International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 2346068 |

Abdellatif Slimani, Saad Dosse Bennani, Ali El Alami, Jaouad Terhzaz, "Ultra Wideband Planar Microstrip Array Antennas for C-Band Aircraft Weather Radar Applications", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2017, Article ID 2346068, 8 pages, 2017.

Ultra Wideband Planar Microstrip Array Antennas for C-Band Aircraft Weather Radar Applications

Academic Editor: Xiulong Bao
Received10 May 2017
Revised27 Sep 2017
Accepted16 Oct 2017
Published13 Dec 2017


A miniaturized ultra wideband (UWB) planar array antennas for C-band aircraft weather RADAR applications is presented. Firstly, the effect of the ground plane is studied. Later, the realization and experimental validation of the geometry that has an UWB characteristic are discussed. This array antennas is composed of a twenty-four radiating element that is etched onto FR-4 substrate with an overall size of mm3 and a dielectric constant of . The results show that this miniaturized array antennas gives us a bandwidth which is about and a gain greater than 13 dB which are required in aircraft weather radar applications.

1. Introduction

Weather system radar, also called weather surveillance radar (WSR), is a type of system that is used to locate precipitation and estimate its type (snow, rain, etc.). Nowadays, various frequency bands are assigned in this system, for example, S, C, X, and K bands. The band covered in this paper is C which included in the UWB range frequency allocated by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) [1].

Aircraft weather measurement radars specifically use antennas which have a high characteristic radiation that treat the atmosphere by transmitting and receiving radio waves, for discovering the weather condition (Figure 1) [24]. They are very complex electromagnetic systems, which are generally composed of many different components which are as follows: power source, transmitter, antenna, duplexer, receiver, and screen.

The optimum transmission of radio waves by the radar requires antennas that have good radiation performance. In this paper, our target is dedicated to optimize the radiation performance and the beam steering of antenna component [57]. For that, microstrip array antennas are selected [812].

In this paper, we tried to work on UWB (ultra wideband) patch antennas. The term UWB commonly refers to systems that either have a large relative bandwidth [1]; this technology is known by a lot of advantages, especially in term capacity of channels and data transfer rate. The FCC is informed that any antenna has a bandwidth equal or greater than 500 MHz, and this bandwidth is included in the frequency range of 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz which is valid for UWB communication systems, which based on narrow pulses to transmit data at extremely low power [2, 13, 14].

Firstly, our objective in this manuscript is the conception and realization of an array antennas with a high radiation performance and UWB characteristic, which is a continuation of another work [15]. The design of this array antennas is down using a methodology well detailed in the paper [16] and based on the two electromagnetic simulators HFSS and CST. Finally, we made a comparison between simulation and experimental result in terms of bandwidth and adaptation performances.

This paper is divided into four principal parts, such as in section 2, the proposed array antennas geometry and technique design are presented. In section 3, we presented a discussion and comparison between simulation results. Finally, in section 4, a discussion and comparison between simulation results and experimental results were presented.

2. Methods and Materials

In this paper, a standard T-junction power divider (Figure 2) is used to divide power equally to two principal parts of array antennas (left and right parts (Figure 3)) [17, 18].

In the designing of the feed array, we have to consider the reflection levels and electrical lengths of the bends. Removing a part of the area of metallization in the bend’s corner can reduce the reflection level of the bend. The percentage mitre is the cut-away fraction of the diagonal between the inner and outer corners of the unmitred bend (Figure 4).

The optimum percentage mitre is given by [19]. where h is the thickness substrate, , and dielectric constant .

For our array antennas design (Figure 5), we give for each corner and we calculate the value of by applying (2). Table 1 shows the results obtained.



The characteristic impedances of microstrip lines which are used for feeding array antennas elements are given in Table 2.

ImpedanceValue (Ω)ImpedanceValue (Ω)


The geometry of the proposed UWB array antennas is depicted in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) represents array antennas with total ground plane, while Figure 3(b) represents array antennas with partial ground plane. The antennas are located on the x-y plane, and the normal direction is parallel to z-axis. There are prints on FR-4 epoxy substrate with a dielectric thickness and a loss tangent These array antennas are excited by a 50 Ω source power.

Table 3 shows the geometric parameters of our array antennas that have been calculated by the use of the relation cited in the paper [12].

ParameterValue (mm)ParameterValue (mm)

3. Simulated Results and Discussion

In this part, we made a comparison between the simulation results found by HFSS and CST, before moving to experimental validation of the geometry that gives us the desired results.

3.1. T-Junction Power Divider

Figure 6 shows the input impedance of the power divider as a function of the frequency, such that the black curve (continuous) represents its imaginary part, while the red curve (dotted) represents its real part. We can observe that the real part is equal to 50 Ω, and the imaginary part is equal to zero. So the input impedance of our divider is well modeled with the source impedance.

3.2. Effect of Ground Plane in the Performance of Array Antennas
3.2.1. Return Loss

Figures 7 and 8 show the comparison return loss simulation between the patch array antennas with partial and total ground plane. If we observe the evolution of the returns loss, we can see that for the partial ground plane case, we have an adaptation over the entire desired band, with a less than −10 dB (Figure 8), which justifies that this array antennas is an UWB.

In other hand, for the total ground plane case (Figure 7), we can observe that the return loss is not adapted over the whole band C. So, this array antennas is not an UWB on all C-band. This distortion of the return loss amounts to the mutual coupling result between the radiating elements and ground plane, such as the waves radiated by the radiating elements and guided by the substrate, towards the total ground plane, its return totally towards the radiating elements, which produces a mutual coupling between radiating elements, and makes a disruption and mismatch of the array antennas. For that, in UWB applications, we do not use array antennas with total ground plane.

From the result shown in Figure 8, we observed that the array antenna with partial ground plane has a bandwidth with UWB characteristic. The is lower than −10 dB from 3.4 GHz to 9 GHz, which is about (115%), and it covers the standard of IEEE 802.15a (3.1–10.6 GHz) fixed by the FCC.

For CST simulation, we can observe that this array antennas has three resonant frequencies which are and and four resonant frequencies for HFSS are and

3.2.2. Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR)

Figures 9 and 10 show the simulated VSWR for both patch array antennas. The result simulations indicate that the VSWR of the array antennas with partial ground plane is less than 2, over the bandwidth range of 3.4 GHz to 9 GHz, which includes all C-band. However, the VSWR of the array antennas with total ground plane is greater than 2 in a lot of frequency of the desired band, which do not respect our objective, consisting of the UWB characteristic in all C-band.

Since our objective is to have an UWB array antennas which covers all C-band, the simulation results show that the array antennas with partial ground plane is suitable for our application.

3.3. Gain Versus Frequency

Figure 11 shows the gain of our array antennas with partial ground plane in the UWB frequency range. In most of the frequencies between 3 GHz and 9 GHz, the gain increase is between 13 dB and 23 dB. Therefore, we can notice that our array antennas has a high gain in all of the band C.

3.4. Far-Field Radiation Pattern

Figure 12 shows the polar radiations of microstrip array antennas with partial ground plane in 2D, between HFSS and CST at the resonance frequency 6 GHz. Figure 12(a) shows the polar gain radiation pattern in E-plane (xz), and Figure 12(b) shows the polar gain radiation pattern in H-plane (yz).

According to Figure 12, we can observe that our array antennas has a bidirectional radiation pattern directed towards the desired directions (End-Fire).

In the E-plane, we can see that it has six secondary lobes. It is the same for the H-plane, where there are six side lobes with a main lobe directed to the desired angle. The level of the main lobe gain can reach 23.

Finally, the results of the UWB array antennas present the best performance in terms of adaptation, bandwidth, and gain. These performances are summarized in Table 4.

Array antennasBandwidth Gain (dB)

This work13–2312.5–22

4. Fabrication and Experimental Results

According to the simulation results, the array antennas with partial ground plane has good characteristics in terms of bandwidth (including all C-band) and radiation pattern. These results lead us directly to its experimental validation, where the prototype is connected to SMA-female connector. It is tested using VNA-network analyzer in collaboration between our laboratory of renewable energy and intelligent systems and the laboratory of electronic and communication. Its photos are shown in top and bottom view in Figure 13 while Figure 14 represents its dimensions.

4.1. Return Loss

Figure 15 shows the comparison between the simulated and measured results of the return loss. From the results, we can conclude that this array antennas is satisfactory, because we need an UWB array antennas which contains all C-band in our radar application. So from these results, we can observe that this array meets this requirement, such as S11 ≤ −10 dB from 3.4 GHz to 8.7 GHz with a bandwidth of 5.6 GHz with several resonance frequencies close to 3.7 GHz, 7 GHz, and 8.2 GHz. So the important thing in the impedance bandwidths of experimental result is able to cover the desired frequency band 4–8 GHz.

4.2. VSWR

Figure 16 represents a comparison between simulated and experimental VSWR results. We can note that the three results are clear and that their values are less than on all band of 3.4 GHz to 9 GHz.

Finally, the proposed UWB array antennas has a good characteristic in terms of several parameters. Table 5 gives us a conclusion and comparison between simulated and experimental results obtained.

Bandwidth (%) at −6 dBBandwidth (%) at −10 dBResonant frequencyLevel S11 (dB)

Simulation resultHFSS1191153.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
5.8 GHz
7.7 GHz
CST1191156 GHz
6.8 GHz
7.8 GHz

Experimental result1171103.7 GHz
7 GHz
8.2 GHz

5. Conclusion

In this paper, the ultra wideband planar array antennas for C-band aircraft weather radar applications has been presented, which composed of a twenty-four radiating element.

The simulation results show that the array antennas with partial ground plane has a best performance than the array antennas with total ground plane in terms of matching and bandwidth which allowed us frankly to validate it experimentally.

The proportionality between the simulation and the measurement results with the high radiation performance over an ultra wide frequency range from about 4 GHz to higher than 8 GHz benefits this array antennas to be good candidates in C-band aircraft weather radar application.

Our perspective is to draw up and plot the measurement radiation pattern, because in our country, there is no an anechoic chamber to make these measurements of the field.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Faculty of Sciences and Technics of Fez, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Morocco, for providing them an opportunity to carry out their said work in a well-equipped laboratory (L.E.R.S.I). The authors are also thankful to their colleagues in the Laboratory of Electronic and Communication in University Mohammed V, who helped them while they were working on this project.


  1. Federal Communications Commission, First Report and Order, Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems FCC, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Washington, 2010.
  2. W. P. Siriwongpairat and K. J. R. Liu, Ultra-Wideband Communication Systems, John Wiley & Sons Publication, 2008.
  3. Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology: Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Phased Array Radar, FMC-R25-2006, Interdep. Cmte. for Meteorological Svcs. and Supporting Research, Cmte, 2006.
  4. P. L. Heinselman, D. L. Priegnitz, K. L. Manross, T. M. Smith, and R. W. Adams, “Rapid sampling of severe storms by the National Weather Radar Testbed phased array radar,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 808–824, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Karimkashi, G. Zhang, and A. A. Kishk, “A-dual polarization frequency scanning microstrip array antenna for weather radar applications,” in 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 1795–1798, Gothenburg, Sweden, 8–12 April 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. Karimkashi and G. Zhang, “A dual-polarized series-fed microstrip antenna array with very high polarization purity for weather measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 5315–5319, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Flashy and A. V. Shanthi, “Microstrip circular antenna array design for radar applications,” in 2014 International Conference on Information Communication and Embedded Systems (ICICES), pp. 1–5, Chennai, India, February 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. M. Bernety, R. Gholami, B. Zakeri, and M. Rostamian, “Linear antenna array design for UWB radar,” in 2013 IEEE Radar Conference (RADAR), pp. 1–4, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 29 April - 3 May 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Slimani, S. D. Bennani, A. El Alami, and H. Harkat, “Optimization parameters of ultra wideband microstrip array antenna for wireless communication using beam steering,” in 2015 Third International Workshop on RFID And Adaptive Wireless Sensor Networks (RAWSN), pp. 12–17, Agadir, Morocco, 13–15 May 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Slimani, S. D. Bennani, and A. E. Alami, “Conception and optimization of UWB microstrip array antennas for radar applications with ordinary end-fire beam steering characteristic,” International Journal of Ultra Wideband Communications and Systems, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 126–132, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Balanis, Antenna Theory : Analysis and Design, Wiley and Sons, New York, Third edition, 2006.
  12. A. Slimani, S. D. Bennani, A. El Alami, and H. Harkat, “Comparative study of the radiation performance between uniform and non-uniform excitation of linear patch antenna array for UWB radar applications,” Wseas Books: Mathematical and Computational Methods in Electrical Engineering, pp. 89–95, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. Sadat, M. Fardis, F. Geran, G. Dadashzadeh, N. Hojjat, and M. Roshandel, “A compact microstrip square-ring slot antenna for UWB applications,” in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 4629–4632, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 9–14 July 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. H. D. Yaccoub, A. Jaoujal, M. Younssi, A. El Moussaoui, and N. Aknin, “Rectangular ring microstrip patch antenna for ultra-wide band applications,” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 441–446, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Slimani, S. D. Bennani, A. El Alami, and H. Harkat, “Conception et optimisation d’un nouveau réseau d’antennes ULB en technologie micro-ruban pour l’evaluation des changements climatiques,” in Pôle de recherche Technologie de l'Information et de Communication, Systèmes et Modélisation (TICSM), FST Fès, Marocco, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Slimani, S. D. Bennani, A. El Alami, and H. Harkat, “Conception and optimization of a bidirectional ultra wide band planar array antennas for C-band weather radar applications,” in 2016 International Conference on Information Technology for Organizations Development (IT4OD), Fez, Morocco, March 30–April 1 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Chorfi, Conception d'un Nouveau Système d'antenne Réseau Conforme en Onde Millimétrique, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 2012.
  18. J. R. James and P. S. Hall, Handbook of Microstrip Antenna, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., London, United Kingdom, 1989.
  19. R. J. P. Douville and D. S. James, “Experimental study of symmetric microstrip bends and their compensation,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 175–182, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Abdellatif Slimani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.