Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Associations with Molecular Subtypes: A Case-Control Study

Ntirenganya, Faustin; Twagirumukiza, Jean Damascene; Bucyibaruta, Georges; Rugwizangoga, Belson; Rulisa, Stephen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5560559

International Journal of Breast Cancer

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5560559 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5560559

Premenopausal Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Associations with Molecular Subtypes: A Case-Control Study

Faustin Ntirenganya,¹Jean Damascene Twagirumukiza,²Georges Bucyibaruta,³Belson Rugwizangoga,¹and Stephen Rulisa¹

Academic Editor: Pranshu Sahgal

Received25 Feb 2021

Accepted16 Sept 2021

Published08 Oct 2021

Abstract

Background. Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in women and the leading cause of women’s cancer-related deaths and morbidity worldwide. In Rwanda, BC incidence is increasing with an unacceptably high mortality rate in premenopausal women. Objectives. The purpose was to identify modifiable BC risk factors and assess associations between common breast cancer risks factors and molecular subtypes in premenopausal women in Rwanda. Methods. This was a case-control study. Premenopausal women with histological confirmation of BC and frequency-matched for age controls were recruited. A preestablished questionnaire was administered to both cases and controls for sociodemographics, BC probable risk factors, and clinical and pathological characteristics. BC was classified into luminal A, luminal B, HER2-type, basal-like (triple negative), and unclassified molecular subtypes by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results. 340 participants were recruited into the study (170 cases vs. 170 controls). The median age was 39 years. The majority of cases presented at advanced stages of the disease (51.2% in stages III and IV) and had invasive ductal carcinoma (98.2%). 60.6% had subtypes of poor prognosis (HER2 enriched 14.7%, triple negative 12.9%, and unclassified 32.9%). Alcohol intake , obesity/overweight in adolescence or early adulthood , history of primary infertility , nulliparity , and a history of benign breast disease were associated with the occurrence of premenopausal breast cancer. There was no significant difference between risk factor stratification per molecular subtype. Conclusion. Several reproductive, environmental, and lifestyle risk factors have been identified to be associated with premenopausal BC. Among them, alcohol intake and obesity/overweight during adolescence/early adulthood can be modified. Interventions targeting alcohol consumption and obesity/overweight in adolescents and young adults may decrease the incidence of premenopausal breast cancer.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of women’s cancer-related deaths and morbidity worldwide. Although breast cancer is described as a disease of the elderly in developed countries, 50% of cases and 58% of deaths are occurring in developing countries within a relatively young population [1–4].

Indeed, breast cancer constitutes a major public health problem worldwide and remains a major scientific, clinical, and societal challenge generally in Africa and particularly in Rwanda. In Africa, publications on breast cancer describe a large number of patients presenting at a young age, with advanced disease and limited access to cancer education, screening, and care. We have learned from previous studies that registries are still scarce in Africa and few available data are generally from hospital-based logs. On the continent, accurate data are generally missing [4–7].

However, there are growing evidences suggesting that clinical presentation of breast cancer in African women may significantly be different compared to their counterparts in high-income countries. Breast cancer patients in Africa may be presenting at younger age and progress rapidly to advanced stages. In fact, the average age of breast cancer diagnosis seems to be 45 years or younger, a considerable difference compared to 64 and above of Caucasian populations [7–9].

Age structure difference alone may not entirely explain the younger age of breast cancer patients in Africa. There may be involved other additional factors to be determined. These may be genetic, molecular, hormonal, and environmental factors or interplay of them [10–12]. Unfortunately, it is not yet clear whether premenopausal breast cancers have different etiologic risk factors compared to postmenopausal BC. Indeed, the existing literature remains unclear or incomplete about the factors behind early-onset and rapid progression of breast cancer in African populations.

The purpose of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors and assess the associations between common risks factors and molecular subtypes in premenopausal breast cancer in Rwanda.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

This was a case-control study conducted at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) and Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence (BCCOE) in Rwanda from September 2019 to September 2020.

2.1.1. Population

Women attending breast clinics at CHUK and BCCOE have been recruited in the study. For the purpose of the study, the premenopausal period was defined based on self-rated menopausal status: (1)Any woman who reported having seen her menses within the last month was considered premenopausal as well as those who were pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period. In addition, women who reported not having seen menses in the previous 6 months for identifiable medical reasons (medications, diseases) were also considered premenopausal if aged ≤50 years(2)Any women who reported not having seen menses in the previous 6 months without any identifiable medical reasons (medications, diseases) were considered postmenopausal if aged ≥50 years. However, if aged ≤50 years, hormonal tests to determine menopausal status were conducted. High FSH levels (over 40 mIU/ml) and low estradiol levels (below 30 pg/ml) were diagnostic for premature menopause. Furthermore, regardless of their age, women who underwent bilateral surgical removal of ovaries were considered postmenopausal

2.1.2. Study Participants’ Selection

Cases were women diagnosed with breast cancer in the premenopausal period. Potential cases were preidentified from outpatients’ breast clinics and recruited in the study after histology confirmation of breast cancer and included in the study using enumerative sampling technique. For 12 months, consecutive cases of premenopausal breast cancers have been included in the study (Figure 1).

As far as controls are concerned, we used a 1 : 1 ratio. Women attending the breast clinic either for breast cancer screening or any other confirmed benign breast complaints were used as controls after clinical evaluation and imaging done to investigate their breast complaints was found to be normal or benign.

Controls were recruited on a weekly basis from the same breast clinic as cases, using stratified simple random sampling technique matching the age of cases recruited the previous week.

2.1.3. Data Collection

A preestablished questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic and potential risk factors for breast cancer. A data capture sheet was developed based on different questionnaires used in previous studies, and information on established or probable breast cancer risk factors (lifestyle, reproductive, hormonal, genetic, and medical history) was collected both for cases and controls. Clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemistry findings were collected for cases using direct patients’ interviews, pathology registries, reports, and patients’ files.

2.1.4. Sample Size Calculation

The sample size was calculated using GPower 3.1.9.7 for Windows, online software for sample size calculation, assuming 85% power, minimum odds ratio to detect of 2.0, percentage of exposed controls of 30%, alpha risk of 5%, 1 : 1 ratio. Therefore, the sample size was found to be 322 individuals with 161 cases and 161 controls.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was done using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corporation, New York 10504-1722, USA). Univariate analysis was conducted to compare sociodemographic characteristics of cases and controls. The Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney test) for continuous variables. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was done for associations between risk factors and premenopausal breast cancer. Risk of premenopausal breast cancer was estimated by the odds ratio. For all odds ratios, 95% confidence interval was considered. A value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2.3. Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the IRB of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, and by ethical committees of the CHUK and BCCOE. Written informed consent was obtained for both cases and controls prior to prospective data collection.

3. Results

348 participants were recruited in the study. 345 of them met inclusion criteria. Three cases and 2 controls had multiple missing data and were excluded. For that reason, 340 (170 cases and 170 controls) were retained for final analysis.

The median age of participants was 39 years with 45.9% of them aged below 40 years. Painless breast lump was the presenting sign in 45.6% of cases. 54.7% of patients reported intermediate to rapid progression of the disease (Table 1).

In bivariate logistic regression analysis, the crude odds ratio (COR) was calculated. Alcohol intake (, 95% CI 2.82-7.16, ), obesity/overweight in adolescence or early adulthood (, 95% CI 6.13-26.8, ), history of primary infertility (, 95% CI 2.13-125.2, ), history of benign breast disease (, 95% CI 2.42-46.1, ), nulliparity (, 95% CI 1.18-4.04, ), and contraceptive use (, 95% CI 1.85-4.5, ) were found to be associated with the occurrence of premenopausal breast cancer (Table 2).

Holding other relevant variables constant, the adjusted odds ratio was calculated in a multivariate regression analysis. Alcohol intake , obesity/overweight in adolescence or early adulthood , history of primary infertility , nulliparity , and a history of benign breast disease were retained in the final fitting model as predictors of premenopausal breast cancer (Table 3).

By stratifying risk factors by molecular subtypes, there was no significant difference between risk factors stratified per molecular subtype (Table 4).

Invasive ductal carcinoma was the main histology type in 98.2% of patients while invasive lobular carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ represented 0.6% each (Table 5).

The most frequent molecular subtype was luminal A with 26.5% with subtypes of poor prognosis in 60.6% (HER2 enriched 14.7%, triple negative 12.9%, and unclassified 32.9%) (Table 6).

4. Discussion

This study identified risk factors for premenopausal breast cancer in Rwanda and stratified them per molecular subtypes.

Indeed, the majority of patients with breast cancer in Rwanda and in sub-Saharan Africa may be young premenopausal women, presenting with advanced stages of the disease and having poor outcomes [6, 8, 13–15]. The reasons why it happens like that are not yet fully understood. Marie Swanson et al. clearly demonstrate the existence of differences in age-specific incidence, risk factors, and outcomes, when comparing young African-Americans and White-Americans [10]. However, what they do not explain is why these epidemiological differences exist.

In our study, the median age of participants was 39 years with 45.9% of them aged below 40 years, aligning with previous studies [14, 16, 17]. On the one hand, population age structure and younger populations in Rwanda and African countries may explain partially the findings. However, age structure may give a false impression that breast cancer patients in Africa are predominantly young [18–21]. On the other hand, breast cancer heterogeneity may also support the hypothesis of BC younger age and aggressive presentation in premenopausal women as seen in this study. Indeed, breast cancer is not a single disease; it is rather a heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes behaving differently in clinical presentation, progression, and outcome [12, 22, 23]. Apparently, more aggressive breast cancer subtypes like triple negative or HER2/Neu-enriched tumors are mainly found in black populations and may present early [24–27].

Generally, premenopausal breast cancer is underdocumented. So far, the majority of available studies on breast cancer are conducted on postmenopausal breast cancers and suggest that premenopausal breast cancer may share the same risk factors with postmenopausal breast cancer [28]. However, there are growing evidences that premenopausal breast cancer may be having different risk factors. For example, extremely dense breasts and having a family history of breast cancer appear to be increasing specifically the risk of premenopausal breast cancers [28–30]. Furthermore, obesity and pauciparity seem to have no effect on premenopausal breast cancer while they are found to be increasing postmenopausal breast cancer [31, 32]. However, contrary to the latter findings, our study found an association between history of obesity/overweight in adolescence and early childhood and the developing breast cancer in the premenopausal period.

While our study found no differences in risk factor distribution among different molecular subtypes in premenopausal women with breast cancer, studies on etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer linking environmental exposures to somatic mutations caused by smoking, exposures to infectious agents, or exposure to other known carcinogens supported the existence of distinct epigenetic profiles of breast cancer in general [22, 25, 33]. In addition, many studies have suggested that estrogen positive premenopausal breast cancer has distinct molecular characteristics compared to postmenopausal cancers and behaves differently with distinct integrin/laminin and EGFR signalling pathways [34–36]. Further studies on this subject are still needed.

Indeed, there are not yet enough evidences to conclude that premenopausal breast cancer is totally different to justify specific treatment guidelines, screening, and early detection strategies [37–39]. Breast cancer heterogeneity has been documented not only among different patients (intertumor heterogeneity) but also within each individual tumor (intratumor heterogeneity). The existence of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer indicating intratumor heterogeneity creates diagnostic and therapeutic challenges but has improved the classification of breast cancer patients into the low, intermediate, and high risk groups for personalized treatments [36, 40–43].

In our study, the majority of molecular subtypes identified in premenopausal women are estrogen negative molecular subtypes (basal-like and HER2/Neu-enriched). Even if young women with breast cancer are more likely to have genetic predisposition with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, the expression of key biomarkers ER, PR, and HER2/Neu and proliferation markers like Ki67 appears to be different compared to postmenopausal cancers, confirming the above findings [11, 44, 45].

This study had some limitations. As in all case-control studies, we attempted to find correlations between past events and current status. Hence, due to its retrospective nature, there is room for potential recall bias, as there is an increased likelihood that those with outcomes will recall and report the exposure better compared to controls due to subject imperfect memories of past exposure. Furthermore, we may have failed to identify all confounding variables as there is no exhaustive list of probable risk factors for premenopausal breast cancer.

Lastly, we have not been able to conduct further analysis for equivocal HER2/Neu results. In fact, FISH technology is not available in the country. For the purpose of this study, tumors with equivocal HER2/Neu status were considered “unclassified”; this may have increased the number of unclassified tumors.

5. Conclusion

This study identified risk factors for premenopausal breast cancer in Rwanda and stratified them per molecular subtypes. Among the identified risk factors, alcohol intake and obesity/overweight during adolescence/early adulthood can be modified. Interventions targeting alcohol intake and obesity/overweight in young women may decrease the incidence of premenopausal breast cancer. Large-scale studies are still needed, to define whether premenopausal breast cancer is totally different from postmenopausal BC, to justify specific treatment guidelines, screening, and early detection strategies.

Data Availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Disclosure

The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contributions

FN designed the study; FN, GB, and JDT performed data extraction and analysis; FN and BR interpreted the results; FN wrote the initial draft. FN, GB, JDT, BR, and SR contributed to subsequent drafts. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version.

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No.: B 8606.R02), Sida (Grant No: 54100113), DELTAS Africa Initiative (Grant No: 107768/Z/15/Z), and Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences’ (AAS’) Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (UK) and the UK government.

References

Globocan, Estimated cancer incidence: mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012, The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Heal Organ, 2013.
World Health Organization, “World Health Statistics 2017,” in Monitoring health for the sustainable development goals, World Health Organization, 2017, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/255336/1/9789241565486-eng.pdf?ua=1.
View at: Google Scholar
G. O. Abdulrahman and G. A. Rahman, “Epidemiology of breast cancer in Europe and Africa,” Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 915610, 5 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. R. Akinde, A. A. Phillips, O. A. Oguntunde, and O. M. Afolayan, “Cancer mortality pattern in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria,” Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 2015, Article ID 842032, 6 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. N. Mody, A. Nduaguba, F. R. R. Ntirenganya, and R. Riviello, “Characteristics and presentation of patients with breast cancer in Rwanda,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 205, no. 4, pp. 409–413, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Murthy, N. Tapela, M. A. Muhimpundu et al., “A national framework for breast cancer control: a report on Rwanda’s inaugural symposium on the management of breast cancer,” Journal of Cancer Policy, vol. 6, pp. 3–7, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ntirenganya, R. T. Petroze, T. B. Kamara et al., “Prevalence of breast masses and barriers to care: results from a population-based survey in Rwanda and Sierra Leone,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 903–906, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Mwakigonja, H. Rabiel, N. A. Mbembati, and L. E. K. Lema, “The pattern of prognostic and risk indicators among women with breast cancer undergoing modified radical mastectomy in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,” Infectious Agents and Cancer, vol. 11, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Mwakigonja, N. E. Lushina, and A. Mwanga, “Characterization of hormonal receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in tissues of women with breast cancer at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,” Infectious Agents and Cancer, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Marie Swanson, S. Z. Haslam, and F. Azzouz, “Breast cancer among young African-American women,” Cancer, vol. 97, Supplement 1, pp. 273–279, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Palmer, C. B. Ambrosone, and A. F. Olshan, “A collaborative study of the etiology of breast cancer subtypes in African American women: the AMBER consortium,” Cancer Causes & Control, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hemminki, S. M. Mousavi, J. Sundquist, and A. Brandt, “Does the breast cancer age at diagnosis differ by ethnicity? A study on immigrants to Sweden,” Oncologist, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Pace, T. Mpunga, V. Hategekimana et al., “Delays in breast cancer presentation and diagnosis at two rural cancer referral centers in Rwanda,” Oncologist, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 780–788, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Darré, M. Tchaou, and K. Folligan, “Breast cancer cases of female patients under 35 years of age in Togo : a series of 158 cases,” Molecular and clinical oncology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1125–1129, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
H. A. J. Azim and A. H. Partridge, “Biology of breast cancer in young women,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 427, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bonnier, S. Romain, C. Charpin et al., “Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer: relationship to pathologic and biologic features,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 138–144, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Uyisenga, Y. Butera, A. Debit et al., “Prevalence of histological characteristics of breast cancer in Rwanda in relation to age and tumor stages,” Hormones and Cancer, vol. 11, no. 5-6, pp. 240–249, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. McPherson, C. M. Steel, and J. M. Dixon, “ABC of Breast diseases: Breast cancer---epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics,” BMJ, vol. 321, no. 7261, pp. 624–628, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. M. Saeed, J. Cao, B. Fadul et al., “A five-year survey of cancer prevalence in Sudan,” Anticancer research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 279–286, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
C. A. Clarke, T. H. M. Keegan, J. Yang et al., “Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 104, no. 14, pp. 1094–1101, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Eccles, E. O. Aboagye, S. Ali et al., “Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–37, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Chow, A. S. Ting, and T. T. Su, “Development of conceptual framework to understand factors associated with return to work among cancer survivors: a systematic review,” Iranian Journal of Public Health, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 391–405, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. R. Palmer, E. Viscidi, M. A. Troester et al., “Parity, lactation, and breast cancer subtypes in African American women: results from the AMBER Consortium,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 106, no. 10, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Brewster, M. Chavez-MacGregor, and P. Brown, “Epidemiology, biology, and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in women of African ancestry,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 15, no. 13, article e625, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Barnard, C. E. Boeke, and R. M. Tamimi, “Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1856, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Galukande, H. Wabinga, F. Mirembe, C. Karamagi, and A. Asea, “Difference in risk factors for breast cancer by ER status in an indigenous African population,” ISRN Oncology, vol. 2013, Article ID 463594, 5 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. D. Nelson, B. Zakher, A. Cantor et al., “Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 156, no. 9, pp. 635–648, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hormones, B. Cancer, and Group C, “Sex hormones and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women: a collaborative reanalysis of individual participant data from seven prospective studies,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1009–1019, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lambertini, L. Santoro, L. del Mastro et al., “Reproductive behaviors and risk of developing breast cancer according to tumor subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 65–76, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. Begg, E. C. Zabor, J. L. Bernstein, L. Bernstein, M. F. Press, and V. E. Seshan, “A conceptual and methodological framework for investigating etiologic heterogeneity,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 29, pp. 5039–5052, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hajiebrahimi, S. Cnattingius, M. Lambe, and S. Bahmanyar, “Pregnancy history and risk of premenopausal breast cancer — a nested case-control study,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 816–824, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kahlenborn, F. Modugno, D. M. Potter, and W. B. Severs, “Oral Contraceptive Use as a Risk Factor for Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 1290–1302, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Demicheli and D. Coradini, “Gene regulatory networks : a new conceptual framework to analyse breast cancer behaviour,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1259–1265, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Yusuf, V. K. Kapoor, R. R. Kamel et al., “Modification and implementation of NCCN Guidelines™ on Hepatobiliary Cancers in the Middle East and North Africa region,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 8, Supplement 3, pp. S-36–S-40, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bhikoo, S. Srinivasa, T. C. Yu, D. Moss, and A. G. Hill, “Systematic review of breast cancer biology in developing countries (part 1): Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, Mexico, the Caribbean and South America,” Cancers, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2358–2381, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Sutter, A. Slinker, D. D. Balumuka, and K. B. Mitchell, “Surgical management of breast cancer in Africa: a continent-wide review of intervention practices, barriers to care, and adjuvant therapy,” Journal of Global Oncology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 162–168, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. R. Yang, R. M. Pfeiffer, M. Garcia-Closas et al., “Hormonal markers in breast cancer: coexpression, relationship with pathologic characteristics, and risk factor associations in a population-based study,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 21, pp. 10608–10617, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Natrajan and B. Weigelt, “Risk stratification and intrinsic subtype classification of breast cancer: a multiparameter test to rule them all?” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 108, no. 9, article djw118, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Harvey, G. M. Clark, C. K. Osborne, and D. C. Allred, “Estrogen Receptor Status by Immunohistochemistry Is Superior to the Ligand-Binding Assay for Predicting Response to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 1474, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Assi, K. E. Khoury, H. Dbouk, L. E. Khalil, T. H. Mouhieddine, and N. S. El Saghir, “Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 5, Supplement 1, pp. S2–S8, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Salhia, C. Tapia, E. A. Ishak et al., “Molecular subtype analysis determines the association of advanced breast cancer in Egypt with favorable biology,” BMC Women's Health, vol. 11, no. 1, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Awadelkarim, C. Arizzi, E. O. M. Elamin et al., “Basal-Like Phenotype in a Breast Carcinoma Case Series from Sudan: Prevalence and Clinical/Pathological Correlations,” Pathology Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 806831, 10 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pang, K. A. Toy, K. A. Griffith et al., “Invasive breast carcinomas in Ghana: high frequency of high grade, basal-like histology and high EZH2 expression,” Breast cancer research and treatment, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Gray, S. Rasanayagam, C. Engel, and J. Rizzo, “State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment,” Environmental Health, vol. 16, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Vanderpuye, S. Grover, N. Hammad et al., “An update on the management of breast cancer in Africa,” Infectious Agents and Cancer, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Faustin Ntirenganya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1477

Downloads

1347

Citations