Letter to the Editor | Open Access

Qing Zou, "Comment on “Some Congruence Properties of a Restricted Bipartition Function ”", *International Journal of Analysis*, vol. 2017, Article ID 9721671, 3 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9721671

# Comment on “Some Congruence Properties of a Restricted Bipartition Function ”

**Academic Editor:**Ahmed Zayed

#### 1. Introduction

This commentary is intended to correct the errors that happened in [1]. Recall that a partition of a positive integer is a nonincreasing sequence of positive integers whose sum is . A bipartition of a positive integer is a pair of partitions such that the sum of all the parts is . Let be the number of bipartitions of . This function has some beautiful arithmetic properties (see, e.g., [2]). Recently, there is more and more research on the bipartitions with certain restrictions on each partition, for example, [3–7]. In this short review, we consider the number of bipartitions with the restriction that each part of is divisible by . Let denote the number of bipartitions of such that part of is divisible by . The generating function for is given by [8] where

We will mainly focus on the case when , where is any positive integer. In [1], the discussion on congruence identities for was based on an incorrect lemma. We will point out all the incorrect points in that paper in the next section.

#### 2. Comments on the Results of Saikia and Boruah

In [1], Saikia and Boruah considered the congruence identities for by employing the following lemma.

*Lemma** 13 of [1]** where** is the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction and*

However, the lemma of this version is wrong, The correct version should be as follows.

Lemma 1. *Let be defined as above: *

There are several proofs of this famous identity (see, e.g., [9, 10]).

In [1], all the discussion in Section was based on Lemma of [1] which has been shown above.

Since Lemma of [1] is not correct, the discussion in Section is not correct.

First, we can say that the conclusion shown in Theorem of [1], which says is correct. However, in the course of the proof, there is one mistake. The equation which is equation () of [1], is not correct. It should be

The first result of Theorem of [1] is also correct, but the proof has a problem. In the course of the proof, equation () of [1] should be rather than

However, the second conclusion and the third conclusion of Theorem of [1] are not correct. The proof of Theorem (ii, iii) of [1] relies on the claim that However, as we have pointed out above, we do not have the factor in . This is the reason why the second conclusion and the third conclusion of Theorem of [1] cannot hold.

Actually, we do have some 3-dissection formulas to find how and modulo-3 look like. Let us show them now.

Thanks to [11], we have If we let , and in Entry 31 of [12, p. 48], we can obtain where According to these two formulas, we get that When extracting terms involving , dividing by and replacing by , we obtain When extracting terms involving , dividing by and replacing by , we obtain Up to now, we have obtained the forms of and modulo-3. However, we cannot get any congruence properties of or by the forms of and modulo-3 above.

#### Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

#### References

- N. Saikia and C. Boruah, “Some congruence properties of a restricted bipartition function ${c}_{N}\left(n\right)$,”
*International Journal of Analysis*, vol. 2016, Article ID 9037692, 7 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - S. H. Chan and R. Mao, “Pairs of partitions without repeated odd parts,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 394, no. 1, pp. 408–415, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - W. Y. Chen and B. L. Lin, “Congruences for bipartitions with odd parts distinct,”
*Ramanujan Journal. An International Journal Devoted to the Areas of Mathematics Influenced by Ramanujan*, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 277–293, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - W. Y. Chen and B. L. Lin, “Arithmetic properties of overpartition pairs,”
*Acta Arithmetica*, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 263–277, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - B. L. Lin, “Arithmetic properties of bipartitions with even parts distinct,”
*Ramanujan Journal*, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 269–279, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - B. L. Lin, “Some results on bipartitions with 3-core,”
*Journal of Number Theory*, vol. 139, pp. 44–52, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - B. L. S. Lin, “Arithmetic of the 7-regular bipartition function modulo 3,”
*Ramanujan Journal*, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 469–478, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - J. Sinick, “Ramanujan congruences for a class of eta quotients,”
*International Journal of Number Theory*, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 835–847, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - B. C. Berndt,
*Number theory in the spirit of Ramanujan*, vol. 34 of*Student Mathematical Library*, American Mathematical Society, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet - M. D. Hirschhorn, “An identitiy of Ramanujan, and applications,” in
*Contemporary Mathematics*, pp. 229–234, 2000. View at: Google Scholar - J. Liu and A. Y. Z. Wang, “Arithmetic properties of a restricted bipartition function,”
*The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics*, vol. 22, 2015. View at: Google Scholar - B. C. Berndt,
*Ramanujan's Notebooks. Part III*, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Qing Zou. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.