and Discussion

All the MA-treated shelled Brazil nut packs presented better quality and safety than the MA-untreated nuts (Group I: air) throughout the whole storage period. It was observed different degrees of fungi reduction and in some groups, aflatoxin degradation too.Table 1 shows the safety (fungi load; aflatoxins) and quality (m.c.; fatty acid oxidation; sensory evaluation) data obtained from the different MA-treated nut Groups (I, II, and III).

Storage Total fungi count*(cfu·g−1)Aspergillus toxigenic strainsm.c.aAflatoxinsb (μg·kg−1)Lipid stability (mg·kg−1)cBrazil nuts sensory attributes (scores)d
Atmosphere Day(%)(diff.%)eAPCOFIRASROD

GROUP I—Controlf


Initial1.83 × 104 (+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus h6.5<0.367.24 ± 0.9444444
Final2.69 × 107(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 8.1(+0.6%)<1.899.98 ± 1.6233232


Initial1.83 × 104(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 4.2<0.367.33 ± 0.4444444
Final0.70 × 10(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 4.2(no diff.)<0.367.24 ± 1.1444444



11.83 × 104(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 6.515.007.33 ± 0.1444444
302.96 × 105(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 7.115.818.25 ± 0.2434333
606.30 × 106(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 7.1(+0.6%)16.859.24 ± 0.7333132


11.83 × 104(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus ± 0.5444444
300.56 × 10NGj4.214.887.24 ± 0.8444444
600.10 × 10NG4.2(−2.3%)14.957.24 ± 0.5455444


1NGNG5.0<0.367.25 ± 1.2444444
30NGNG4.9<0.367.24 ± 0.6444444
60NGNG4.7(−1.8%)<0.367.84 ± 0.6454444

Ozone + vacuum

1NGNG3.1<0.366.25 ± 0.2444444
30NGNG3.3<0.367.04 ± 0.7444444
60NGNG3.0(−3.5%)<0.367.25 ± 0.5445444
Carbon dioxide

11.83 × 104(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 6.515.007.25 ± 0.2444444
30NGNG7.014.907.24 ± 1.1444444
60NGNG7.0(+0.5%)14.927.90 ± 0.6344443

Oxygen absorber pad

11.83 × 104(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus 6.515.007.25 ± 2.2444444
302.6 × 10NG6.514.907.90 ± 1.7444444
60NGNG6.5(no diff.)15.008.20 ± 0.6434443

Oxygen  absorber pad  +  vacuum

11.8 × 104(+) A. flavus; A. parasiticus ± 2.2444444
30NGNG3.915.017.24 ± 1.5444444
60NGNG4.3(−2.2%)14.997.24 ± 1.5435443



1NGNG5.6<0.367.56 ± 0.9444444
30NGNG5.4<0.367.94 ± 0.2444444
60NGNG5.2(−1.6%)<0.367.99 ± 0.5443444

Ozone + vacuum

1NGNG4.0<0.36 7.95 ± 0.4444444
30NGNG3.9<0.36 7.94 ± 1.2444444
60NGNG3.7(−3.2%)<0.368.54 ± 0.6434444

am.c.: moisture content; baflatoxin total: AFB1+AFB2+AFG1+AFG2 (method LOQ: 0.350 μg/kg); cin malondialdehyde; dvalues as mean scores of 18 individual panellists [AP: nut appearance; CO: color; FI: firmness; RA: rancid odour; SR: slicing resistant; OD: strange odor (5: like very much, 4: like, 3: neither like nor dislike, 2: dislike and 1: dislike very much)]; ediff: m.c. difference (+) increased or (−) reduction; fno aflatoxin spiked (nuts total AFL < method LOQ = 0.36 μg·kg−1); htoxigenic Aspergillus strains isolated in AFPA media; i15 μg·kg−1 AFLs spiked and 6.5% m.c.; jNG: no growth; kBrazil nuts naturally aflatoxin contaminated = 10.61 μg·kg−1 and 7.2% m.c. *The genera and species more often isolated from the Control Brazil nuts were Acremonium sp; A. ochraceus; A. nomius; Cladosporium sp.; P. corylophilum, and Rhizopus sp. followed by A. niger; A. parasiticus; A. versicolor, and P. crustosum.
3.1. MA Effects on Shelled Brazil Nuts Microbiological Content and M.C.

As expected, inhibition of microoganisms growth was registered throughout the experiment despite the MA applied.

(a) Total Fungi Load and Aflatoxigenic Strains
A substantial fungi reduction was observed, both with O2 absorber and O3 packaged under vacuum, as well as with nuts O3 loose pack ones. CO2 also played an important role in the microorganism reduction in the current experiment reducing from 1.8 × 104 cfu·g−1 to NG (no grow). Applying vacuum improved quality and safety regarding fungi further. Although, it was observed a reduction on their growth in the MA-treated Groups; in the untreated nuts (Group I) was possible to isolate and identify them. Their main genera and species were Acremonium sp; A. ochraceus; Cladosporium sp.; P. corylophilum Rhizopus sp. followed by A niger; A. parasiticus; A. versicolor; P. crustosum. With regards to m.c., nuts presented different degree of reduction after being MA-treated as follows: . That was especially true for vacuum treated packs, which led to a synergistic effect (low m.c. + lack of O2) on controlling fungi growth. Regarding the O3 treated nuts, the reduction of m.c. was due to the fact that during O3 application occurred an exposure of nuts to 90 minutes with O3 stream that can take moist from nut surface apart from its known reaction with atmospheric water, decreasing the microenvironment relative humidity [21]. In fact, the lowest total fungi count, that is, no growth was detected in the packs that nuts were submitted to O3 with or without vacuum application (m.c. reduction: −1.8 and −3.5%, resp.), suggesting that apart from the fungi destruction by the O3, the reduction of m.c. powered fungi reduction. These data were corroborated by some authors that reported m.c. reduction in different foods including in-shell Brazil nuts O3 treated [13, 21].

(b) Hygienic Bacterial Indicators
Similar to what was observed for fungi and yeast, all gases and O2 absorbers as well as vacuum did not allow Salmonella, Staphylococcus, or coliform to grow on the nuts showing the safe power of the treatments for microbial population control. It is important to emphasize that the potent disinfectant characteristics of O3 has been recognized by the Food and Agriculture Organization [41] and Food and Drug Administration [42].

3.2. MA Effects on Shelled Brazil Nuts Aflatoxin Degradation

It was possible to observe in the aflatoxin spiked nut samples O3 treated (Groups II: O3 and O3+vac) that the gas was able to degrade them as none, during the storage period, were detected (LC-MS/MS method LOQ: 0.36 μg·kg−1). That was different for the other O2 reducing atmospheres (CO2 and O2 absorber pads with/without vacuum). They were able only to stabilize/reduce the microorganisms growth keeping nuts safe but with aflatoxins. In that sense the packs with O3 and vacuum applied bring an alternative for aflatoxin degradation and also m.c. reduction, a factor that is directly related to fungi proliferation and development of possible aflatoxigenic strains.Nuts O3 treated utilized in the study showed to be able for consumption, as no aflatoxin was detected in none of them. Brazil nuts naturally contaminated by O3: to make sure O3 would degrade aflatoxins not only in spiked nuts (i.e., toxins just applied and dried onto nut surfaces), we carried out also an experiment utilizing the special batch of nuts naturally aflatoxin-contaminated (packs with nuts O3 and O3 + vacuum treated). Similarly to the nuts spiked, no aflatoxin was detected after O3 application neither fungi. That was probably due to the fact that Brazil nut has the advantage of its contamination/fungi proliferation to occur mostly on the nut surface/external layer as its structure is completely sealed (Figure 3). In addition, the testae (a pellicle that surrounds the edible part) of the Brazil nut, which is rich in Selenium (antioxidant), can act as a protector [2]. Thus reducing the possibility of easy access by the fungi spores to the nut core, as it occurs in peanuts (loose testae) or shelter fungi spores in-between shell and edible part of pistachios (in-shell), making gaseous O3 application and action more effective. Currently, there is no available technology to completely eliminate the mycotoxin contamination of food and feed chain. Most of the current strategies for mycotoxin reduction are based on prevention, either pre- or postharvest and detoxification, which are not always effective. From the available tools to ensure food safety, O3 application may be one of the most promising methods that come to meet the grain producers and food industries needs [4345].

3.3. O2-Reducing Atmosphere Effect on Nuts Quality

As far as quality is concerned, the parameters evaluated were the fatty acid oxidation, m.c., and sensorial evaluation which give information on lipid rancidity development, crunchiness texture alterations, and aroma/colour/odor/texture modifications. (a) Fatty acid peroxidation: regarding MDA formation during the nuts storage period and MA applied, no significant changes occurred despite the MA applied except for the O2 absorber at the end of the storage period. In contrary, the samples packed loose in air (either Control and spiked) had an increase of MDA from 7.24 to 9.98 mg·kg−1. With regards to CO2 and O3, with and without vacuum, effect on shelled Brazil nuts lipids, it was observed that the values of MDA lowered and kept constant throughout the whole period of storage (Table 1). The same occurred when Gamli and Hayoǧlu (2007) studied vacuum packaged pistachio [46]. The authors observed no significant difference on the MDA values during the storage period and reported that those results could be attributed to the higher amount of the fatty acid oleic acid (monounsaturated) and less linoleic acid (poliunsaturated) content in that nut. These results can be attributed to the reduction/control in the oxidation rate speed, both, by air withdraw (vacuum) and O3 treatment (waste from O2 removal). Similar results occurred in peppers and pistachio after the application of O3 and vacuum packaging, that is, the effect on lipid oxidation was not apparent, thus could not alter the sensory characteristics [13] which was corroborated with the current data of the Brazil nut experiment. It is different when Rudolph et al. (1992) evaluated the oxidative stability of pecan oil and observed that changes in colour (O2 effect on carotenoids) followed by a rapid increase of rancidity products (O2 effect on fatty acids) [47]. However in the case of oil, lipids (fatty acids) present much more intense exposure to air O2 than when it is protected in the liposomes inside the nut cells (or just the nut damaged surface exposes their lipid content from broken cells/lysosomes. As for Brazil nuts where their oil (lipids) is protected inside the undamaged nut cells or slightly damaged during the industrial nut cracking procedure. (b) Sensory Evaluation: the scores for the sensory attributes tested (nut appearance, strange odor, rancid odor, slicing resistance, and firmness) are shown in Table 1. The O2 absorber pads applied led to some slight variation with regards to the visual appearance (color) of nuts probably due to its reducing effectiveness in the nuts located away from the pad site, sitting for long time (60 days) during storage. The sensory analysis of the Brazil nuts treated with O3 and vacuum-packed did not present significant changes among the panelists ( ). All scores for the O3-treated nuts during storage period were between 4 (like) and 5 (like very much). It was verified also that O3 leaves no residual odor. In fact O3 with vacuum and vacuum only received the best scores showing that vacuum is still the best choice when preserving sensory characteristics is concerned. Similar thing occurred when Inan et al. (2006) worked with red pepper ozonation [27]. They did not register significant sensory changes after the O3 application as the peppers were still quite palatable. When Akbas and Ozdemir (2006) studied the quality of pistachio, no significant changes also were observed between sweetness, rancidity, overall appearance, and taste, compared to control samples (no O3) indicating the efficacy of that gas application [13]. Other authors also have reported the efficiency of the O3 and its low interference in the sensory attributes of quality in several products such as vegetables, fish, birds carcasses, and their byproducts [44, 48, 49]. In a work carried by Dull and Kays (1988) with pecans, the author reported a slight better sensory quality on the vacuum-treated packaging nuts after 6 months of storage at 24°C. Other potential uses of O3 in the food industry include reduction of undesirable volatile metabolites, such as off-flavours or contaminants by their removal during O3 stream application [50]. Considering that MDA is volatile, all experiments that had vacuum applied and/or gaseous O3 stream exposure, had lower MDA just after application (day one), thus giving the idea of fast oxidation reduction which was expected. The nuts final storage MDA measure should be taken as the indicator of the degree of oxidation together with the sensory evaluation. (c) Moisture content: as expected, nuts presented m.c. reduction after the MA treatments. That was especially true for vacuum-treated packs which kept nuts cruncher throughout the whole storage period. That effect was enhanced by the O3 application which allowed to reduce possible off-odours.

4. General Discussion

All O2-reducing atmospheres treated Brazil nut packs presented better nut quality after the period of study. However, the best performance, regarding safety was obtained either with or without vacuum. It was the only nut treatment that was able to degrade aflatoxins. It also led to fungi/yeast destruction, was able to eliminated off-flavours, reduced m.c., and maintained fatty acid oxidative process stable thus leading to safer, cruncher, and of better quality nuts. Next comes vacuum that kept sensory attributes of consumer acceptance, kept controlled lipid oxidation, and microorganisms. All other treatments stabilized and/or inhibited microorganisms’ growth only, which also is important regarding safety, microorganisms-wise, and quality nuts.

Considering that Brazil nuts can be suitable to aflatoxin contamination, are good fungi substrate, and are rich in oil, as other tree nuts, the best method that could control those parameters and improve consumer acceptance for best and stable dry nut product packs is O3 with vacuum. Aflatoxin that may still remain in the Brazil nuts at the packaging can be destroyed at that stage. O3 will be useful for those hard packages (tubs) sold in small portion, that are commonly commercialized in Brazil too—providing a safer product for the national consumers. Regarding the costs and environment impact, O3 equipments are of low cost and environment friendly, it is fast converted into O2.

Our modern days have been emphasizing the importance of additives reduction in food. The use of O3 features as an important technology for food storage and industry as it leaves no residue. Its use has been approved in countries around the world and supported by several international food and health agencies inclusive for use in organically labelled agricultural products, inclusive in medicine. Currently, there is no available technology to completely eliminate the mycotoxins contamination of food and feed chain. Most of the current strategies for mycotoxin reduction are based on prevention, either pre- or postharvest. From the available tools to ensure food safety, O3 application is one of the most promising methods that come to meet the needs.


The authors thank the Renmero Factory and the Brazilian Association of Brazil Nuts Producers located in Cameta, Para State, in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon Region for providing the shelled dry Brazil nut samples.


  1. S. J. Kershaw, “Aflatoxins in imported edible nuts: some data 1982–1984,” Journal of Food Technology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 647–649, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. M. Pacheco and V. M. Scussel, “Selenium and aflatoxin levels in raw Brazil nuts from the amazon basin,” Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 26, pp. 11087–11092, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. M. Pacheco and V. M. Scussel, “Aflatoxins evaluation on in-shell and shelled dry brazil nuts for export analysed by LC-MS/MS-2 006 & 2007 harvests,” World Mycotoxin Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 295–304, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Cartaxo, J. Souza, T. Correa, P. Costa, and O. Freitas-Costa, “Occurrence of aflatoxins and filamentous fungi contamination in Brazil nuts in the forest,” in IVth Congresso Latino-Americano de Micotoxicologia, Havana, Cuba, September 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. Arrus, G. Blank, D. Abramson, R. Clear, and R. A. Holley, “Aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus in Brazil nuts,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 513–527, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. M. Scussel, “Aflatoxin and food safety: recent south American perspectives,” Journal of Toxicology, Section Toxin Review, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 179–216, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Olsen, P. Johsson, T. Moller, R. Paladino, and M. Lindblat, “Aspergillus nomius, an important aflatoxin producer in Brazil nuts?” World Mycotoxin Journal, vol. 1, pp. 123–126, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. K. S. McKenzie, A. B. Sarr, K. Mayura et al., “Oxidative degradation and detoxification of mycotoxins using a novel source of ozone,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 807–820, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Zhao and P. M. Cranston, “Microbial decontamination of black pepper by ozone and the effect of the treatment on volatile oil constituents of the spice,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. G. Kim and A. E. Yousef, “Inactivation kinetics of foodborne spoilage and pathogenic bacteria by ozone,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 521–528, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Achen and A. E. Yousef, “Efficacy of ozone against Escherichia coli O157:H7 on apples,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1380–1384, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. R. Sharma, A. Demirci, L. R. Beuchat, and W. F. Fett, “Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on inoculated alfalfa seeds with ozonated water and heat treatment,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 447–451, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Y. Akbas and M. Ozdemir, “Effect of different ozone treatments on aflatoxin degradation and physicochemical properties of pistachios,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 86, no. 13, pp. 2099–2104, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. Ölmez and M. Y. Akbas, “Optimization of ozone treatment of fresh-cut green leaf lettuce,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 487–494, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. F. Mexis, A. V. Badeka, K. A. Riganakos, and M. G. Kontominas, “Effect of active and modified atmosphere packaging on quality retention of dark chocolate with hazelnuts,” Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 177–186, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Freshpax, 2011,
  17. Ageless, 2011,
  18. F. M. Gabler, J. L. Smilanick, M. F. Mansour, and H. Karaca, “Influence of fumigation with high concentrations of ozone gas on postharvest gray mold and fungicide residues on table grapes,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Maskan and Ş. Karataş, “Storage stability of whole-split pistachio nuts (Pistachia vera L.) at various conditions,” Food Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 227–233, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Mazza and D. S. Jayas, “Controlled and modified atmosphere storage,” in Food Shelf Life Stability. Chemical, Biochemical and Microbiological Changes, N. A. M. Eskin and D. S. Robinson, Eds., CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  21. B. N. E. Giordano, V. Simão, and V. M. Scussel, “Effect of ozone gas on Brazil Nut (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) mycoflora and aflatoxin reduction,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products (CAF '08), pp. 214–220, Chengdu, China, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  22. N. Kaliyan, R. V. Morey, W. F. Wilcke, K. Alagusundaram, and P. Gayathri, “Applications of carbon dioxide in food and processing industries: current status and future thrusts,” in ASAE Annual Meeting 076113, View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. van der Steen, F. Devlieghere, and J. Debevere, “High oxygen concentration in combination with elevated carbon dioxide to affect growth of fresh-cut produce micro organisms,” ISHS Acta Horticulturae, vol. 599, pp. 141–147, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  24. H. Maeba, Y. Takamoto, M. Kamimura, and T. Miura, “Destruction and detoxification of aflatoxins with ozone,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 53, pp. 667–668, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. G. Dollear, G. E. Mann, L. P. Codifer, H. K. Gardner, S. P. Koltun, and H. L. E. Vix, “Elimination of aflatoxins from peanut meal,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 862–865, 1968. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. D. Proctor, M. Ahmedna, J. V. Kumar, and I. Goktepe, “Degradation of aflatoxins in peanut kernels/flour by gaseous ozonation and mild heat treatment,” Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 786–793, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Inan, M. Pala, and I. Doymaz, “Use of ozone in detoxification of aflatoxin B1 in red pepper,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 425–429, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. B. N. E. Giordano and V. M. Scussel, “Effect of ozone gas on Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) mycoflora and aflatoxin reduction during storage,” Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  29. U. Samarajeewa, A. C. Sen, M. D. Cohen, and C. I. Wei, “Detoxification of aflatoxins in foods and feeds by physical, chemical methods,” Journal Food Protection, vol. 53, pp. 489–501, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. S. McKenzie, L. F. Kubena, A. J. Denvir et al., “Aftatoxicosis in Turkey poults is prevented by treatment of naturally contaminated corn with ozone generated by electrolysis,” Poultry Science, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1094–1102, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  31. B. N. E. Giordano, V. Simao, D. Manfio, S. Galvao, J. N. Scussel, and V. M. Scussel, “Reduction of in-shell Brazil nut on aflatoxin contamination by ozone application during storage,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conferences on Stored-Product Protection (IWCSPP '10), M. O. Carvalho, P. G. Fields, C. S. Adler et al., Eds., Estoril, Portugal, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  32. F. R. De Mello and V. M. Scussel, “Characteristics of in-shell Brazil nuts and their relationship to aflatoxin contamination: criteria for sorting,” Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 22, pp. 9305–9310, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. I. Pitt and A. D. Hocking, Fungi & Food Spoilage, Blackie Academic & Profissional, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1997.
  34. J. I. Pitt, D. Hocking, and D. R. Glenn, “An improved medium for the detection of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  35. R. A. Samsom, E. S. Hoesktra, and J. C. Frisvad, Introduction to Food and Airborne Fungi, CBS, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 7th edition, 2004.
  36. APHA—American Public Health Association, Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 3rd edition, 1997.
  37. J. J. M. Xavier and V. M. Scussel, “Development of an LC-MS/MS method for the determination of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in Brazil nut,” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 425–433, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis International Nuts and Nuts Products, vol. II, chapter 40, 18th edition, 2005.
  39. C. Genot, “Some factors influencing TBA test,” Report of diet-ox project (AIRIII-CT-92-1577), 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  40. H. S. Stone and J. L. Sidel, Sensory Evaluation Practices, Academc Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 1993.
  41. FAO. Corporate DOC depository, “Fresh water fish processing and equipment in small plants,” 1994, View at: Google Scholar
  42. FDA. Food and Drug Administration, “Direct food substances affirmed as generally recognized as safe,” 2008, View at: Google Scholar
  43. R. Shapira and N. Paster, “Control of mycotoxins in storage and techniques for their decontamination,” in Mycotoxins in Food: Detection and Control, N. Magan and M. Olsen, Eds., pp. 190–223, Woodhead Publishing and CRC Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  44. S. Naito and H. Takahara, “Ozone contribution in food industry in Japan,” Ozone: Science & Engineering, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 425–429, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Halász, R. Lásztity, T. Abonyi, and Á. Bata, “Decontamination of mycotoxin-containing food and feed by biodegradation,” Food Reviews International, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 284–298, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Ö. F. Gamli and İ. Hayoǧlu, “The effect of the different packaging and storage conditions on the quality of pistachio nut paste,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 443–448, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. J. Rudolph, G. V. Odell, H. A. Hinrichs, H. J. Thomson, and S. J. Kays, “Chemical changes in pecan oils during oxidation,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 279–293, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  48. J. M. King and T. Walker, “Ozone: new weapon for fighting food hazards,” Louisiana Agriculture Magazine, vol. 43, pp. 12–13, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  49. Ş. Ibanoǧlu, “Influence of tempering with ozonated water on the selected properties of wheat flour,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 345–350, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. G. Dull and S. J. Kays, “Quality and mechanical stability of pecan kernels with different packaging protocols,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 565–567, 1988. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Vildes Maria Scussel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.