Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2007, Article ID 12839, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/12839
Research Article

The Formula of Grangeat for Tensor Fields of Arbitrary Order in n Dimensions

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Helmut Schmidt University, P.O. Box 700822, Hamburg 22008, Germany

Received 18 October 2006; Revised 7 February 2007; Accepted 7 February 2007

Academic Editor: Alfred Karl Louis

Copyright © 2007 T. Schuster. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. K. Louis, “Filter design in three-dimensional cone beam tomography: circular scanning geometry,” Inverse Problems, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. S31–S40, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Katsevich, “Theoretically exact filtered backprojection-type inversion algorithm for spiral CT,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2012–2026, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Schuster, “An efficient mollifier method for three-dimensional vector tomography: convergence analysis and implementation,” Inverse Problems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 739–766, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. E. Yu. Derevtsov and I. G. Kashina, “Numerical solution to the vector tomography problem by tools of a polynomial basis,” Siberian Journal of Numerical Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 233–254, 2002 (Russian). View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Sparr, K. Stråhlén, K. Lindström, and H. W. Persson, “Doppler tomography for vector fields,” Inverse Problems, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1051–1061, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. E. Yu. Derevtsov, “An approach to direct reconstruction of a solenoidal part in vector and tensor tomography problems,” Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 213–246, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. G. Kazantsev and A. A. Bukhgeim, “Singular value decomposition for the 2D fan-beam Radon transform of tensor fields,” Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 245–278, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Grangeat, “Mathematical framework of cone beam 3D reconstruction via the first derivative of the Radon transform,” in Mathematical Methods in Tomography, G. T. Herman, A. K. Louis, and F. Natterer, Eds., vol. 1497 of Lecture Notes in Math., pp. 66–97, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  9. V. A. Sharafutdinov, Integral Geometry of Tensor Fields, VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.
  10. F. Natterer, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, NH, USA, 1986.
  11. F. Natterer and F. Wübbeling, Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2001.
  12. A. Denisjuk, “Inversion of the X-ray transform for 3D symmetric tensor fields with sources on a curve,” Inverse Problems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 399–411, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. K. Louis, “Approximate inverse for linear and some nonlinear problems,” Inverse Problems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 175–190, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Rieder and T. Schuster, “The approximate inverse in action III: 3D-Doppler tomography,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 353–378, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar