Clinical Study

Outcome for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Is Not Dependent on Race/Ethnicity

Table 1

Distribution of patient, clinicopathologic, and socioeconomic characteristics of 202 Patients with triple negative breast cancer.

African-AmericanCaucasian value
( )( )
68%32%

Characteristics

 Mean age years (range)54 (28–33)60 (36–87)0.38

 Mean tumor size (cm)3.393.160.35

 Tumor size distribution
   T1 (28%)33 (24%)24 (38%)
   T2 (53%)76 (55%)30 (47%)0.25
   T3 (13%)19 (14%)7 (11%)
   T4 (6%)10 (7%)3 (4%)

 Nodal distribution
   N0 (55%)71 (51%)40 (62%)
   N1 (25%)37 (27%)14 (22%)0.5
   N2 (15%)23 (17%)7 (11%)
   N3 (5%)7 (5%)3 (5%)

 Stage distribution
   Stage 1 (21%)25 (18%)17 (26%)
   Stage 2 (52%)73 (53%)33 (52%)0.31
   Stage 3 (27%)40 (29%)14 (22%)

 Tumor grade
   I/II (38%)40/125 (32%)29/59 (49%)0.04
   III (62%)85/125 (68%)30/59 (51%)

 Definitive surgery
   Breast-conserving Rx (31%)51 (37%)12 (19%)0.01
   Mastectomy (69%)87 (63%)52 (81%)

 Systemic treatment
  Adriamycin alone (19%)28 (20%)11 (17%)
  Adriamycin + Taxane (41%)60 (44%)22 (34%)
  Taxane alone (3%)3 (2%)3 (5%)0.33
  Hormone therapy alone (3%)2 (1%)3 (5%)
  Hormone therapy + chemotherapy (16%)19 (14%)14 (22%)
  Others (18%)26 (19%)11 (17%)

 Median annual income$16,493$16,667
 Mean (range) annual income$17,873$21,081<0.001
($15,367–$36,772)($15,795–$36,787)

 Financial class

  Commercial (11%)8/80 (10%)5/35 (14%)

  Medicare (10%)7/80 (9%)4/35 (11%)0.69

  Medicaid (6%)6/80 (7%)1/35 (3%)

  Free care (73%)59/80 (74%)25/35 (72%)