International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6621116 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621116

B. A. Kleinau, D. L. de Melo, M. T. de Melo, D. C. P. Barbosa, A. J. B. Oliveira, C. P. N. Silva, J. M. A. M. de Oliveira, "Application of the Base Transceiver Station with Smart Antennas in the Power Distribution Sector", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2021, Article ID 6621116, 12 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621116

Application of the Base Transceiver Station with Smart Antennas in the Power Distribution Sector

Academic Editor: Ahmed Toaha Mobashsher
Received14 Oct 2020
Revised19 May 2021
Accepted12 Jun 2021
Published18 Jun 2021

Abstract

The use of distribution automation systems has grown significantly in electricity companies in recent years. The main reason for this is the need to have a smarter network, in order to reduce the time of power interruption. For such applications, communication using radio frequency is preferred because this solution is more reliable than 3G/4G and cheaper than fiber optics. In this context, it is of utmost importance to have a more efficient base transceiver station (BTS) that can cover the communication of a larger area. In this paper, the mathematical concepts of an intelligent antenna array, as well as the logical operation of an intelligent radiation system controller, are presented. Such system receives as inputs the geographic coordinates of network elements and automatically feeds an intelligent Yagi–Uda antenna array with the appropriate parameters, in order to optimize the radiation pattern into the desired directions. The presented model uses a stochastic optimization method to automatically achieve a set of optimal electrical parameters to excite the array and efficiently direct its beams in a fully controlled way. Thus, the results obtained indicate that the proposed intelligent scheme allows the energy optimization of the antenna system, reducing in 61% the number of BTS needed to cover the same area, when compared to traditional collinear antenna systems.

1. Introduction

Automation systems have been widely used by the electrical industry in recent years [1]. Currently, there is a considerable growth in the number of automated equipment, where radio frequency (RF) communication is one of the main means of remote control used by companies to drive remote devices [2, 3]. For this application, radio frequency communication is more reliable than 3G/4G, due to its independence of third-party operators, and cheaper than fiber optics, being, therefore, the most viable alternative [4, 5]. In this context, it is extremely important to have more efficient BTS capable of operating devices distributed over a larger area.

Smart antennas use an array whose elements are antennas of low gain that are connected by a combination device [6]. Smart antennas can help in improving the communication system performance by increasing channel capacity and spectrum efficiency, extending range coverage, steering multiple beams to track many mobiles, and compensating electronically for aperture distortion [7]. For the most part of BTS solutions used in the electrical sector, the RF signal is propagated by a collinear array with an omnidirectional propagation [8]. In the location where the researches generated this article (Pernambuco, Brazil), an antenna array of collinear dipoles is used by the electricity distribution company (Neoenergia) in each of the Base Transceiver Stations. These arrays generally generate an omnidirectional radiation pattern with gain of about 6 dBi. By law, the Brazilian National Telecommunications Regulatory Agency (ANATEL—Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações) narrows the use of radio frequency communication for remote sensing directed at public interest service provider companies to the frequency ranges of 458 to 460 MHz and 468 to 470 MHz. The first waveband is allocated to outstation transmission, whereas the second one is allocated to BTS transmission. Using these two bands, the communication protocol between the BTS and its outstations works in a half-duplex master-slave manner. Therefore, the BTS communicates with only one device at time in a pooling architecture, and the device only report to its manager BTS when it is questioned.

It is well known that several factors, such as the distance, vegetation, civil construction, and the terrain topology between the outstations and its manager BTS, can affect the signal link quality [9, 10]. It can moreover generate disruption in the radio communication, leaving some of these outstations in shadow regions [11]. In order to overcome the path obstacles and then restore the communication link, it is necessary to increase the signal intensity, within the allowed power emission limits. Hence, for an optimized use of the power of the RF signal generator, it is convenient that the maximum power of the radio signal can be directed intelligently to certain interesting areas in a controlled way.

An alternative to achieve an adjustable directivity of the beams without the need of mechanical schemes is using smart antenna arrays. Using multiple antenna elements enables such arrays to produce the desired radiation characteristics [12], allowing to point the beams in the desired direction [13, 14]. Antenna arrays have been widely adopted in several solutions, such as estimation of the direction of arrival (DOA) for the signal received by the antenna [15, 16] and concentration of the radiation on a predefined spot, reducing the energy wasted in directions where it is not required [17].

To increase the efficiency and reach of Radio Base Stations, it is presented in this paper the theoretical and constructive principles of a RF system that uses a smart Yagi–Uda antenna array with 360-degree coverage electronically controlled. The proposed system receives as input the geographical coordinates regarding the locations of the transmitter and the equipment to be driven, and through an embedded mathematical optimization model, it is able to automatically control the optimal radiation direction of the RF generator power, increasing the range and efficiency of a common BTS. The great advantage of this process is that it provides a high gain concentrated radiation beam in any angular direction of a remote device the BTS needs to communicate with.

2. Antenna Array Theoretical Background

An antenna array is the name given to the controlled grouping of antennas built in order to achieve gain and radiation diagram specifications that are unreachable if it is employed by a single antenna. It can be understood, therefore, as a new and complex antenna generated by the combination of a set of simpler antennas.

There are 5 possible mechanisms for the control of the antenna array radiation pattern [18]:(1)Geometric configuration of the array (linear, circular, and planar)(2)Relative separation between elements(3)Relative diagram of individual elements(4)Amplitude of excitation of each element(5)Electrical excitation phase of each element

The first 3 mechanisms are related to geometric factors, while the latter are related to electrical factors. The main objective is to initially define the used geometric factors and then perform intelligent control by changing only the electrical factors.

For the application adopted for energy utilities, the best type of array to be applied is the linear, since the existing structures are already adapted for this type of antenna array. Other geometries would need physical and operational adaptations from the Operation and Maintenance teams.

It is also important to define the radiation pattern in terms of the antenna element type and the geometric configuration of the array. In punctiform antennas (with isotropic source) systems, for example, the total diagram of the array is equal to the diagram of a single antenna element multiplied by the array factor diagram (AF) [18]. Considering a collinear array with N isotropic elements with the same excitation amplitude and a gradual increase in the electric phase ß of excitation, as shown in Figure 1, the expression for the array factor is given by [19]where is the spacing between antennas. It also may be written aswith

Considering that the maximum array factor occurs when , regardless of the applied electrical amplitude being uniform or not, the maximum of the function will occur at an angle , according to equation (3), whenwhere β is the electrical excitation phase that is gradually applied to the elements [17]. This mathematical method, known as phase shift model in [19], allows a control of the desired angle to direct the maximum power for arrangements that use omnidirectional elements.

However, when the array elements are directive, the phase shift model application proves inefficient, as shown in Figure 2. These patterns were obtained by the attempt of using the aforementioned method to direct the radiation pattern of the Yagi–Uda array in Figure 3 to  = 60° and  = 30°. The positive direction of the y-axis (in green color) in Figure 2 points to 90° of these generated azimuthal diagrams.

The Ansys HFSS [20] was the electromagnetic simulation software used for designing the antenna array presented in Figure 2, as well as simulating it to get its radiation patterns. The HFSS is able to use both Finite Element Method (FEM) [21] and Method of Moments (MOM) [22] to solve electromagnetic problems. In all the simulations reported here, a boundary condition that uses the FEM as the numerical technique to perform its infinite element analysis is selected.

It is known that when the array element is directive instead of omnidirectional, it provides a greater gain in its physical oriented direction. In this case, to direct the beam to different directions, it is necessary to adopt some optimization method in order to find the proper sets of complex antenna excitations to the array, since the phase shift model shall not apply.

Elements of antenna arrays are spatially sampled and reradiate the incident fields that interact with the other elements causing the antennas to be mutually coupled [23]. Such mutual coupling can seriously degrade the performance of array signal processing methods, including beamforming techniques [24]. In order to minimize the interference among arrays and allow them to operate independently, the relationship must be met, where D is the largest dimension of the array, λ is the wavelength, and r is the distance between two arrays [19]. Figure 4 shows the real example and the best result for D for the experimental setup used to validate the model in the field measurements.

3. Method Using the PSO Optimization

Due to the need for more accuracy, Yagi–Uda antenna array models tend to set aside the use of array factor concepts (equations (1) and (2)). Being mathematically expressed through the induced mutual impedances [25], the electromagnetic interferences between their elements make almost mandatory the use of more robust numerical approaches in its modeling. Examples of such numerical costs are the application of Finite Element Method (FEM) [26], Green Discrete Functions (FDG-FTDT) [27], and The Method of Moments (MOM) [28].

In order to calibrate isotropic or even Yagi–Uda antenna array parameters, the literature currently has been using stochastic optimization techniques [2933]. These stochastic computing methods (e.g., Particle Swarm Optimization) help to overcome these complexities in the equation of the model concerned [30]. This section addresses the use of the Particle Swarm Optimization Method (PSO) with the aim to direct the beam of maximum power to in the radiation diagram of the Yagi–Uda antenna array, as well as minimize its secondary lobes. The array electrical factors are handled in the method for these purposes.

Having its initial version developed by Kennedy and Eberhart [34], the PSO method seeks a parameter adjustment that better accommodates the mathematical system modeling to the restrictions imposed by the chosen objective function. Its concept was initially developed by applying a population-based artificial life (A-life) approach to evolutionary computation with the aim of optimizing continuous nonlinear functions [34]. As an evolutionary self-adaptative algorithm, the advances of its independent agents through the iterations emulate the synchronism of birds in a flock or bees in a swarm.

Each method possible solution, referred commonly to as a particle, has its trajectory continuously adjusted towards its own best location achieved so far and towards the position of the best particle of the entire swarm at each time step (generation). The individual influence component of a particle is called its Pbest (personal best) component, while the social influence component of the particle set is commonly referred to as its Gbest (global best) [3436]. Depending on the weight values appended to these components, the velocity of each particle can be dominated by its own flying experience or by the flying experience of the other particles [35]. The third and last component used to the particle position update is called the momentum component and it uses the previous computed particle velocity to provide the necessary inertial factor that the particle needs to mimic a natural fluid motion to roam across the search space [37].

Figure 5 shows an example of the PSO particle’s arrangement in four different progressive stages during the iteration algorithm process in a R2 search space. The dashed arrows indicate the particles current movement direction, whereas the global optimum position, which the method is looking for by using some objective function, is indicated in red color.

In this work, the variables, which the method seeks to find an optimal configuration, are the electrical excitations in the antennas of the array. By this configuration, it is hoped to obtain an improved pattern diagram. Thus, each PSO particle is a point contained in a subspace Ω ∁ R8, where four of its components are the power amplitudes (∈ [0; 1], in Watts) and the other four are the signal phase shifts with which the antennas are fed, ∈ [0; 2π].

The position update of each particle is built based on the traditional algorithm, found in the literature ([34, 38]), namely,with being the moment of inertia and c1 and c2 being the cognitive and social dynamic accelerations, respectively. These PSO parameters are updated through iteration bywhile the maximum computed speed is maintained, by means of saturation, in the interval (), withwhere k is the numerical value of the current iteration and Kmax is the proposed total number of iterations. , , c1max, c1min, c2max, c2min, Kv, p, and are positive constants adjusted by trial and error, following the initial selection criteria pointed out by [35, 39, 40]. The reflecting condition is used as the boundary handling condition to the proposed optimization. The reflecting, invisible, and damping boundary techniques are three promising methods when used in the PSO for handling antenna calibration problems [36, 41, 42].

The objective function used in the PSO contains two components. The first one maximizes the value of the diagram in the angular position , where it is intended to maximize the power. The second one, with lower weight, minimizes the secondary lobes [37, 43] in positions over to 0 dBi, what rectifies some adverse events arisen by the first one. Each particle has its components injected into the mathematical model of the antenna array, and the errors resulting from these two objectives are calculated and added. The resulting value then is used as a performance meter for the current particle's position.

In order to find the secondary lobes in the pattern diagram generated from the position of each particle, a lobes detector code is written. It is capable of returning the angular positions in which the lobes of interest are, namely, those ones bigger than 0 dBi. By these positions, the respective values in dBi are taken in the diagram. Then, these error values are added together resulting in the weightless second objective function's component. Lobes that have a position near the desired lobe are not computed in this sum, that is, those ones angularly closer than 4° from . This approach allows the pattern to accommodate itself in a configuration, within a confidence interval that minimizes the error.

The applied PSO algorithm was written in Python [44] and used by access remote to the HFSS [20]. For each algorithm iteration, the current position of each particle is inserted in the HFSS design as its electrical excitations, using the proper Python packages and modules. Soon after it, the resultant radiation patterns are extracted from the HFSS by the algorithm, exported as a table containing its set of points. Then, the objective function uses these tables to score each particle position as mentioned above. Figure 6 presents a flowchart that shows the algorithm generic process of remotely accessing the HFSS in order to score a particle position.

4. Computational System Description

The complete system consists of an antenna array formed by a symmetrical circular set of 3 antenna arrays shown in Figure 7, with an individual control of the excitation amplitude and the electrical excitation phase for each individual element.

An antenna array controller (AAC), based on [45], is responsible for all the processing intelligence to define the parameters which will excite the array so that the maximum gain is pointed towards the desired direction. In its internal memory, there is an inserted table containing all the optimal electrical excitations sets for each azimuthal direction, obtained by the application of the PSO to the simulated antenna array model.

The geographical coordinates of the BTS, where the smart antenna array is located, as well as the geographical coordinates of the remote devices to be controlled are the input parameters of the AAC. With the information of the location of the BTS and the devices, the controller converts the geographic coordinates to polar coordinates identifying the angle . Such angle corresponds to the relative direction of the device intended to receive the maximum power of the BTS.

With obtained, the AAC catches its corresponding set of electrical feeding at the PSO optimal excitation table. Then, it uses the controlled attenuators and phase shifters to feed each antenna of the array with the proper values of amplitude and phase. Bidirectional Amplifiers are embedded to the system to amplify the transmission and reception signals. They use constant values of amplification and, on this account, the attenuators have the role of fully adjusting the power amplitudes inserted in the antennas.

Controlled switches are used by the AAC to excite the correct Yagi–Uda antenna array among the three existing, depending on the remote device direction. Figure 8 illustrates the complete control system.

The system shall be able, from the geographical coordinates of the BTS and the device to be triggered, to automatically calculate the steering angle and thus polarize the antenna array to illuminate that direction with its maximum power. The geographical locations (latitude, longitude) of each system element shall be converted to a spherical coordinate system (ϴ, φ). The BTS is located at a position equivalent to the point (0, 0) of this spherical coordinate system, and the reference of the angles is the vector that points in the normal direction of the antenna array.

Considering an element in the geographical position (lat, lon), the conversion to the system (ϴ, φ) is given by

Considering the BTS coordinates are (ϴBTS, φBTS) and that the radius R of the Earth remains approximately constant between small distances on its surface, the repositioning of the other devices (ϴdev, φdev) in the system (x, y, z) so that the BTS is at the position equivalent to the geographical point (lat = 0, long = 0) is given bywith [A] equal to

Finally, considering the vector as the zero-reference direction of the antenna array, the angle δ between and the device positioned at the point Pdev = (x, y, z) is given by

Figure 9 shows the complete flowchart of the process which obtains the proper excitation set to be applied into the array from the geographical coordinates of the network devices. The process starts with a command on the SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system to access the device of interest.

5. Computational Results for PSO Optimization

Attempts to adapt equation (4) to the Yagi–Uda antenna mathematical model and all its electromagnetic interferences end up generating a high computational cost. This cost includes the need to solve nonelementary integral equations of the impedances induced among the components of the model [2528]. Furthermore, in some cases, there is no direct access to the modeling applied by the simulation software and its numerical approximations. That said, it would be relatively complicated to determine an efficient balance between computational cost and mathematical precision in those mathematical adaptations of equation (4). It should also be commented that the stochastic method uses the software model's own responses in its optimization, making it easily adapted to the system electromagnetic interferences particularities that are calculated by its platform. This indicates efficiency for different simulation software, within its own different levels of delivered numerical precision.

The constructive geometry of the proposed smart array, based on the angular range of a 120° azimuthal sector ensured by the PSO, consists of combining 3 intelligent collinear arrays, operating independently. The three arrays are mirrored, and each independently covers 120°, given a total coverage of 360°, as shown in Figure 7.

Numerical simulations were made in HFSS [20] and Python [44] for the 0° (Broadside), 30°, 60°, and 90 (End-Fire) configurations using PSO. Figure 10 shows the radiation diagram results of the three antenna array models. The positive direction of the y-axis in Figure 7 points to 90° of Figure 10 patterns. For all the diagrams shown in this figure, the directivity is given in dBi for a frequency of 459.438 MHz.

6. Complete System Simulation and Measured Results

The calculation of the angle and distance of the device and relative to the BTS can be seen in Figure 11. The actual coordinates of a BTS (8°11′51.4″S, 35°34′39.7″W) and a device (8°12′51.7″S, 35°33′30.6″W) located in the city of Gravatá, state of Pernambuco, Brazil, were used. Comparing the calculated result with the measured one with Google Earth, it can be observed that the system has a relative error less than 0.2% in relation to the relative position of the elements.

The calculated angle in the conversion model for the BTS and one of the devices is θ0 = −42°. The result of the complete system is shown in Figure 12.

To validate the simulated mathematical model, the antenna array of Figure 13 was assembled with the 4 Yagi antennas of the numerical simulations, and the receiver antenna of Figure 14 was used to measure the power of the antenna array. The Antenna Array was rotated around its axis every 10° to read the power at the receiver and thus build the radiation diagram of the array [19]. The measurements were performed considering the array parameters for the angles θ_o = 10°, θ_o = 30° and θ_o = 60°. A radio was connected to the array antenna and to the receiver antenna and the RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indication in dBm) of the receiver antenna was captured via SSH (Secure Shell) protocol. Commercial attenuators and phase shifters were used to control the amplitude and phase of the signal.

Measurement parameters are as follows:(i)Transmitted frequency of the array: 459 MHz(ii)Distance between the fixed antenna and the array: 15.3 m (between the masts, bigger than the far-field distance)(iii)Antenna height: 2 m (from the ground)

Figure 15 shows the comparison between the simulated and measured normalized radiation pattern. The results are in good agreement, and the differences observed between the measured and simulated responses are due to imperfect parallelism of the antennas and small errors in the phase and amplitude of the signals which feed the array of the experimental setup, compared to the calculated ones. However, the angle of maximum radiation matches accurately the desired positions of the elements, which demonstrates the capability of the system of automatically find the best set of parameters to excite the array and intelligently control the radiation pattern.

Table 1 shows the comparation of some smart antenna array technologies that use electrical excitation mechanisms for the control of the radiation pattern. The presented system presents full angular coverage and no significant secondary beams. Additionally, the proposed method allows the manipulation of both phase and amplitude by an intelligent search PSO algorithm, in order to find independent and optimized parameters to excite the arrays on each desired direction.


ReferenceTechnologySpecifications
Freq (GHz)Angular coverageSignificant secondary beamsControlled feed
PhaseAmplitudeMethod

[19]Ten isotropic elements linearFullYesYesYesBinomial and Chebyshev polynomials
[46]Six dipole switched parasitic arrays3.560° sectorNoYesNoGenetic algorithm (GA)
[47]Four linear dipole arrays2.16180° sectorYesYesNoDynamic adjustment (Butler matrix)
This workThree sets of four Yagi–Uda linear arrays0.46FullNoYesYesPSO

In order to numerically compare the advantages of the proposed scheme for the electrical distribution application, let us consider a typical BTS irradiating a signal in 459 MHz with a power of 40 dBm, covering a circular area of radius R. Additionally, let us consider that remote devices connected to an 8 dBi gain antenna are placed in the edge of this circle. For the traditional collinear array (6 dBi), applying the Frias equation [19] in an ideal situation where the BTS and remote devices are at the same height and there is no obstacle between them, the remote devices receive a power of −53.77 dBm, at a distance equals to R = 9 km from the BTS. On the other hand, with the proposed scheme, the gain of the Yagi–Uda array ranges between 10.13 and 13.31 dBi. For this new scenario, in the worst case, where the gain is 10.13 dBi, a remote device receives the same power of −53.77 dBm at a further distance of R = 14.48 km. Therefore, comparing the two situations, the antenna Yagi–Uda array covers a larger area (659.7 km2) than the colinear array (254.46 km2). In practical terms, 36 BTS with traditional colinear arrays would cover an area of 9,160.56 km2. Using the proposed scheme instead, to cover the same area, only 14 BTS with Yagi–Uda arrays are needed, a reduction of 61% in the number of BTS required for the same service.

7. Conclusion

This paper presented the design of an intelligent antenna array system using an optimized parameter search model in order to find the best amplitude and phase excitations to automatically direct the maximum radiation lobe towards any desired direction. It was shown that it is possible to automatically control the radiation pattern of the array according with the geographic coordinates of the transmitter and receiver, radiating the maximum power towards the devices connected to the communication link. The proposed optimized mathematical model is capable of feeding the set of antennas with the appropriate amplitude weights and excitation phases to generate a concentrated radiation lobe, allowing an efficient 360° full coverage.

The optimization algorithm ensures, at a low computational cost, an optimal solution without it producing considerable secondary lobes in undesirable directions, which would force the system to share the density power of the output diagram with regions other than the one of interest. This allows the signal strength in the desired direction to be amplified to the maximum, resulting in a longer range of the radiated signal.

Compared to a configuration where the electrical parameters are static and the power is omnidirectionally radiated, the proposed smart antenna array system allows the coverage of a larger area, optimizing the maximum power delivery in either direction by simply varying intelligently the electrical excitations of the intelligent array.

Data Availability

The simulation data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. All the data shared in this paper have only academic interest and their reproduction is permitted unrestrictedly since the original paper is properly cited.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Brazilian Electrical Power Agency Program (ANEEL) and Pernambuco State Electricity Company (CELPE), SA.

References

  1. R. Das, V. Madani, F. Aminifar et al., “Distribution automation strategies: evolution of technologies and the business case,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2166–2175, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Tightiz, H. Yang, and M. J. Piran, “A survey on enhanced smart micro-grid management system with modern wireless technology contribution,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 9, Article ID 2258, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Alam, M. F. Sohail, S. A. Ghauri, I. M. Qureshi, and N. Aqdas, “Cognitive radio based smart grid communication network,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 72, pp. 535–548, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Katic, “Performance Analysis of smart grid solutions in distribution power systems,” Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, vol. 15, pp. 79–97, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Q. Guo, J. Zhong, L. He, X. Guo, and Q. Zhang, “Analysis and design of wireless private network for electric power company,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), pp. 736–740, Chongqing, China, June 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. S. Rappaport and J. C. Liberti, in Smart Antennas for Wireless Communications:IS-95 and Third Generation CDMA Applications, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999.
  7. M. Chryssomallis, “Smart antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 129–136, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. Luna, J. J. Durillo, A. J. Nebro, and E. Alba, “Evolutionary algorithms for solving the automatic cell planning problem: a survey,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 671–690, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Azpilicueta, P López-Iturri, E Aguirre et al., “Analysis of radio wave propagation for ISM 2.4 GHz wireless sensor networks in inhomogeneous vegetation environments,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 23650–23672, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Faruk, S. I. Popoola, N. T. Surajudeen-Bakinde et al., “Path loss predictions in the VHF and UHF bands within urban environments: experimental investigation of empirical, heuristics and geospatial models,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 77293–77307, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Bai, R. Vaze, and R. W. Heath, “Analysis of blockage effects on urban cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 5070–5083, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Hanaoui, H. Bouassam, M. Rifi, and H. Terchoune, “Improvement of energy efficiency of GSM BTS by using smart antenna system,” Revue Méditerranéenne des Télécommunications, vol. 5, no. 2, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  13. L. C. Godara, “Applications of antenna arrays to mobile communications. I. Performance improvement, feasibility, and system considerations,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1031–1060, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. Ludwig-Barbosa, E. Schlosser, R. Machado, F. G. Ferreira, S. Müller Tolfo, and M. V. T. Heckler, “Linear array design with switched beams for wireless communications systems,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2015, Article ID 278160, 9 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Harkouss, H. Shraim, and H. Bazzi, “Direction of arrival estimation for smart antenna in multipath environment using convolutional neural network,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 28, Article ID e21282, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Mohammadi, A. Ghani, and S. H. Sedighy, “Direction-of-Arrival estimation in conformal microstrip patch array antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 511–515, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. G. Ayestaron, “Fast near-field multifocusing of antenna arrays including element coupling using neural networks,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1233–1237, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. K. Cheng, Field and Wave Electromagnetics, Pearson, London, UK, 2nd ed. edition, 2006.
  19. C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 4th ed. edition, 2016.
  20. HFSS, 3D Electromagnetic Field Simulator for RF and Wireless Design, 2020, https://www.ansys.com/products/electronics/ansys-hfss.
  21. J. F. Lee, D. K. Sun, and Z. J. Cendes, “Tangential vector finite elements for electromagnetic field computation,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 4032–4035, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. F. Harrington, “The method of moments in electromagnetics,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181–200, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. J. L. Alves and M. Sampaio de Alencar, “Effects of mutual coupling in smart antenna arrays,” in 2007 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference, pp. 418–421, Salvador, Brazil, November 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Liao and S.C. Chan, “Adaptive beamforming for uniform linear arrays with unknown mutual coupling,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 11, pp. 464–467, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. A. Milligan, Modern Antenna Design, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2nd ed. edition, 2005.
  26. J.-S. Jian-She Wang, “Finite element computation of antenna impedance including feed modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1500–1503, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W. Ma, M. Rayner, and C. Parini, “The modelling of a Yagi-Uda array antenna using the DGF-FDTD method,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/CNC/URSI North American Radio Sci. Meeting (Cat. No.03CH37450), vol. 3, pp. 780–783, Columbus, OH, USA, June 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. Pandav and G. Kumar, “Modeling of yagi-uda antenna using method of moments,” IETE Technical Review, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 283–291, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Khodier and M. Al-Aqil, “Design and optimisation of Yagi-Uda antenna arrays,” IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 426–436, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Rattan and B. S. Manjeet Singh Patterh, “Sohi, “optimization of gain, impedance, and bandwidth of yagi-uda array using particle swarm optimization”,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2008, Article ID 193242, p. 4, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. A. Jones and W. T. Joines, “Design of Yagi-Uda antennas using genetic algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1386–1392, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. A. Greda, A. Winterstein, D. L. Lemes, and M. V. T. Heckler, “Beamsteering and beamshaping using a linear antenna array based on particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 141562–141573, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Zhang, D. Lu, X. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Antenna array design by a contraction adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2019, no. 1, p. 57, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of ICNN’95—International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948, Perth, WA, Australia, December 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Ratnaweera, S. K. Halgamuge, and H. C. Watson, “Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 240–255, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Xu and Y. Rahmat-Samii, “Boundary conditions in particle swarm optimization revisited,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 760–765, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. Han and L. Wang, “Array pattern synthesis using particle swarm optimization with dynamic inertia weight,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2016, Article ID 1829458, 7 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. Liu, Q. Feng, W.-B. Wang, and X. Yu, “Synthesis of unequally spaced antenna arrays by using inheritance learning particle swarm optimization,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol. 118, pp. 205–221, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Huang, L. Yu, F. Han, and Y. Luo, “Pipeline implementation of polyphase PSO for adaptive beamforming algorithm,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2017, Article ID 3926821, 12 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. K. Goudos, C. Kalialakis, and R. Mittra, “Evolutionary algorithms applied to antennas and propagation: a review of state of the art,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2016, Article ID 1010459, 12 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Robinson and Y. Rahmat-Samii, “Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 397–407, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. N. Jin and Y. Rahmat-Samii, “Particle swarm optimization for antenna designs in engineering electromagnetics,” Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications, vol. 2008, Article ID 728929, 10 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. G. Sun, L. Yanheng, L. Han, L. Shuang, W. Aimin, and L. Boyu, “An antenna array sidelobe level reduction approach through invasive weed optimization,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2018, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Python, 2015, https://www.python.org/.
  45. M. R. Santos, B. G. M. de Oliveira, M. T. de Melo et al., “A smart antenna system for remote supervision,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 45, no. 1–4, pp. 293–299, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. I. Sotiriou, P. K. Varlamos, P. T. Trakadas, and C. N. Capsalis, “Broadband wireless access base station performance using smart antenna cell,” in Proceedings of the 2007 International workshop on Antenna Technology: Small and Smart Antennas Metamaterials and Applications, pp. 357–360, Cambridge, UK, March 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. F. Bobor-Oyibo, S. J. Foti, and D. Smith, “A multiple switched beam Smart antenna with beam shaping for dynamic optimisation of capacity & coverage in mobile telecommunication networks,” in Proceedings of the 2008 8th International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory, pp. 356–359, Kunming, China, November 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 B. A. Kleinau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views729
Downloads554
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.