Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 475742, 6 pages
Research Article

Approximate State Transition Matrix and Secular Orbit Model

Flight Dynamics Group, ISRO Satellite Centre, Bangalore 560 017, India

Received 21 September 2014; Revised 24 February 2015; Accepted 24 February 2015

Academic Editor: Christopher J. Damaren

Copyright © 2015 M. P. Ramachandran. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Gill, O. Montenbruck, and K. Brieß, “GPS-based autonomous navigation for the BIRD satellite,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Spaceflight Dynamics, Biarritz, France, June 2000.
  2. S. D. Amico, J.-S. Ardaens, and O. Montenbruck, “Navigation of formation flying spacecraft using GPS: the PRISMA technology demonstration,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS '09), pp. 1427–1441, Savannah, Ga, USA, September 2009.
  3. D. A. Vallado, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
  4. K. T. Alfriend, S. R. Vadali, P. Gurfil, J. P. How, and L. S. Breger, Spacecraft Formation Flying, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2010.
  5. H. Schaub, S. R. Vadali, J. L. Junkins, and K. T. Alfriend, “Spacecraft formation flying control using mean orbit elements,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 69–87, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. S. Shaver, Formulation and evaluation of parallel algorithms for orbit determination problem [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Aeronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1980.
  7. A. P. M. Chiaradia, H. K. K. Kuga, and A. F. B. A. Prado, “Comparison between two methods to calculate the transition matrix of orbit motion,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 768973, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. Y. Tsuda, “State transition matrix approximation with geometry preservation for general perturbed orbits,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 68, no. 7-8, pp. 1051–1061, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. R. Vadali, “An analytical solution of relative motion of satellites,” in Proceedings of the Dynamics and Control of Systems and Structures in Space Conference, Cranfield, UK, July 2002.
  10. C. J. Damaren, “Almost periodic relative orbits under J2 perturbations,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 221, no. 5, pp. 767–774, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. E. Roy, Orbital Motion, Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1982.
  12. F. L. Markley, “Approximate Cartesian state transition matrix,” The Journal of Astronautical Sciences, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 1986. View at Google Scholar