Testing and Modeling Fuel Regression Rate in a Miniature Hybrid Burner

<table>HTPB baseline, Test 3: example of experimental data <svg height="16.637501" id="M84" style="vertical-align:-4.77652pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 47.712502 16.637501" width="47.712502" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,16.6375)">
<g transform="translate(72,-58.69)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑟</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-66.85,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">𝑓</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-60.44,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">(</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="4.1634989" y="0">𝐺</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-47.1,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">o</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="4.1834559" y="0">x</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-38.04,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">)</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> and TOT analysis results showing the different paths and concavities characterizing the two techniques.  </table>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Testing and Modeling Fuel Regression Rate in a Miniature Hybrid Burner 