International Journal of Atmospheric Sciences

International Journal of Atmospheric Sciences / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 680735 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/680735

Physical and Chemical Components of Cuba’s Rain: Effects on Air Quality

Academic Editor: Prodromos Zanis
Received30 Apr 2014
Accepted08 Jul 2014
Published12 Aug 2014

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the physical and chemical components of rain affecting air quality in Cuba. Samples were obtained from pollution monitoring stations throughout Cuba. Different chemical analyses including elements and ions were conducted. Meteorological data was also included for the analysis. Results show that the pH was slightly basic for most stations, except those of the eastern region which exhibit pH values below 5.6. The major anthropogenic sources of ions are the burning of fossil fuel by power plants, cement factories, and nickel-processing industries and the burning of biomass through poor agricultural practices. The western region exhibited increased concentrations of and during the dry season, most likely due to the long-range transport of pollutants from the northeastern United States as well as local pollutants. Marine aerosols clearly influence Cuba’s rain. Only a small fraction of the potentially acidic ions contributes to the free acidity of Cuba’s rainwater, mainly due to the neutralizing capacity of some ions such as Cl-, Na+, Ca+2, and . The implementation of abatement techniques for SO2 and NOX and some elements emissions from major stationary sources will be an effective measure to improve air quality in Cuba.

1. Introduction

The fall of rain, snow, fog, and dew is the mechanism that permanently removes gases and particles from the atmosphere [1], an important role, especially in countries with a humid climate. The acidity and the concentration of ions in rainwater depend on the type and magnitude of its sources, its physical incorporation into the water system, and the chemical transformation during the formation of clouds and drag below them [2].

Acid rain is any form of wet precipitation of pH < 5.6 [2]. Acid rain is a major environmental problem, especially across national boundaries in the Northern Hemisphere due to the movement of air masses over long distances [2]. In recent years such movement has spread to other parts of the world, especially Asia and tropical countries, becoming a problem for the tropics due to its abundant precipitation [3]. Acid rain reduces growth in trees and increases their vulnerability to pathogens and pests and causes leaching of nutrients, acidification of soils, and modification to the ecology of lakes. Acid rain also causes the dissolution of CaCO3 in the monuments and buildings of limestone or marble [4].

Rainwater contains elements in the range of μg/L, some of which dissolve at acid pH, affecting human health and the ecosystem. The presence of those elements in the atmosphere is mainly due to various anthropogenic activities [5].

During the period 1981–1994, an increasing trend in the frequency of acid rain nationwide was observed in Cuba; this trend has possibly intensified in recent years due to the increased use of fuel oil with native sulfur content of 4–7%.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of the major physical and chemical components of rain on Cuba that account for the origin of pollutants affecting its air quality.

2. Materials and Methods

Monthly samples collected by the stations of the Centro de Contaminación y Química de la Atmósfera (Pollution and Atmospheric Chemistry Center) of the Institute of Meteorology of Cuba were used. The period of sampling was November 2008 to April 2010. The sampling method recommended by the World Meteorological Office (WMO) for operating manuals rain and wet precipitation collectors was used [58]. Before each time it rains, collector was cleaned with deionized water and exposed only during the event. The samples were transferred to a polyethylene bottle. An aliquot of whole event collected during a month was transferred to a clean polyethylene bottle, creating a monthly “average” sample stored in a dark place cooled to 4°C for the chemical analyses. Figure 1 shows the location of the 11 monitoring stations.

A conductivity meter LF 539 WTD and a pH meter Oakton 1100 series were used. The pH meter was calibrated in the range 4–7 before every use. Ions , , , , , , , , , , , , and were quantified with a Dionex ion chromatograph model ICS 3000. Optical emission spectrometry along with inductively coupled plasma (ICP-OES) PE Optima XL 3–300 was used for chemical element quantification. Certified standards for elements and ions were used. Detection and quantification limits were calculated as 3 and 10 times the standard deviation, respectively.

The volume-weighted mean concentrations (VWMC) for ions expressed in μeq/L for the elements in μg/L were calculated according to (1) [1]: where is concentration of the analyte in the sample expressed as μeq/L or μg/L, is mm of total rainfall collected for the sample, and is the sum of the mm for the sampling period.

Wet deposit flow (FD) expressed in meq/m2*year or mg/m2*year was calculated using the following [9]: where is concentration of chemical species expressed in meq/L or mg/L and is mm of rainfall in the month or period (mm).

Neutralization factors, NF, were calculated using the following [10]: where corresponds to the respective ions, , , and , as

Marine contribution to concentrations of ions was estimated according to the following [11]: where is marine contribution to the element in μeq/L, is concentration of in the rain (μeq/L), and is the relative concentration of ions in seawater (μeq/L).

Contribution to the ions from the terrestrial crust, biogenic and anthropogenic (Xns), called ion concentrations in excess, was calculated according to the following:

The ratio between neutralization potential (NP) and acidification potential (AP) was calculated according to the following [5]:

Enrichment factors (EF) for elements and ions were calculated according to the following [12]: where is the concentration of the ion or element of interest.

The principal component analysis with orthogonal rotation was performed using SPSS version 17 for Windows XP.

The type of monthly predominantly synoptic situation (TSS) for western, central, and eastern Cuba was determined using the statistic of mode, and the information was collected regarding the number of cold fronts affecting each region. Two periods of rain can be distinguished in Cuba: the low volume rain periods, November–April that we are calling the “dry period,” and May–October, the rainy period called “wet period.”

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows acid rain in Pinares de Mayari, Gran Piedra, and Palo Seco, but not in the rest of the stations.

Pinares de Mayari and Gran Piedra stations (under the direct influence of the prevailing winds from the NE) show the impact of high sulfur emissions from the mining sector of Moa and the Felton thermoelectric plant burning fuel oil and native crude oil for power generation. In the western region, pH values in the dry season suggest the influence of seasonal weather conditions, such as the arrival of cold fronts, which have traveled from the NE US (with high industrialization) and transport high concentrations of and [13, 14].

Figure 3 shows that the concentrations of and are above the background values ​​of 2.50 μeq/L and 10 μeq/L, respectively, reported in the Northern Hemisphere [15]. The highest concentrations were quantified in Pinares de Mayari and Gran Piedra, probably due to the influence of mesoscale emissions of the thermoelectric plant located in the northern part of the eastern provinces.

In the western and central regions greater concentrations of non-sea sulfate, but not necessarily of nitrate, were determined during the dry period than in the wet period, and this may be associated with the movement of air masses of cold fronts from the US passing over Cuba and increasing the concentrations due to their transport of pollutants, in addition to industrial centers located NW of the Cuban stations. Improved results could be obtained in the future using individual events and back trajectories [17].

Figure 4 shows that the contribution to the total acidity in urban stations of mineral acids ( and ) ranges between 80 and 90% with the contribution of the organic acid ( and ) between 10 and 20%. In rural stations the contribution of organic acid is 20 to 45% and the mineral acid 65 to 80%. In Pinares de Mayari, a rural station, only 10% are organic acids and 90% mineral, suggesting again the direct influence of winds from the north east coast (industrial area).

Table 1 shows that the highest rates of deposit, FD, correspond to and , reflecting the influence of marine aerosols on rainfall for the island. The FD of , , , , and in rural stations is much higher than in a rural station of NW Europe, suggesting the transport of chemical species from other sites. The high FD of formate in Guantanamo suggests the biomass burning in the sugar cane fields, an environmentally unwise practice [18]. Table 2 shows that the FD in urban stations has the highest values ​​for , , , and . The concentration of in Santiago de Las Vegas is as high as in the industrialized area of NE US. This suggests that Cuban fossil fuel burning contributes to increased emissions of . However, the concentrations of Ca and Mg explain the neutralization of acidic species. The FD of formate and acetate quantified may be associated with natural emissions of urban trees [9].


Wet deposition flow, meq/m2/year
PalmaColónPalo SecoC. MaestreP. MayariG. PiedraGuantanamoNW Europe*

Cl63.787.844.067.632.837.059.1
9.014.011.410.322.520.611.95.0
40.232.324.537.944.432.437.315
4.23.54.76.23.18.111.9
11.44.43.110.83.87.837.3
Na+55.246.741.241.332.134.550.7
16.047.512.521.111.49.118.15.0
K+2.115.24.28.32.62.611.3
Mg2+19.620.113.115.015.410.520.72.0
Ca2+74.137.829.554.232.128.967.45.0

*Migliavacca et al. [8]; —not informed.

Wet deposition flow, meq/m2/year
IonS. VegasCasablancaNuevitasU. OrienteNE of USAaPiracicaba Brasilb

Cl93.935.210874.325.07.4
16.98.57.88.430.018.4
56.015.132.235.665.020.0
6.62.53.05.2
6.14.81.33.6
Na+72.222.15758.720.03.5
15.77.77.922.115.016.5
K+8.21.27.212.32.04.2
Mg2+41.56.420.410.25.02.0
Ca2+10328.585.742.115.05.8

aMigliavacca et al. [8]; bLara et al. [16]; —not informed.

Table 3 shows the prevalence of as the principal neutralizing ion of rain in Cuba, except in Colón where it also contributes ; this could be due to livestock activities developed in the vicinity of the station. The high values ​​of are also linked to the resuspension of natural soil particles, rich in limestone (calcium carbonate) due to anthropogenic activities. Note that a correlation of 95% exists between ions Ca and Mg [19]. Similar influence of limestone has been recently obtained by Hong-wei et al. [20] in Guiyang, SW China. Other anthropogenic sources of are the cement factories in La Habana and Nuevitas, A similar effect produced by cement factories was reported in the southern region of Jordan in 2013 [21]. The lower neutralization factors were found in Pinares de Mayari and Gran Piedra, which explains the acidity of rainfall of these stations.


Monitoring stationNF Ca2+ (eq/L)NF (eq/L)NF Mg2+ (eq/L)

La Palma1.30.30.3
Santiago de las Vegas1.30.20.5
Casablanca1.30.30.2
Colón0.80.80.4
Nuevitas2.00.20.7
Palo Seco0.80.30.3
Contramaestre1.10.40.3
Pinares de Mayari0.50.20.3
Universidad de Oriente1.00.50.3
Gran Piedra0.60.20.2
Guantánamo1.40.40.4

Table 4 shows that the majority of the ratio NP/AP was >1, suggesting that, in rainfall at different localities in Cuba, there is a predominance of alkali species over the acid, except stations in Pinares de Mayari and Gran Piedra, consistent with their more acidic pH values.


StationpHNP/AP*

La Palma6.061.7
Santiago de las Vegas6.081.8
Casablanca6.021.7
Colón6.081.8
Nuevitas6.442.6
Palo Seco5.421.1
Contramaestre6.041.7
Pinares de Mayari4.730.7
Universidad de Oriente6.021.7
Gran Piedra5.190.8
Guantánamo6.272.0

*NP: neutralization potential; AP: acidification potential.

Table 5 shows that the enrichment factors (EF) for Cu, Mn, Ba, Co, and Ni were below 7, suggesting predominant crustal origin; EF between 1 and 6 were considered indicative of natural origin by differences in their concentrations in the earth’s crust for different parts of the world [12]. Zinc, Se, and Pb have an anthropogenic origin.


Enrichment factors*
StationZnCuMnBaSeCoNiPb

Palma710.030.3
Nuevitas710.010.38930.465
Contramaestre110.010.2
P. Mayari310.010.18460.9
U. Oriente10.40.010.1
G. Piedra20.40.010.2
Guantanamo120.030.16630.7

*Enrichment factors > 7 indicate anthropogenic origin.

The principal component analysis for major ions at all stations showed a component that groups mainly and , which agrees with the anthropogenic sources of fossil fuels. The other component group, the and , represents marine influence. In the stations Contramaestre and Guantanamo the third component grouping and can be associated with biomass burning, probably related to the burning of the foliage of sugarcane for easier manual cutting and also burning of crop residues to finish off the sugar harvest (Table 6). In Contramaestre it was also observed that grouped with and , which could be attributed to the resuspension of soil particles by the increase of heavy vehicles in the fields as well as the use of trucks on unpaved roads during the cutting of sugar cane [18].


IonMonitoring stations
ContramaestreGuantanamo
123123

Cl0.910.160.14−0.130.900.39
0.02−0.110.910.92−0.09−0.11
0.250.330.860.96−0.05−0.16
−0.030.950.14−0.250.160.92
Na+0.920.150.01−0.080.950.18
0.050.100.870.820.24−0.14
K+0.340.880.180.060.380.88
Mg2+0.810.200.130.92−0.360.01
Ca2+0.360.74−0.080.93−0.180.03
% variance292727472321
Probable contributionSea saltBiomass burning/soilAnthropogenicAnthropogenic/soilSea saltBiomass burning

Table 7 shows the prevalence of polar continental anticyclone the dry period, characterized by high polar influence on Cuban territory that introduces lower temperatures and northerly winds from the American continent. In the wet period, the North Atlantic anticyclone predominates and is characterized by humid winds coming from the east. Air masses coming from the mainland (west) bring concentrations of and much higher than those from the North Atlantic (east) [22]. It is noted also that the west was affected by a greater number of cold fronts (Table 7), in which clouds produce rain associated with their trajectory through an important part of the industrialized NE area of the US, increasing the transport of contaminants to the Caribbean, mainly during the dry period [15, 23].


PeriodSynoptic situationWestern regionCentral regionEastern region

Dry period
November 2008–April 2009
TSSPolar continental anticyclone
(type VIII)
Polar continental anticyclone (type VIII)Polar continental anticyclone (type VIII)
#  Cold fronts171513

Wet period
May 2009–October 2009
TSSAtlantic anticyclone (type I)Atlantic anticyclone (type I)Atlantic anticyclone (type I)
#  Cold fronts333

Dry period
November 2009–April 2010
TSSPolar continental anticyclone
(type VIII)
Polar continental anticyclone
(type VIII)
Atlantic anticyclone (type I)
#  Cold fronts281811

Figures 5 and 6 confirm this hypothesis since the western and central regions reach higher concentrations during the dry period than during the wet period; in the eastern region the contrary situation was observed. Also, cold fronts can carry pollutants from urban and industrial sites located in western Cuba, increasing concentrations of and non-sea in the eastern and western regions. In the eastern region stations highest concentrations were observed during the wet period possibly associated with the predominance of the North Atlantic anticyclone, characterized by the predominance of the NE winds component that facilitates the transport of and non-sea from a thermoelectric plant and the industrial zone for nickel processing to the monitoring stations in the eastern provinces.

4. Conclusions

The high levels of acid deposit, mainly of sulfates in different locations similar to those that have appeared in adverse environmental impacts in areas of North America, suggest that anthropogenic emissions of , through the use of fossil fuel with 4–7% sulfur content, constitute the main problem for Cuba air quality.

The anthropogenic origin of the elements nickel, zinc, selenium, and lead, which generate risks to human health and ecosystems, shows the need to control and develop environmentally sound production processes.

In most parts of the country, calcium concentrations contribute to neutralize the acidity of rainfall, thus avoiding most problems with acid rain. The free acidity of rainfall is only evident in areas where the influence of emissions of precursor gases is higher due to local sources and there are lower concentrations of neutralizing compounds, such as the stations in Pinares de Mayari, Gran Piedra, and Palo Seco. In this sense an isotopic analysis of H and O in rain could be very useful for better estimating the origin of [19].

At the national level, the most probable anthropogenic sources are the burning of fossil fuels in power plants, the nickel industry, the cement factories, and the burning of biomass in cane fields. It is therefore important to stress the need to control and monitor efficiently and effectively these activities.

Seasonal variation of nitrate and sulphate in precipitation is determined by magnitude of and proximity to emission sources and meteorological factors affecting local and regional transport of pollutants.

In order to reduce the risks of air pollution on human health and the environment, it would be desirable to extend the number of monitoring stations and the quantification of their corresponding chemical species. Considering each rain event, it could be possible to refine the allocation of sources in different locations, using for example back-trajectories [17], and specifically contribute to the solution of environmental problems in Cuba.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Del Carpio Analysis y Asesorías Ltda, Chile, for the use of Ion Chromatograph for ions quantification, Centro Nacional de Medio Ambiente (CENMA) for elements quantification, Instituto de Meteorología de Cuba, Centro de Contaminación y Química Atmosférica, La Habana, for the collection of the samples, and Licentiate in Chemistry Raúl Fuentealba for editorial contribution.

References

  1. E. Sanhueza, M. Santana, L. Donoso, and M. Pacheco, “Química atmosférica en la Gran Sabana III. Composición iónica y características ácido-básicas de las lluvias,” Interciencia, vol. 30, pp. 618–622, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. H. Seinfeld and S. N. Pandis, Wet Deposition in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics from Air Pollution to Climate Change: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.
  3. R. D. Vogt, J. Guo, J. Luo et al., “Water chemistry in forested acid sensitive sites in sub-tropical Asia receiving acid rain and alkaline dust,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1140–1148, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. A. Bravo, R. A. Soto, R. E. Sosa et al., “Effect of acid rain on building material of the El Tajín archaeological zone in Veracruz, Mexico,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 655–660, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Herrera, S. Rodríguez, and A. P. Baéz, “Chemical composition of bulk precipitation in the metropolitan area of Costa Rica, Central America,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 151–160, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. World Meteorological Organization, International Operations Handbook for Measurement of Background Atmospheric Pollution, vol. 491 of WMO, 1978.
  7. World Meteorological Organization, Manual for the GAW Precipitation Chemistry Programme Guidelines, Data Quality Objectives and Standard Operating Procedures, 2004.
  8. D. Migliavacca, E. C. Teixeira, F. Wiegand, A. C. M. Machado, and J. Sanchez, “Atmospheric precipitation and chemical composition of an urban site, Guaíba hydrographic basin, Brazil,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1829–1844, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. N. Mphepya, J. J. Pienaar, C. Galy-Lacaux, G. Held, and C. R. Turner, “Precipitation chemistry in semi-arid areas of Southern Africa: a case study of a rural and an industrial site,” Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. U. C. Kulshrestha, A. K. Sarkar, S. S. Srivastava, and D. C. Parashar, “Wet-only and bulk deposition studies at New Delhi (India),” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 2137–2142, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. C. Keene, A. A. P. Pszenny, J. N. Galloway, and M. E. Hartley, “Sea-salt corrections and interpretation of constituents ratios in marine precipitation,” Journal Geophysical Research, vol. 91, pp. 6647–6658, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. A. Duce, G. L. Hoffman, and W. H. Zoller, “Atmospheric trace metals at remote northern and southern hemisphere sites. Pollution or natural?” Science, vol. 187, no. 4171, pp. 59–61, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. Hernández, “El Niño-Oscilación del Sur (ENOS) y los frentes fríos que arriban a la región occidental cubana,” Investigaciones Marinas, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 3–19, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  14. T. Jickells, A. Knap, T. Church, J. Galloway, and J. Miller, “Acid rain on Bermuda,” Nature, vol. 297, no. 5861, pp. 55–57, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. A. Pio, M. L. Salgueiro, and T. V. Nunes, “Seasonal and air mass trajectory: effects on rainwater quality at the southwestern European border,” Atmospheric Environment A: General Topics, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2259–2266, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. B. L. S. Lara, P. Artaxo, L. A. Martinelli et al., “Chemical composition of rainwater and anthropogenic influences in the Piracicaba River Basin, Southeast Brazil,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 35, no. 29, pp. 4937–4945, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. T. Nastos, D. Alexakis, H. A. Kanellopoulou, and A. E. Kelepertsis, “Chemical composition of wet deposition in a Mediterranean site Athens, Greece related to the origin of air masses,” Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 167–179, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. H. Coelho, J. G. Francisco, R. F. P. Nogueira, and M. L. A. M. Campos, “Dissolved organic carbon in rainwater from areas heavily impacted by sugar cane burning,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 42, no. 30, pp. 7115–7121, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. Kita, T. Sato, Y. Kase, and P. Mitropoulos, “Neutral rains at Athens, Greece: a natural safeguard against acidification of rains,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 327, no. 1–3, pp. 285–294, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. Hong-wei, X. Hua-yun, L. Ai-min, W. Yan-li, and L. Cong-qiang, “Chemical composition and source apportionment of rainwater at Guiyang, SW China,” Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 269–228, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  21. O. A. Al-Khashman, A. Q. Jaradat, and E. Salameh, “Five-year monitoring study of chemical characteristics of Wet atmospheric precipitation in the Southern region of Jordan,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 185, no. 7, pp. 5715–5727, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. N. Galloway, A. H. Knap, and T. M. Church, “The composition of western Atlantic precipitation using shipboard collectors,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 88, no. 15, pp. 10859–10864, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. H. McDowell, C. Gines Sánchez, C. E. Asbury, and C. R. Ramos Perez, “Influence of sea salt aerosols and long range transport on precipitation chemistry at El Verde, Puerto Rico,” Atmospheric Environment A, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2813–2821, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Margarita Préndez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1609 Views | 323 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.