|
Analysis Method | Benefits | Drawbacks |
|
2-DE-MS and DIGE-MS (GB) | 1. DIGE minimizes gel-to-gel variation | 1. low-abundant protein identification |
2. DIGE produces better spot matching | 2. sensitive to experimental and technological variation |
3. allows for study of protein change on large scale | 3. laborious process |
4. strong resolving power | 4. difficulties automating procedure |
5. high sensitivity | 5. protein comigration |
6. low equipment cost | 6. study replication may be prohibitive |
|
LC-MS and LC-MS/MS (GB) | 1. fast procedure | 1. difficulty analyzing low-abundance proteins |
2. easily automated high resolution measurements | 2. not quantitative |
3. Expensive machines |
3. MS/MS improves the detection limits for some compounds | 4. MS/MS spectrum TIC decreased compared to MS spectrum TIC |
4. MS/MS improves S/N ratio relative to MS | 5. Ion activation methods affect spectra efficiency, reproducibility, feature detection |
|
ICAT (NGB) | 1. accurate relative quantification | 1. missed identification of proteins containing little to no cysteine residue (i.e., cysteine-content biased) |
2. reduces peptide mixture complexity |
3. compatible with various fractionation methods | 2. posttranslational modifications missed |
4. at least as sensitive as DIGE | 3. complex interpretation of MS/MS spectra when biotin group added |
| 4. noise impacts peak detection for ICAT peaks with low expression levels |
| 5. compounds may dilute through LC column at different speeds |
|
iTRAQ (NGB) | 1. greater sensitivity than DIGE and ICAT | 1. occasional inherent problem due to timed-ion selector resolution of tandem mass spectrometer |
2. can perform relative or absolute quantification in four phenotypes | 2. compounds may dilute through LC column at different speeds |
|
MudPIT (NGB) | 1. orthogonality of the chromatographic phases in the separation process | 1. does not allow for identification of the site at which probe labeling occurs |
2. robust representation of separated proteins peptides, from complex peptides | 2. since the proteins are broken down to their component, any information about modifications and isoforms is lost. |
| 3. large computing power required to complete database searching |
| 4. the approach is generally limited to use with organisms that have complete genome sequence data available for searching |
|