Abstract

This paper presents a new analysis method based on the finite integral technique (FIT) of practical three-dimensional leaky-wave antennas comprised of a finite number of patches arranged in arrays. Radiation patterns and scattering parameters are calculated and compared with corresponding measured results to demonstrate the adequacy and the accuracy of the proposed method. The technique is then used as an antenna design tool to obtain the desired radiation patterns and beam scanning by selective choice of array elements dimensions, spacing, and substrate parameters.

1. Introduction

The foundation for surface-wave and leaky-wave antennas was laid by Sommerfeld in 1899 [1]. After this pioneering work, leaky-wave antennas (LWAs) have been the subject of many investigations [2, 3]. The planar printed-circuit leaky-wave antenna arrays with discrete periodic energy leakage have, however, been the focus of research in recent years [4, 5]. The interest in these newer antenna types stems from their ability to produce both broadside pencil beams and scanned conical beams, and their structural simplicity such as low-profile construction and ease of integration with other planar structures. The beam scanning ability of early leaky-wave antennas was achieved by using substrates with dielectric materials of permittivity as high as 100 which were clearly not realistic [6, 7]. Alternatively, the idea of using multilayered dielectric substrates was introduced which used lower permittivity but added significant complexity to the theoretical analysis and antenna fabrication [8]. Later, Zhao et al. reported a new planar structure that consisted of infinite periodic arrays of metallic patches separated from a ground plane by substrates that had lower dielectric permittivity, which permitted beam scanning from broadside to close to end-fire by adjusting other antenna parameters [9]. Their analysis was based on a method of moments approach along with the application of reciprocity theorem to obtain the far-field patterns of a short electric dipole positioned in the middle of the dielectric substrate. Instead of the actual radiation problem, they calculated the scattering of the entire structure under plane wave illumination. Although their contribution offers major insights into the operation of periodic planar leaky-wave antennas, their approach is limited to 2-dimensional infinite structures. The analysis of practical antennas with finite number of elements is substantially more difficult.

The purpose of this research is to present a complete analysis and design of 3-dimensional finite periodic planar leaky-wave patch antennas which have practical significance. Such structure is seen in Figure 1.

The patch antenna consists of a simple finite periodic planar array of metal strips that are printed on a grounded dielectric substrate as depicted above. A small horizontal dipole located in the middle of the substrate with a length of ld is used as the source in modeling because it is easy to analyze and launche the desired leaky waves on the antenna. In experimental verifications, more convenient methods of excitation may be used without changing the antenna pattern appreciably. In our measurements, we employed a coaxial line that was insulated from and passed through the ground plane and fed the horizontal dipole antenna. The inner conductor was connected to one arm, and the outer conductor was shorted to the second arm of the dipole. Also as shown in Figure 1, w and l are the width and length of array patches, a and b are their periodicities in x and y directions, respectively, and h is the substrate thickness. The finite integration technique (FIT) [10] and perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing boundary condition [11] are combined in a numerical technique introduced earlier by the authors to analyze general diffraction gratings [12] and periodic slot antennas [13]. This method is now extended, specialized, and used to solve the present finite periodic patch antenna to obtain convergent and accurate results. The main contribution of this work is that it analyzes a practical finite size antenna which is analytically more demanding than an idealized infinite structure in which infinite periodicity can be used to advantage. Different parameters including substrate height and permittivity, the patch width w and length l, the periodicities a and b, and the frequency are varied to investigate the effects on the antenna scanning properties and to obtain patterns that may be either a pencil beam at broadside, or a conical beam, depending on the desired scan angle. The results are cast into a few empirical design equations that can serve as convenient design tools.

2. Formulation

One of the direct methods of solving Maxwellโ€™s equations is the finite integration technique (FIT) that is based on the integral form of these equations which are โˆฎ๐‘โ†’๐ธ๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ๎‚,๐‘กโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘™โˆฌ=โˆ’๐‘ ๐œ•๐œ•๐‘กโ†’๐ต๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ๎‚,๐‘กโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘ ,โˆฎ(1)๐‘โ†’๐ป๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ๎‚,๐‘กโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘™=โˆฌ๐‘ ๎‚†๐œ•๐œ•๐‘กโ†’๐ท๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ๎‚+,๐‘กโ†’๐ฝ๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ,๐‘ก๎‚๎‚‡โ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘ ,โˆฏ(2)๐‘ โ†’๐ท๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ๎‚,๐‘กโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘ โˆฏ=0,(3)๐‘ โ†’๐ต๎‚€โ†’๐‘Ÿ๎‚,๐‘กโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘ =0.(4) These equations are discretized by first defining a grid cell complex G as ๎‚†๐‘‰๐บ=๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜โˆˆ๐‘…3โˆฃ๐‘‰๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜๎‚ƒ๐‘ฅโˆถ=๐‘–,๐‘ฅ๐‘–+1๎‚„ร—๎‚ƒ๐‘ฆ๐‘—,๐‘ฆ๐‘—+1๎‚„ร—๎‚ƒ๐‘ง๐‘˜,๐‘ง๐‘˜+1,๎‚„๎‚‡๐‘–=1,โ€ฆ,๐ผโˆ’1,๐‘—=1,โ€ฆ,๐ฝโˆ’1,๐‘˜=1,โ€ฆ,๐พโˆ’1.(5) Faradayโ€™s law of (1) is then discretized on a cell Vi,j,k of G according to โŒข๐‘’๐‘ฅ(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)+โŒข๐‘’๐‘ฆ(๐‘–+1,๐‘—,๐‘˜)โˆ’โŒข๐‘’๐‘ฅ(๐‘–,๐‘—+1,๐‘˜)โˆ’โŒข๐‘’๐‘ฆ๐‘‘(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)=โˆ’๐‘‘๐‘กโŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ง(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜),(6) where โŒข๐‘’๐‘ฅโˆซ(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)=(๐‘ฅ๐‘–+1,๐‘ฆ๐‘—,๐‘ง๐‘˜)(๐‘ฅ๐‘–,๐‘ฆ๐‘—,๐‘ง๐‘˜)โ†’๐ธโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘™ is the voltage along one edge of surface ๐‘†๐‘ง(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘ง) and โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘งโˆซ(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)=๐‘ ๐‘ง(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜) is the magnetic flux through the cell face โ†’๐ตโ‹…๐‘‘โ†’๐‘  as shown in Figure 2. The above procedure is carried out over all grid surfaces of G to obtain the matrix equation:

๐‘†๐‘ง(๐‘–, where C is the discrete curl matrix, ๐‘—,๐‘ง) is the vector containing electric voltages, and ๐ถโŒข๐‘‘๐‘’=โˆ’๐‘‘๐‘กโŒขโŒข๐‘,(7) is the magnetic flux vector. The magnetic Gaussโ€™s law of (4) is then discretized by performing the surface integral over the six faces of the cell shown in Figure 2 to obtain โŒข๐‘’ Upon applying the above discretization to all grid volumes of G, the following matrix equation is obtained: โŒขโŒข๐‘ with S being the discrete divergence matrix.

Ampereโ€™s law of (2) and the electric Gaussโ€™s law of (3) are discretized in a similar manner using a dual grid โˆ’โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ฅ(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)+โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ฅ(๐‘–+1,๐‘—,๐‘˜)โˆ’โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ฆ(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)+โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ฆโˆ’(๐‘–,๐‘—+1,๐‘˜)โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ง(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)+โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ง(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜+1)=0.(8) with foci of G as its grid points to obtain the corresponding matrix equations: ๐‘†โŒขโŒข๐‘=0(9) As the final step, the following equations involving constitutive parameters are used to relate the integral of the voltage and flux state variables allocated on G and ๎‚๐บ: ๎‚๐ถโŒข๐‘‘โ„Ž=๐‘‘๐‘กโŒขโŒข๐‘‘+โŒข๎‚๐‘†๐‘—,โŒขโŒข๐‘‘=๐‘ž.(10) where ๎‚๐บ are the permittivity, conductivity, and reluctivity matrices, respectively, and โŒข๐‘‘=๐‘€๐œ€โŒข๐‘’+โŒขโŒข๐‘,โŒขโŒข๐‘—=๐‘€๐œ…โŒข๐‘’,โŒขโ„Ž=๐‘€๐œˆโŒขโŒข๐‘โˆ’โŒข๐‘š,(11) are permanent electric and magnetic polarizations. Additionally, the time derivatives in (7) and (10) are discretized through application of a simple forward difference scheme as ๐‘€๐œ€,๐‘€๐œ…,and๐‘€๐œˆ where ฮ”t is the time step chosen to satisfy the Courant stability criterion.

3. Results

We first illustrate the accuracy and effectiveness of our numerical implementation by calculating the radiation pattern and โŒขโŒข๐‘andโŒข๐‘š parameter of a 9 ร— 9 periodic planar patch antenna and comparing the results with their corresponding measured values. Antenna parameters are selected to obtain a broadside pencil beam pattern. Referring to the antenna geometry shown in Figure 1, the following parameters are chosen: ๐‘‘๐‘‘๐‘กโŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ง(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)=โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ง๐‘›โˆ’1/2(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)โˆ’โŒขโŒข๐‘๐‘ง๐‘›+1/2(๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘˜)ฮ”๐‘ก,(12), and an operating frequency of ๐‘†11. The leaky waves are excited by an x-directed infinitesimal dipole antenna of length ๐‘Ž=0.54๐œ†,๐‘=0.12๐œ†,๐‘ค=0.04๐œ†,๐‘™=0.5๐œ†, located at the middle of the substrate and the E-plane radiation pattern (โ„Ž=0.5333๐œ†,๐œ€๐‘Ÿ=1.0) and the ๐‘“๐‘Ÿ=4GHz parameter are calculated and compared with the measured results. The comparisons are seen in Figure 3 and indicate excellent agreements.

After the accuracy of our numerical implementation is verified, we first investigate the effect of changing the operating frequency on the radiation property of the antenna with its parameters described above. The frequencies of 4.0โ€‰GHz, 4.618โ€‰GHz, and 5.08โ€‰GHz are considered. As seen in Figure 4, the resulting radiation patterns are broadside for ๐œ‘=0โˆ˜ and scans to ๐‘†11 and ๐‘†11 at the two higher frequencies.

The next study focuses on the variation of the strip length l. As seen in Figure 5, the patterns become broader as l decreases from 3.75โ€‰cm to 3.0โ€‰cm and 2.25โ€‰cm (corresponding to 0.5 ฮป, 0.4 ฮป, and 0.3 ฮป) supporting the fact that the patch arrays are not confining the leaky waves and the patterns become closer to the pattern of a simple short electric dipole.

In order to study the effects of changing the periodicity of the arrays in the y direction on the patterns, we compute patterns for b of 0.9โ€‰cm, 2.4โ€‰cm, and 3.6โ€‰cm (corresponding to 0.12 ฮป, 0.32 ฮป, and 0.48 ฮป). Results are shown in Figure 6 and indicate that the main beam scans from broadside to 40โˆ˜ and ๐‘“=4.0, respectively, illustrating the scanning capability of the structure.

We then investigate the effect of substrate height on the radiation property of the antenna at h of 3.99โ€‰cm, 4.63โ€‰cm, and 5.7โ€‰cm. It is seen in Figure 7 that the resulting radiation pattern is broadside for 15โˆ˜, and then it scans to 33โˆ˜, and ๐‘=0.9 as h varies from 4.63โ€‰cm to 5.7โ€‰cm.

The last study involves varying the substrate permittivity from air, 25โˆ˜ to 1.1, and 2.2 and calculating the far-field patterns of the antenna. The simulation results are shown in Figure 8, where it is observed that as the permittivity increases from 1 to 1.1, the main lobe scans from broadside pencil beam to 37โˆ˜. However, for โ„Ž=3.999, the pattern is degraded which is consistent with the results reported in [9].

4. Design Rules

In this section, we use our numerical results presented above to obtain empirical equations that can serve as convenient design tools for finite arrays of leaky-wave patch antennas.

4.1. Substrate Height

Based on the results shown in Figures 6 and 7, we have found that for a finite structure of 9 ร— 9 patch antenna, the substrate thickness h is related to the scan angle ฮธp by 12โˆ˜ where ๐œ€๐‘Ÿ=2.2 is the free-space wavelength and ๐œ€๐‘Ÿ=1.0 is the substrate relative permittivity. For the infinite structure operating in the order 1 mode, the theoretical value of the coefficient in (13) is 0.58 instead of 0.5 [9].

4.2. Operating Frequency

According to (13), with a fixed substrate height h, a desired scan angle ฮธp can be obtained by varying the frequency. The results in Figure 4 show that as the frequency increases, the scan angle increases as predicted by (13).

4.3. Maximum Scan Angle with a Single Beam

It is known that for mode โ„Ž๐œ†0=0.58๎”๐œ€๐‘Ÿโˆ’sin2๐œƒ๐‘,(13) to radiate at broadside, the substrate height h should be [9] ๐œ†0 However, for this substrate thickness, the scan angle for ๐œ€๐‘Ÿ mode can be written based on (13) as ๐‘›=2 Therefore, (15) should provide the maximum possible angle for single mode operation without degradation from the higher-order modes. Based on (15), for an air-filled substrate, the maximum scan angle should be โ„Ž๐œ†0=1.0โˆš๐œ€๐‘Ÿ.(14). When this value is used in (13), a substrate thickness of 0.987 ฮป0 is obtained. To illustrate the accuracy of (15), we calculated the E-plane pattern of the antenna with its parameters given as ๐‘›=1, and an operating frequency of ๐œƒ๐‘=sinโˆ’1โˆš1.973๐œ€๐‘Ÿ1.724=sinโˆ’1๎‚ƒโˆš0.814๐œ€๐‘Ÿ๎‚„.(15). The results are seen in Figure 9 which show a nondegraded beam that has scanned to 54โˆ˜. The results for the broadside radiation (๐‘Ž=0.54๐œ†,๐‘=0.12๐œ†,๐‘ค=0.04๐œ†,) are also included for illustration purposes.

5. Conclusions

We have presented a complete analysis of a 3-dimensional periodic planar array patch antenna. The finite integration technique (FIT) was used to obtain theoretical results. The adequacy and accuracy of our approach were verified by computing antennas radiation pattern and ๐‘“๐‘Ÿ=4GHz parameter and comparing results with their corresponding measured values. Excellent agreements were observed. We then studied the effects of different antenna parameters such as substrate height and permittivity, array periodicity, patch dimensions and frequency on both broadside, and scanned-beam patterns. This study confirms the beam scanning properties of these antennas. The substrate thickness and its dielectric constant play a major role in determining the beam angle. Based on our analysis, some empirical design rules are given which should be of interest to practical patch antenna designers who would want to avoid extensive numerical analysis.