Research Article  Open Access
Guo Qing Luo, Zheng Zheng Song, Xiao Hong Zhang, Xiao Ping Hu, "Millimeter Wave on Chip Antenna Using Dogbone Shape Artificial Magnetic Conductor", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2013, Article ID 743649, 5 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/743649
Millimeter Wave on Chip Antenna Using Dogbone Shape Artificial Magnetic Conductor
Abstract
An artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) applied in millimeter wave on chip antenna design based on a standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology is studied. The AMC consisting of twodimensional periodic dogbone shape elements is constructed at one metal layer of the CMOS structure. After its performance has been completely investigated, it has been used in an on chip dipole antenna design as an artificial background to enhance efficiency of the dipole antenna. The result shows that 0.72 dB gain has been achieved at 75 GHz when the AMC is constructed by a 4*6 dogbone array.
1. Introduction
In recent years, applications of millimeterwave systems have great significance in communications, radar, guidance system, remote sensing technology, radio astronomy, and so on. Millimeterwave band is defined as a spectrum from 30 GHz to 300 GHz, whose corresponding wavelength is from 10 mm to 1 mm. Millimeterwave system researches were firstly started in the United States, Japan, Europe, and other advanced countries. In the past, millimeterwave systems were used in the military and the scientific community. Now, they are widely used in commercial applications, such as automotive collision avoidance radar, local multipoint distribution services (LMDS), and local area networks (WLANs) [1–4]. Because of the short wave length in millimeterwave band, millimeterwave devices have small size, strong antiinterference, and other advantages.
Reflector antennas, horn antennas and lens antennas, are typically used for millimeterwave antenna of the radio system [5–7]. Reflector antenna and horn antenna are mechanical structures and occupy large volumes. With the development of wireless communication and semiconductor technology, antenna on chip (AoC) was presented to meet the requirement of high integration and compact size. In this paper, a standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology with six metal layers is used in AoC design. In order to avoid the low radiation efficiency, the bottom metal layer cannot be used as the shield between the silicon dioxide layer and the silicon substrate. But most of the power will be dissipated in the silicon substrate as heat for its low resistivity and high permittivity. For instance, a 140 GHz on chip antenna implemented in 65 nm CMOS process by [8] has a gain of only −25 dB. Therefore, gain enhanced methods of AoC should be investigated.
Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) inserted between antenna and the silicon substrate is presented in [9–12]. AMC can be adopted to redirect onehalf of the radiation back to the opposite direction so that antenna gain can be enhanced to some extent. In this paper, an AMC composed of periodic dogbone shape conductors above a ground plane is placed underneath a dipole to improve the proposed on chip antenna performance.
2. Dogbone Shape AMC
The dogbone shape AMC, as a sort of the texture presented in [13], provides a good shielding and reflecting capability. Its shape and dimension are shown in Figure 1. Its equivalent circuit model provides an approximate method to calculate the magnetic resonant frequency of a groundbacked dogbone element. According to the equations, we can easily get geometrical parameters of a dogbone element whose resonant frequency is 75 GHz.
A simulation setup of plane wave incidence on an AMC made by a periodic array of groundbacked dogbone unit cell with geometrical parameters of A = 350, B = A2 = 250, C = B1 = 150, B2 = 20, and A1 = 50 (unit: μm) has been done. Periodic boundary conditions are applied in the simulation. The magnitude and phase of the plane wave reflection coefficient are shown in Figure 2. From the figure, it can be found that the proposed structure acts as AMC within a frequency range (−90° < phase < 90°) from 67 to 83 GHz. Frequency responses of the proposed AMC varied with different geometrical parameters are shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The proposed AMC operating frequency is mainly determined by the geometrical parameters of A1, A2, and B1, less determined by geometrical parameters of A, B, and B2.
As we can see, the influence of the structure parameters on can be divided into three cases. For the magnitude of , the cell size A and size B have similar influence. With increment of size A or B, the AMC operation frequency increases. Conversely, with increment of length A1, A2, or B1, the AMC operation frequency decreases. For the phase of , with increment of size A, A1, or A2, the center operating frequency of the AMC increases. Conversely, with increment of length B or B1, the center operating frequency of the AMC decreases. However, the variation of width B2 has little influence on , both its magnitude and phase.
3. On Chip Dipole Antenna
Figure 9 shows the phases of the reflection coefficient by implanting AMC into CMOS when its location is differed from M1 to M5. From the figure, it can be found that the AMC has the largest bandwidth when it is constructed in the M5 metal layer.
Figure 10 shows the configuration of a dipole antenna backed by the proposed AMC. The geometrical dimensions of the proposed AMC are shown in Figure 2. The dipole antenna is located on the top metal layer M6, while the AMC layer is located on M5. A metal ground plane is located on the bottom surface of the silicon substrate. The dipole length is 696 μm.
The antenna input reflection coefficient is plotted in Figure 11. Its matched input impedance bandwidth ( dB) is more than 20 GHz. Radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 75 GHz are shown in Figure 12. Due to the perfect symmetry of the proposed antenna, its radiation patterns are symmetrical in both the and planes.
The proposed antennas whose AMC is constructed by different numbers of the dogbone shape element have been investigated. Their realized gains are listed in Table 1 when the dogbone shape array varies between 4*6, 4*8, and 6*6.

4. Conclusion
Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) constructed by twodimensional periodic dogbone shape element is applied in millimeterwave CMOS on chip dipole antenna design. The detailed frequency response of the proposed AMC has been completely studied. A gain of 0.72 dBi is realized at 75 GHz when the dipole antenna is backed by the proposed AMC with a 4*6 dogbone shape array.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program of China under Contract 2010CB327403, the NSFC under Contract 61372020, the FANEDD under Contract 201045, the NCET under Contract 090910, and the ZJNSF under Contracts R1110003 and Y1110992.
References
 D. D. Falconer and J.P. DeCruyenaere, “Coverage enhancement methods for LMDS,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 86–92, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. D. Wang and S. Halajian, “Processing methods enhance collisionwarning systems,” Microwaves & RF, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 72–82, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 H. H. Meinel, “Applications of microwaves and millimeterwaves for vehicle communications and control in Europe,” in Proceedings of the IEEE MTTS International Microwave Symposium Digest, vol. 2, pp. 609–612, June 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. O. McCaw, Remarks at G7 Information Society Conference, Brussels, Belgium, 1995.
 M. Cotp, “Crash avoidance FLR sensors,” Microwave Journal, pp. 122–126, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 E. O. Rausch, A. F. Peterson, and W. Wiebach, “Electronically scanned millimeter wave antenna using a Rotman lens,” in Proceedings of the Radar Edinburgh International Conference, pp. 374–378, October 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 P. L. Lowbridge, “Low cost millimeterwave radar systems for intelligent vehicle cruise control applications,” Microwave Journal, vol. 38, no. 10, p. 7, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 S. T. Nicolson, A. Tomkins, K. W. Tang, A. Cathelin, D. Belot, and S. P. Voinigescu, “A 1.2 V, 140 GHz receiver with ondie antenna in 65 nm CMOS,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC '08), pp. 229–232, June 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chu, Y. X. Guo, F. Lin, and X. Q. Shi, “Wideband 60 GHz onchip antenna with an artificial magnetic conductor,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on RadioFrequency Integration Technology (RFIT '09), pp. 307–310, Singapore, January 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Lin and B. L. Ooi, “Integrated millimeterwave onchip antenna design employing artificial magnetic conductor,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on RadioFrequency Integration Technology (RFIT '09), pp. 174–177, Singapore, January 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Pan, D. Wang, C. Guclu, and F. Capolino, “High impedance layer for CMOS onchip antenna at millimeter waves,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI '11), pp. 903–906, Spokane, Wash, USA, July 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Ying, M. A. Abdallah, and H. Zhirun, “A 60 GHz onchip antenna with metamaterial structure,” in Proceedings of the 28th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC '11), Cairo, Egypt, April 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Donzelli, A. Vallecchi, F. Capolino, and A. Schuchinsky, “Metamaterial made of paired planar conductors: particle resonances, phenomena and properties,” Metamaterials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–27, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Guo Qing Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.