Research Article
Nonlinear Material Behavior Analysis under High Compression Pressure in Dynamic Conditions
Table 3
Comparative analysis of piezoelectric transducer and copper pressure at 25 mm.
| Test ammo # | Mean of 10 fired rounds | Piezo pressure [MPa] | Copper crusher | Difference | Deformation [mm] | Pressure [MPa] | Piezo – copper | [MPa] | % |
| 1-NATO | 317.28 | 0.858 | 297.69 | 19.59 | 6.17 | 2-NATO | 316.2 | 0.839 | 293.6 | 22.6 | 7.15 | 3-NATO | 308.125 | 0.85 | 296.9 | 11.22 | 3.64 | 1-NSTD | 327.675 | 0.852 | 296.24 | 31.39 | 9.58 | 2-NSTD | 319.305 | 0.859 | 297.77 | 21.53 | 6.74 | 3-NSTD | 316.775 | 0.874 | 300.93 | 15.84 | 5.00 |
|
|
: percentage increased in piezo pressure with reference to copper crusher pressure.
|