Theoretical and Experimental Comparison Results of Dual-Channel 3D Quasi-Optical Network System between Frequency Selective Surface and Wire Grid Polarizer

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2018/3730121/figures/3730121.fig.004a.svgz" name="3730121.fig.004a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Single-layer FSS has circular hole with equilateral triangular lattice</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2018/3730121/figures/3730121.fig.004b.svgz" name="3730121.fig.004b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>The simulation and measurement results of transmission coefficients</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="c"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijap/volume-2018/3730121/figures/3730121.fig.004c.svgz" name="3730121.fig.004c" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(c) </b>The simulation results of reflection coefficients</td></tr></table>

<div>The structure of FSS and its frequency response curve at the different incidence angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°.</div>

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Theoretical and Experimental Comparison Results of Dual-Channel 3D Quasi-Optical Network System between Frequency Selective Surface and Wire Grid Polarizer 

Figure 4 | Theoretical and Experimental Comparison Results of Dual-Channel 3D Quasi-Optical Network System between Frequency Selective Surface and Wire Grid Polarizer 