Theoretical and Experimental Comparison Results of Dual-Channel 3D Quasi-Optical Network System between Frequency Selective Surface and Wire Grid Polarizer

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2018/3730121/figures/3730121.fig.001a.svgz" name="3730121.fig.001a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>The system view</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2018/3730121/figures/3730121.fig.001b.svgz" name="3730121.fig.001b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>The system light path</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="c"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2018/3730121/figures/3730121.fig.001c.svgz" name="3730121.fig.001c" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(c) </b>The beam propagation distance</td></tr></table>

<div>The dual-channel 3D QON system with 183 GHz and 324 GHz.</div>

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Theoretical and Experimental Comparison Results of Dual-Channel 3D Quasi-Optical Network System between Frequency Selective Surface and Wire Grid Polarizer 

Figure 1 | Theoretical and Experimental Comparison Results of Dual-Channel 3D Quasi-Optical Network System between Frequency Selective Surface and Wire Grid Polarizer 