Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 183712, 19 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/183712
Research Article

A Comprehensive Probabilistic Framework to Learn Air Data from Surface Pressure Measurements

1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
2Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA

Received 11 May 2015; Revised 13 August 2015; Accepted 23 August 2015

Academic Editor: Christopher J. Damaren

Copyright © 2015 Ankur Srivastava and Andrew J. Meade. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. J. Rohloff, S. A. Whitmore, and I. Catton, “Fault-tolerant neural network algorithm for flush air data sensing,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 541–549, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. Samy, I. Postlethwaite, and D. Gu, “Subsonic tests of a flush air data sensing system applied to a fixed-wing micro air vehicle,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications, vol. 54, no. 1–3, pp. 275–295, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. J. Rohloff, Development and evaluation of neural network flush air data sensing systems [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1998.
  4. T. J. Larson, T. R. Moes, and P. M. Siemers III, Wind-Tunnel Investigation of a Flush Airdata System at Mach Numbers From 0.7 to 1.4, NASA Dryden Research Center, Palmdale, Calif, USA, 1990.
  5. S. A. Whitmore, R. J. Davis, and J. M. Fife, “In-flight demonstration of a real-time flush Airdata sensing (RT-FADS) system,” NASA Technical Memorandum 104314, Dryden Flight Research Center, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  6. G. Johnson, Wind Energy Systems, Technology & Engineering, Prentice Hall, 1985.
  7. K. Long, Wind Tunnel Surface Pressure Measurements on a 1/72 Scale Model of the Runway Arrested Landing Site (RALS) Control Tower, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, Md, USA, 2008.
  8. L. Milne-Thompson, Theoretical Hydrodynamics, The Macmillan Company, London, UK, 1955.
  9. J. Katz and A. Plotkin, Low-Speed Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2001.
  10. S. S. Desai, “Relative roles of computational fluid dynamics and wind tunnel testing in the development of aircraft,” Current Science, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 49–64, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. E. Faller and S. J. Schreck, “Neural networks: applications and opportunities in aeronautics,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 433–456, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. B. Nair, A. Choudhury, and A. J. Keane, “Some greedy learning algorithms for sparse regression and classification with Mercer kernels,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, pp. 781–801, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. M. D. McKay, “Latin hypercube sampling as a tool in uncertainty analysis of computer models,” in Proceedings of the 24th conference on Winter simulation, pp. 557–564, Arlington, Va, USA, December 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Hasenjäger, Active data selection in supervised and unsupervised learning [Ph.D. thesis], Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany, 2000.
  15. A. J. Meade Jr. and B. A. Zeldin, “Integrating experimental data and mathematical models in simulation of physical systems,” AIAA Journal, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1787–1790, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Srivastava, A. J. Meade, and K. R. Long, “Learning air-data parameters for flush air data sensing systems,” Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 110–124, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Lowe and C. Zapart, “Point-wise confidence interval estimation by neural networks: a comparative study based on automotive engine calibration,” Neural Computing & Applications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 77–85, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Hull, D. Ward, and R. R. Zakrzewski, “Verification and validation of neural networks for safety-critical applications,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 6, pp. 4789–4794, May 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. J. Roebber, M. R. Butt, S. J. Reinke, and T. J. Grafenauer, “Real-time forecasting of snowfall using a neural network,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 676–684, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. J. Shayler, M. Goodman, and T. Ma, “Exploitation of neural networks in automotive engine management systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 147–157, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. R. Long, B. J. Porter, T. J. Garbeff, S. D. Schery, and L. E. Chen, “Development, testing, and validation of an anemometer employing a flush air data system (FADS),” in Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA 2012-0696, Nashville,Tenn, USA, January 2012.
  22. R. Unger, M. Hutchinson, M. Rais-Rohani, R. Haftka, and B. Grossman, “Variable-complexity design of a transport wing,” International Journal of Systems Automation: Research and Applications, vol. 2, pp. 87–113, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. J. Keane and P. B. Nair, Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design: The Pursuit of Excellence, Wiley, 2005.
  24. R. T. Haftka, “Combining global and local approximations,” AIAA Journal, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1523–1525, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Srivastava, A. J. Meade, and A. A. Mokhtarzadeh, “A hybrid data-model fusion approach to calibrate a flush air data sensing system,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech at Aerospace, Atlanta, Ga, USA, April 2010. View at Scopus
  26. A. C. Atkinson, A. N. Donev, and R. D. Tobias, Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS, Oxford University Press, 2007. View at MathSciNet
  27. J. Kindermann, G. Paass, and F. Weber, “Query construction for neuralnetworks using the bootstrap,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN '95), pp. 135–140, October 1995.
  28. N. Roy and A. Mccallum, “Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '01), pp. 441–448, Williamstown, Mass, USA, June-July 2001.
  29. K. Fukumizu, “A regularity condition of the information matrix of a multilayer perceptron network,” Neural Networks, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 871–879, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Kanamori and H. Shimodaira, “Active learning algorithm using the maximum weighted log-likelihood estimator,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 149–162, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. M. Sugiyama, “Active learning in approximately linear regression based on conditional expectation of generalization error,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 7, pp. 141–166, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. M. Sugiyama and S. Nakajima, “Pool-based active learning in approximate linear regression,” Machine Learning, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 249–274, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Hering and M. Šimandl, “Sequential optimal experiment design for neural networks using multiple linearization,” Neurocomputing, vol. 73, no. 16–18, pp. 3284–3290, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Freund, “Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority,” Information and Computation, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 256–285, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. S. G. Mallat and Z. Zhang, “Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 3397–3415, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  36. L. K. Jones, “Constructive approximations for neural networks by sigmoidal functions,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1586–1589, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. K. Jones, “A simple lemma on greedy approximation in Hilbert space and convergence rates for projection pursuit regression and neural network training,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 608–613, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. A. R. Barron, “Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 930–945, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. C. A. Fletcher, Computational Galerkin Methods, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  40. A. J. Meade and B. A. Zeldin, “Approximation properties of local bases assembled from neural network transfer functions,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 43–62, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. A. Srivastava and A. J. Meade, “A sparse greedy self-adaptive algorithm for classification of data,” Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 97–114, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  42. A. Srivastava, A. J. Meade, and J. Needham, “Adaptive algorithm for classifying launch and recovery of the HH-60H seahawk,” Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 109–120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus