Research Article  Open Access
Fangwei Li, Yue Wu, Yifang Nie, Ce Shi, "Time Allocation and Optimization in TimeReversal Wireless Powered Communication Networks", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2020, Article ID 8906438, 8 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8906438
Time Allocation and Optimization in TimeReversal Wireless Powered Communication Networks
Abstract
This paper studies optimal resource allocation in the wireless powered communication networks (WPCN) combined with time reversal (TR) in which one hybrid access point (HAP) broadcasts constant wireless energy to a set of distributed users in the downlink (DL) and receives information from the users via space division multiple access (SDMA) in the uplink (UL). Inevitable interferences will occur when users transmit information in the UL simultaneously and the special spacetime focusing of TR is used to suppress the interferences. An efficient protocol is proposed to support wireless energy transfer (WET) and TR in the DL and wireless information transmission in the UL for the proposed TRWPCN. We optimize the time allocations to the HAP for DL WET, DL TR, and UL WIT to maximize the sum throughput. Due to the nonconvexity of the studied optimization problem, we optimize variables successively, where the nonconvex optimization problem is transformed into the convex optimization problem. The approximate convex optimization problem can then be solved iteratively combined with the dichotomy method. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can effectively suppress interferences and improve system performance.
1. Introduction
With the rapid development of wireless communication network and the rapid growth of the number of wireless terminals access to the network, a large number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices represented by sensor nodes will exist in future wireless communication systems. Thus, how to provide stable and continuous power supply for these ubiquitous devices is an urgent problem to be solved for IoT. Radiofrequency (RF) energy harvesting (EH) has recently emerged as a promising solution to unlimited power supply for wireless networks. Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) [1, 2] and WPCN [3, 4] are the main methodologies for EH in wireless network.
In SWIPT, the base station can simultaneously transmit information and energy to the receivers. Power splittingbased SWIPT was discussed in [1], and the decoding cost at the relay was proved less than the destination. A general time switching protocol for the SWIPT broadcast channels was studied in [2], and the achievable rate region was analyzed under EH constraint at the receivers. Compared with SWIPT, all the received RF signals are used to provide power supply in WPCN, so the users can receive more energy and the transmission distance is farther and wider. Besides, the uplink transmission is considered in WPCN which is more compatible with the sensor network that needs to upload detection information regularly.
In WPCN, the wireless communication devices receive RF signal in the DL and store the energy which is converted by the RF signal in the rechargeable batteries. Thus, the devices can communicate with each other and send data to the HAP in the UL. There are two access approaches in the WPCN system: time division multiple access (TDMA) and SDMA.
TDMA is the main access method discussed in WPCN which can effectively avoid interference between users [5–9]. A time allocation algorithm was proposed in [5] to maximize the common throughput of users via TDMA, and a “double near and far” problem was found in the multiuser WPCN system. In [6], a weighted throughput optimization problem was discussed for the twonode WPCN where energy can be purposely transferred from an energyrich network node (e.g., an access point) to terminal devices. The work in [7] considered two different scenarios whether PS and the sensor nodes belong to the same service operator and two optimal solutions are proposed to maximize the system sum throughput of the sensor network for the two scenarios. WPCN with heterogeneous nodes (nodes with and without energy harvesting capabilities) was studied, and the optimal solutions were proposed in [8, 9] to maximizing the sum throughput or maximizing the minimum throughput. Abad and Ercetin [10] studied a sensing resolution optimization problem for a wireless powered device which is powered by wireless power transfer from an access point. And a balance between the quality of the sensed data and the probability of successfully delivering it was struck. Fullduplex WPCN was studied in [11–13]. Ju and Zhang [11] considered both cases with perfect and imperfect selfinterference cancellation (SIC) at the HAP aiming at maximizing the users’ weighted sum rate of UL information transmission. Kang et al. [12] investigated the sumthroughput maximization problem and the total time minimization problem for the proposed fullduplex wireless powered communication network. AbdElmagid et al. [13] departed from the strong assumption adopted in [11, 12], where the energy harvested in a slot is used completely in that slot, and embraced a longterm optimization framework to maximize the longterm weighted throughput.
Different from TDMA which can effectively avoid interference between users in the UL, SDMA can further improve the system throughput with the existence of interference. SDMA was mentioned in [14] which can further improve the system throughput in the case of increased interference. Nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) was introduced in WPCN in [15, 16]. Users transmit information via SDMA in the UL to enhance the powerbandwidth efficiency. AbdElmagid et al. [15] considered a tradeoff between maximizing the sum throughout and achieving fairness through maximizing the minimum throughput in NOMAWPCN. Aboelwafa et al. [16] studied a generic scenario, in which the energy rich and access point do not coincide in WPCN with NOMA to optimize the sum throughput. However, the interference between users is not carefully considered in the UL. In this paper, we introduce TR in WPCN to focusing signals and suppressing the uplink transmission interference. In [17], a “tunneling effect” caused by TR was verified in the cloud radio access network (CRAN) which can improve the uplink throughput. Tran et al. [18] outlined the specific applications of TR in green IoT, especially in the energy harvesting system, indicating that TR was a promising research direction of IoT. Chen et al. [19] introduced TR to the energy harvesting system with an active eavesdropper to reduce the system error rate.
Our contributions can be summarized as follows. We consider a WPCN composed of an HAP and N users (N ≥ 2). As HAP receives information from the users via SDMA in the UL, inevitable interferences will occur. TR is introduced in WPCN to suppress interference and improve the system performance. And a novel protocol is proposed to support WET and TR in the DL and wireless information transmission in the UL for the proposed TRWPCN. We optimize the time allocations to the HAP for DL WET, DL TR, and UL WIT to maximize the sum throughput. Since the optimization problem is nonconvex, we optimize variables successively, where the nonconvex optimization problem is transformed into the convex optimization problem. Our numerical results show the superiority of the proposed TRWPCN.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. A novel protocol of the TRWPCN system is proposed in Section 2, adding a part to transmit probe signal. In Section 3, we labor the three parts of the TRWPCN system and obtain its performance parameters. In Section 4, we obtain the optimum time allocation scheme to maximize the system throughput. Section 5 provides simulation results. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 6.
2. System Model
We study a multiuser WPCN system composed of one HAP and N users. It is assumed that the HAP and all users are equipped with one single antenna each. The HAP supports wireless transmission and can also send and receive information. Users can convert the obtained RF signals into energy and store it in the rechargeable batteries; then, they transfer information uplink using the stored energy in the downlink (Figure 1).
To enhance the spectral efficiency, we assume that all users transmit information to the HAP via SDMA after receiving the probe signal. At this point, we propose a novel protocol in Figure 2 which is different from the traditional harvestthentransmit protocol.
Corresponding to the three phases in Figure 2, the system has divided a block transmission time into three parts: DL wireless energy transmission phase, TR phase, and the UL wireless information transmission phase. The first amount of time is assigned to the DL for the users to obtain energy from the RF signals sent by the HAP and store it in the rechargeable batteries. Then, represents the time portion in each block allocated to users to receive the timereversal probe signal sent by the HAP. The last amount of time is assigned to the UL for the users to transmit information to HAP. The length of each block transmission time can be different from block to block; however, for convenience, we assume a normalized unit block time in the sequel without loss of generality.
3. Proposed WPCN System
3.1. Downlink Energy Transmission
During the DL wireless energy transmission, the DL channel from the HAP to the ith user is denoted by . Assuming all the channels follow independent quasistatic flat fading, so the remains constant during one block transmission time. The downlink RF energy signal sent by the HAP is denoted by , and is an arbitrary complex random signal satisfying , where denotes the transmit power at HAP. So the energy signal received by the user is given bywhere indicates the distance from the ith user to the HAP and is the path loss factor. For the convenience of the following description, let and indicates that the additive white Gaussian noise received by the ith user with an average value of 0 and the variance is .
Therefore, the DL transmission energy received by each user is given bywhere is the energy harvesting efficiency for each user, where , in the subsequent text, let to facilitate the calculation.
3.2. Time Reversal
TR is a digital signal processing technology that utilizes probe signals to obtain channel state information (CSI) so that the source signal can be perfectly reconstructed in its original position. The operation process of TR can be divided into two steps, including the probe phase and the reversal phase. During the probe phase, the receiver first sends the TR probe pulse signal which contains CSI to the sender:where represents convolution and is the channel impulse response (CIR) from the receiver to the sender:
Since it is in a multipath environment, CSI is composed of multiple paths. and represent the attenuation amplitude and delay factor of the path, respectively. is the Dirichlet function and represents the total number of nonzero multipaths.
In the reversal phase, after receiving the probe pulse signal, the sender performs timereversal processing on the received signal to obtain a TR signal:where is the normalized TR channel signature. After that, the sender sends the TR signal together with the signal to be sent to the receiver via the original path. The signals received at the receiver are as follows:
When users simultaneously transmit information via SDMA in the UL, interuser interference (IUI) occurs. Take into account the influence of parameters such as intersymbol interference (ISI), path loss, and channel state on the received signal quality during transmission, timereversal technique is added to the system transmitting end [20–22]. Utilizing the unique spacetime focusing characteristics of time reversal in the multipath scattering environment, the multiuser interference and cochannel interference in the system can be resisted. After receiving the RF energy signal, the UE transmits the probe signal of the timereversal period to obtain the CIR. According to channel reciprocity, the equivalent channel response can be obtained. When the users transmit information uplink, the conjugate inversion form of the equivalent channel response will be generated and this will cause a “tunneling effect” in a multipath environment [17]. Due to the “tunneling effect” of TR, each user transmits the signals independently in their respective paths, which effectively suppresses interference. The signal signature after TR is as follows:where represents conjugate, L is the total number of multipath, and .
3.3. Uplink Information Transmission
During the UL wireless information transmission, the signal HAP received from the user is as follows:
Assuming that the ith user’s capacity usage ratio is , then, the energy used to transmit the information is , and the transmission power of is given by
Because the user’s capacity usage ratio is not the focus of this paper, let in the following for convenience. Here, we consider a linear energy harvesting model instead of a practical nonlinear one because the nonlinear energy harvest model is not easy to construct and the real data are not easy to capture. Both linear energy harvesting model and nonlinear energy harvesting model are the function of , where denotes the transmit power at HAP and is the channel power gain between the ith user and the HAP. However, the nonlinear one involves an exponential function. So the optimization scheme is different using different energy harvest model. Although the nonlinear energy harvest model is more accurate and closer to reality, we aim to show the superiority of the proposed TRWPCN, so we use the linear energy harvest model for simplicity.
Based on the above analysis, the signaltointerference and noise ratio (SINR) of the ith user in the uplink is as follows:wherein , , the superscript is conjugate transpose, is the Lth row vector of , and . In equation (10), and represent ISI and IUI, respectively. To simplify the calculation, we assume that the variance of the different channel noises is the same.
Then, the uplink throughput of the ith user can be obtained as follows:
According to equation (11), the system throughput can be derived as follows:
4. Time Allocation and Optimization
According to the proposed transmission protocol, the time used for uplink wireless information transmission , so the uplink throughput of the ith user . Only consider the scenario the system throughput is maximum, that is, all the time after transmitting the probe signal is used to transmit the signal uplink and . So the time used for DL energy transmission and the time used for TR are analyzed as shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the system throughput has a convex function with the change of and the system throughput has a maximum value, while the system throughput is a monotonously decreasing function with the change of . To make the system throughput large enough, the time for time reversal should be as small as possible. However, the distance between users and HAP should also be taken into account to ensure that the farthest user from the HAP can complete the probe signal transmission phase of TR. Assume that the user’s farthest distance from the HAP is , so , and is the information transmission rate.
To guarantee the QoS in the WPCN system, the SINR of each user must meet a threshold value. Therefore, under the premise of meeting the QoS needs of users, the total throughput of the system is maximized as shown in the following equation:where is the minimum threshold value of the user’s signaltointerference ratio. Further refine the objective function equation (13) as follows:where , , and for facilitation.
Theorem 1. The optimal value for the timereversal phase is .
Proof. Fix and and solve the optimal solution of , and then, the objective function becomesIn equation (15), is a monotonically decreasing function about ; therefore, .
Theorem 1 is proved.
After finding the optimized , the objective function becomesThe objective function equation (16) is a concave function concerning and [23–25]. Fix , and then, the objective function becomesFor constraints (17a) and (17b), introduce the Lagrange multipliers and , respectively; let , then the Lagrangian function of the problem is as shown in the following equation:The dual function of problem (18) isand the dual problem becomesThe KKT (KarushKuhnTucher) conditions given in (21) are necessary:Further simplification is shown in the following equation: Therefore, the solution of is the solution of the function which is , where , and , and the optimal solution for the uplink information transmission time can be solved asThen, a variableis introduced, where . Let , at this point, the objective function becomes a function of :Then, we can update using subgradientbased algorithms and the subgradient factor is shown aswhereis the increment of subgradient in the process of iteration and the dual function is updated bywhere is the step size of Lagrange multiplier during iteration. Based on the above foundation, combined with the dichotomy method, time allocation and optimization algorithm for TRWPCN is proposed, as shown in Algorithm 1.

5. Numerical Result
In this section, we compare the proposed scheme with the conventional schemes proposed in [5, 14]. And the impact on system performance of the proposed scheme under different conditions is analyzed.
In the simulation process, the channel obeys the Rayleigh distribution and the system bandwidth is . For each user, the energy utilization rate is assumed to be and the path loss factor between users is . Finally, we define the power spectral density of the noise .
Figure 4 shows the relationship between the average user throughput and the number of users in different scenarios, where the transmit power is . By comparing with the other two schemes proposed in [5, 14], the impact of introducing TR on the system throughput can be intuitively analyzed. Assume that the time used for DL wireless energy transmission in this paper is equal to the SDMA scheme proposed in [14] and the TDMA scheme proposed in [5], that is, all schemes are equally on . Suppose all users use the same time to transmit information uplink via the TDMA scheme proposed in [5]. From Figure 5, the proposed scheme can effectively improve system throughput. Compared with the scheme proposed in [14], the average throughput increases by which is twice that of the scheme proposed in [5]. Since the transmission power is constant, the average throughput of users decreases as the number of users increases in all schemes. However, with the increase in the number of users, the reduction of the average throughput of the users in the proposed scheme is smaller than other schemes. Compared with the method of using only SDMA in [14], TRWPCN can effectively suppress IUI and ISI during uplink information transmission, thus improving the system throughput and stability. In the scheme using TDMA in [5], there is no IUI, but the UL transmission consumes too much time, so the spectrum utilization is lower and the system throughput declined relatively. In summary, compared with the traditional time allocation scheme, the proposed scheme can effectively improve the average throughput of users and the stability of the system is stronger.
In Figure 5, we show the sum throughput versus the distance from the users to the HAP. We set four cases to show the effect of the transmission power and on the system throughput. The horizontal axis is in meters. In Figure 5, as the distance from the users to the HAP increases, the system throughput gradually decreases, which is consistent with the “double near” problem described above. Moreover, the smaller the transmission power is, the greater the reduction of the system throughput there is. When the time ratio of the TR phase is larger, the throughput of the system is smaller and this is consistent with the previous research content. So the time used for TR should be as small as possible but no less than . Therefore, the system throughput is inversely proportional to the distance between the user to the HAP and the time spent in the timereversal phase.
In Figure 6, system throughput is plotted versus the rate of cost in a block transmission time. The blue line in Figure 6 indicates the throughput of the system when the optimization algorithm finds the optimal time allocation scheme , such as when and ; the red line indicates the throughput of the system when , such as if , then . Both lines correspond to the left Yaxis. From Figure 6, as the time spent in the probing phase increases, the system throughput gradually decreases. Moreover, the solid line with a triangle corresponds to the Yaxis on the right side, which indicates the increment of the system throughput compared to the optimal time allocation scheme with the scheme when . It shows that the system throughput is improved by about compared with the scheme. This further proves that the system throughput is inversely proportional to the time spent in the timereversal phase.
6. Conclusion
In this paper, we studied a WPCN composed of an HAP and N users. Aiming at the uplink transmission interference problem of multiuser WPCN system, we combined with time reversal to focus the transmission signal and restrain interference. Moreover, a time allocation algorithm is proposed to maximize the system throughput. We explained how to solve the system throughput maximization problem while explicitly considering channel state information and the distance between the HAP and users. We simplified the optimization by processing the original problem as an optimization problem corresponding to each variable and solve the problems in stages. The simulation results prove that the proposed scheme can effectively suppress interference and improve system performance from the aspects of average user throughput and total system throughput. And the average throughput increases by compared with that reported in [14]; meanwhile, the average throughput is twice of that proposed in [5]. The proposed TRWPCN has broad application prospects and can be used in wireless sensor networks. Future research can allocate and optimize resources for multiantenna HAP and multiuser complex multicell environments and vehicle networking environments.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant funded by the China Government (61771084, 61102062, and 61271260) and also funded by the Natural Science Foundation of the Science and Technology Committee in Chongqing (cstc2015jcyjA40050).
References
 G. Dong, H. Zhang, and D. Yuan, “Downlink achievable rate of massive MIMO enabled SWIPT systems over rician channels,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 578–581, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Chen, X. Wang, and X. Chen, “Energyefficient optimization for wireless information and power transfer in largescale MIMO systems employing energy beamforming,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 667–670, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Nithya and P. Latha, “Energy harvest and transfer technology in wireless networks,” in Proceedings of World Conference on Futuristic Trends in Research and Innovation for Social Welfare, pp. 1–4, Coimbatore, India, March 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 M. U. Kim and H. J. Yang, “MinSINR maximization with DL SWIPT and UL WPCN in multiantenna interference networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 318–321, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ju and R. Zhang, “Throughput maximization in wireless powered communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 418–428, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Biason and M. Zorzi, “Transmission policies in wireless powered communication networks with energy cooperation,” in Proceedings of the 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 592–596, Budapest, Hungary, August 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Chu, F. Zhou, Z. Zhu, R. Q. Hu, and P. Xiao, “Wireless powered sensor networks for Internet of Things: maximum throughput and optimal power allocation,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 310–321, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. AbdElmagid, T. ElBatt, and K. G. Seddik, “Optimization of wireless powered communication networks with heterogeneous nodes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–7, San Diego, CA, USA, December 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 M. A. AbdElmagid, T. ElBatt, and K. G. Seddik, “Optimization of energyconstrained wireless powered communication networks with heterogeneous nodes,” Wireless Networks, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 713–730, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. H. Abad and O. Ercetin, “Optimal finite horizon sensing for wirelessly powered devices,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 131473–131487, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ju and R. Zhang, “Optimal resource allocation in fullduplex wirelesspowered communication network,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 3528–3540, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Kang, C. K. Ho, and S. Sun, “Fullduplex wirelesspowered communication network with energy causality,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 5539–5551, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. AbdElmagid, A. Biason, T. ElBatt, K. G. Seddik, and M. Zorzi, “On optimal policies in fullduplex wireless powered communication networks,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), pp. 1–7, Tempe, AZ, USA, May 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Liu, R. Zhang, and K.C. Chua, “Multiantenna wireless powered communication with energy beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4349–4361, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. AbdElmagid, A. Biason, T. ElBatt, K. G. Seddik, and M. Zorzi, “Nonorthogonal multiple access schemes in wireless powered communication networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6, Paris, France, May 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 M. M. N. Aboelwafa, M. A. AbdElmagid, A. Biason, K. G. Seddik, T. ElBatt, and M. Zorzi, “Towards optimal resource allocation in wireless powered communication networks with nonorthogonal multiple access,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 85, pp. 1–10, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ma, B. Wang, Y. Chen, and K. J. Ray Liu, “Timereversal tunneling effects for cloud radio access network,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 3030–3043, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. V. Tran, G. Kaddoum, H. Tran, D. Tran, and D. Ha, “Time reversal SWIPT networks with an active eavesdropper: SERenergy region analysis,” in Proceedings Of IEEE VTCFall, pp. 1–5, Montreal, Canada, September 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Chen, F. Han, Y.H. Yang et al., “Timereversal wireless paradigm for green Internet of Things: an overview,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–98, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Y. Huang, “Research on propagation characteristics of time reversal electromagnetic wave,” University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, 2014, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
 G. D. Ge, “Superresolution characteristics timereversed electromagnetic wave and its application,” University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, 2012, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Blomgren, P. Kyritsi, A. D. Kim, and G. Papanicolaou, “Spatial focusing and intersymbol interference in multipleinputsingleoutput time reversal communication systems,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 341–355, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Stephen, V. Lieven, and B. Stephen, “Convex optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 11, p. 1859, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Lim and T. Hwang, “Usercentric energy efficiency optimization for MISO wireless powered communications,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 864–878, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Alessio and J. Eduard, Energy Efficiency in Wireless Networks via Fractional Programming Theory, Now Publishers Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 2015.
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Fangwei Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.