CSF-Targeted Proteomics Indicate Amyloid-Beta Ratios in Patients with Alzheimer’s Dementia Spectrum

Behzad, Maryam; Zirak, Negin; Madani, Ghazal Hamidi; Baidoo, Linda; Rezaei, Ali; Karbasi, Shima; Sadeghi, Mohammad; Shafie, Mahan; Mayeli, Mahsa; Alzheimer&#x2019;s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, undefined

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5336273

International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 5336273 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5336273

CSF-Targeted Proteomics Indicate Amyloid-Beta Ratios in Patients with Alzheimer’s Dementia Spectrum

Maryam Behzad,^1,2Negin Zirak,^1,3Ghazal Hamidi Madani,^1,4Linda Baidoo,¹Ali Rezaei,¹Shima Karbasi,^1,5Mohammad Sadeghi,¹Mahan Shafie,^1,6Mahsa Mayeli ,^1,6and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative⁷

Academic Editor: Giulia Abate

Received05 Jun 2022

Revised01 Dec 2022

Accepted07 Dec 2022

Published06 Feb 2023

Abstract

Background. According to recent studies, amyloid-β (Aβ) isoforms as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have remarkable predictive value for cognitive decline in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Herein, we aimed to investigate the correlations between several targeted proteomics in CSF samples with Aβ ratios and cognitive scores in patients in AD spectrum to search for potential early diagnostic utility. Methods. A total of 719 participants were found eligible for inclusion. Patients were then categorized into cognitively normal (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD and underwent an assessment of Aβ and proteomics. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), and Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) were used for further cognitive assessment. The Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, and Aβ42/38 ratios were considered as means of comparison to identify those peptides corresponding significantly to these established biomarkers and cognitive scores. The diagnostic utility of the IASNTQSR, VAELEDEK, VVSSIEQK, GDSVVYGLR, EPVAGDAVPGPK, and QETLPSK was assessed. Results. All investigated peptides corresponded significantly to Aβ42 in controls. In those with MCI, VAELEDEK and EPVAGDAVPGPK were significantly correlated with Aβ42 ( value < 0.001). Additionally, IASNTQSR, VVSSIEQK, GDSVVYGLR, and QETLPSK were significantly correlated with Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/38 ( value < 0.001) in this group. This group of peptides similarly corresponded to Aβ ratios in those with AD. Eventually, IASNTQSR, VAELEDEK, and VVSSIEQK were significantly associated with CDR, ADAS-11, and ADAS-13, particularly in MCI group. Conclusion. Our research suggests potential early diagnostic and prognostic utilities for certain peptides extracted from CSF-targeted proteomics research. The ethical approval of ADNI is available at ClinicalTrials.gov with Identifier: NCT00106899.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with substantial memory loss, executive dysfunction, disorientation, and psychiatric symptoms, enduring 8 to 10 years and affecting individuals and their families [1–3]. AD is the most common cause of dementia [4] and will likely increase to 12.5 million in the United States by 2050 [5]. As a disorder accompanied by cognitive symptoms [6], different clinical cognitive assessments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Mini-Cog, and the Alzheimer’s disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) are widely developed and used along with lab assessments to fully picture the disease [7, 8].

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a proximal fluid characterized by a dynamic range of protein abundance [9]. CSF originates from the ependymal cells in the choroid plexus of the brain’s ventricles [10], so CSF proteomics can perfectly mirror the biochemical changes in the central nervous system [11]. A recent CSF proteomics analysis reported that 48 proteins were remarkably dysregulated in AD patients compared to other neurodegenerative diseases [12, 13]. An integrative approach can be useful to advance AD brain network proteomics in identifying promising CSF biomarkers. Several protein targets were previously identified by integrative proteomics linked to brain-based pathophysiology, including dysfunction in synaptic, myelination, and metabolic pathways. Targeted CSF proteomics levels such as APOE, VGF, and CH3L1 altered between AD and control groups and showed consistent changes (up- or downregulation) across independent studies. VGF protein and its related peptides refer to a stimulatory role in memory formation in the hippocampus. They have been implied as AD biomarkers and change with the progression of the disease [14–16]. The increase in secreted protein levels like chitinase 3 like 1 (CHI3L1) and osteopontin (SPP1) was observed in patients with pathology of AD and neurodegenerative disease [17–19]. Also, 14-3-3-Zeta (YWHAZ), which is a signaling protein, showed a high correlation with AD in a recent study () [20].

Various biomarkers are used for better risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring intervention in AD [21]. The three important CSF biomarkers for AD diagnosis are beta-amyloid isoforms, tau protein, and phosphorylated tau protein [11].

The amyloid-beta proteins are formed from the breakdown of a larger protein called amyloid precursor protein. The pathological decline associated with AD is driven by protein, specifically the aggregation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) into neurotic plaques that collect between neurons and disrupt cell function, so there is a noticeable decline in the ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 in CSF [22], which is greater than the reduction of CSF Aβ42 itself [13]. Research suggests that the abnormal processing of amyloid precursors leads to the development of pathologic plaques [23, 24].

In AD treatment, it is important to reduce the pace of cognitive decline. As amyloid CSF levels can be used as a biomarker for the existence of AD pathology, which can already be identified in the very early grade of the disease when cognition and behavior are still normal [25, 26]. Thus, the importance of hallmark biomarkers that ease the early diagnosis is significant [27] and allows the development of particular tests for the early detection of AD in at-risk groups [28].

Despite many pilot studies, the knowledge about the pathology and heterogeneity of AD is still insufficient because of the absence of duplicate findings. Also, methodological challenges can limit the performance of these biomarkers in clinical practice, especially in the early stages [29, 30]; thus, additional diagnostic tools are beneficial for early and correct diagnosis [31].

The correlation between CSF proteins and cognitive decline should also be investigated to further determine the functionality of these markers in clinical settings.

In this research, we hypothesized that the levels of this CSF proteomics might associate with the rate of cognitive decline in AD patients. Thus, the ability of these CSF biomarkers to predict the rate of disease progression and cognitive function has indications for the early diagnosis and treatment of AD. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the targeted proteomics of CSF samples with the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, ADAS-cog-13, and ADAS-total in AD and non-AD groups.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). The ADNI was launched in 2003 as a public-private partnership led by Principal Investigator Michael W. Weiner, MD. The primary goal of ADNI has been to test whether serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), other biological markers, and clinical and neuropsychological assessment can be combined to measure the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Inclusion and exclusion criteria for ADNI participants are fully described elsewhere. In brief, enrolled subjects aged between 55 and 90 and were required to undergo various test procedures including neuroimaging, lumbar punctures, and longitudinal follow-up. Participants were excluded if they had a Hachinski Ischemic Score of higher than 4, unpermitted medications use, or permitted medications to change over four weeks before the study, a Geriatric Depression Scale score of equal to or higher than 6, less than 6 grades of education or working equivalent. Clinical classification of Alzheimer’s disease based on ADNI criteria was used to categorize participants into three cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and AD groups, which is described elsewhere.

We included all subjects with CN, MCI, and AD diagnosis from ADNI database, for whom data regarding CSF-targeted proteomics and CSF amyloid-β measurements were available. Besides, we extracted data regarding demographics, diagnosis (CN, MCI, and AD), and cognitive assessments including Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), and Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), and merged all data tables for further analysis. More specifically, data for CSF-targeted proteomics were extracted from “Emory University CSF targeted MS.csv”; data for CSF amyloid-β measurements were extracted from “UPENN–2D UPLC tandem mass spectrometry measurements of Abeta42, Abeta40, and Abeta38”; and data for demographics, diagnosis, and cognitive assessments from “ADNIMERGE–Key ADNI tables merged into one table.csv” from ADNI database. Eventually, a total number of 719 participants were found to be eligible for the study, including 225 CN, 381 MCI, and 113 AD subjects.

2.2. Cognitive Assessments

In this study, we used CDR, ADAS, and MMSE to assess cognition, which are valid assessment tools for cognitive and noncognitive behavioral dysfunctions among subjects with the dementia spectrum. CDR is a validated instrument for clinical studies on the AD spectrum, which assesses three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, and judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care) using structured interviews. The scores for the six domains (ranging from 0 to 3) tested can be summed (CDR Sum of Boxes or CDR-SB), which was used in this study. The ADAS-Cog is a well-known cognitive assessment with raw scores that range from 0 to 70, where higher scores indicate greater cognitive dysfunction. In addition, due to some limitations in the 11-item version of ADAS-Cog, the 13-item version was recommended which has two complementary items including delayed word recall and a number cancellation or maze task, with a score range between 0 and 85. In this study, we used both ADAS-Cog 11- and 13-item versions. The MMSE is also a well-known brief screening instrument for clinical research on cognitive dysfunction with raw scores that range from 0 to 30, where lower scores indicate greater cognitive dysfunction.

2.3. CSF-Targeted Proteomics and Amyloid-β Measurements

Targeted CSF proteomics data were analyzed and processed by the Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, using CSF samples from the ADNI cohort by mass spectrometry. Detailed technical information on the mass spectrometry analysis of CSF, data acquisition, validation protocols, and quality control metrics used in this study are previously described. Briefly, the five protein targets (CHI3L1, NPTX2, SPP1, VGF, and YWHAZ) were previously identified by integrative proteomics as brain-based CSF biomarkers and reported to change in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. CSF proteins were reduced, alkylated, denatured, and digested with Lys-C (1 : 100 enzyme to protein ratio) and trypsin (1 : 10 enzyme to protein ratio) and desalted. The resulting peptides were analyzed as a single replicate over approximately nine days using a standard flow Agilent 1290 Infinity II liquid chromatography system coupled with Thermo Fisher Scientific TSQ Altis Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer. Isotopically labeled peptide standards were added for relative quantification by reporting the total area ratios for six targeted peptides related to five proteins (CHI3L1, NPTX2, SPP1, VGF, and YWHAZ). Table 1 illustrates the peptides investigated, their associated genes, and their protein description.

In this study, all subjects were also tested for Aβ1-42, Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio, and Aβ1-42/1-38 ratio using tandem mass spectrometry analysis by the ADNI biomarker core at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn). Detailed information regarding the 2D-UPLC-tandem mass spectrometry method used for these analyses has previously been described. This new method has been re-validated and compared with the original, reference method for Aβ and has fulfilled the requirements for validation as a rugged and reliable procedure. Each reported value in the data is the average of analyses of duplicate 0.1 mL aliquots from each CSF sample.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The descriptive data were summarized using means and standard deviations for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical variables. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for comparing demographics, cognitive assessments, and CSF-targeted proteomics and amyloid-β measurements between CN, MCI, and AD subjects. To determine the association between CSF proteomics and amyloid-β ratios and cognitive assessments, a multivariate linear regression model was used. In these models, CSF proteomics were entered as predictors, and age and gender were entered as covariates to control the effects of them as possible confounders. square, standardized beta coefficient, and its value were reported for these models. The data were analyzed using SPSS, Version 26, for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 719 subjects, including 225 CN, 381 MCI, and 113 AD subjects were investigated in this research. Significant differences in age, gender, education, and all cognitive assessments were observed between groups. Aβ and proteomics findings also showed significant differences between the three diagnosis groups. Table 2 shows demographics, cognitive assessments, and Aβ and proteomics measurements.

3.1. Association between Proteomics and Aβ

Linear regression model analysis between Aβ1-42, Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio, and Aβ1-42/1-38 ratio and targeted proteomics controlled for age and gender as possible confounders in each CN, MCI, and AD group are shown in Table 3.

Among CN participants, Aβ1-42 showed a significant positive association with all six targeted proteomics; however, the Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio was significantly negatively associated with VVSSIEQK and GDSVVYGLR ( and 0.039, respectively), and Aβ1-42/1-38 was only associated negatively with GDSVVYGLR (). In the MCI group, although a significant association of Aβ1-42 with VAELEDEK and EPVAGDAVPGPK was observed ( for both), both Aβ1-42/1-40 and Aβ1-42/1-38 ratios showed negative significant association with other four proteomics. Among subjects with AD, IASNTQSR, VAELEDEK, and EPVAGDAVPGPK had a significant positive association with Aβ1-42 (, , and , respectively). However, a different pattern was observed for rations. VVSSIEQK, GDSVVYGLR, and QETLPSK showed significant association with both Aβ1-42/1-40 and Aβ1-42/1-38 ratios.

3.2. Association between Proteomics and Cognitive Assessments

Linear regression model analysis between cognitive measurements (CDR, ADAS-Cog 11 and 13, and MMSE) and targeted proteomics controlled for age and gender in CN, MCI, and AD group are shown in Table 4. In the CN group, only VAELEDEK and EPVAGDAVPGPK showed a significant negative association with both ADAS-Cog 11 and 13. No significant association was observed between any proteomics and CDR and MMSE scores. IASNTQSR, VAELEDEK, and VVSSIEQK were significantly associated with CDR, ADAS-Cog 11, and 13 in subjects with MCI; however, a different pattern was observed for MMSE which was significantly associated with VVSSIEQK, GDSVVYGLR, and QETLPSK. In AD patients, however, no significant association was yielded regarding CDR and MMSE scores, and VVSSIEQK was the only proteomic to associate with ADAS-Cog 11 and 13.

4. Discussion

In this study, we explored the correlation between CSF proteomics with Aβ1-42, Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio, and Aβ1-42/1-38 ratio with ADAS-total and ADAS-Cog-13. CSF proteomics has not been a trend of research in AD biomarker search so far [32]. One work suggested that the lower plasma Aβ 42/Aβ 40 was associated with greater cognitive decline in attention, executive function, and memory tests, besides the lower CSF Aβ42 level related to more and steeper cognitive in MMSE [33]. Aβ42 or Aβ42/Aβ40 in both plasma and CSF was also associated with delayed memory recall, the third item of ADAS-Cog, and they did not find any significant association between Aβ 42 or Aβ42/Aβ40 levels of plasma with delayed memory recall, but the CFS level of them was correlated with worse delayed memory recall (Aβ42, , ; Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, , ) [34]. Moreover, studies showed that the decrease in CSF Aβ42 levels comes before AD for at least 10-20 years [35–37].

Our findings showed that Aβ1-42 was significantly reduced in cases with AD compared to both MCI and CN subjects. Similar findings were detected regarding the Aβ 1-42/1-40 and Aβ 1-42/1-38. Regarding the investigated peptides, IASNTQSR, VVSSIEQK, GDSVVYGLR, and QETLPSK indicated a significantly increased pattern in those with more progressive stages of the disease, while VAELEDEK and EPVAGDAVPGPK manifested a decreasing pattern in more severe cases. In the IASNTQSR peptide, which is related to the CHI3L1 protein gene, a significant correlation was detected with Aβ 1-42/1-40 at MCI and AD cases. This finding is in agreement with another study showing that CHI3L1 expression in the brain increases with aging, and its expression is higher in women than in men. This peptide is related to inflammatory processes and connected to neurodegeneration [38–40]. We found a positive correlation between the level of IASNTQSR and both ADAS-11 and ADAS-13 in MCI cases; however, no significant association was found between this peptide and cognitive scores at CN and AD subjects. This result suggests that the IASNTQSR has potential utility as a biomarker for the early stages of the disease [40]. Considering the VVSSIEQK peptide, Miller et al. showed that the expression of YWHAZ as a crucial linker gene decreases in both aging and AD [20]. Another study indicated that YWHAZ protein expression is reduced in the hippocampus of AD patients [41]; conversely, in the prefrontal lobe of mice, the expression level of the YWHAZ gene was increased. These may imply that the expression alteration can be different across brain regions [42]. We found a positive correlation between MMSE scores and QETLPSK in MCI cases. In addition, in this study, VVSSIEQK showed a correlation with CDR, ADAS-11, ADAS-13, and MMSE in those with MCI but no significant correlation was found for this peptide with cognitive scores at any other disease stage. As for the VALEDEK peptide, which is related to the NPTX2 protein, recent studies showed lower NPTX2 levels in individuals subjected to AD and a strong correlation with memory decline [4, 5]. One study found that NPTX2 plays an urgent role in Parkinson’s disease [43, 44], and another study found that the level of CSF synaptic protein named NPTX2 considerably declines in AD patients. This protein can be known as a biomarker for cognitive decline. Currently, NPTX2 has been confirmed as a closely related protein to the pathogenesis of AD and can predict cognitive decline in mild AD and MCI [45]. One study looked for a correlation between serum level NPTX2 level and MOCA scores in patients with vascular dementia and find a positive correlation between them (, ). These patients had a lower serum level () of NPTX2 than the control group [46]. Our experience contradicts the previous findings of a moderate negative correlation between the peptide of this protein and ADAS-Total and ADAS-cog-13 in the Aβ + group and suggests that a lower level of VAELEDEK is correlated with more severe forms of the disease. With regard to the GDSVVYGLR and QETLPSK peptides, which are related to SPP1, one study showed a positive correlation between SSP1 and cognitive decline in MMSE scores in AD patients [19]. However, another study found a negative correlation between CSF-related SPP1 protein gene and MMSE scores in a control group, which shows a lower level of SSP1 and a higher level of MMSE scores and found a weak positive correlation between SSP1 and MMSE in MCI and AD patients [47]. Our results about those peptides associated with the SPP1 protein gene and cognitive decline in the ADAS indicated positive significant correlations for VVSSIEQK at the MCI phase represented in CDR, ADAS-11, and ADAS-13. Eventually, the QETLPSK peptide was only significantly correlated with MMSE in MCI subjects. Additionally, GDSVVYGLR showed a significant negative correlation with MMSE in MCI cases, which supports previous studies. Regarding the peptide EPVAGDAVPGPK, which is related to VGF, recent studies showed that VGF peptide levels in CSF are lower in patients with AD compared with controls [48, 49]. Although the mechanism behind the decrease in the level of VGF in CFS of AD patients is not clear yet [49], a lower level of the VGF protein gene can be influenced by a decrease in the level of NPTX2 [50]. One research examined the level of VGF-related peptides in CSF measured by ELISA among patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), patients with AD, and the control group. They found lower levels of CSF VGF in patients with DLB compared to AD and control groups, and in contrast with previous studies, VGF levels had not differed significantly between patients with AD and the control group [51]. Other previous studies showed that VGF peptide or protein levels were reduced in the CSF [16, 52, 53] and parietal cortex of a patient with AD [54] in comparison to the control group. All peptides related to VGF are decreased in AD patients [49]. In our study, however, no significant association was found between EPVAGDAVPGPK and cognitive score in MCI or AD cases, and significant associations were only detected in CN cases and ADAS-11 ADAS-13. This is a cross-sectional study, which limits the possibility of concluding the direction of associations. Furthermore, future studies are to consider the correlation between each item of ADAS with peptides and the Aβ ratio.

In conclusion, our results suggest the following peptides of IASNTQSR, VAELEDEK, VVSSIEQK, GDSVVYGLR, EPVAGDAVPGPK, and QETLPSK, correspond to formerly well-established biomarkers of Aβ. Particularly, CSF proteomics appears to be a considerable biomarker of cognitive decline in cases with MCI. Future longitudinal studies are required to investigate further the potential diagnostic and prognostic utilities of this proteomics longitudinally.

Data Availability

The data used in this research was obtained from Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and is available with permission to all researchers.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted using ADNI data. The ADNI study is ethically approved and operated in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, 1964.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

M.B. contributed to developing research ideas, analysis, interpretation of data, writing the draft, and revising it. N.Z. contributed to developing research ideas, analysis, interpretation of data, writing the draft, and revising it. G.H. contributed to the interpretation of data and draft revision. L.B. contributed to interpreting data, writing, and editing the draft. A.R. contributed to the interpretation of data and writing the draft. S.K. contributed to writing and revising the draft. M.Sa. contributed to writing and revising the draft. M.Sh. contributed to analyzing the data, interpreting data, writing the draft, and revising it. M.M. contributed to developing the research idea, analyzing the data, interpreting data, writing the draft, and revising it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Maryam Behzad and Negin Zirak contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

Data collection and sharing for this project were funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (http://www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuroimaging at the University of Southern California. Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf

References

B. M. Tijms, J. Gobom, C. Teunissen et al., “Csf proteomic Alzheimer’s disease-predictive subtypes in cognitively intact amyloid negative individuals,” Proteomes, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 36, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Ulep, S. K. Saraon, and S. McLea, “Alzheimer disease,” The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 129–135, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sathe, C. H. Na, S. Renuse et al., “Quantitative proteomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid to identify candidate biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease,” Proteomics–Clinical Applications, vol. 13, no. 4, article 1800105, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lane, J. Hardy, and J. Schott, “Alzheimer’s disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
“2021Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 327–406, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kelley and R. Petersen, “Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Neurologic Clinics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 577–609, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Kueper, M. Speechley, and M. Montero-Odasso, “The Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog): modifications and responsiveness in pre-dementia populations. A narrative review,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 423–444, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Papp, M. Pákáski, G. Drótos, and J. Kálmán, “Validation of the Hungarian version of Alzheimer’s disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in patients with mild cognitive impairment,” Psychiatria Hungarica: A Magyar Pszichiatriai Tarsasag tudomanyos folyoirata, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 426–434, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Begcevic, D. Brinc, A. P. Drabovich, I. Batruch, and E. P. Diamandis, “Identification of brain-enriched proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid proteome by LC-MS/MS profiling and mining of the Human Protein Atlas,” Clinical Proteomics, vol. 13, no. 1, article 11, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Fang, A. Strand, W. Law et al., “Brain-specific proteins decline in the cerebrospinal fluid of humans with Huntington disease,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 451–466, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Blennow, H. Zetterberg, and A. M. Fagan, “Fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer disease,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 2, no. 9, article a006221, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bastos, R. Ferreira, B. Manadas, P. Moreira, and R. Vitorino, “Insights into the human brain proteome: disclosing the biological meaning of protein networks in cerebrospinal fluid,” Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 185–204, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Mehta, T. Pirttilä, S. P. Mehta, E. A. Sersen, P. S. Aisen, and H. M. Wisniewski, “Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of amyloid β proteins 1-40 and 1-42 in Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Alder, S. Thakker-Varia, D. A. Bangasser et al., “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-induced gene expression reveals novel actions of VGF in hippocampal synaptic plasticity,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 34, pp. 10800–10808, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Bozdagi, E. Rich, S. Tronel et al., “The neurotrophin-inducible gene Vgf regulates hippocampal function and behavior through a brain-derived neurotrophic factor-dependent mechanism,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 39, pp. 9857–9869, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. H. Duits, G. Brinkmalm, C. E. Teunissen et al., “Synaptic proteins in CSF as potential novel biomarkers for prognosis in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, article 5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bonneh-Barkay, G. Wang, A. Starkey, R. L. Hamilton, and C. A. Wiley, “In vivo CHI3L1 (YKL-40) expression in astrocytes in acute and chronic neurological diseases,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 7, no. 1, article 34, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Paterson, W. E. Heywood, A. J. Heslegrave et al., “A targeted proteomic multiplex CSF assay identifies increased malate dehydrogenase and other neurodegenerative biomarkers in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease pathology,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 6, no. 11, article e952, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Comi, M. Carecchio, A. Chiocchetti et al., “Osteopontin is increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and its levels correlate with cognitive decline,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1143–1148, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Miller, M. C. Oldham, and D. H. Geschwind, “A systems level analysis of transcriptional changes in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1410–1420, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Blennow, H. Hampel, M. Weiner, and H. Zetterberg, “Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 131–144, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Portelius, H. Zetterberg, J. Gobom, U. Andreasson, and K. Blennow, “Targeted proteomics in Alzheimer’s disease: focus on amyloid-β,” Expert Review of Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 225–237, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Grundke-Iqbal, K. Iqbal, Y. C. Tung, M. Quinlan, H. M. Wisniewski, and L. I. Binder, “Abnormal phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau (tau) in Alzheimer cytoskeletal pathology,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 13, pp. 4913–4917, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. V. De Ferrari and N. C. Inestrosa, “Wnt signaling function in Alzheimer’s disease,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Konijnenberg, J. Tomassen, A. Den Braber et al., “Onset of preclinical Alzheimer disease in monozygotic twins,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 987–1000, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Vos and P. J. Visser, “Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: implications for refinement of the concept,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 64, no. s1, pp. S213–S227, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Choi, S. Hou, L. H. Choe, and K. H. Lee, “Targeted human cerebrospinal fluid proteomics for the validation of multiple Alzheimer’s disease biomarker candidates,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 930, pp. 129–135, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Bader, P. E. Geyer, J. B. Müller et al., “Proteome profiling in cerebrospinal fluid reveals novel biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 16, no. 6, article e9356, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mattsson, A. Lönneborg, M. Boccardi, K. Blennow, O. Hansson, and Geneva Task Force for the Roadmap of Alzheimer's Biomarkers, “Clinical validity of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42, tau, and phospho-tau as biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in the context of a structured 5-phase development framework,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 52, pp. 196–213, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Portelius, G. Brinkmalm, J. Pannee et al., “Proteomic studies of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: an update,” Expert Review of Proteomics, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1007–1020, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Puchades, S. F. Hansson, C. L. Nilsson, N. Andreasen, K. Blennow, and P. Davidsson, “Proteomic studies of potential cerebrospinal fluid protein markers for Alzheimer’s disease,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 140–146, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sämgård, H. Zetterberg, K. Blennow, O. Hansson, L. Minthon, and E. Londos, “Cerebrospinal fluid total tau as a marker of Alzheimer’s disease intensity,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 403–410, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Verberk, H. M. Hendriksen, A. C. van Harten et al., “Plasma amyloid is associated with the rate of cognitive decline in cognitively normal elderly: the SCIENCe project,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 89, pp. 99–107, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Janelidze, E. Stomrud, S. Palmqvist et al., “Plasma β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 26801, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Buchhave, L. Minthon, H. Zetterberg, Å. K. Wallin, K. Blennow, and O. Hansson, “Cerebrospinal fluid levels of β-amyloid 1-42, but not of tau, are fully changed already 5 to 10 years before the onset of Alzheimer dementia,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Jansen, R. Ossenkoppele, D. L. Knol et al., “Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 313, no. 19, pp. 1924–1938, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Bateman, C. Xiong, T. L. Benzinger et al., “Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, no. 9, pp. 795–804, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sanfilippo, P. Castrogiovanni, R. Imbesi et al., “Sex difference in CHI3L1 expression levels in human brain aging and in Alzheimer’s disease,” Brain Research, vol. 1720, article 146305, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ziatabar, J. Zepf, S. Rich, B. T. Danielson, P. I. Bollyky, and R. Stern, “Chitin, chitinases, and chitin lectins: emerging roles in human pathophysiology,” Pathophysiology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 253–262, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Choi, H. W. Lee, and K. Suk, “Plasma level of chitinase 3-like 1 protein increases in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 258, no. 12, pp. 2181–2185, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ho Kim, J. Franck, T. Kang et al., “Proteome-wide characterization of signalling interactions in the hippocampal CA4/DG subfield of patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 11138, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Yang, X. Diao, F. Wang et al., “Identification of key regulatory genes and pathways in prefrontal cortex of Alzheimer’s disease,” Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 90–98, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Xiao, D. Xu, M. T. Craig et al., “NPTX2 and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease,” eLife, vol. 6, article e23798, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lang, Y. Li, H. Yu et al., “HOTAIR drives autophagy in midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra compacta in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease by elevating NPTX2 via miR-221-3p binding,” Aging, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 7660–7678, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Galasko, M. Xiao, D. Xu et al., “Synaptic biomarkers in CSF aid in diagnosis, correlate with cognition and predict progression in MCI and Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 871–882, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Shao, S. Shan, W. Ru, and C. Ma, “Association between serum NPTX2 and cognitive function in patients with vascular dementia,” Brain and Behavior, vol. 10, no. 10, article e01779, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Begcevic, D. Brinc, M. Brown et al., “Brain-related proteins as potential CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: a targeted mass spectrometry approach,” Journal of Proteomics, vol. 182, pp. 12–20, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. D. Beckmann, W. J. Lin, M. Wang et al., “Multiscale causal networks identify VGF as a key regulator of Alzheimer’s disease,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, article 3942, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Llano, P. Devanarayan, V. Devanarayan, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), “VGF in cerebrospinal fluid combined with conventional biomarkers enhances prediction of conversion from MCI to AD,” Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 307–314, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Boiten, I. van Steenoven, M. F. Xiao et al., “Pathologically decreased CSF levels of synaptic marker NPTX2 in DLB are correlated with levels of alpha-synuclein and VGF,” Cell, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 38, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. van Steenoven, B. Noli, C. Cocco et al., “VGF peptides in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 19, article 4674, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jahn, S. Wittke, P. Zürbig et al., “Peptide fingerprinting of Alzheimer’s disease in cerebrospinal fluid: identification and prospective evaluation of new synaptic biomarkers,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 10, article e26540, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Hendrickson, A. Y. Lee, Q. Song et al., “High resolution discovery proteomics reveals candidate disease progression markers of Alzheimer’s disease in human cerebrospinal fluid,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 8, article e0135365, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cocco, F. D’Amato, B. Noli et al., “Distribution of VGF peptides in the human cortex and their selective changes in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 217, no. 6, pp. 683–693, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Maryam Behzad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1013

Downloads

544

Citations