Electromagnetic Shielding Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Foamed Concrete Wall

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2017/9794053/figures/9794053.fig.003a.svgz" name="9794053.fig.003a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Measured results of permittivity (<svg height="9.25658pt" id="M17" style="vertical-align:-3.295671pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 15.6507 9.25658" width="15.6507pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M387 375C387 402 357 448 257 448C172 448 82 404 82 326C82 289 108 255 156 241V239C85 223 23 181 23 116C23 39 89 -12 182 -12C265 -12 336 31 378 91L361 114C320 73 269 47 216 47C157 47 115 82 115 137C115 191 160 219 218 219C243 219 262 218 272 217L304 259L302 266C295 265 281 264 255 264C195 264 163 294 163 335C163 377 200 416 249 416C293 416 321 389 329 342C331 332 335 329 341 329C355 329 387 352 387 375Z" id="g113-247"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="410" vert-adv-y="410"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,5.005,3.132)"><path d="M384 109C349 76 310 59 268 59C197 59 123 113 120 245C240 248 367 259 384 262C403 266 407 275 407 296C407 376 338 451 254 451H253C201 451 148 425 105 378C65 334 39 272 39 203C39 88 112 -12 235 -12C266 -12 339 5 402 84L384 109ZM230 411C285 411 319 365 319 313C319 298 313 293 294 293C236 291 180 290 125 290C141 370 185 411 230 411Z" id="g58-99"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="434" vert-adv-y="434"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.954,3.132)"><path d="M100 439H52L25 408L28 396H100V106C100 41 92 35 31 30V0H250V29C188 37 181 41 181 106V396H372V107C372 40 365 37 309 29V0H537V29C461 37 453 40 453 106V396H564C576 403 579 428 574 439H453V469C452 558 462 604 474 623S500 656 527 656C562 656 589 634 608 615C619 604 628 607 639 615C647 622 658 633 661 641C666 653 664 664 656 674C637 696 609 708 572 710C528 703 483 682 439 638C418 661 380 685 320 688C269 683 230 666 190 633C139 593 122 550 113 525S100 476 100 451V439ZM372 439H181V461C181 530 194 571 211 598C226 621 248 643 287 643C343 643 379 607 400 578C391 561 384 546 381 529C376 510 372 486 372 457V439Z" id="g58-26"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="572" vert-adv-y="572"></glyph.data></g></svg>)</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2017/9794053/figures/9794053.fig.003b.svgz" name="9794053.fig.003b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Measured results of loss tangent</td></tr></table>

<div>Measured results of electrical characteristics according to foam content.</div>

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Electromagnetic Shielding Characteristics of Eco-Friendly Foamed Concrete Wall 