Research Article  Open Access
Bindi You, Zhihui Gao, Jianmin Wen, Yiming Sun, Peibo Hao, Dong Liang, "Coupling Dynamic Behavior Characteristics of a Spacecraft Beam with Composite Laminated Structures and LargeScale Motions", International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 9416340, 12 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9416340
Coupling Dynamic Behavior Characteristics of a Spacecraft Beam with Composite Laminated Structures and LargeScale Motions
Abstract
A nonlinear dynamic modeling method for a spacecraft body composed of a laminated composite beam undergoing large rotation is proposed in this paper. To study the characteristics of a laminated composite beam attached to a spacecraft body for the dynamic systems, the deformation description of a laminated beam is established with the consideration of laying angles and laying layers, and the displacementstrain relations is acquired based on the globallocal higherorder shear deformation theory. Accordingly, a nonlinear dynamic model of the spacecraft body composed of a laminated composite beam is deduced using Hamilton variational principle. And the complete coupling terms for the laminated material properties are considered unlike any other singular or unidirectional materials. Then, the dynamic behavior of the spacecraft system is analyzed by comparison of an orthogonalsymmetric, singular, and unidirectional laminated beam. The results show that the laminated composite structures have significant influences on the dynamics properties of spacecraft compared with conventional equivalent singular or unidirectional materials. Hence, the nonlinear model is well suitable for approaching the problem of coupling relationship between geometric nonlinearity and large rotation motions. These conclusions will have significant theory and engineering practice values for coupling dynamics properties of laminated beams.
1. Introduction
Laminated composite materials are formed by combining layers of different materials or the same material by using different laying angles, laying sequence, and laying layers [1–3]. Some of the properties can be improved by forming a composite material. For example, the stiffness and strength of fibrous composites come from fibers which are stiffer and stronger than the same material in bulk form [4]. In addition, some new laminated structures composed of different reinforcements were investigated in [5, 6], such as basalt fiber reinforced polymer and carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. However, stiffness changes during the service loading of composite laminates can be significantly large, especially as those changes affect deflections, dimensional changes, vibration characteristics, and load or stress distributions [7]. With the development of aerospace exploration technology, spacecraft is becoming so largescale, complex, flexible, and lightweight that conventional alloy materials cannot meet the practical engineering needs. Because composite materials exhibit not only better strength and stiffness properties but also better fatigue life and vibration resistance. Some laminated structures formed by composite materials have been widely used in aviation, aerospace, and many other engineering fields [8].
Flexible beams undergoing largescale motions have their own unique theoretical and practical values in many applications. Many slender structures in aerospace engineering, such as space manipulators, solar wings, and satellite antenna, can be idealized to beam structures, and the dynamics properties of those structures are critical to system performance, integrity, and reliability [9–11]. For these reasons, the dynamic behaviors of flexible bodies experiencing a largescale motion have been studied by many researchers in some academic fields. Accordingly, a lot of research of multibody system dynamics modeling for beam structures has been presented. Space flexible beams with largescale motion and nonlinear deformation have been studied in [12]. In particular, the effect of impactinduced damage on the mechanical behavior of laminated composite structures was studied in [13, 14]. Rigidflexible coupling system dynamic properties with largescale translational motion were studied in [15]. Next, rigidflexible coupling system dynamics properties of flexible beams with largescale deformation were studied in [16]. However, the geometric nonlinearity of laminated structures with composite material has been studied by few researchers. Dynamic properties of rotating composite material plates were studied in [17]. And considering shear deformation, dynamics properties of rigidflexible coupling composited material beam system were studied in [18]. Moreover, dynamics equations of laminated beams with a largescale motion were presented in [19], and the influences on dynamics properties for the transverse shear deformation of laminated beams were analyzed. Then, the vibration properties of laminated beams were studied in [20]. However, the geometric nonlinear effect of deformations can significantly influence dynamic behavior of the spacecraft system within the framework of a multibody dynamics, and few researchers have illustrated the specific rigidflexible coupling characteristics of the laminated composite structures. Moreover, most of the above researchers did not consider the influence of laminated composite material beams on its own dynamics properties with largescale motion. Thus, how to reasonably derive exact models for a rotating laminated beam attached to a spacecraft body within the context of multibody system dynamics has been a subject of several researches.
In order to study dynamic behavior characteristics of a spacecraft beam with laminated composite structures and a largescale motion, the aim of the present investigation is to develop a dynamic model. Also, the rigidflexible coupling dynamics modeling are performed with the consideration of laying angles and laying layers of laminated composite beams. Then, the complete expressions of nonlinear terms, coupled deformation terms, and nonlinear elastic forces are developed in this study.
2. Formulation for a Laminated Composite Beam with a LargeScale Motion
2.1. Deformation Description
The laminated composite beam can be illustrated in Figure 1. The length, width, and height of the beam are denoted as , , and (, ). The laminated beam is composed of orthotropic layers. and are the inertial reference coordinate system and floating coordinate system, respectively. When the laminated composite beam undergoes a largescale motion with a spacecraft body, the deformation relative to the floating coordinate system will be produced in the laminated beam. An arbitrary point of the laminated composite beam can move from position before deformation to position after deformation, and the displacement vector can be expressed as . In Figure 1, and denote displacement vectors of points and relative to floating coordinate origin of the laminated composite beam, and denote displacement vectors of points and relative to inertial reference coordinate origin . is the coordinate value of the th layer in the direction of , and is the lamina thickness of the th layer by . In the inertial reference coordinate system , the position vector of point of the laminated composite beam can be expressed as where is the direction cosine matrix between the floating coordinate system and inertial reference coordinate system .
Let be the deformation of a point on the midplane of the layer relative to floating coordinate system, based on the globallocal higherorder shear deformation theory, then the deformations , , and (in Figure 2) of any point on the th layer of the laminated composite beam can be expressed as [21] where , , , , , and are the displacements on the midplane of the th layer of the laminated composite beam, and is far away from the midplane of laminated composite beam as shown in Figure 2.
The laying angles are denoted as in the laminated composite beam as shown in Figure 3. Then, the total deformation vector of the laminated composite beam can be written as where is the position vector of any point on the midplane of the th layer, is the direction cosine transformation matrix from floating coordinate system of the th layer (shown in Figure 3) to inertial reference coordinate system , and
The transformation relations between Euler parameters and Euler angles can be written as where , , and are the relative rotating angles of around , , and of , respectively.
We introduce a order auxiliary matrix defined by where and antisymmetric matrix
Substituting (2), (3), (5), and (6) into (1), then differentiating with respect to time , we have the velocity vector of an arbitrary point in : where is the antisymmetric matrix, and , , and are the displacement coordinates of point along axis , , and , respectively, in Figures 2 and 3. We introduce a fourdimension vector defined by , and in (8).
Using the finite element discretization method, the laminated composite beam can be divided into spatial beam elements having two nodes as shown in Figure 4, in which each node has six deformation degrees of freedom.
The node displacement vector of the spatial beam element in the local reference coordinate system can be written as where
A simple way to obtain the derivatives of the director field is to use interpolation. So, being linear Lagrangian shape function coefficients will be used. Then, the deformation vector of the spatial beam element in can be written as where is the shape function of the spatial beam element with two nodes and six degrees of freedom of two nodes defined by [22]
The parameters of can be written as where , and is the total displacement coordinates of point along axis in , is the length of the spatial beam element .
The node deformation displacement vector in can be given by
We introduce a order orientation matrix based on nodes of spatial beam element, and it can be defined by [22]
Then, the displacement vector of any point in can be given by where is a order matrix, , , , and is a coupled shape function matrix of order .
The coupled shape function matrix can be written as
2.2. DisplacementStress Equations of a Laminated Composite Beam
According to the deformation displacement of point in (2) and the displacementstrain relations of elastic mechanics based on the globallocal higher order shear deformation theory, the strain of a laminated composite beam can be given by [19]
Using the displacementstrain relations of (20), the displacementstrain equation of the th layer can be given by [19] where is the equivalent stiffness coefficients of twodimensional layers which can be defined by [21] where , , and is the laying angle, and where is the primary Poisson’s ratio of a laminated composite beam, is the secondary Poisson’s ratio, is the elastic modulus, and is the shear modulus of elasticity.
We introduce the stress and the strain of point on the th layer of a laminated composite beam defined by
Then, (21) can be rewritten as the matrix form where is reduced stiffness matrix of laminated composite beam along the primary fiber direction, and
2.3. RigidFlexible Coupling Dynamics Modeling
The coupling dynamics equations of a laminated composite beam undergoing a largescale motion can be obtained by using the Hamilton variational principle. The Hamilton variational principle can be given by [23] where is the kinetic energy of the laminated composite beam, is the potential energy of the laminated composite beam, and is the virtual work by external forces of the laminated composite beam.
2.3.1. Kinetic Energy
The kinetic energy of the laminated composite beam undergoing a largescale motion can be written as where is the mass density of the laminated composite beam, is the volume of the laminated composite beam, and is the absolute velocity of any point of laminated composite beams.
According to (8) and (17), the velocity vector of point of the laminated beam in the inertial reference coordinate system can be rewritten as where and is reduced transformation matrix, , , is the generalized coordinate of the laminated composite beam, and .
Substituting (29) into (28), the variational form of kinetic energy of the laminated composite beam can be given by where is the mass matrix of the laminated composite beam defined by in which
2.3.2. Potential Energy
The potential energy of the laminated composite beam undergoing a largescale motion can be written as
Further, we introduce a order operator matrix defined by
Then, substituting (3), (17), (20), and (25) into (33), the potential energy of the laminated composite beam can be rewritten as where is the stiffness matrix of the laminated composite beam defined by where is a coupling stiffness matrix and in which . Consequently, is strongly determined by the constitutive relationships of laminated composite structure and a large rotation motion. In other words, as the beam structure is made of singular or unidirectional laminated materials, can be condensed statistically to a smaller sized matrix. Therefore, it accurately represents the nonlinear properties unlike other conventional stiffness matrix.
2.3.3. Virtual Work by External Forces
The virtual work by external forces of the laminated composite beam with a largescale motion can be written as where is the virtual work by inertial forces and is the virtual work by all the driving and disturbing forces.
Let the external force act on the laminated composite beam; the virtual work by external forces can be given by where , , , and .
Given the generalized inertial force acting on the laminated composite beam, the virtual work by the inertial forces can be written as where . Accordingly, where Here, the expressions of is characterized by more conciseness and formalized for the dynamic model, and it can be easily applied to the derivation of generalized force for arbitrary beam structures. Especially, in dealing with geometric nonlinear problems, the expressions can be used to avoid the derivation of large nonlinear stiffness matrix. Hence, it can significantly simplify the computational procedures.
Substituting (39) and (40) into (38), the virtual work by external and inertial forces can be given by
2.3.4. Coupling Dynamic Modeling of the Spacecraft System
Substituting (30), (35), and (43) into (27), the coupling dynamic equation of the laminated composite beam with a largescale motion can be written as where is the Lagrange multiplier, is the rightside term column matrix of the acceleration form constrain equation, and is the Jacobi matrix of link hinge joints constrain equations of the spacecraft system.
3. Numerical Simulations
In this section, numerical simulations of a laminated composite beam rotating around the fixed axis are conducted as shown in Figure 5, including four laying layers and laying style . The size of the beam is , and the thickness of each layer . Point is on the end of the laminated beam. The influences of gravity, air resistance force, and structural damping force have been neglected in this simulation.
The numerical examples can be governed and verified by a generally largescale motion. The equation of angular displacement curve can be defined by where and .
Boron/aluminum composite materials are used in both the orthogonalsymmetric laminated beam and unidirectional laminated beam . The material properties of the boron/aluminum composite are listed as follows in [24]. The density ; other material characteristic parameters are listed in Table 1. For the single material structure beam with boron aluminum alloy, the modulus of elasticity , the density , and Poisson’s ratio .

The initial parameters are the following: the displacement and velocity of the spacecraft body is zero, namely, and . The spacecraft body experiences a large rotation motion around a fixed axis in Figure 5, Euler parameter and , and the initial motion position . Moreover, the initial velocity of the flexible beam is assumed as zero without any external load disturbance during the motion.
To reveal the dynamics characteristics of the spacecraft beam with a largescale motion as shown in Figure 5, the dynamic behavior of a spacecraft body composed of a rectangle beam with different material properties has been studied in this section. The transversal and longitudinal deformations of the end point in the singular material beam and laminated beam are shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. From the two figures, when , the deformation displacement of the laminated beam has greater fluctuations for its transversal and longitudinal components. Meanwhile, because the and are introduced in (37) to express the coupling stiffness matrix of the anisotropy of materials, the deformation of the laminated beam is larger than that of the isotropic beam. Consequently, the geometric nonlinear effect of laminated structures can be described more exactly. Besides, the unidirectional laminated beam and the orthogonal symmetric beam show greater difference because the coupling stiffness matrix can produce the differences caused by the laying angle and laying layers of the laminated beam. Likewise, when , the response of the three beams can converge to the same equilibrium position with lowamplitude decay oscillations, but the amplitude of singular material beam is smaller. Thus, it can be seen that modeling without considering the laminated composite structure will lead to greater errors and cannot exactly describe the spacecraft dynamics responses.
The angular deformation velocity and acceleration curves of point of a singular material and laminated beams are illustrated in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. From the two figures, the variation trend of those curves is consistent between the total motions of singular material and laminated beams. The velocity of the laminated beam fluctuates obviously, so obvious vibration is induced in the motions. Meanwhile, due to persistent disturbances by the nonlinear elastic force in (41), the value of angular acceleration amplitude of the laminated beam is much larger than that of the singular material beam. Furthermore, the obvious disturbing force will be induced to increase the coupling dynamics effect. Thus, it can be seen that the differences of system dynamics responses between the singular material and laminated beams are much more obvious. For this reason, the geometric nonlinear effect of laminated structures must be considered in the study of the dynamic characteristics of the spacecraft system.
Furthermore, we study the influences of different laying layers of laminated structure on the system dynamics characteristics. The structural dimensions and material parameters of the beam are defined by Figure 5 and Table 1, respectively, and the numbers of layers of the laminated beam are 2, 4, 8, and 20, and laying angle of the unidirectional laminated beam is 0°.
Figures 10 and 11 show the transversal and longitudinal deformation of the unidirectional laminated beam with different layer thickness. From the two figures, when the number of laying layers during the total motion of the laminated beam, the responses of transversal and longitudinal deformations of point are similar. When , the value of deformation of the laminated beam obviously become greater due to the coupling stiffness matrix considering the influence of laying layers in the matrix . Thus, as the thickness of each layer of the laminated beam increases, the differences of deformations tend to become larger.
Figures 12 and 13 show the angular deformation velocity and acceleration of point with different laying layers of the laminated composite beam, respectively. From the two figures, in the laminated beam model, the difference between values of angular deformation velocity and acceleration is smaller as the layers increases. However, as a whole, the vibration amplitudes tend to increase as the thickness of laying layer decreases. For this reason, the influence of thickness of laying layer should be considered carefully when a laminated beam rotates with large rotations.
The transverse and longitudinal deformation of point with different laying angles () are illustrated in Figures 14 and 15, respectively. From the two figures, for , the elastic deformation varies between −2.0 mm and 2.0 mm, and for , the elastic deformation varies between −8.0 mm and 8.0 mm. Accordingly, the elastic deformation of the laminated beam becomes larger as the laying angle increases. In general, the laying angles of laminated beams have significant influences on the dynamic properties of a laminated composite beam with a largescale motion.
Through the above analysis, the dynamics characteristics of the rectangle beam considering laminated composite material structures and simplification of isotropic material (singular material) from the conventional equivalence have been verified preliminarily by using numerical methods. And, the complete expressions of the coupling stiffness matrix and the nonlinear elastic force are considered in the dynamic modeling of the spacecraft system. The results show that the laminated structure has significant influences on the exact calculation of the dynamic model. This also reveals the importance and correctness of considering laminated composite structures. Meanwhile, the influence of the laminated composite beam with various lamination parameters on the system dynamic behavior is further carefully considered in this section. The results also show that the number of layers and the laying angles have more significant influences on system dynamics properties.
4. Conclusions
When the spacecraft with laminated beam appendages undergoes largescale motions, such as attitude adjustment and orbital maneuver, the elastic deformation of laminated composite appendages can be induced, which can influence the dynamics properties of the spacecraft system. From these reasons, the rigidflexible coupling dynamic model for a spacecraft body with laminated composite beamshape appendages have been presented in this paper by considering constitutive relationships of anisotropic laminated structures. Accordingly, the important influences of the coupling stiffness matrix and the nonlinear elastic force are considered in this model. Furthermore, the numerical simulations of laminated composite beams with a large rotation motion are conducted by considering the influences of the laminated structures and equivalent laminated beams of a singular material, different laying angles, and layers on the dynamics properties of the spacecraft system. The numerical results indicate that characteristics of material properties, the number of layers, and laying angles cannot be ignored for the dynamic analysis of largescale rigidflexible multibody systems with laminated composite structures.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This material is based on Projects 51575126 and 51675118 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Project 2015T80358 supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.
References
 C. M. C. Roque, D. S. Fidalgo, A. J. M. Ferreira, and J. N. Reddy, “A study of a microstructuredependent composite laminated Timoshenko beam using a modified couple stress theory and a meshless method,” Composite Structures, vol. 96, pp. 532–537, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. R. Vinson and R. L. Sierakowski, The Behavior of Structures Composed of Composite Materials, Springer, Netherlands, 1986. View at: Publisher Site
 R. K. Kapania and S. Raciti, “Recent advances in analysis of laminated beams and plates. Part I  sheareffects and buckling,” AIAA Journal, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 923–935, 1989. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. N. Reddy, “A general nonlinear thirdorder theory of plates with moderate thickness,” International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 677–686, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Zhang et al., “Optical and mechanical excitation thermography for impact response in basaltcarbon hybrid fiberreinforced composite laminates,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. PP, no. 99, p. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Zhang, L. Yu, U. Hassler et al., “An experimental and analytical study of microlaser line thermography on microsized flaws in stitched carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 126, pp. 17–26, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. L. Highsmith and K. L. Reifsnider, “Stiffnessreduction mechanisms in composite laminates,” in Damage in Composite Materials: Basic Mechanisms, Accumulation, Tolerance, and Characterization, pp. 103–117, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1982, STP775. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Neto, J. A. C. Ambrósio, and R. P. Leal, “Composite materials in flexible multibody systems,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 195, no. 5051, pp. 6860–6873, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Li, S. Wang, X. Li, X. Kong, and W. Wu, “Modeling the coupled bending–torsional vibrations of symmetric laminated composite beams,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 991–1007, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Tian and J. Liu, “An improved dynamic model for hub and laminated composite plate system considering warping effect,” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 74, pp. 14–19, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. B. Chai and C. W. Yap, “Coupling effects in bending, buckling and free vibration of generally laminated composite beams,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 78, pp. 1664–1670, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. S. He, F. Y. Deng, G. Y. Wu, and R. Wang, “Dynamic modeling of a flexible beam with large overall motion and nonlinear deformation using the finite element method,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Abrate, “Impact on composite structures,” Tech. Rep., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Sfarra, F. López, F. Sarasini et al., “Analysis of damage in hybrid composites subjected to ballistic impacts: an integrated nondestructive approach,” in Handbook of Composites from Renewable Materials, V. K. Thakur, M. K. Thakur, and M. R. Kessler, Eds., pp. 175–210, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1st edition, 2017, Chapter: 8. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. B. Wu and D. G. Zhang, “Rigidflexible coupling dynamic analysis of hubflexible beam with large overall motion,” Journal of Vibration Engineering, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 X. S. Zhang, D. G. Zhang, and J. Z. Hong, “Rigidflexible coupling dynamic modeling and simulation with the longitudinal deformation induced curvature effect for a rotating flexible beam under large deformation,” Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 692–701, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Y. Wu, X. S. He, and F. Y. Deng, “Dynamic analysis of a rotating composite plate,” Journal of Vibration and Shock, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 149–154, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Q. Pan and J. Y. Liu, “Rigidflexible coupling dynamics of composite beam considering shear deformation,” Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1293–1297, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Karama, K. S. Afaq, and S. Mistou, “Mechanical behaviour of laminated composite beam by the new multilayered laminated composite structures model with transverse shear stress continuity,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1525–1546, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. H. Yoo, S. H. Lee, and S. H. Shin, “Flapwise bending vibration analysis of rotating multilayered composite beams,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 286, no. 45, pp. 745–761, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Nosier and J. N. Reddy, “A study of nonlinear dynamic equations of higherorder shear deformation plate theories,” International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 233–249, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Xu and G. Q. Xu, “Finite element analysis of a laminated beam with coupled bendingtorsional deflections,” Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 35–44, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
 J. N. Reddy, Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells: Theory and Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.
 C. T. Sun and R. S. Vaidya, “Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 171–179, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Bindi You et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.