Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Volume 2017, Article ID 2863454, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2863454
Research Article

Robustness of Tomato Quality Evaluation Using a Portable Vis-SWNIRS for Dry Matter and Colour

Central Queensland University, Building 361, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to U. K. Acharya; moc.liamg@hcahsemu

Received 15 July 2017; Revised 19 October 2017; Accepted 7 November 2017; Published 3 December 2017

Academic Editor: Günther K. Bonn

Copyright © 2017 U. K. Acharya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. H. S. Peiris, G. G. Dull, R. G. Leffler, and S. J. Kays, “Spatial variability of soluble solids or dry-matter content within individual fruits, bulbs, or tubers: implications for the development and use of NIR spectrometric techniques,” HortScience, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 114–118, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. M. Beckles, “Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 129–140, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Helyes and Z. Pek, “Tomato fruit quality and content depend on stage of maturity,” HortScience, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1400-1401, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. E. Balibrea, A. M. Santa Cruz, M. C. Bolarín, and F. Pérez-Alfocea, “Sucrolytic activities in relation to sink strength and carbohydrate composition in tomato fruit growing under salinity,” Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. N. Davies, G. E. Hobson, and W. B. McGlasson, “The constituents of tomato fruit — the influence of environment, nutrition, and genotype,” C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 205–280, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Ecarnot, P. Baogonekczyk, L. Tessarotto, and C. Chervin, “Rapid phenotyping of the tomato fruit model, Micro-Tom, with a portable VIS-NIR spectrometer,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 70, pp. 159–163, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. L. Segura, J. I. Contreras, R. Salinas, and M. T. Lao, “Influence of salinity and fertilization level on greenhouse tomato yield and quality,” Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis, vol. 40, pp. 485–497, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. S. Birth, G. G. Dull, W. T. Renfoe, and S. J. Kays, “Nondestructive spectrometric determinatin of dry matter in onions,” Journal of American Society of Horticulture Science, vol. 110, pp. 297–303, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. P. Subedi, K. B. Walsh, and G. Owens, “Prediction of mango eating quality at harvest using short-wave near infrared spectrometry,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 326–334, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. B. Jordan and M. P. F. Loeffen, “A new method for modelling biological variation using quantile functions,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 86, pp. 387–401, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. C. Slaughter, D. Barrett, and M. Boersig, “Nondestructive determination of soluble solids in tomatoes using near infrared spectroscopy,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 695–697, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. Khuriyati, T. Matsuoka, and S. Kawano, “Monitoring internal properties of on-plant tomato fruits using NIR spectroscopy for control of nutrient solution in soilless culture,” Environmental Control in Biology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Hong and S. Tsou, “Determination of tomato quality by near infrared spectroscopy,” Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 321–324, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. I. Ścibisz, M. Reich, S. Bureau et al., “Mid-infrared spectroscopy as a tool for rapid determination of internal quality parameters in tomato,” Food Chemistry, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1390–1397, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Khuriyati and T. Matsuoka, “Near infrared transmittance method for nondestructive determination of soluble solids content in growing tomato fruits,” Environment Control in Biology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 217–223, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Clement, M. Dorais, and M. Vernon, “Nondestructive measurement of fresh tomato lycopene content and other physicochemical characteristics using visible NIR spectroscopy,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 21, pp. 9813–9818, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Xie, Y. Ying, and T. Ying, “Combination and comparison of chemometrics methods for identification of transgenic tomatoes using visible and near-infrared diffuse transmittance technique,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 395–401, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Shao and Y. He, “Nondestructive measurement of the internal quality of bayberry juice using Vis/NIR spectroscopy,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1015–1019, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. B. Walsh, M. Golic, and C. V. Greensill, “Sorting of fruit using near infrared spectroscopy: Application to a range of fruit and vegetables for soluble solids and dry matter content,” Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 141–148, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Radzevicius, J. Viskelis, R. Karkleliene, D. Juskeviciene, and P. Viskelis, “Determination of tomato quality attributes using near infrared spectroscopy and reference analysis,” Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, vol. 103, pp. 91–98, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  21. T. Kusumiyati, M. Akinaga, S. Tanaka, and Kawasaki., “On-tree and after-harvesting evaluation of firmness, color and lycopene content of tomato fruit using protable NIR spectroscopy,” Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, vol. 6, pp. 327–332, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  22. C. Camps, “Non destructive measurement of tomato quality by portable near infrared spectroscopy,” Revuesuisse Viticulture Arboriculture and Horticulture, vol. 42, pp. 298–303, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. C. V. Greensill and K. B. Walsh, “A remote acceptance probe and illumination configuration for spectral assessment of internal attributes of intact fruit,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1674–1684, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Cen and Y. He, “Theory and application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in determination of food quality,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Golic, K. Walsh, and P. Lawson, “Short-wavelength near-infrared spectra of sucrose, glucose, and fructose with respect to sugar concentration and temperature,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus