Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5947521, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5947521
Research Article

Time-Optimal Attitude Scheduling of a Spacecraft Equipped with Reaction Wheels

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Camino del Molino s/n, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Ernesto Staffetti; se.cjru@itteffats.otsenre

Received 7 August 2017; Accepted 7 December 2017; Published 8 April 2018

Academic Editor: Kenneth M. Sobel

Copyright © 2018 Alberto Olivares and Ernesto Staffetti. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. A. Leve, B. J. Hamilton, and M. A. Peck, Spacecraft Momentum Control Systems, Springer, Cham, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Zhou, D. Wang, B. Wu, and E. K. Poh, “Time-optimal reorientation for rigid satellite with reaction wheels,” International Journal of Control, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 1452–1463, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Zorn and M. West, “Multipoint extension of Pontryagin’s maximum principle applied to the optimal attitude scheduling of an imaging satellite,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 150, pp. 209–222, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Karpenko, S. Bhatt, N. Bedrossian, and I. M. Ross, “Flight implementation of shortest-time maneuvers for imaging satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1069–1079, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Karpenko and R. J. Proulx, “Experimental implementation of Riemann–Stieltjes optimal control for agile imaging satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 144–150, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Sager, Numerical Methods for Mixed-Integer Optimal Control Problems, [Ph.D. Thesis], Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006.
  7. C. Kirches, Fast Numerical Methods for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, [Ph.D. Thesis], Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
  8. A. L. Herman and B. A. Conway, “Direct optimization using collocation based on high-order Gauss-Lobatto quadrature rules,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 592–599, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. T. Betts, Practical Methods for Optimal Control and Estimation Using Nonlinear Programming, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010.
  10. P. Bonami, L. T. Biegler, A. R. Conn et al., “An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs,” Discrete Optimization, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Wächter and L. T. Biegler, “On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 25–57, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. B. Kuipers, Quaternions and Rotation Sequences, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1999.
  13. P. Crouch, “Spacecraft attitude control and stabilization: applications of geometric control theory to rigid body models,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 321–331, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Bai and J. L. Junkins, “New results for time-optimal three-axis reorientation of a rigid spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1071–1076, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. D. Bilimoria and B. Wie, “Time-optimal three-axis reorientation of a rigid spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 446–452, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Zefran, Continuous Methods for Motion Planning, [Ph.D. Thesis], University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1996.
  17. I. M. Ross and M. Karpenko, “A review of pseudospectral optimal control: from theory to flight,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus