The Impact of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Densities and Ki67 Index on Residual Breast Cancer Burden following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Elmahs, Aya; Mohamed, Ghada; Salem, Mostafa; Omar, Dina; Helal, Amany Mohamed; Soliman, Nahed

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2597889

International Journal of Breast Cancer

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 2597889 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2597889

The Impact of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Densities and Ki67 Index on Residual Breast Cancer Burden following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Aya Elmahs,¹Ghada Mohamed,^2,3Mostafa Salem,⁴Dina Omar,⁴Amany Mohamed Helal,^5,6and Nahed Soliman¹

Academic Editor: Taobo Hu

Received12 Jul 2022

Accepted17 Aug 2022

Published12 Sept 2022

Abstract

To avoid unnecessary neoadjuvant chemotherapy in case anticipating a poor therapy response, it is essential to find the pathological parameters that would predict pathological complete response or at least a decrease in tumor burden following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the hypothesis that tumor infiltrating lymphocytes can predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to find the Ki67 cutoff value that best predicts the benefit of chemotherapy. 153 cases of breast cancer were chosen, based on their molecular subtype: triple negative subtype (77) and luminal, HER2-ve subtype (76). Histopathological assessment of pretherapy core biopsies was conducted to assess variable pathological parameters including TILs rates with the aid of immunohistochemical staining for CD20 and CD3. Moreover, core biopsies were stained for Ki67, and the findings were compared to the residual cancer burden following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On analyzing and contrasting the two groups, a significant association between molecular subtype and pathological complete response was confirmed, while tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in either group had no effect on therapy response. We used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine that a cutoff of 36% for Ki67 is the most accurate value to predict complete therapy response.

1. Introduction

The primary treatment for advanced breast cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) [1], that is why identifying the pathological parameters that can anticipate poor therapeutic response can help avoid unnecessary NACT and its accompanying side effects and costs. Despite being the desired target, the pathological complete response (pCR) system is not able to risk-stratify patients with residual cancer following NACT, in contrast to residual cancer burden (RCB) system that can classify patients with residual cancer which has been proven to be of prognostic value [2]. Tumor size, overall cancer cellularity, percentage of in situ carcinoma, number of residually positive lymph nodes, and length of longest nodal metastasis are all factors considered in RCB scoring. Raw scores are then categorized into RCB classes using predefined cut-points, with a score of zero representing pCR and scores from 1 to 3 representing increasing amounts of residual disease [3].

Tumor microenvironment has an important role in the progression of cancer. However, historically breast cancer was considered as immunologically inactive relative to other tumors, particularly melanoma [4]. On the contrary, evidence has emerged that pretherapy tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within breast cancer may predict response to therapy [5].

The choice of cutoff points to define high Ki67 levels is controversial. Although most studies suggest that higher grade tumors with a high proliferation index would respond better to NACT [6, 7], the intervariability in manual counting and the controversy of analytical validity decrease the accuracy of ki67 scoring, that is why the limitations of global standardization of Ki67 cutoff value persist [8].

This study is aimed at testing the hypothesis that the presence of a lymphocytic infiltrate in tumor tissue may predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, identifying the optimal Ki67 cutoff point for use as a predictor of chemotherapy benefit. In addition to analyzing which of the studied pathological parameters may aid in predicting therapy response.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This is a retrospective study that included 153 breast cancer cases, chosen by accessing the database of Baheya Centre for Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer between November 2019 and September 2020. Cases were selected according to their molecular subtype; TNBC (77 cases) and luminal HER2-ve subtype (76 cases). Selected cases should have performed core biopsy followed by NACT with subsequent surgical treatment, whether modified radical mastectomy or quadrantectomy with axillary clearance. Ethics committee approval was granted from the Institutional Review Board of Baheya Centre. Only the principal investigator reviewed the patients’ original reports to compile demographic information. A coding number was used instead of a patient’s name to identify each case.

Prior to receiving neoadjuvant therapy, all patients should have adequate cell blood count, liver, and kidney functions as well as adequate ejection fraction (≥60%) on echocardiographic evaluation. Details of the treatment regimen were available for the included patients; all patients received a neoadjuvant anthracyclin containing regimen followed by taxanes.

2.2. Clinicopathologic Analysis

Tumor core biopsy paraffin blocks were serially sectioned and stained with H&E, and they were evaluated by two qualified pathologists. Tumors were typed according to the WHO histological classification [9]. Grading of the tumors was done using the Nottingham combined grading system [10]. First, H&E-stained slides were used to evaluate the TILs. TILs were then classified into intratumoral lymphocytes (ITLs) and stromal lymphocytes (SLs). ITLs were reported as a percentage of tumor epithelial nests containing infiltrating lymphocytes and defined as intraepithelial mononuclear cells within tumor cell nests or in direct contact with tumor cells. While SLs were defined as the percentage of tumor stroma area that contains a lymphocytic infiltrate without direct contact with tumor cells [11]. There was no consideration given to the immune infiltrate surrounding DCIS or normal breast lobules, neither areas with crush artefacts and necrosis [11, 12]. Tumors were quantitively divided into three groups based on the expression of SLs and/or ITLs, namely, lymphocyte poor tumors (0-10%), intermediate group (20-40%), and lymphocyte predominant tumors (50-90%) [12]. Cores were immunostained with CD3 (rabbit monoclonal antibody), CD20 (mouse monoclonal antibody), and Ki67 (rabbit monoclonal antibody). All markers were ready to use and are obtained from Cell Marque, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States. BENCHMARK XT IHC/ISH staining module (Ventana) was used for immunostaining.

2.3. Assessment of RCB

Following surgery, data was taken from the reports, and slides were reviewed to collect the following parameters: tumor bed size, residual tumor cellularity, percentage of ductal carcinoma that is in situ, number of positive lymph nodes, and size of the largest tumor metastasis.

RCB class was calculated using the MD Anderson Residual cancer burden calculator http://www3.mdanderson.org/app/medcalc/index.cfm?pagename=jsconvert3.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to code data and statistical analysis. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS-test) was used to evaluate the data which was found to be nonparametric [13]. Mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum values were used to summarize quantitative data, while frequency (count) and percentage were used to summarize categorical data. Comparing quantitative variables was done using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney nonparametric tests. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. However, Fisher exact test was used when the expected frequency was less than 5. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to calculate correlations between quantitative variables. To test whether the link between triple negative subtype and pCR is independent of TILs, we used logistic regression analysis that was performed. And, to study the effect of all positive predictors on pCR, multiple logistic regression analysis was also used. To find the best cutoff value of Ki67 for the detection of pCR, a ROC curve was constructed using the area under the curve analysis. Statistical significance was defined as a value lower than 0.05.

3. Results

A total of 153 cases were included in the analysis. All patients were female with median age 48 years ( years). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological features, and results of immunohistochemical analysis for the entire study population are shown in (Table 1). RCB classes I, II, and III were attended in 3.3%, 32.7%, and 45.1% of the cases, while pCR was achieved in 19% of study cases (Table 1). By using the predefined cut points, lymphocyte poor, intermediate group, and lymphocyte predominant were attended in 17.6%, 43.1%, and 39.2% of study cases (Figure 1; case [1–5] A, E, I, M, and Q).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

(n)

(o)

(p)

(q)

(r)

(s)

(t)

Figure 1

(a–d) Case (1) IDC, grade 3 (lymphocyte predominant); 10% ITL, 70% SL (H&E 40×), (b) Ki67 IHC (40×) proliferation index 40%, (c) CD3 IHC (40×), 60%, (d) CD20 IHC (40×), 40%. (e–h) Case [2] IDC, grade 3 (intermediate group); 20% ITL, 40% SL (H&E) (10×), (f) Ki67 IHC (10×) proliferation index 60%, (g) CD3 IHC (40×), 60%, (h) CD20 IHC (40×), 20%. (i–l) Case [3] IDC, grade 2 (lymphocyte poor); 5% ITL, 10% SL (H&E (40×), (j) Ki67 IHC (40×) proliferation index 5%, (k) CD3 IHC (40×), 70%, (l) CD20 IHC (40×), 10%. (m–p) Case [4] Medullary carcinoma, grade 3 (lymphocyte predominant); 30% I1L, 80% SL (H&E (40×), (n) Ki67 IHC (40×) proliferation index 90%, (o) CD3 IHC (40×), 60%, (p) CD20 IHC (40×), 30%. (q–t) Case [5] ILC, grade 2 (intermediate group); 5% ITL, 40% SL (H&E 10×), (r) Ki67 IHC (40×) proliferation index 50%, (s) CD3 IHC (40×), 50%, (t) CD20 IHC (40×), 5%.

3.1. Relation between Different Pathological Features and RCB Classes

There was no significant association between tumor histological type and the RCB classes nor with pCR. In invasive duct carcinoma, pCR, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III were achieved in 18.7%, 3.3%, 35.8%, and 42.3% of cases, respectively. Tumor grade shows significant association with both RCB classes and pCR ( value < 0.001 and 0.008, respectively). The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was significantly associated with RCB classes and pCR ( value < 0.001, each). Molecular subtype was significantly associated with both pCR and decreased tumor burden ( value < 0.001, each) with pCR and RCB-I attended in 35 and 5.2%, respectively, in TNBC in comparison to 2.6% and 1.3%, respectively, in Luminal subtype (Table 2).

Regarding TILs, there was no significant association with RCB nor with pCR ( value = 0.623 and 0.147, respectively) (Table 2). By using of the predefined cut points, lymphocytic predominant tumors achieved pCR, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III in 26.7%, 3.3%, 31.7%, and 38.3% of the cases, respectively. Intermediate group achieves pCR, RCB-I RCB-II, and RCB-III in 13.6%, 3%, 33.3%, and 50% of cases, respectively, while the lymphocyte poor group achieves PCR, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III in 14.8%, 3.7%, 33.3%, and 48.1% of cases, respectively. When further classifying cases according to the molecular subtype, TILs fail to show significant association with pCR in both luminal and TN subtypes ( value = 1 and 0.803, respectively) (Table 3). By logistic regression analysis, the absence of a statistically significant association between TILs and pCR was confirmed despite the molecular subtype (Table 4).

CD20 and CD3 range from (0-60%) to (2-95%), respectively, among study cases (Figure 1; case [1–5] C, D, G, H, K, L, O, P, S, and T). There was no significant relation between CD20 B lymphocytes and RCB classes ( value = 0.735), nor with pCR ( value = 0.673). Similarly, CD3 T lymphocytes show no significant difference neither with RCB classes nor with pCR ( value = 0.701 and 0.534, respectively (Table 5). Regarding the types of TILs, Spearman correlation proved the positive correlation between SL and ITL (Figure 2).

Ki67 index ranges from 2% up to 98% (Figure 1; case (1–5) B, F, J, N, and R). Ki67 proliferation index showed a significant relation with both RCB class and pCR ( value = 0.002 and 0.018, respectively). Ki67 is expressed by median value of 60%, 60%, 40%, and 20% in RCB-0, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III, respectively (Table 5). And by ROC curve analysis, we identified 36% as the optimal Ki67 cut-off value to predict the pathological complete response (Figure 3).

To define the predictive power of each variable regarding therapy response, logistic regression analysis was performed for molecular subtype, Ki67, LVI, and tumor grade; and it shows that molecular subtype and negative LVI have the upper hand when predicting therapy response (Table 6 and Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Two nearly equal groups of two molecular subtypes were analyzed in this study: (luminal, HER2 negative) and TNBC. By using this subtype selection-based approach, we were able to investigate whether the lymphocytic infiltrate’s predictive role is restricted to a specific molecular subtype [11, 14]. We have classified TIL into three groups: lymphocyte predominant, intermediate, and lymphocyte poor [4].

4.1. Relation between Histological Types, Tumor Grades, LVI, and NAC Response

In terms of correlation with the included pathological parameters, we found no difference between RCB and pCR systems. In our study, we found no association between tumor type and pCR nor RCB classes, as did Nagao and his colleagues [15]. However, due to sample size limitations for rare histological subtypes in the mentioned study as well as our own research, larger studies are required to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on various breast cancer subtypes.

There was a significant association between higher tumor grade and both pCR and lower tumor burden ( value = 0.001 and 0.008). Many previous studies had found similar results [16, 17]. That is why assessment of histological grade has always considered as an important factor in the prognosis of breast cancer patients and should be incorporated into staging systems and treatment algorithms [18].

According to the results of this study, NACT had a significantly worse outcome in patients who had LVI. Previously, similar findings were found [19]. Hence, routine assessment of LVI is linked to good tumor tissue assessment practice [20].

4.2. Relation between Luminal Subtypes, TILs, and NAC Response

Following NACT, pCR was observed in 19% of the study cases. Similar results were found in previous studies; 19.2%, 15.2%, and 12% in [16, 21, 22]. Triple-negative subgroup attended pCR in 35.1% of the cases. This was in line with the global average of pCR for triple-negative breast cancer as numerous studies have confirmed these findings [16, 23]. For luminal tumors, a pCR rate of 2.6% was obtained. Previous study revealed a variable but close rates [24]. This result was also consistent with what was mentioned by Torrisi and his colleges, with an expected range for pCR in luminal tumors being 0-18% [25]; as a result of low pCR rate after NACT, hormone therapy is still being used as a primary treatment for hormonal positive tumors worldwide after NACT [26]. A more recent study suggests that better outcomes can be achieved by excluding hormonal positive tumors from NAC planning [27].

Upon categorizing posttherapy residual cancer into RCB classes, luminal and HER2-ve tumors were more likely to be categorized as RCB-III and II (68.4% and 27.6%), respectively, whereas post-NAC TNBC was more likely to be RCB-0 (35.1%) (). The same results were reported by Hamy and his colleagues [28]. That is why, despite the fact that TNBC has a higher recurrence rate and a lower survival rate than other breast cancer subtypes, it is significantly more responsive to chemotherapy [29].

For luminal-HER2 negative included cases, TILs do not appear to have a significant correlation with pCR, as has been found in many previous studies [30, 31] and in a meta-analysis performed by Gao and his colleagues [32]. In contrary to the findings of most of the reviewed studies, we were unable to find a significant association between TILs and pCR in TNBC [33, 34]. With more comprehensive review, these studies have never performed a linearity test for this analysis [33, 34], unlike Hamy et al.’s study that detected a significant but nonlinear relationship between TILs and pCR in TNBC [35]. Neither of these studies have been able to explain why pre-NACT TILs were exclusively linked to pCR in TNBC [33, 34]. A prominent inflammatory infiltrate is a well-known feature of TNBC [36, 37]. To confirm whether the observed significance was due to the molecular subtype itself or it is linked to the density of TILs, we used logistic regression and a significant association between pCR, and TNBC subtype was confirmed irrelevant to TILs. As a result, Laenkholm and his colleagues advised caution when using TILs as a prognostic factor, as well as combining it with other well-established prognostic factors like tumor size and lymph node status, as well as performing the assessment in conjunction with PD-L1 IHC [38].

Further to that, more research studies are needed on tumor biology and cross-talk between immune system components and tumor cells as those can be the main determinants of therapy response. Additionally, the interactions between TILs and chemotherapy regimen may play an important role in this context.

4.3. SLs and ITLs

In this research, we discovered a strong correlation between SL and ITL ( value < 0.001). That is consistent with the findings mentioned by Denkert and his colleagues [11]. An explanation for this could be found in the initial hypothesis that the static situation of TILs in histologic tissue may be artificial, because lymphocytes are free to move within the microenvironment of a living tissue [30].

In this study, primarily CD3 T cells and then CD20 B cells are found in the tumor microenvironmet, which is consistent with most previous studies [27, 28]. Our study found no correlation between CD20 B-cells and NACT response nor RCB classes. In regard to the relationship between tumor-infiltrating CD20 B cells and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous studies were inconclusive [29, 30]. Some studies found that the mean of CD20 B cells in tumors was not significantly associated with chemotherapy effect [31, 32]. However, a link has been found between B cell infiltration and poor prognosis in a recent clinical study [39]. It is important to note that because CD20 B cells have lower levels than T lymphocytes, little is known about their role in the tumor microenvironment and the outcome of therapy. More research with larger sample sizes is needed to clarify this point.

CD3 T-cells had no effect on pCR nor RCB classes of cancer. In a previous study, Mao and his colleagues found that CD3 had no predictive value, which is consistent with these findings [40], while CD3 T-cells and pCR have been shown to be linked in other studies [34, 41]. This study’s findings may be explained by what Kolesta said about the redundancy of lymphocytic markers in the prognosis of breast cancer. If we look at the biology of the tumor immune contexture and the endless list of technical and methodology issues, this redundancy could be accepted [42]. Despite Kolesta’s conclusion, and due to the small sample size of our study and Mao’s study, our recommendation is that the results of this analysis should be interpreted cautiously.

4.4. Relation between Ki67 Proliferation Index and NAC Response

A greater likelihood of pCR following NACT was associated with higher Ki67 levels in the current study. According to previous researches, the same findings were found [7, 43]. This was expected, as measures of tumor cell proliferation are typically associated with a greater likelihood of pCR [6].

The median value for Ki67 in our study was 30% with a range of (2-98%). To test human visual perception, we did not use image analysis in our work; instead, we preferred the pathologist’s “trained eyes” because this aligns with what pathologists do on in their routine work. By using the ROC curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for Ki67 to predict pCR was 36%. This is in agreement with Denkert and his colleague’s findings which mentioned to be an optimal threshold for pCR [44].

Our work aligns with the recommendations of the International Ki67 Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) regarding Ki67 IHC being accepted to decide chemotherapy for the patient if it has a value of 30% or more after maintaining training modules for pathologists together with adopting good staining and scoring protocols [43].

Finally, in this study and based on the logistic regression analysis, we were able to identify the predictors of NAC response with molecular subtyping and negative LVI being the most important predictors followed by high tumor grade and high .

4.5. Conclusion

TNBC, negative LVI, higher tumor grade, and a were found to be predictors of pCR or at least reduction in residual cancer burden following NACT. With further research, we may be able to develop a new scoring system that considers both clinical and pathological parameters when predicting how patients will respond to NACT.

Abbreviations

DCIS:	Ductal carcinoma in situ
IKWG:	International Ki67 Breast Cancer Working Group
ITLs:	Intratumoral lymphocytes
IHC:	Immunohistochemical staining
KS:	Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
LVI:	Lymphovascular invasion
NACT:	Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
pCR:	Pathological complete response
ROC:	Receiver operating characteristic
RCB:	Residual cancer burden
SPSS:	Statistical package for the social sciences
SLs:	Stromal lymphocytes
TNBC:	Triple negative breast cancer
TILs:	Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.

Data Availability

Raw data were collected by accessing the database of Baheya Centre for Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

I am most thankful to Baheya Centre for Early Detection and treatment of Breast Cancer, Egypt, that has provided the needed material to accomplish this work.

Supplementary Materials

Table 1: distribution of demographic data, pathological features collected from pretherapy core biopsies and parameters investigated in the posttherapy specimens. Table 2: relation between categorical parameters in 153 breast cases and pCR (chi-square test). Table 3: relation between quantitative parameters in 153 breast cases and pCR (Mann–Whitney test). (Supplementary Materials)

References

W. M. Sikov, “Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer based on underlying tumor biology,” Management of the Breast and Axilla in the Neoadjuvant Setting, pp. 125–150, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yau, M. Osdoit, M. van der Noordaa et al., “Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 149–160, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. I. Campbell, C. Yau, P. Krass et al., “Comparison of residual cancer burden, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and pathologic complete response in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657),” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 181–191, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Savas, R. Salgado, C. Denkert et al., “Clinical relevance of host immunity in breast cancer: from TILs to the clinic,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 228–241, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Loi, N. Sirtaine, F. Piette et al., “Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 860–867, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Gluz, C. Kolberg-Liedtke, A. Prat et al., “Efficacy of deescalated chemotherapy according to PAM50 subtypes, immune and proliferation genes in triple-negative early breast cancer: primary translational analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 262–271, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wajid, F. A. Samad, A. S. Syed, and F. Kazi, “Ki-67 and its relation with complete pathological response in patients with breast cancer,” Cureus, vol. 13, no. 7, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Choi, J. M. Park, J. H. Ahn et al., “Ki-67 and breast cancer prognosis: does it matter if Ki-67 level is examined using preoperative biopsy or postoperative specimen?” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 343–352, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Allison, B. E. Ellis, F. Lyon et al., WHO classification of tumors series, International Agency for Pesearch on Cancer, France, vol. 2, 5th edition, 2019, https://publications.iarc.fr/581.
C. W. Elston and I. O. Ellis, “Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up,” Histopathology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 403–410, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Denkert, S. Loibl, A. Noske et al., “Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Salgado, C. Denkert, S. Demaria et al., “The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 259–271, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghasemi and S. Zahediasl, “Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians,” International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 486–489, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solinas, L. Carbognin, P. De Silva, C. Criscitiello, and M. Lambertini, “Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer according to tumor subtype: current state of the art,” The Breast, vol. 35, pp. 142–150, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nagao, T. Kinoshita, T. Hojo, H. Tsuda, K. Tamura, and Y. Fujiwara, “The differences in the histological types of breast cancer and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the relationship between the outcome and the clinicopathological characteristics,” The Breast, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 289–295, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Díaz-Casas, J. A. Castilla-Tarra, E. Pena-Torres et al., “Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the molecular classification of locally advanced breast cancer in a Latin American cohort,” The Oncologist, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. e1360–e1370, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jarząb, E. Stobiecka, and M. Sklodowska-Curie, “Association of breast cancer grade with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy assessed postoperatively,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 91–99, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Rakha, J. S. Reis-Filho, F. Baehner et al., “Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pegah, S. Saleh, M.-J. Alireza, and M. Mona, “Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Iranian breast cancer patients,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2423–2427, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Rakha, S. Martin, A. H. S. Lee et al., “The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 118, no. 15, pp. 3670–3680, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. M. Fayanju, Y. Ren, S. M. Thomas et al., “The clinical significance of breast-only and node-only pathologic complete response (PCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): a review of 20, 000 breast cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB),” Annals of Surgery, vol. 268, no. 4, pp. 591–601, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Bharadwaj, B. C. Goswami, and K. Bhuyan, “Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancers in association with different clinicopathological parameters,” Oncology Journal of India, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 13, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Spring, G. Fell, A. Arfe et al., “Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival: a comprehensive meta-analysis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2838–2848, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Straver, E. J. T. Rutgers, S. Rodenhuis et al., “The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2411–2418, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Torrisi, E. Marrazzo, E. Agostinetto et al., “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: when, why and what?” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 160, p. 103280, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Grover, K. Phan, T. Magge et al., “Association of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a retrospective study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 39, 15_suppl, p. e12621, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Tekyol, G. Gurleyik, A. Aktaş, F. Aker, E. Tanrikulu, and D. Tekyol, “Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and molecular subtypes,” Cureus, vol. 30, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-S. Hamy, L. Darrigues, E. Laas et al., “Prognostic value of the residual cancer burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 6, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Marra and G. Curigliano, “Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer with chemotherapy,” The Cancer Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Khoury, V. Nagrale, M. Opyrchal, X. Peng, D. Wang, and S. Yao, “Prognostic significance of stromal versus intratumoral infiltrating lymphocytes in different subtypes of breast cancer treated with cytotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 523–532, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Honda, S. Kurozumi, A. Katayama et al., “Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer,” Molecular and Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 252, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Z. Hua, L. C. Xin, M. Liu, and J. J. Yuan, “Predictive and prognostic role of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis,” BMC Cancer, vol. 20, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Loi, S. Dushyanthen, P. A. Beavis et al., “RAS/MAPK activation is associated with reduced tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic cooperation between MEK and PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1499–1509, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. Ali, A. Dariush, J. Thomas et al., “Lymphocyte density determined by computational pathology validated as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: secondary analysis of the ARTemis trial,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1832–1835, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-S. Hamy, H. Bonsang-Kitzis, D. De Croze et al., “Interaction between molecular subtypes and stromal immune infiltration before and after treatment in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 6731–6741, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. S. Stovgaard, K. Asleh, N. Riaz et al., “The immune microenvironment and relation to outcome in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine,” Oncoimmunology, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Goff and D. N. Danforth, “The role of immune cells in breast tissue and immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer,” Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. e63–e73, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Laenkholm, G. Callagy, M. Balancin et al., “Incorporation of TILs in daily breast cancer care: how much evidence can we bear?” Virchows Archiv, vol. 480, no. 1, pp. 147–162, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ishigami, M. Sakakibara, J. Sakakibara et al., “Coexistence of regulatory B cells and regulatory T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte aggregates is a prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer,” Breast Cancer, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 180–189, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mao, Q. Qu, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, X. Chen, and K. Shen, “The value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, article e115103, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. R. West, K. Milne, P. T. Truong, N. Macpherson, B. H. Nelson, and P. H. Watson, “Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 6, p. R126, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Koletsa, V. Kotoula, G.-A. Koliou et al., “Prognostic impact of stromal and intratumoral CD3, CD8 and FOXP3 in adjuvantly treated breast cancer: do they add information over stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density?” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1549–1564, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. O. Nielsen, S. C. Y. Leung, D. L. Rimm et al., “Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: updated recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 808–819, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Denkert, S. Loibl, B. M. Müller et al., “Ki67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2786–2793, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Aya Elmahs et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

823

Downloads

874

Citations