International Journal of Biomaterials

International Journal of Biomaterials / 2012 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 926059 |

Victor W. Wong, Benjamin Levi, Jayakumar Rajadas, Michael T. Longaker, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, "Stem Cell Niches for Skin Regeneration", International Journal of Biomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 926059, 8 pages, 2012.

Stem Cell Niches for Skin Regeneration

Academic Editor: Kadriye Tuzlakoglu
Received15 Jan 2012
Accepted08 Apr 2012
Published03 Jun 2012


Stem cell-based therapies offer tremendous potential for skin regeneration following injury and disease. Functional stem cell units have been described throughout all layers of human skin and the collective physical and chemical microenvironmental cues that enable this regenerative potential are known as the stem cell niche. Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge, interfollicular epidermis, dermal papillae, and perivascular space have been closely investigated as model systems for niche-driven regeneration. These studies suggest that stem cell strategies for skin engineering must consider the intricate molecular and biologic features of these niches. Innovative biomaterial systems that successfully recapitulate these microenvironments will facilitate progenitor cell-mediated skin repair and regeneration.

1. Introduction

Skin serves as the interface with the external world and maintains key homeostatic functions throughout life. This regenerative process is often overlooked until a significant exogenous and/or physiologic insult disrupts our ability to maintain skin homeostasis [1]. Complications of normal repair often result in chronic wounds, excessive scarring, or even malignant transformation, cutaneous diseases that contribute substantially to the global health burden [2, 3]. As human populations prone to inadequate healing (such as the aged, obese, and diabetics) continue to expand, novel therapies to treat dysfunctional skin repair and regeneration will become more critical.

Tissue regeneration has been demonstrated in multiple invertebrate and vertebrate species [4]. In humans, even complex tissues can regenerate without any permanent sequelae, such as liver, nerves, and skin. Although the typical result after significant organ injury is the formation of scar, regeneration after extensive skin and soft tissue trauma has been reported, most notably after digit tip amputation [5]. It is well accepted that human skin maintains the ability to regenerate; the question for researchers and clinicians is how to harness this potential to treat cutaneous injury and disease.

The integumentary system is a highly complex and dynamic system composed of myriad cell types and matrix components. Numerous stem cell populations have been identified in skin and current research indicates that these cells play a vital role in skin development, repair, and homeostasis [1, 6, 7]. In general, stem cells are defined by their ability to self-renew and their capacity to differentiate into function-specific daughter cells. These progenitor cells have been isolated from all skin layers (epidermis, dermis, hypodermis) and have unique yet complimentary roles in maintaining skin integrity. The promise of regenerative medicine lies in the ability to understand and regulate these stem cell populations to promote skin regeneration [4].

2. Stem Cells in Wound Healing

Wound healing is a highly regulated process that is thought to be mediated in part by stem cells [8, 9]. This has prompted researchers to examine the use of stem cells to augment skin repair following injury. Preclinical studies have suggested that the secretion of paracrine factors is the major mechanism by which stem cells enhance repair [10, 11]. Consistent with this hypothesis, conditioned media from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to promote wound healing via activation of host cells [11, 12]. Clinical studies have suggested that topical delivery of MSCs may improve chronic wound healing [1315] and multiple groups have demonstrated the benefit of using recombinant cytokines (many of which are known to be secreted by stem cells) in patients with recalcitrant wounds [16]. However, more research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which stem cell therapies might improve wound healing in humans.

For example, the extent of stem cell engraftment and differentiation following topical delivery remains unclear. In one study, bone-marrow-derived allogeneic MSCs injected into cutaneous wounds in mice were shown to express keratinocyte-specific proteins and contributed to the formation of glandular structures after injury [17]. Although long-term engraftment was poor (only 2.5% of MSCs remained engrafted after four weeks), levels of secreted proangiogenic factors were greater in MSC-treated wounds. Our laboratory has demonstrated that local injection of allogeneic MSCs improved early wound closure in mice but that injected MSCs contributed to less than 1% of total wound cells after four weeks [18]. Taken together, these studies suggest that the benefits observed with stem cell injections are the result of early cytokine release rather than long-term engraftment and differentiation.

One potential reason for the transient presence of exogenous stem cells is the absence of proper contextual cues after cells are delivered into the wound. The dynamic microenvironment, or niche, of stem cells is responsible for regulating their “stem-like” behavior throughout life [19, 20]. This niche is comprised of adjacent cells (stem and nonstem cells), signaling molecules, matrix architecture, physical forces, oxygen tension, and other environmental factors (Figure 1). A useful analogy is the “seed versus soil” paradigm in which seeds (stem cells) will only thrive in the proper chemical and physical soil environment (wound bed) [4]. Clearly, we need to better define what these niches are and how they dictate cell behavior to fully realize the potential of progenitor cell therapies.

3. The Epidermal Stem Cell Niche

The epidermis is comprised of at least three major stem cell populations: the hair follicle bulge, the sebaceous gland, and the basal layer of interfollicular epithelium [21]. Because these subpopulations are responsible for regulating epithelial stratification, hair folliculogenesis, and wound repair throughout life [22], the epidermis has become a model system to study regeneration. Elegant lineage tracing and gene mapping experiments have elucidated key programs in epidermal homeostasis. Specifically, components of the wingless-type (Wnt)/β-catenin, sonic hedgehog (Shh), and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathways appear to be particularly relevant to epidermal stem cell function [1, 22, 23]. Microarray analyses have even indicated that hair follicle stem cells share some of the same transcriptomes as other tissue-specific stem cells [24], suggesting that conserved molecular machinery may control how environmental stimuli regulate the stem cell niche [25].

Epithelial stem cells from the bulge, sebaceous gland, and basal epithelium have common features, including expression of K5, K14, and p63, and their intimate association with an underlying basement membrane (BM) [26]. These cells reside in the basal layer of stratified epithelium and exit their niche during differentiation [26]. This process is mediated in part by BM components such as laminin and cell surface transmembrane integrins that control cell polarity, anchorage, proliferation, survival, and motility [27, 28]. Epithelial progenitor cells are also characterized by elevated expression of E-cadherin in adherens junctions and reduced levels of desmosomes [29], underscoring the importance of both extracellular and intercellular cues in stem cell biology.

In addition to complex intraepithelial networks, signals from the dermis (e.g., periodic expression of BMP2 and BMP4) are thought to regulate epithelial processes [30]. Dermal-derived stem cells may even differentiate into functional epidermal melanocytes [31], suggesting that mesenchymal-epithelial transitions may underlie skin homeostasis, as has been shown in hepatic stem cells [32]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that irreversibly committed progeny from an epithelial stem cell lineage may be “recycled” and contribute back to the regenerative niche [33], further highlighting the complexity of the epidermal regeneration.

4. The Dermal Niche

In contrast to the highly cellular nature of the epidermis, the dermis is composed of a heterogeneous matrix of collagens, elastins, and glycosaminoglycans interspersed with cells of various embryonic origin. Recent studies suggest that a cell population within the dermal papilla of hair follicles may function as adult dermal stem cells. This dermal unit contains at least three unique populations of progenitor cells differentiated by the type of hair follicle produced and the expression of the transcription factor Sox2 [34]. Sox2-expressing cells are associated with Wnt, BMP, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling whereas Sox2-negative cells utilize Shh, insulin growth factor (IGF), Notch, and integrin pathways [35, 36]. Skin-derived precursor (SKP) cells have also been isolated from dermal papillae and can be differentiated into adipocytes, smooth myocytes, and neurons in vitro [37, 38]. These cells are thought to originate in part from the neural crest and have been shown to exit the dermal papilla niche and contribute to cutaneous repair [39].

Researchers have also demonstrated that perivascular sites in the dermis may act as an MSC-like niche in human scalp skin [40]. These perivascular cells express both NG2 (a pericyte marker) and CD34 (an MSC and hematopoietic stem cell marker) and are predominantly located around hair follicles. Perivascular MSC-like cells have been shown to protect their local matrix microenvironment via tissue-inhibitor-of-metalloproteinase (TIMP-) mediated inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) pathways, suggesting the importance of the extracellular matrix (ECM) niche in stem cell function [41]. Interestingly, even fibroblasts have been shown to maintain multilineage potential in vitro and may play important roles in skin regeneration that have yet to be discovered [42, 43].

5. The Adipose Niche

The ability to harvest progenitor cells from adipose tissues is highly appealing due to its relative availability (obesity epidemic in the developed world) and ease of harvest (lipoaspiration). Secreted cytokines from adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have been shown to promote fibroblast migration during wound healing and to upregulate VEGF-related neovascularization in animal models [44]. ASCs have even been harvested from human burn wounds and shown to engraft into cutaneous wounds in a rat model [45]. Although these multipotent cells have only been relatively recently identified, they exhibit significant potential for numerous applications in skin repair [46].

ASCs are often isolated from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of homogenized fat tissue. These multipotent cells are closely associated with perivascular cells and maintain the potential to differentiate into smooth muscle, endothelium, adipose tissue, cartilage, and bone [47, 48]. Researchers have attempted to recreate the ASC niche using fibrin matrix organ culture systems to sustain adipose tissue [49]. Using this in vitro system, multipotent stem cells were isolated from the interstitium between adipocytes and endothelium, consistent with the current hypothesis that ASCs derive from a perivascular niche.

Detailed immunohistological studies have demonstrated that stem cell markers (e.g., STRO-1, Wnt5a, SSEA1) are differentially expressed in capillaries, arterioles, and arteries within adipose tissue, suggesting that ASCs may actually be vascular stem cells at diverse stages of differentiation [50]. Adipogenic and angiogenic pathways appear to be concomitantly regulated and adipocytes secrete multiple cytokines that induce blood vessel formation including vascular endothelial-derived growth factor (VEGF), FGF2, BMP2, and MMPs [51, 52]. Additionally, cell surface expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) has been linked to these putative mural stem cells [53]. Reciprocal crosstalk between endothelial cells and ASCs may regulate blood vessel formation [54] and immature adipocytes have been shown to control hair follicle stem cell activity through PDGF signaling [55]. Taken together, these studies indicate that the ASC niche is intimately associated with follicular and vascular homeostasis but further studies are needed to precisely define its role in skin homeostasis [48].

6. Engineering Niches through Biomaterials

Strategies to recapitulate the complex microenvironments of stem cells are essential to maximize their therapeutic potential. Biomaterial-based approaches can precisely regulate the spatial and temporal cues that define a functional niche [56]. Sophisticated fabrication and bioengineering techniques have allowed researchers to generate complex three-dimensional environments to regulate stem cell fate. As the physicochemical gradients, matrix components, and surrounding cells constituting stem cell niches in skin are further elucidated (Table 1), tissue engineered systems will need to be increasingly scalable, tunable, and modifiable to mimic these dynamic microenvironments [5761]. A detailed discussion of different biomaterial techniques for tissue engineering is beyond the scope of this paper, but we refer to reader to several excellent papers on the topic [6270].

In situ locationEpidermal stem cellDermal stem cellAdipose stem cell
Hair follicle bulgeDermal papillaPerivascular/vascular

Signaling pathwaysWntWntVEGF

Surface and structural proteinsK5NG2CD29
CD34CD133Integrin α6β1

Potential matrix componentsLamininFibrin
Collagen IVCollagen I
Collagen XVII

Wnt: wingless-type; Shh: sonic hedgehog; BMP: bone morphogenetic protein; TGFβ: transforming growth factor β, VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; FGF: fibroblast growth factor; IGF: insulin-like growth factor; PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor; PPARγ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; Timp: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases.

One matrix component thought to regulate interactions between hair follicle stem cells and melanocyte stem cells is the hemidesmosomal collagen XVII [71]. Collagen XVII controls their physical interactions and maintains the self-renewal capacity of hair follicles via TGF-β, indicating that biomaterial scaffolds containing collagen XVII may be necessary for stem cell-mediated hair follicle therapies. Another matrix component implicated in the hair follicle niche is nephronectin, a protein deposited into the underlying basement membrane by bulge stem cells to regulate cell adhesion via α8β1 integrins [72]. Hyaluronic acid fibers have been incorporated into collagen hydrogels to promote epidermal organization following keratinocyte seeding [73], and in vitro studies have demonstrated the critical role of collagen IV in promoting normal epithelial architecture when keratinocytes are grown on fibroblast-populated dermal matrices [74]. These studies collectively suggest that tissue engineered matrices for skin regeneration will need to recapitulate the complex BM-ECM interactions that define niche biology [75].

The role of MSCs in engineering skin equivalents has been studied using either cell-based or collagen-based dermal equivalents as the scaffolding environment [76]. When these constructs were grown with keratinocytes in vitro, only the collagen-based MSCs promoted normal epidermal and dermal structure, leading the authors to emphasize the “necessity of an instructive biomaterial-based scaffold to direct stem cell differentiation, proliferation, paracrine activity [and] ECM deposition [76].” Our laboratory has reported that MSCs seeded into dermal-patterned hydrogels maintain greater expression of the stem cell transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4 as compared to those grown on two-dimensional surfaces [18]. MSCs seeded into these niche-like scaffolds also exhibited superior angiogenic properties compared to injected cells [18], indicating that stem cell efficacy may be enhanced with biomaterial strategies to recapitulate the niche. Another study demonstrated that ASC delivery in natural-based scaffolds (dermis or small intestine submucosa) resulted in improved wound healing compared to gelatin-based scaffolds, suggesting the importance of “biologically accurate” architecture for stem cell delivery [77].

Researchers have developed novel three-dimensional microfluidic devices to study perivascular stem cell niches in vitro [78]. For example, MSCs seeded with endothelial cells in fibrin gels were able to induce neovessel formation within microfluidic chambers through α6β1 integrin and laminin-based interactions. Fibrin-based gels have also been used to study ASC and endothelial cell interactions in organ culture [49] and to control ASC differentiation in the absence of exogenous growth factors, demonstrating the importance of the three-dimensional matrix environment in regulating the ASC niche [79]. These studies indicate that the therapeutic use of ASCs in skin repair will likely be enhanced with biomaterial systems that optimize these cell-cell and cell-matrix contacts.

Finally, it must be recognized that the wound environment is exceedingly harsh and often characterized by inflammation, high bacterial loads, disrupted matrix, and/or poor vascularity. In this context, it should not be surprising that injection of “naked” stem cells into this toxic environment does not produce durable therapeutic benefits. Our laboratory has shown that the high oxidative stress conditions of ischemic wounds can be attenuated with oxygen radical-quenching biomaterial scaffolds that also deliver stem cells [80]. Other researchers have shown that oxygen tension, pH levels, and even wound electric fields may influence stem cell biology, suggesting that the future development of novel sensor devices will allow even finer control of chemical microgradients within engineered niches [70, 81]. It is also important to acknowledge that current research on niche biology has been performed largely in culture systems or rodent models, findings that will need to be rigorously confirmed in human tissues before clinical use.

As interdisciplinary fields such as material science, computer modeling, molecular biology, chemical engineering, and nanotechnology coordinate their efforts, multifaceted biomaterials will undoubtedly be able to better replicate tissue-specific niche environments. Recent studies suggest that the cells necessary for skin regeneration are locally derived [5], indicating that adult resident cells alone may have the ability to recreate skin (Figure 2). Thus, the ability to engineer the proper environment for skin stem cells truly has the potential to enable regenerative outcomes. We believe that next-generation biomaterial scaffolds will not only passively deliver stem cells but also must actively modify the physicochemical milieu to create a “therapeutic” niche.

7. Conclusion

Current research indicates that skin regeneration is highly dependent upon interactions between resident progenitor cells and their niche. These microenvironmental cues dictate stem cell function in both health and disease states. Early progress has been made in elucidating skin compartment-specific niches but a detailed understanding of their molecular and structural biology remains incomplete. Biomaterials will continue to play a central role in regenerative medicine by providing the framework upon which to reconstruct functional niches. Future challenges include the characterization and recapitulation of these dynamic environments using engineered constructs to maximize the therapeutic potential of stem cells.


  1. C. Blanpain and E. Fuchs, “Epidermal homeostasis: a balancing act of stem cells in the skin,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 207–217, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. K. Sen, G. M. Gordillo, S. Roy et al., “Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 763–771, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Aarabi, M. T. Longaker, and G. C. Gurtner, “Hypertrophic scar formation following burns and trauma: new approaches to treatment,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 9, article e234, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. C. Gurtner, S. Werner, Y. Barrandon, and M. T. Longaker, “Wound repair and regeneration,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7193, pp. 314–321, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Rinkevich, P. Lindau, H. Ueno, M. T. Longaker, and I. L. Weissman, “Germ-layer and lineage-restricted stem/progenitors regenerate the mouse digit tip,” Nature, vol. 476, pp. 409–413, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  6. E. Fuchs and J. A. Nowak, “Building epithelial tissues from skin stem cells,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol. 73, pp. 333–350, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. X. Yan and D. M. Owens, “The skin: a home to multiple classes of epithelial progenitor cells,” Stem Cell Reviews, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Ito, Y. Liu, Z. Yang et al., “Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1351–1354, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Levy, C. Lindon, B. D. Harfe, and B. A. Morgan, “Distinct stem cell populations regenerate the follicle and interfollicular epidermis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 855–861, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. M. Hocking and N. S. Gibran, “Mesenchymal stem cells: paracrine signaling and differentiation during cutaneous wound repair,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 316, no. 14, pp. 2213–2219, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Chen, E. E. Tredget, P. Y. G. Wu, Y. Wu, and Y. Wu, “Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 4, Article ID e1886, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. S. Yoon, J. H. Moon, E. K. Jun et al., “Secretory profiles and wound healing effects of human amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 887–902, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. V. Badiavas and V. Falanga, “Treatment of chronic wounds with bone marrow-derived cells,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 510–516, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. R. Dash, S. N. Dash, P. Routray, S. Mohapatra, and P. C. Mohapatra, “Targeting nonhealing ulcers of lower extremity in human through autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Rejuvenation Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 359–366, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. V. Falanga, S. Iwamoto, M. Chartier et al., “Autologous bone marrow-derived cultured mesenchymal stem cells delivered in a fibrin spray accelerate healing in murine and human cutaneous wounds,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1299–1312, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Werner and R. Grose, “Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 835–870, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Y. Wu, L. Chen, P. G. Scott, and E. E. Tredget, “Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2648–2659, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. C. Rustad, V. W. Wong, M. Sorkin et al., “Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  19. L. Li and T. Xie, “Stem cell niche: structure and function,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 21, pp. 605–631, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. A. Moore and I. R. Lemischka, “Stem cells and their niches,” Science, vol. 311, no. 5769, pp. 1880–1885, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. Fuchs, “Skin stem cells: rising to the surface,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 273–284, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Blanpain and E. Fuchs, “Epidermal stem cells of the skin,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 22, pp. 339–373, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Yang and R. Peng, “Unveiling hair follicle stem cells,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 658–664, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. J. Morris, Y. Liu, L. Marles et al., “Capturing and profiling adult hair follicle stem cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 411–417, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Tumbar, G. Guasch, V. Greco et al., “Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5656, pp. 359–363, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. E. Fuchs, “Finding one's niche in the skin,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 499–502, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Margadant, R. A. Charafeddine, and A. Sonnenberg, “Unique and redundant functions of integrins in the epidermis,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 4133–4152, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. V. Marthiens, I. Kazanis, L. Moss, K. Long, and C. Ffrench-Constant, “Adhesion molecules in the stem cell niche—more than just staying in shape?” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 1613–1622, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Jamora, R. DasGupta, P. Kocieniewski, and E. Fuchs, “Links between signal transduction, transcription and adhesion in epithelial bud development,” Nature, vol. 422, no. 6929, pp. 317–322, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. V. Plikus, J. A. Mayer, D. de la Cruz et al., “Cyclic dermal BMP signalling regulates stem cell activation during hair regeneration,” Nature, vol. 451, no. 7176, pp. 340–344, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. Li, M. Fukunaga-Kalabis, H. Yu et al., “Human dermal stem cells differentiate into functional epidermal melanocytes,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 853–860, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B. Li, Y. W. Zheng, Y. Sano, and H. Taniguchi, “Evidence for mesenchymal-epithelial transition associated with mouse hepatic stem cell differentiation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 2, Article ID e17092, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. C. Hsu, H. A. Pasolli, and E. Fuchs, “Dynamics between stem cells, niche, and progeny in the hair follicle,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 92–105, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. C. Kellner and P. A. Coulombe, “SKPing a hurdle: Sox2 and adult dermal stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 569–570, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. R. Driskell, A. Giangreco, K. B. Jensen, K. W. Mulder, and F. M. Watt, “Sox2-positive dermal papilla cells specify hair follicle type in mammalian epidermis,” Development, vol. 136, no. 16, pp. 2815–2823, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Biernaskie, M. Paris, O. Morozova et al., “SKPs derive from hair follicle precursors and exhibit properties of adult dermal stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 610–623, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. G. Toma, M. Akhavan, K. J. L. Fernandes et al., “Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 778–784, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. J. L. Fernandes, I. A. McKenzie, P. Mill et al., “A dermal niche for multipotent adult skin-derived precursor cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1082–1093, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. G. Toma, I. A. McKenzie, D. Bagli, and F. D. Miller, “Isolation and characterization of multipotent skin-derived precursors from human skin,” Stem Cells, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 727–737, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. Yamanishi, S. Fujiwara, and T. Soma, “Perivascular localization of dermal stem cells in human scalp,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 78–80, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  41. T. P. Lozito and R. S. Tuan, “Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit both endogenous and exogenous MMPs via secreted TIMPs,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 385–396, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Lorenz, M. Sicker, E. Schmelzer et al., “Multilineage differentiation potential of human dermal skin-derived fibroblasts,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 925–932, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. I. Huang, S. K. Chen, Q. D. Ling, C. C. Chien, H. T. Liu, and S. H. Chan, “Multilineage differentiation potential of fibroblast-like stromal cells derived from human skin,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1491–1501, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. E. Y. Lee, Y. Xia, W. S. Kim et al., “Hypoxia-enhanced wound-healing function of adipose-derived stem cells: Increase in stem cell proliferation and up-regulation of VEGF and bFGF,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 540–547, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Natesan, N. L. Wrice, D. G. Baer, and R. J. Christy, “Debrided skin as a source of autologous stem cells for wound repair,” Stem Cells, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1219–1230, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. H. Jeong, “Adipose stem cells and skin repair,” Current Stem Cell Research and Therapy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–140, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. C. W. Zannettino, S. Paton, A. Arthur et al., “Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 413–421, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. S. Lin, Z. C. Xin, C. H. Deng, H. Ning, G. Lin, and T. F. Lue, “Defining adipose tissue-derived stem cells in tissue and in culture,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 807–815, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  49. Y. I. Yang, H. I. Kim, M. Y. Choi et al., “Ex vivo organ culture of adipose tissue for in situ mobilization of adipose-derived stem cells and defining the stem cell niche,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 224, no. 3, pp. 807–816, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. Lin, M. Garcia, H. Ning et al., “Defining stem and progenitor cells within adipose tissue,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1053–1063, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W. Tang, D. Zeve, J. M. Suh et al., “White fat progenitor cells reside in the adipose vasculature,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5901, pp. 583–586, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Y. Cao, “Angiogenesis modulates adipogenesis and obesity,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 2362–2368, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. K. Jain, “Molecular regulation of vessel maturation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 685–693, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. O. Traktuev, D. N. Prater, S. Merfeld-Clauss et al., “Robust functional vascular network formation in vivo by cooperation of adipose progenitor and endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 1410–1420, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. E. Festa, J. Fretz, R. Berry et al., “Adipocyte lineage cells contribute to the skin stem cell niche to drive hair cycling,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 761–771, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  56. E. S. Place, N. D. Evans, and M. M. Stevens, “Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering,” Nature Materials, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 457–470, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Charruyer and R. Ghadially, “Stem cells and tissue-engineered skin,” Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 55–62, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. R. A. F. Clark, K. Ghosh, and M. G. Tonnesen, “Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1018–1029, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. Dieckmann, R. Renner, L. Milkova, and J. C. Simon, “Regenerative medicine in dermatology: biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, gene transfer and beyond,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 697–706, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. P. Glotzbach, V. W. Wong, G. C. Gurtner, and M. T. Longaker, “Regenerative Medicine,” Current Problems in Surgery, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 148–212, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. D. Metcalfe and M. W. J. Ferguson, “Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 413–437, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. E. L. Chaikof, H. Matthew, J. Kohn, A. G. Mikos, G. D. Prestwich, and C. M. Yip, “Biomaterials and scaffolds in reparative medicine,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 961, pp. 96–105, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  63. E. Dawson, G. Mapili, K. Erickson, S. Taqvi, and K. Roy, “Biomaterials for stem cell differentiation,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 215–228, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. D. Metcalfe and M. W. J. Ferguson, “Bioengineering skin using mechanisms of regeneration and repair,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 34, pp. 5100–5113, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. F. Williams, “On the nature of biomaterials,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 30, pp. 5897–5909, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. R. Langer and D. A. Tirrell, “Designing materials for biology and medicine,” Nature, vol. 428, no. 6982, pp. 487–492, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. P. Domachuk, K. Tsioris, F. G. Omenetto, and D. L. Kaplan, “Bio-microfluidics: biomaterials and biomimetic designs,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 249–260, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. T. Dvir, B. P. Timko, D. S. Kohane, and R. Langer, “Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. X. Ma, “Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 184–198, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Peerani and P. W. Zandstra, “Enabling stem cell therapies through synthetic stem cell-niche engineering,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. S. Tanimura, Y. Tadokoro, K. Inomata et al., “Hair follicle stem cells provide a functional niche for melanocyte stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. H. Fujiwara, M. Ferreira, G. Donati et al., “The basement membrane of hair follicle stem cells is a muscle cell niche,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 577–589, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. H. J. Stark, K. Boehnke, N. Mirancea et al., “Epidermal homeostasis in long-term scaffold-enforced skin equivalents,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. N. Segal, F. Andriani, L. Pfeiffer et al., “The basement membrane microenvironment directs the normalization and survival of bioengineered human skin equivalents,” Matrix Biology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 163–170, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Kruegel and N. Miosge, “Basement membrane components are key players in specialized extracellular matrices,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 67, no. 17, pp. 2879–2895, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. R. K. Schneider, J. Anraths, R. Kramann et al., “The role of biomaterials in the direction of mesenchymal stem cell properties and extracellular matrix remodelling in dermal tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 31, pp. 7948–7959, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. Y. Zhou, Z. Yan, H. Zhang et al., “Expansion and delivery of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on three microcarriers for soft tissue regeneration,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 17, no. 23-24, pp. 2981–2997, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  78. B. Carrion, C. P. Huang, C. M. Ghajar et al., “Recreating the perivascular niche ex vivo using a microfluidic approach,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1020–1028, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. S. Natesan, G. Zhang, D. G. Baer, T. J. Walters, R. J. Christy, and L. J. Suggs, “A bilayer construct controls adipose-derived stem cell differentiation into endothelial cells and pericytes without growth factor stimulation,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 17, no. 7-8, pp. 941–953, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. V. W. Wong, K. C. Rustad, and J. P. Glotzbach, “Pullulan hydrogels improve mesenchymal stem cell delivery into high-oxidative-stress wounds,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1458–1466, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  81. L. Li and J. Jiang, “Stem cell niches and endogenous electric fields in tissue repair,” Frontiers of Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Victor W. Wong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.