Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 247378, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/247378
Research Article

Some Fixed Point Results for Generalized Weak Contraction Mappings in Modular Spaces

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand

Received 18 August 2012; Revised 9 February 2013; Accepted 19 February 2013

Academic Editor: Stefan Kunis

Copyright © 2013 Chirasak Mongkolkeha and Poom Kumam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We prove the existence theorem of fixed points for a generalized weak contractive mapping in modular spaces.

1. Introduction

In 1997, Alber and Guerre-Delabriere [1] introduced the concept of weak contraction in Hilbert spaces. Later, Rhoades [2] proved that the result which Alber et al. is also valid in complete metric spaces, the result of Rhoades in the following: A mapping where is a metric space, is said to be weakly contractive if where is continuous and nondecreasing function such that if and only if . In 2008, Dutta and Choudhury [3] introduced a new generalization of contraction in metric spaces and proved the following theorem.

Theorem 1. Let be a complete metric space, and let be a self-mapping satisfying the following inequality: where are both continuous and monotone nondecreasing function with if and only if . Then has a unique fixed point.

We note that, if one takes , then (2) reduces to (1).

Recall that the theory of modular on linear spaces and the corresponding theory of modular linear spaces were founded by Nakano [4, 5] and redefined by Musielak and Orlicz [6]. Furthermore, the most complete development of these theories is due to Mazur, Luxemburg, and Turpin [79]. In the present time, the theory of modular and modular spaces is extensively applied, in particular, in the study of various Orlicz spaces which in their turn have broad applications [1014]. In many cases, particularly in applications to integral operators, approximation and fixed point theory, modular-type conditions are much more natural as modular-type assumptions can be more easily verified than their metric or norm counterparts. Even though a metric is not defined, many problems in metric fixed point theory can be reformulated in modular spaces. For instance, fixed point theorems are proved in [15, 16] for nonexpansive mappings. The existences for contraction mapping in modular spaces has been studied in [3, 1724] and the references therein.

From the above mentioned, we will study the existence of fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying generalized weak contraction mappings in modular spaces.

2. Preliminaries

First, we start with a brief recollection of basic concepts and facts in modular spaces.

Definition 2. Let be a vector space over (or ). A functional is called a modular if for arbitrary and , elements of , it satisfies the following conditions: (1) if and only if ; (2) for all scalar with ; (3), whenever and .  If one replaces (3) by (4), for , with an , then the modular is called -convex modular, and if , is called convex modular.

If is modular in , then the set is called a modular space. is a vector subspace of .

Definition 3. A modular is said to satisfy the -condition if , whenever as .

Definition 4. Let be a modular space. (1)The sequence in is said to be -convergent to if , as . (2)The sequence in is said to be -Cauchy if , as . (3)A subset of is said to be -closed if the -limit of a -convergent sequence of always belong to . (4)A subset of is said to be -complete if any -Cauchy sequence in is -convergent sequence and its -limit is in . (5)A subset of is said to be -bounded if any .

Definition 5. Let be a nonempty set and . A point is a fixed point of if and only if .

Definition 6. Let be a subset of a real numbers . A mapping is called monotone increasing (or monotone nondecreasing) if and only if , for all and are elements in . A mapping is called monotone decreasing (or monotone nonincreasing), if and only if for all and are elements in .

Definition 7. A sequence of a real number is said to be monotone increasing (or monotone nondecreasing), if it satisfies . It is also said to be monotone decreasing (or monotone nonincreasing) if it satisfies .

3. A Generalized Weak Contraction in Modular Spaces

In this section, we prove fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying generalized weak contractions in modular spaces.

Proposition 8. Let be a modular space on . If with , then .

Proof. In case , we are done. Suppose , and then one has and

Proposition 9. Let be a modular space in which satisfies the -condition and let be a sequence in . If as , then as , where with and .

Proof. Since as , by the -condition, we get for . Using (5), Proposition 8, and the sandwich theorem, we conclude that for . From the fact that , we get , then there exist such that By Proposition 8, we get From (6) and (8), we obtain

Theorem 10. Let be a -complete modular space, where satisfies the -condition. Let , , and be a mapping satisfying the inequality for all , where are both continuous and monotone nondecreasing functions with if and only if . Then, has a unique fixed point.

Proof. Let , and we construct the sequence by , . First, we prove that the sequence converges to 0. Indeed By monotone nondecreasing of and Proposition 8, we have
This means that the sequence is monotone decreasing and bounded below. Hence there exists such that If , taking in the inequality (11), we get which is a contradiction, thus . So we have Next, we prove that the sequence is a -Cauchy. Suppose that is not -Cauchy, then there exist and subsequence , with such that Now, let such that , then we get which implies that We have By (16), (18), and (19), we get Using (15) and Proposition 9, we have From (20) and (21), we obtain
Letting in (17), by property of and (22), we get which is a contradiction. Therefore, is -Cauchy. Since is -complete there exists a point such that as . Consequently, as . Next, we prove that is a unique fixed point of . Putting and in (10), we obtain Taking in the inequality (24), we have which implies that and . Suppose that there exists such that and , and then we have which is a contradiction. Hence and the proof is complete.

Corollary 11. Let be a -complete modular space, where satisfies the -condition. Let , , and be a mapping satisfying the inequality for all , where is continuous and monotone nondecreasing function with if and only if . Then, has a unique fixed point.

Proof. Take , and then we obtain the Corollary 11.

Theorem 12. Let be a -complete modular space, where satisfies the -condittion and let be a mapping satisfying the inequality for all ,where and are both continuous and monotone nondecreasing functions with if and only if . Then, has a unique fixed point.

Proof. First, we prove that the sequence converges to 0. Since,
By monotone nondecreasing of , we have From the definition of , we get If , then . Furthermore it is implied that which is a contradiction, and, hence, So, we have that the sequence is monotone decreasing and bounded below. Hence there exists such that If , taking in the inequality (30), we get which is a contradiction, and thus . So, we have Next, we prove that the sequence is -Cauchy. Suppose is not -Cauchy, and there exist and sequence of integers , with such that Since, which implies that On the other hand, For the last term in , by Proposition 8, we have It follow from (41) and (42) that By (37), (38), (40), (43), and the -condition of , we have Taking in (39), by (44) and the continuity of , we get which is a contradiction. Hence, is -Cauchy. Since is -complete, there exists a point such that as . Next, we prove that is a unique fixed point of . Suppose that , then .
Since, Taking in (46), by using (47), we get which is a contradiction. Hence, and . If there exists point such that and , then using an argument similar to the above we get which is a contradiction. Hence, and the proof is complete.

Corollary 13. Let be a -complete modular space, where satisfies the -condition, and let be a mapping satisfying the inequality for all , where , , , and is continuous and monotone nondecreasing function with if and only if . Then, has a unique fixed point.

Proof. Taking , we obtain the Corollary 13.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission. The authors would like to thank the referee for his comments and suggestion. C. Mongkolkeha was supported from the Thailand Research Fund through the the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Grant no. PHD/0029/2553).

References

  1. Ya. I. Alber and S. Guerre-Delabriere, “Principle of weakly contractive maps in Hilbert spaces,” in New Results in Operator Theory and Its Applications, I. Gohberg and Yu. Lyubich, Eds., vol. 98 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, pp. 7–22, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. B. E. Rhoades, “Some theorems on weakly contractive maps,” in Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress of Nonlinear Analysts, Part 4 (Catania, 2000), vol. 47, pp. 2683–2693, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. P. N. Dutta and B. S. Choudhury, “A generalisation of contraction principle in metric spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2008, Article ID 406368, 8 pages, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. H. Nakano, Modulared Semi-Ordered Linear Spaces, vol. 1 of Tokyo Mathematical Book Series, Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan, 1950. View at MathSciNet
  5. H. Nakano, Topology of Linear Topological Spaces, vol. 3 of Tokyo Mathematical Book Series, Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan, 1951. View at MathSciNet
  6. J. Musielak and W. Orlicz, “On modular spaces,” Studia Mathematica, vol. 18, pp. 49–65, 1959. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. W. A. J. Luxemburg, Banach function spaces [Ph.D. thesis], Delft Institute of Technology, Assen, The Netherlands, 1955.
  8. S. Mazur and W. Orlicz, “On some classes of linear spaces,” Studia Mathematica, vol. 17, pp. 97–119, 1958. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. Ph. Turpin, “Fubini inequalities and bounded multiplier property in generalized modular spaces,” Commentationes Mathematicae, vol. 1, pp. 331–353, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, vol. 65 of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1975. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. L. Maligranda, Orlicz Spaces and Interpolation, vol. 5 of Seminars in Mathematics, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Departamento de Matemática, Campinas, Brazil, 1989. View at MathSciNet
  12. J. Musielak, Orlicz Spaces and Modular Spaces, vol. 1034 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1983. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. S. Rolewicz, Metric Linear Spaces, PWN—Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, Poland, 2nd edition, 1984. View at MathSciNet
  14. M. M. Rao and Z. D. Ren, Applications of Orlicz Spaces, vol. 250 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. M. A. Khamsi, W. M. Kozłowski, and S. Reich, “Fixed point theory in modular function spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 935–953, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. M. A. Khamsi, “Fixed point theory in modular function spaces,” in Recent Advances on Metric Fixed Point Theory (Seville, 1995), vol. 48 of Ciencias, pp. 31–57, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. M. Beygmohammadi and A. Razani, “Two fixed-point theorems for mappings satisfying a general contractive condition of integral type in the modular space,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2010, Article ID 317107, 10 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. C. Mongkolkeha and P. Kumam, “Fixed point and common fixed point theorems for generalized weak contraction mappings of integral type in modular spaces,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2011, Article ID 705943, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. T. Dominguez Benavides, M. A. Khamsi, and S. Samadi, “Uniformly Lipschitzian mappings in modular function spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 267–278, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. M. A. Khamsi, “Uniform noncompact convexity, fixed point property in modular spaces,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 439–450, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. M. A. Khamsi, “Quasicontraction mappings in modular spaces without Δ2-condition,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2008, Article ID 916187, 6 pages, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. P. Kumam, “Fixed point theorems for nonexpansive mappings in modular spaces,” Archivum Mathematicum, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 345–353, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. K. Kuaket and P. Kumam, “Fixed points of asymptotic pointwise contractions in modular spaces,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1795–1798, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. A. Razani and R. Moradi, “Common fixed point theorems of integral type in modular spaces,” Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 11–24, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet