Research Article
Sensitive Determination of Terazosin in Pharmaceutical Formulations and Biological Samples by Ionic-Liquid Microextraction Prior to Spectrofluorimetry
Table 4
Comparison of the proposed approach with other reported methods for determination of terazosin.
| Method | Sample | LOD (μg L−1) | R.S.D. (%) | LR (μg L−1) | References |
| Spectrofluorimetry | Serum, urine | 210 | 2.5 | Up to 3486.9 | [4] | X-ray fluorescence spectrometry | Drug | 732 | — | 732–843000 | [5] | HPLC with fluorescence detection | Plasma | 0.25 | <7 | Up to 100 | [6] | HPLC with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry detection | Plasma | 0.0625 | — | — | [7] | Square-wave adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry | Plasma, drug | 0.0058 | <1.1 | 0.39–11.62 | [8] | ionic-liquid microextraction spectrofluorimetry | Urine, plasma, drug | 0.027 | 2.4 | 0.1–115 | This work |
|
|
LOD: limit of detection, LR: linear range, R.S.D.: relative standard deviation.
|