Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 8107190, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8107190
Research Article

Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Transonic Aerodynamics with Geometric Uncertainty

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Weiwei Zhang; nc.ude.upwn@citsaleorea

Received 1 November 2016; Accepted 2 February 2017; Published 26 February 2017

Academic Editor: Hikmat Asadov

Copyright © 2017 Xiaojing Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. A. Zang, M. J. Hemsch, M. W. Hilburger et al., “Needs and opportunities for uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design methods for aerospace vehicle,” Tech. Rep. NASA/TM-2002-211462, Langley Research Center, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. Yao, X. Q. Chen, W. C. Luo, M. van Tooren, and J. Guo, “Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 450–479, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Pelletier, É. Turgeon, D. Lacasse, and J. Borggaard, “Adaptivity, sensitivity, and uncertainty: toward standards of good practice in computational fluid dynamics,” AIAA Journal, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1925–1933, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Luckring, M. J. Hemsch, and J. H. Morrison, “Uncertainty in computational aerodynamics,” AIAA Paper 2003-409, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. W. Walters and L. Huyse, “Uncertainty analysis for fluid mechanics with applications,” Tech. Rep. NACA/CR-2002-211449, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Mathelin, M. Y. Hussaini, and T. A. Zang, “Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 38, no. 1–3, pp. 209–236, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. D. Xiu and G. E. Karniadakis, “Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 137–167, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. S. Hosder, R. W. Walters, and M. Balch, “Point-collocation nonintrusive polynomial chaos method for stochastic computational fluid dynamics,” AIAA Journal, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2721–2730, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. M. Knioand and O. P. L. Maitre, “Uncertainty propagation in CFD using polynomial chaos decomposition,” Fluid Dynamics Research, vol. 38, pp. 616–640, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  10. H. N. Najm, “Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 41, pp. 35–52, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  11. P. F. Wei, Z. Z. Lu, and J. W. Song, “Variable importance analysis: a comprehensive review,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 142, pp. 399–432, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. M. Sobol′, “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 55, no. 1–3, pp. 271–280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres et al., “Global sensitivity analysis. The Primer,” Global Sensitivity Analysis. The primer, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. C. Helton, J. D. Johnson, C. J. Sallaberry, and C. B. Storlie, “Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 91, no. 10-11, pp. 1175–1209, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Xu and G. Gertner, “Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the Fourier amplitudes sensitivity test (FAST),” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 184–198, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. B. Sudret, “Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 964–979, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. J. A. Loeven, J. A. S. Witteveen, and H. Bijl, “Probabilistic collocation: an efficient non-intrusive approach for arbitrarily distributed parametric uncertainties,” in Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 2007. View at Scopus
  18. F. Simon, P. Guillen, P. Sagaut, and D. Lucor, “A gPC-based approach to uncertain transonic aerodynamics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 199, pp. 1091–1099, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. J.-C. Chassaing and D. Lucor, “Stochastic investigation of flows about airfoils at transonic speeds,” AIAA Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 938–950, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Liu, X. Wang, and S. Kang, “Stochastic performance evaluation of horizontal axis wind turbine blades using non-deterministic CFD simulations,” Energy, vol. 73, pp. 126–136, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Hosder and B. R. Bettis, “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for reentry flows with inherent and model-form uncertainties,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 193–206, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. Gong, Q. Y. Duan, J. D. Li et al., “An intercomparison of sampling methods for uncertainty quantification of environmental dynamic models,” Journal of Environmental Informatics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Nematian, “An extended two-stage stochastic programming approach for water resources management under uncertainty,” Journal of Environmental Informatics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 72–84, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. E. Garzon and D. L. Darmofal, “Impact of geometric variability on axial compressor performance,” Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 692–703, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Bui-Thanh, K. Willcox, and O. Ghattas, “Parametric reduced-order models for probabilistic analysis of unsteady aerodynamic applications,” AIAA Journal, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 2520–2529, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Chen, Q. Q. Wang, R. Hu, and C. Paul, “Conditional sampling and experiment design for quantifying manufacturing error of transonic airfoil,” AIAA Paper 2011-658, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Dodson and G. T. Parks, “Robust aerodynamic design optimization using polynomial chaos,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 635–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. M. Kulfan and J. E. Bussoletti, “'Fundamental' parametric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes,” in Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, pp. 547–591, Portsmouth, VA, USA, September 2006. View at Scopus
  29. M. Padulo, J. Maginot, and M. Guenov, “Airfoil design under uncertainty with robust geometric parameterization,” AIAA Paper 2009-2270, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  30. Y. H. Duan, J. S. Cai, and Y. Z. Li, “Gappy proper orthogonal decomposition-based two-step optimization for airfoil design,” AIAA Journal, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 968–971, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Padulo, M. S. Campobasso, and M. D. Guenov, “Novel uncertainty propagation method for robust aerodynamic design,” AIAA Journal, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 530–543, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. W. Jiang, Numerical solution of Navier-Stokes equations on generalized mesh and its applications [Ph.D. thesis], Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China, 2013.
  33. S. Jakobsson and O. Amoignon, “Mesh deformation using radial basis functions for gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimization,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1119–1136, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus