Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2006, Article ID 35290, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/35290

Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
2Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7055, USA

Received 27 August 2005; Revised 26 June 2006; Accepted 6 July 2006

Academic Editor: Yibin Zheng

Copyright © 2006 Donglai Huo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. E. Bishop, G. E. Santyr, F. Kelcz, and D. B. Plewes, “Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 716–723, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. L. Duerk, J. S. Lewin, and D. H. Wu, “Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 918–924, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. J. van Vaals, M. E. Brummer, W. T. Dixon et al., “Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 671–675, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. L. P. Panych, P. D. Jakab, and F. A. Jolesz, “Implementation of wavelet-encoded MR imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 649–655, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. B. Weaver, Y. Xu, D. M. Healy, and J. R. Driscoll, “Wavelet-encoded MR imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 275–287, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Shankaranarayanan, O. P. Simonetti, G. Laub, J. S. Lewin, and J. L. Duerk, “Segmented k-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories,” Radiology, vol. 221, no. 3, pp. 827–836, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Shankaranarayanan, M. Wendt, A. J. Aschoff, J. S. Lewin, and J. L. Duerk, “Radial keyhole sequences for low field projection reconstruction interventional MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 142–151, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. H. Meyer, B. S. Hu, D. G. Nishimura, and A. Macovski, “Fast spiral coronary artery imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 202–213, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. D. Gatehouse, D. N. Firmin, S. Collins, and D. B. Longmore, “Real time blood flow imaging by spiral scan phase velocity mapping,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 504–512, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. H. Glover and S. Lai, “Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 361–368, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. K. P. Pruessmann, M. Weiger, M. B. Scheidegger, and P. Boesiger, “SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 952–962, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. D. K. Sodickson and W. J. Manning, “Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 591–603, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. G. H. Glover and A. T. Lee, “Motion artifacts in fMRI: comparison of 2DFT with PR and spiral scan methods,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 624–635, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Börnert, B. Aldefeld, and K. Nehrke, “Improved 3D spiral imaging for coronary MR angiography,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 172–175, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. I. Jackson, C. H. Meyer, D. G. Nishimura, and A. Macovski, “Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 473–478, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Oesterle, M. Markl, R. Strecker, F. M. Kraemer, and J. Hennig, “Spiral reconstruction by regridding to a large rectilinear matrix: a practical solution for routine systems,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 84–92, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Rosenfeld, “An optimal and efficient new gridding algorithm using singular value decomposition,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. V. Rasche, R. Proksa, R. Sinkus, P. Boernert, and H. Eggers, “Resampling of data between arbitrary grids using convolution interpolation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 385–392, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. D. Hoge, R. K. S. Kwan, and G. B. Pike, “Density compensation functions for spiral MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. K. A. Salem, H. Moriguchi, J. L. Duerk, and D. L. Wilson, “Optimization of noisy nonuniform sampling and image reconstruction for fast MRI using a human vision model,” in Medical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance, vol. 4324 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 82–90, San Diego, Calif, USA, February 2001.
  21. G. E. Sarty, R. Bennett, and R. W. Cox, “Direct reconstruction of non-cartesian k-space data using a nonuniform fast fourier transform,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 908–915, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. C. J. van den Branden Lambrecht and O. Verscheure, “Perceptual quality measure using a spatiotemporal model of the human visual system,” in Digital Video Compression: Algorithms and Technologies, vol. 2668 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 450–461, San Jose, Calif, USA, January 1996.
  23. J. Lubin, “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, Ed., pp. 245–283, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  24. W. B. Jackson, M. R. Said, D. A. Jared, J. O. Larimer, J. L. Gille, and J. Lubin, “Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance,” in Medical Imaging 1997: Image Perception, vol. 3036 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 64–73, Newport Beach, Calif, USA, February 1997.
  25. J. P. Johnson, J. Lubin, E. A. Krupinski, H. A. Peterson, H. Roehrig, and A. Baysinger, “Visual discrimination model for digital mammography,” in Medical Imaging 1999: Image Perception and Performance, vol. 3663 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 253–263, San Diego, Calif, USA, February 1999.
  26. J. Oh, S. I. Woolley, T. N. Arvanitis, and J. N. Townend, “A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1352–1361, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Daly, “The visual differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, Ed., pp. 179–206, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  28. K. A. Salem, J. S. Lewin, A. J. Aschoff, J. L. Duerk, and D. L. Wilson, “Validation of a human vision model for image quality evaluation of fast interventional magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 224–235, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. K. A. Salem, J. L. Duerk, M. Wendt, and D. L. Wilson, “Evaluation of keyhole MR imaging with a human visual system response model,” Radiology, vol. 209P, p. 246, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  30. C. A. Flask, K. A. Salem, H. Moriguchi, J. S. Lewin, D. L. Wilson, and J. L. Duerk, “Keyhole Dixon method for faster, perceptually equivalent fat suppression,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. C. A. Flask, K. A. Salem, J. S. Lewin, and J. L. Duerk, “Keyhole Dixon method for faster fat suppression with perceptual equivalence,” Radiology, vol. 225, p. 314, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. P. Xue, C. W. Thomas, G. C. Gilmore, and D. L. Wilson, “An adaptive reference/test paradigm: application to pulsed fluoroscopy perception,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 332–348, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  33. Y. Jiang and D. L. Wilson, “Optimization of detector pixel size for stent visualization in x-ray fluoroscopy,” Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 668–678, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. R. Van de Walle, H. H. Barrett, K. J. Myers et al., “Reconstruction of MR images from data acquired on a general nonregular grid by pseudoinverse calculation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1160–1167, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. K. F. King, T. K. F. Foo, and C. R. Crawford, “Optimized gradient waveforms for spiral scanning,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 34, pp. 156–160, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. C. H. Hardy and H. E. Cline, “Broadband nuclear magnetic resonance pulses with two-dimensional spatial selectivity,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1513–1516, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. Macovski, “Noise in MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 494–497, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. D. Huo, D. Xu, Z.-P. Liang, and D. L. Wilson, “Application of perceptual difference model on regularization techniques of parallel MR imaging,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. L. Mannos and D. J. Sakrison, “The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 525–536, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. J. J. McCann, S. P. McKee, and T. H. Taylor, “Quantitative studies in retinex theory. A comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the “color mondrian” experiments,” Vision Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 445–458, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. A. B. Watson, “The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 311–327, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  42. R. A. Normann, B. S. Baxter, H. Ravindra, and P. J. Anderton, “Photoreceptor contributions to contrast sensitivity: applications in radiological diagnosis,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 944–953, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  43. ITU, “Recommendations ITU-R BT.500-11 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures,” 2002.
  44. J.-B. Martens and L. Meesters, “Image dissimilarity,” Signal Processing, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 155–176, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. A. E. Burgess, “Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods,” Medical Physics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 643–655, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. R. M. Manjeshwar and D. L. Wilson, “Effect of inherent location uncertainty on detection of stationary targets in noisy image sequences,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  47. Y. Srinivas and D. L. Wilson, “Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy,” Medical Physics, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1611–1621, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. D. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, Krieger, New York, NY, USA, 1974.
  49. J. P. Johnson, K. J. Kirchberg, and C. H. Lorenz, “Perceptual evaluation of artifacts in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging due to partial parallel imaging,” in Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, vol. 5749 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 549–556, San Diego, Calif, USA, February 2005.