International Journal of Brain Science

International Journal of Brain Science / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 217503 |

Jan de Weille, "On the Genesis of Neuroblastoma and Glioma", International Journal of Brain Science, vol. 2014, Article ID 217503, 14 pages, 2014.

On the Genesis of Neuroblastoma and Glioma

Academic Editor: João O. Malva
Received20 Sep 2013
Accepted29 Dec 2013
Published26 Mar 2014


As the emergence of cancer is most frequent in proliferating tissues, replication errors are considered to be at the base of this disease. This review concentrates mainly on two neural cancers, neuroblastoma and glioma, with completely different backgrounds that are well documented with respect to their ontogeny. Although clinical data on other cancers of the nervous system are available, usually little can be said about their origins. Neuroblastoma is initiated in the embryo at a moment when the nervous system (NS) is in full expansion and occasionally genomic damage can lead to neoplasia. Glioma, to the contrary, occurs in the adult brain supposed to be mostly in a postmitotic state. According to current consensus, neural stem cells located in the subventricular zone (SVZ) in the adult are thought to accumulate enough genomic mutations to diverge on a carcinogenic course leading to diverse forms of glioma. After weighing the pros and cons of this current hypothesis in this review, it will be argued that this may be improbable, yielding to the original old concept of glial origin of glioma.

1. The Origins of Neural Cancers

Several hypotheses on the origin of cancers in general and those of the nervous system in particular have been proposed in the last century [1]. Currently, most hypotheses are based on the idea that a cancer is the result of the accumulation of several mutations, estimated at about 6 [2]. For this accumulation to occur, the precancer cell must be a cell that divides regularly such as those that form the nervous system during embryogenesis. Neuroblastoma is a childhood cancer of the nervous system in which the N-myc protooncogene transcription factor (N-myc) is often overexpressed [3]. This transcription factor is essential during neurogenesis for the rapid expansion of progenitor cell populations. It is encoded by the neuroblastoma-derived myelocytomatosis oncogene (MYCN). Overexpression of MYCN in transgenic mice indeed causes neuroblastoma in their pups [4]. It has been speculated that glioma and glioblastoma might arise from astrocytes with appropriate genetic abnormalities because astrocytes and their progenitors were, for long, the only cell types known to be capable of replication in the adult NS [57]. Expression of a mutated, constitutively active, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in mice brain causes glioblastoma-like lesions [8] and infection with the viral oncogene v-ERB, a homologue of EGFR, initiates oligodendroglioma in mice [9].

Glial tumours are generally of a heterogeneous composition, containing cells with astrocytic, oligodendrocytic, and neuronal properties [1013], indicating the presence of multipotent cells within the tumour. These multipotent cells might be the result of progenitor cell dedifferentiation in an abnormal environment [14, 15] or by oncogenic mutation [11]. Since the discovery of neural multipotent cells in the adult NS [16], the hypothesis that mutations accumulated in stem cells and their more committed progenitor offspring are at the origin of tumours of the NS meets almost general consensus [2].

During the life of an organism, many cells are created and many chromosome copies are made, which are almost inevitably accompanied by error. Evolution has put into place four mechanisms to limit the propagation of DNA damage and the risk of mutation-driven, uncontrolled proliferation.

First, only a few trustworthy stem cells are allowed to maintain the potential to divide during all of the organism’s life span. This trustworthiness is achieved by dividing only rarely and by retaining the template copy of DNA at each (asymmetrical) division [17, 18]. Hence, because the original DNA is retained by the stem cell, no telomere erosion takes place and, with the exception of double strand breaks, no copy errors can occur. It is the daughter progenitor cell that receives the possibly faulty copy.

Second, a stem cell generates progenitor cells by asymmetrical division that subsequently divide a limited number of times (they have their telomeres eroded) and that progressively loose the potential to differentiate into more than one phenotype. Their differentiated offspring becomes senescent and eventually dies, preventing genomic errors that possibly occurred in the course of its existence to spread and to develop into malignancy.

Third, if important DNA damage occurs that cannot be repaired, interleukins are secreted invoking an immune response and removal of the deficient cell. When telomeres become too short, a similar DNA damage response is elicited which implies increased activity of the tumour suppressor p53/p21 pathway. Natural killers, macrophages, and T-cells contribute to clearance of deficient cells [19].

Fourth, stem cells in the adult reside in niches that exert constant control over these stem cells. Stem cells need signals from the niche, in particular, endothelial cells, for proliferation and the generation of progenitor cells [20, 21].

In a perfect world, the stem cell population in adults would never need to expand by symmetrical division, and cancer would probably not exist. However, even though stem cells have taken antiapoptotic measures [22], they sometimes need to be replenished by symmetrical division, presumably to compensate for losses due to disease or other stresses [23, 24] or because stem cells might give rise to two daughter progenitor cells every now and then, thus eliminating themselves [23].

The rare symmetrical divisions necessary to replenish the stem cell store are nevertheless often designated as the principal source of carcinogenesis. Six arguments sustaining this hypothesis have been advanced as follows.

One, it is clear that postmitotic cells such as neurones cannot accumulate the number of required mutations to become a cancer cell. Cells in proliferating tissue stop proliferating after a number of cycles and are often removed. This mechanism to prevent aberrant proliferation seems to work rather well since cancer is mostly an aged man’s disease [25, 26] even though several neural cancers are more frequent in early childhood than at adulthood [27]. It is likely that stem cells live long enough to accumulate the required number of mutations.

Two, stem cells are less apt to defend themselves against cytotoxic stress (of extracellular origin), because they use an error-prone DNA repair mechanism shared by quiescent cells, called nonhomologous end joining, as opposed to the more reliable homologous recombination used by proliferating cells [28].

Three, it has been shown experimentally that proliferating cells mutate more likely than senescent cells [2].

Four, cancers are clonal [29] and yet heterogeneous (e.g., neuron-, oligodendrocyte-, and astrocyte-like cells are present in GBM). Glioblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, and medulloblastoma give rise to these three cell types when put in culture [1013]. This suggests stem cell properties for at least a subpopulation in the cancer [10, 13, 29, 30].

Five, several authors suggest that the SVZ, where an important niche for adult neural stem cells is located, is the origin of glioma. Malignant glioma rarely occurs in the temporal lobe and the spinal cord [28]. It has been shown that subventricular zone cells cultured in neurobasal medium with EGF and bFGF spontaneously develop into cancer cells [31].

Six, with the exception of haematopoietic progenitors [32, 33], only germ and stem cells express telomerase, an enzyme that is also upregulated in a subpopulation of cancer cells [34].

Although several cancers may appear to result from the accumulation of mutations in stem cells, another set is likely due to mutations having occurred in more or less committed progenitors.

Firstly, Progenitor cells transfected with oncogenes such as myc and ras can develop into cancer cells [35]. A mutation that enhances -catenin in granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells causes chronic myeloid leukaemia [20].

Secondly, it has been observed that not all brain cancers are identical and that some appear to have limited differentiation potential: oligoastrocytoma and oligodendroglioma only give offspring that resemble oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. Neuroblastoma cells only display neuronal characteristics and do not differentiate into glial cells [4]. This suggests that the original cancer cells were not stem cells but mono- or bipotential progenitor cells that acquired self-renewal capacity [2].

2. Neuro- and Gliogenesis in the Embryo and the Neonate

As mentioned above, it seems most likely that transformation of a normal cell into a cancer cell occurs in proliferating tissues. For this reason, a period in life that should be especially cancer-prone is embryogenesis in which a single zygote evolves into an organism consisting of billions of cells. Indeed, several neural cancers are more frequent in newborn and children than in the adult, such as medulloblastoma [36], brainstem glioma [37, 38], ependymoma [39], retinoblastoma, and neuroblastoma [27, 40]. Low-grade glioma is a frequent CNS tumour in children. Other low-grade paediatric CNS tumours are pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour (DNET), desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma, and oligodendroglioma [41].

Upon fertilisation, the mammalian egg divides forming a 32-cell morula, which then differentiates into a blastula. The outer cells will connect to the placenta and form the amniotic sac, while the inner cell mass will form the embryo (Figure 1). During gastrulation the mesoderm is formed from the ectoderm by invagination through the primitive streak. FGF signalling is required for the induction of the axial mesoderm, which then forms the notochord [42]. The notochord secretes Noggin and Chordin. Ectodermal cells express both bone morphogenic protein 4 (Bmp4) and its receptor. Bmp4 signalling suppresses the expression of neural genes. Noggin and Chordin are capable of binding to Bmp4, which then fails to bind to its receptor. This then leads to the transcription of neural progenitor genes in the ectoderm [43] and the formation of the neural groove. Chordin is necessary for forebrain development. In mammals, Noggin plays a role in neural tube fusion and has relatively mild effects on neural development. After induction, the neural groove folds in, creating the neural tube. The neural groove borders are at the origin of migrating neural crest cells that later form the peripheral nervous system (PNS).

After its formation, the neural tube takes on dorsal-ventral polarity due to sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling. Shh is secreted by the notochord and induces the formation of the floor plate in the neural tube, which in its turn also commences to secrete Shh. The Shh gradient defines in a ventral to dorsal manner the fates of the neuronal tube cells. The neural crest fate is determined by low Shh in conjunction with high Bmp2&4 secreted by the close by ectoderm. The neural crest cells express, amongst others, Slug and Snail. FGF, secreted by the mesoderm, and Wnt signalling are also implicated in crest cell determination [44]. Those from the trunk give rise to the peripheral autonomic ganglia, neurones, glia cells, and Schwann cells. They also form the adrenal medulla, melanocytes, thyroid parafollicular cells, and smooth muscle cells. Crest cells from the head form teeth, bones of the skull, and the visceral skeleton (i.e., bones other than those of legs and arms). Together with the cranial placode cells, they form the cranial ganglia. A subset of neural crest cells within the trunk region, the sympathoadrenal lineage, contributes to the sympathetic ganglia and medullary region of the adrenal gland. This lineage of cells, also called committed sympathoadrenal progenitors (SAPs), is thought to be the origin of neuroblastoma. SAPs undergo an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). Snail and Slug are transcription factors that are at the base of EMT induction. They are also implied in the adoption of stem cell properties and metastasis of cancer cells [45, 46]. This EMT transition results in acquisition of enhanced migratory abilities, which allow the crest cells to leave the dorsal neural tube. Remarkably, DNA repair genes are downregulated during SAP migration, increasing the risk of genomic alterations [47]. At this time SAPs loose part of their multipotency, becoming restricted neural or melanocyte precursors [48]. Upon arrival of trunk SAPs in the mesenchyme lateral of the dorsal aorta, Bmp/Notch signals induce differentiation of these cells, which results in the creation of the primary sympathetic ganglion chain. Bmp-2, 4, and 7 induce the expression of Ascl1, a transcription factor transiently expressed throughout the autonomic progeny [49]. Shortly thereafter, Phox2a and b expression occurs in sympathoadrenal lineage cells. Phox2a is required for the production of enzymes in catecholamine biosynthesis (dopamine, (nor)adrenaline). Induction and differentiation of SAPs are due to a complex interplay of transcription factors and signalling pathways including FGF, Notch, Wnt, Ascl1, Phox2a, and Phox2b [48]. Phox2b mutations cause the congenital central hypoventilation syndrome [50]. The patients of this disease are predisposed to have neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroma, and ganglioneuroblastoma.

The early germinal zone of the NS consists of a single neuroepithelium layer that first expands by symmetrical division. The cells in this layer, the subventricular zone (SVZ), then transform into radial glia that by asymmetric division produce neurones in early embryogenesis and restricted progenitor daughter cells that produce up to six neurones each during later embryogenesis [5153]. Radial glia cells express RC2, Nestin, Blbp, and the glial markers Vimentin and GFAP [5456]. They remain in this state during neurogenesis by CBF1-mediated Notch signalling stimulated by reelin in the extracellular matrix [56] and by Delta1 expressed by migrating neurones as well as by ErbB and FGF signalling [1, 57]. Notch target genes prevent offspring from becoming neurones [58]. Notch signalling in the neuroepithelium is modulated by Numb protein that is asymmetrically distributed during radial glia division. Numb interacts with cytosolic ACBD3 during mitosis to temporarily suppress Notch signalling and to determine radial glia phenotype. After mitosis and retention of ACBD3 in the Golgi system, the young neuron synthesizes its own Numb, which, then, in the absence of cytosolic ACBD3, suppresses Notch signalling and thus enables neuronal differentiation [59]. Migration of young neurones to the pial face requires reelin secreted by Cajal-Retzius cells and doublecortin (Dcx) expressed by the young neurones. Around birth, SVZ radial glia cells mostly transform into astrocytes but also give rise to ependymal cells and oligodendrocytes [51, 60]. As mentioned before, the interplay between Bmp and Shh gradients determines the kind of daughter cell that will be produced. Regionalisation not only occurs to determine neuronal traits but has also been proposed to determine glial properties [53, 61]. At least two clearly distinct glial precursor cell types coexist at around E14 mouse embryonic stage. (1) The glial restricted precursor (GRP) which is negative for platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGF) and NG2 and gives rise to GalC+ oligodendrocytes, A2B5−/GFAP+ type1 astrocytes, and A2B5+/GFAP+ type 2 astrocytes. (2) The second precursor is the O-2A cell that stains positive for NG2, PDGF, and O4 and that, possibly via a not yet identified progenitor cell, generates GalC+/O4+/MBP+ oligodendrocytes and type 2 astrocytes [61, 62]. After birth, the radial glia cell transforms into a tripotent (stem) cell that generates neurones, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes [53]. In the early postnatal period, glial progenitors from the SVZ migrate to different places of the brain including neocortex, striatum, and hippocampus where most of them differentiate into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [63], leaving small dispersed populations of immature glial cells that persist in adulthood [62, 64, 65]. Glial progenitors migrate radially or follow the white matter [63], very akin to the mode of migration of glioma cells [60]. In the peri- and early postnatal period, when angiogenesis is elevated, most progenitors differentiate into astrocytes upon blood vessel contact [66]. This is followed later by a wave of oligodendrocyte differentiation.

Similar to the generation of neocortex neurones in the SVZ, hippocampal neurones are born in the subgranular zone (SGZ) via the generation of progenitor cells by SGZ radial astrocytes. They possibly also furnish oligodendrocyte and astrocyte progenitors [53].

Cerebellar neurone precursors (GNPCs) continue to proliferate after birth and give rise to granule neurones that express the Notch ligand Jagged1 [54]. They, too, migrate along radial glia from the SVZ to form a layer at the surface of the cerebellum that is called the external granular layer (EGL). The Purkinje cells in the EGL control the proliferation of the GNPCs through the release of sonic hedgehog (Shh). GNPCs from the upper rhombic lip of the SVZ are the source of Shh type of medulloblastoma, while GNPCs from the lower rhombic lip, which form brainstem nuclei, cause the Wnt type of medulloblastoma [67].

It has been shown that SVZ stem cells obtained from 8-day-old mice, maintained in vitro in the presence of EGF and bFGF, paradoxically increase in number by the formation of more committed progeny upon withdrawal of these mitogenic signals [68, 69]. Remarkably, this progeny transiently becomes hyperploid and shows other similarities with tumour cells such as changes in cell cycle genes and lack of contact inhibition of proliferation.

3. Neuro- and Gliogenesis in the Adult

Neural proliferation continues to take place in the adult SVZ, SGZ, and a zone lining the corpus callosum, named the subcallosal zone (SCZ) [70, 71] (Figure 2). Cells taken from the SCZ and grown in the presence of EGF and FGF form neurospheres containing self-renewing cells. They differentiate into neurones, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes upon withdrawal of the mitogens. The presence of dormant neural stem cells in other parts of the adult cortex may be suspected [72].

In contrast to the situation in the embryonic neuroepithelium where Notch promotes abundant NSC proliferation, Notch signalling in the adult SVZ, in conjunction with EGF and FGF signalling, keeps stem cells in a slowly proliferate state and also promotes astrocyte differentiation [52, 58]. Adult SVZ NSCs express markers such as Sox2, GFAP, and Nestin [73]. They do no longer stain for RC2 [74] and do not stain for CD133, an often acclaimed marker of stem cells [75]. A dozen splice variants of CD133 exist; two of which, s1 and s3, are present in the brain. The 115 kD s1 variant partakes in myelinisation in mature oligodendrocytes, while ependymal cells and a subpopulation of astrocytes express the 100 kD s3 form [76]. Adult SVZ NSCs are thought to reside in a special environment or stem cell niche that provides for their maintenance [21, 70, 73, 7779]. NSCs are surrounded by ependymal cells, a structure that is not present in nonneurogenic regions [80]. The NSCs contact both the ventricle and blood vessels, thus receiving signals from both sides. Vascular endothelial cells contribute soluble factors to the NSC niche, that is, pigment epithelium-derived factor, BDNF, erythropoietin, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Ependymal cells produce Noggin, which, by blocking Bmps secreted by NSCs, augments proliferation of NSCs and progenitors and stimulates neuronal differentiation at the expense of (also Bmp-induced) glial differentiation [81]. Autocrine bFGF signalling via tyrosine kinase receptors on SVZ NSCs stimulates the proliferation of these stem cells [54, 82, 83], while Notch signalling mediated by intermediate neural progenitor (INP) cells inhibits it. Hence, Notch signalling in the adult SVZ promotes stem cell dormancy rather than proliferation [8486]. The Number of INPs in the SVZ is positively regulated by stimulation of EGF receptors present on these cells that, via upregulation of Numb, antagonise Notch signalling. It has been shown that EGF-induced INP proliferation indirectly inhibits NSC proliferation [86]. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling is upregulated in secondary glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma [30, 87], particularly in so-called “neural cancer stem cells” [88]. The precise role of Shh signalling in normal SVZ proliferation is not very clear yet. Astrocytes taken from the SVZ and the SGZ of adult mice secrete Shh [72, 89] and neuroblast proliferation in the SVZ can be reduced by blocking Shh signalling or by ablation of the primary cilium, the centre of command of hedgehog-mediated signalling [90]. Shh plays a role in the migration of neuroblasts since it stimulates the secretion of Slit from INPs and astrocytes in the SVZ, which is a chemorepellent for migrating neuroblasts [60]. The patched receptor is present on migrating rostral stream neuroblasts [89] and on cells of the CA1-CA3 region of the hippocampus [91]. Rostral stream neuroblasts express Dcx as well [60].

Glia cells of the adult are born in dispersed gliogenic niches or from reactive astrocytes that are not restricted to the SVZ [64, 65]. Glial progenitors express PDGFR and A2B2 or NG2. They differentiate into astrocytes upon blood vessel contact or into oligodendrocytes in the absence thereof [66]. When they assume oligodendrocyte lineage, they express O4 [9294]. By retroviral labelling, it was shown that proliferating SCZ cells in vivo only give rise to oligodendrocytes and a few astrocytes but not to neurones [71]. However, after injury, GLAST+ cells from possibly the same region proliferate and generate tubulin III+ cells [95]. Astrocytes in damaged areas release Shh, IL-6, neuregulins, VEGF, and bFGF thus amplifying glial progenitor proliferation [62, 92] and their dedifferentiation into tripotent progenitors [96]. Neurogenesis and INP proliferation in the adult SVZ can be induced by stroke. It has been shown that occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, causing substantial damage and neuronal death in the striatum and parietal cortex, induces birth of neuroblasts and astrocytes in the SVZ [84, 97]. The Dcx+ neuroblasts subsequently repopulate the striatum and parietal cortex. Young neurones normally follow the rostral migratory stream to meet their destination in the olfactory bulb, but they were found to leave the stream after a brain lesion due to the upregulation of reelin in the damaged area [85, 98, 99]. Ectopic expression of reelin in the cortex in the absence of injury had the same effect [98]. Since reelin does not have chemoattractant properties, other soluble factors should be supposed to intervene such as Shh released by reactive astrocytes [100], hepatocyte growth factor, stromal-derived factor 1, or stem cell factor, all of which have been shown to induce progenitor/neuroblast tropism [85, 89, 99].

4. Neural Stem Cells In Vitro

Neural cells with stem cell-like properties can be maintained in vitro using defined media containing EGF, bFGF, or both [16, 101]. They may be grown for some time on an adhesive substrate [69, 102], but most often culture dishes are treated so as to prevent adhesion. This causes cells to adhere to each other and to grow in neurospheres. Neurospheres contain multiple cell types amongst which cells that after isolation proliferate to give new, secondary neurospheres containing neurones, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. These multipotent, self-renewing cells are thought to be NSCs [70, 71, 101, 103, 104]. However, INPs give rise to neurospheres too [53] which can amount up to 90% of the spheres formed when starting from fresh SVZ tissue [103], but these are smaller and tend to have difficulties to form secondary and tertiary spheres [105]. In accordance with the notion that EGF promotes INP proliferation [86], neurospheres derived from EGF-infused mice ventricular zones give rise to more small spheres when compared to controls [105].

The neurosphere cell culture constitutes a relatively well-defined method to obtain a constant source of stem cells. Moreover, the lack of reliable and generally accepted NSC markers has made the neurosphere assay an important and often used tool to demonstrate stem cell properties. However, two potential drawbacks of this assay may lead to false negative and false positive NSC identifications. On the one hand, the neurosphere culture has been established initially using tissue from the striatum [16] and is not necessarily adapted for the maintenance of NSCs of other brain regions. So it has been argued that, since adult hippocampal tissue is unable to self-renew in the neurosphere assay, NSCs are absent in the hippocampus [106]. The adult CA1-CA3 region and dentate gyrus stain positive for patched [91] and astrocytes taken from the SGZ secrete Shh [72]. If cultured in the presence of Shh, adult hippocampal cells were shown to self-renew, giving offspring containing oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and neurones [72, 91]. Similarly, the absence of cancer stem cells in secondary glioblastoma was deduced based on negative results with the neurosphere assay. These results were obtained in the absence of Shh in the culture medium [107], while it has been shown that Shh signalling is required for maintenance in low-grade glioma and secondary glioma [108, 109]. On the other hand, NSCs reside in niches, special environments that may be partially responsible for the stemness of cells that, otherwise, would not be as remarkable as that. Cells in the neurosphere culture are exposed to important levels of the growth factors EGF and FGF (10–20 ng/mL) that might entice cells to dedifferentiate and proliferate. So it was shown that cells behaving as astrocyte and oligodendrocyte progenitors at E14 in vivo are reprogrammed to become tripotent stem cells in the neurosphere assay in vitro [110]. Similar results were obtained with P6 oligodendrocyte progenitor cells from the optic nerve [14]. Genetic and epigenetic transformations were observed in SVZ neurospheres after prolonged neurosphere culture, some clones adopting haematopoietic stem cell properties [111]. Reprogramming can even take on pathological traits, as SVZ cells cultured as neurospheres develop several chromosomal aberrations reminiscent of cancer cells and grow as tumours if transplanted into rodent brain [31]. Moreover, the presence of growth factors such as EGF and FGF tends to induce the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), dedifferentiation, and proliferation, important prerequisites for the development of cancer [44, 45, 112]. Even so, carcinogenesis in neurospheres does not appear to be very frequent, since another research group showed that NSCs could be maintained over 120 neurosphere passages without changes in karyotype [113, 114].

5. Neuroblastoma

Phox2b mutations cause the congenital central hypoventilation syndrome [50] which predisposes patients of this disease to develop ganglioneuroma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and neuroblastoma (NB) proper. The former two forms of neuroblastoma are morphologically more differentiated and are lower grade with more favourable outcome. Hence, not all NBs are identical. It is thought that mortality depends on the stage of the sympathoadrenal progenitor (SAP) development, the more differentiated stages causing less lethal tumours.

Sometimes a NB spontaneously regresses. Perhaps regression occurs more often than thought. Since most NBs secrete catecholamines, the presence of catecholamines in baby’s urine indicates the presence of a NB. It has been found that high levels of catecholamines in baby urine occur at a much higher frequency than the diagnosis of NB [115, 116]. Hence, many NBs regress spontaneously before being diagnosed [4]. The International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) differentiates NB into 5 “stages” that correspond in inverse order to embryonic developmental stages (see Table 1). SAPs are the common progenitors of melanocyte precursors and neural precursors [50] sometimes referred to as peripheral neural progenitors (PNPs). After migration and neuronal proliferation PNPs finally differentiate into glial cells [117]. Interestingly, both extracranial glioma and melanoma are infrequent in neonates [27, 118] suggesting that mutations in these progenitors are either infrequent or that beginning tumours regress.

1Localized tumour with complete gross excision, with or without microscopic residual disease; representative ipsilateral lymph nodes negative for tumour microscopically (nodes attached to and removed with primary tumour may be positive)

2ALocalized tumour with incomplete gross excision; representative ipsilateral nonadherent lymph nodes negative for tumour microscopically

2BLocalized tumour with or without complete gross excision, with ipsilateral nonadherent lymph nodes positive for tumour; enlarged contralateral lymph nodes must be negative microscopically

3Unresectable unilateral tumour infiltrating across the midline, with or without regional lymph node involvement; localized unilateral tumour with contralateral regional lymph node involvement; or midline tumour with bilateral extension by infiltration (unresectable) or by lymph node involvement

4Any primary tumour with dissemination to distant lymph nodes, bone marrow, bone, liver, skin, and/or other organs (except as defined for stage 4S)

4SLocalized primary tumour (as defined for stage 1, 2A, or 2B), with dissemination limited to skin, liver, and/or bone marrow (limited to infants less than 1 year of age)

Stage 4S is the NB type that often regresses and happens mostly in young children. Crest cells undergo an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). This EMT transition allows the neural crest cells to leave the dorsal neural tube. EMT is characterized by (1) loss of epithelial morphology, (2) downregulation of junctional complexes (E-cadherin, cytokeratin, occludins, and claudins), (3) upregulation of intracellular migratory proteins (RhoB), (4) increased expression of matrix modulators (collagenase, matrilysin, urokinase, heparanase, and matrix metalloproteinases), and (5) upregulation of matrix recognition molecules (N-cadherin). Metastatic neuroblastoma cells, INSS stages 3 and 4, exhibit many of these features [4]. More than 50% of all neuroblastoma patients are diagnosed with metastasis [119]. These tumours with unfavourable outcome most often overexpress the MYCN gene, which codes for a transcription factor that downregulates four “N-myc downregulated genes” [3, 120]. The latter genes play a role in differentiation of various tissues. Neuroblastoma of this stage generates cancer stem cells that are self-renewing and multipotent and that are able to produce neurones, Schwann-like cells, and melanocytes [121, 122]. Once the PNPs have reached their final destination, they stop migrating and differentiate into neurones. NBs evolving at this stage are more differentiated and belong to INSS stages 1 and 2. Glial differentiation occurs after neuronal differentiation, despite the continued presence of neurogenic Bmp2. The switch is due to Notch signalling by newly formed neuroblasts expressing Delta and Jagged to undifferentiated PNPs [117]. These glial cells form satellite cells, ensheathing neurone cell bodies, in the PNS ganglia and Schwann cells that myelinate axons. Schwannoma is a benign form of tumour that is rare in children [123]. It is not a multipotent cancer, producing Schwann-like cells only.

6. Glioma

The world Health Organization has classified the rather heterogeneous ensemble of CNS neoplasms into grades 1 through 4 [124]. This classification also applies to CNS tumours with a (suspected) glial component, that is, glioma (see Table 2). Low-grade gliomas grow slowly for many years before manifestation of symptoms (grade 1 or pilocytic astrocytoma and grade 2 or diffuse astrocytoma). Anaplastic astrocytoma is grade 3. Glioblastomas, which are grade 4, grow rapidly and are highly vascularized and infiltrate. In the centre of the glioblastoma, necrosis and hypoxia typically occur. Once diagnosed, the life expectancies of grade 1 glioma and grade 4 glioblastoma patients are 10 years and 1.5 year, respectively. Extensive resection significantly increases 5-year survival rates of low-grade glioma patients, but degrades faculties. A surgical technique known as “intraoperative stimulation mapping” spares these faculties but then gives only very limited results on 5-year survival rates [125, 126].

1Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma
Myxopapillary ependymoma
Pilocytic astrocytoma
Paraganglioma of the spinal cord
Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumour of the fourth ventricle
Low proliferative potential and the possibility of cure by surgical resection

Pilomyxoid astrocytoma
Diffuse astrocytoma
Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma
Choroid glioma of the third ventricle
Diffusely infiltrative glial tumours with cytological atypia, often recurrent

3Anaplastic astrocytoma
Anaplastic oligodendroglioma
Anaplastic oligoastrocytoma
Anaplastic ependymoma
Anaplastic ganglioglioma
As grade 2 plus anaplasia (i.e., dedifferentiation, pleomorphism, and hyperploidy) and mitotic activity

Giant cell glioblastoma
As grade 3 plus microvascular proliferation and/or necrosis, virtually incurable

The genesis of glioma appears to obey a certain sequence of events. P53, a gene implicated in the induction of senescence after DNA damage [19] and cell death by apoptosis, is mutated early in the development of low-grade glioma [127, 128]. These low-grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas, that is, glioblastomas derived from low-grade gliomas, also carry a mutation in either the IDH1 or IDH2 gene [129]. In patients from whom multiple biopsies were made, the IDH mutation never occurred after p53 mutation, suggesting that IDH mutation necessarily precedes p53 mutation [130, 131]. Mutation of the PTEN gene and hyperexpression of the EGFR gene are late events [131]. IDH mutation causes hypoxia-induced factor (HIF) overexpression [132, 133]. Sonic hedgehog signalling is upregulated in low-grade glioma and secondary glioblastoma but downregulated in primary glioblastoma [108, 109]. The latter also lacks mutations in the IDH genes, almost never expressing mutated p53 [132], but carries often PTEN mutations and overexpresses the epithelial growth factor receptor [134, 135]. Chromosome 10 is lost in primary glioblastoma and 19q is lost in secondary glioblastoma [130].

The subventricular zone is an important niche for neural stem cells and is thought to be the origin of most if not all gliomas [28]. After having acquired the necessary number of mutations and undergone epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), the mutated stem cell migrates and expands in the frontal (40%), temporal (29%), parietal (14%), and occipital (3%) lobes of the neocortex [136]. The EMT, required to adopt a migratory phenotype [44, 45, 137], is also a requirement for metastasis [46, 137139]. In contrast to the low-stage neuroblastoma discussed above, for which migration and metastasis are intimately linked [4, 119], there is no indication whatsoever that gliomas in the early phases of their genesis and expansion are metastatic. The same argument argues against SVZ intermediate progenitors (INP) as the source of glioma, because they too need to migrate over long distances before expanding. Moreover, it seems odd that hardly a single cancer INP would reach the olfactory epithelium by the rostral migratory stream to form a tumour there, given that nasal glioma in the adult has never been reported and that olfactory neuroblastoma is extremely rare [140142]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that human glioblastoma cells injected in the striatum of healthy mice tend to migrate towards the SVZ and olfactory bulbs rather than away from those structures [143]. The only cancers that actually originate in the SVZ are ependymoma [144], glioneuronal tumour [145], and neurocytoma [146, 147]. Hence, it seems more probable that gliomas originate elsewhere in the CNS and start to infiltrate (and eventually enter into metastasis) only after initial expansion. Indeed, Snail and Slug, key transcription factors in EMT, are more upregulated in glioma the more they attain higher WHO grade [148, 149].

The source of the glioma could then be either local dormant stem cells [72], progenitors recruited from the SVZ after traumatic [150] or age-related brain damage [84, 97], or glia cells that are activated upon brain damage or inflammation. After injury, microglia cells are the first to be activated and migrate to the site of damage. This is followed by proliferation of NG2+ glia cells and finally astrogliosis [93]. Normally, astrocytes are maintained in a senescent state by contact inhibition in which cadherins of one astrocyte retain -catenin of neighbour astrocytes at the plasma membrane. Upon disruption of the cadherin bond, -catenin is released, moves to the nucleus, and initiates the transcription of genes implied in migration, proliferation, and differentiation, thus initiating the phenotype of reactive astrocytes [151]. Beside migration and proliferation, glioma cells share many features with reactive astrocytes such as growth factor expression (VEGF, EGFR), NG2, Nestin, Vimentin, CD133, and Sox2 expression and upregulation of IL-6, Stat3, Shh, and -catenin signalling [100, 151153]. Downregulation of -catenin in glioma suppresses its growth [154]. Just as in glioma, HIF-associated signalling is important in astrocyte activation upon ischaemia [155]. Remarkably, like glioblastoma-initiating cells, activated astrocytes exhibit anchorage-independent growth; that is, they can grow in neurospheres without being eliminated by anoikis [156]. In vitro, they may take on tripotent properties [72, 157, 158] and give rise to tubulin III+ cells in vivo [95].

The hypothesis that proliferating (NG2+) glial cells develop into glial tumours [57] appears most tempting as it explains many of the properties of these tumours, such as the absence of metastasis in the early stages of growth. However, it requires astrocyte activation. A correlation between brain damage and glioma incidence should therefore exist. Unfortunately, very little evidence for such a correlation has been established, as epidemiological studies on head injury, infections, and the use of cell phones on glioma incidence have not yielded clear-cut results [159161]. Seizures are often associated with glioma but reasonably assumed to be the result rather than the cause of the tumour [162, 163]. Even so, the incidence of glial brain tumours increases sharply with age, the incidence in the elderly being 5 times as high as in young adults [164]. At that age (60+), many other diseases manifest themselves such as impaired blood circulation, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and (generalised) chronic inflammation that might lead to repetitive minor brain damage, thus increasing the necessity of repair and the risk of neoplasia.

7. Conclusion

The fate of neural crest cells is determined while they still reside in the neuroepithelium. After having gone through the EMT and while migrating to their destination, these cells continue to multiply. Proliferation comes to an end when they reach their targets. The progenitors, that form the sympathetic ganglia, differentiate into neurones or Schwann cells. At every stage from neuroepithelium to ganglion, the crest cell progenitor may adopt malignant treats. As outlined above, malignancy and phenotype of neuroblastomas correlate well with the different stages of the crest cell’s expedition, even if malignant cells acquire more phenotypical plasticity. Here, the theory is easy to comprehend and is appealing. In the case of glial tumours of the adult CNS, the theory used to be just as simple: glial cells are at the origin of glial tumours. The ideas changed around the turn of the century in favour of the hypothesis that the neural stem cell in the SVZ is the source of glioma. The reasons for this choice have been outlined in this review and lie mostly in the premise that the adult brain possesses very few cycling cells with multipotent properties that are similar to those found in gliomas. However, this hypothesis seems untenable in the light of several observations. Glioma cells, which do not give rise to metastasis in the early phases of their genesis, are nevertheless assumed to migrate throughout the brain before expansion. This is in contrast to other brain cancers, which are known to originate in the SVZ such as ependymoma, glioneuronal tumour, and neurocytoma which remain there until becoming metastatic. The ensemble of glioma markers is more akin to reactive astrocytes than to neuronal stem cells of the SVZ. The alternative hypothesis, that is, gliomas originate in situ from locally present tripotent stem cells, from glial progenitors, or from reactive astrocytes, still shows some weaknesses. For one, the existence of a widespread distribution of stem cells within the brain is not quite established. Hence, given the glial nature of glial tumours, a glial origin seems more likely. But this needs glial activation to occur and a relation between glioma incidence and brain repair is, for the moment, lacking.


Blbp:Brain lipid binding protein (a.k.a, fabp7: fatty acid binding protein 7)
Bmp:Bone morphogenic protein
CNS:Central nervous system
DNET:Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour
EGF:Epidermal growth factor
EGFR:Epidermal growth factor receptor
EGL:External granular layer
EMT:Epithelial to mesenchymal transition
ERK:Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
FGF:Fibroblast growth factor
GBM:Glioblastoma multiforme
GFAP:Glial fibrillary acidic protein
GNPC:Cerebellar neurone precursor
GRP:Glial restricted precursor
IDH:Isocitrate dehydrogenase
INP:Intermediate neural progenitor
INSS:International Neuroblastoma Staging System
Ascl:Achaete-scute homolog
MYCN:Neuroblastoma-derived myelocytomatosis oncogene
NG2:Neuroglycan 2
N-myc:Transcription factor coded by MYCN
NS:Nervous system
NSC:Neural stem cell
O-2A:Oligodendrocyte and type 2 astrocyte bipotent progenitor
PDGF:Platelet-derived growth factor
PNP:Peripheral neural progenitor
PNS:Peripheral nervous system
SAP:Sympathoadrenal progenitor
SCZ:Subcallosal zone
SGZ:Subgranular zone
Shh:Sonic hedgehog
SVZ:Subventricular zone
TIA:Transient ischaemic attack
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor
Wnt:Wingless integration site.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Support has been received from l’Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM). The author thanks Dr. F. Kuper, TNO, Zeist, The Netherlands, Dr. M. Mersel, Beta Innov, Montpellier, France, and Dr. C. Fabre, INSERM U1051, Montpellier, France, for their critical reading of the paper and suggestions for its improvement.


  1. D. Schiffer, L. Annovazzi, V. Caldera, and M. Mellai, “On the origin and growth of gliomas,” Anticancer Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1977–1998, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. N. Sanai, A. Alvarez-Buylla, and M. S. Berger, “Mechanisms of disease: neural stem cells and the origin of gliomas,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 8, pp. 811–822, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Melotte, X. Qu, M. Ongenaert et al., “The N-myc downstream regulated gene (NDRG) family: diverse functions, multiple applications,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 4153–4166, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Jiang, J. Stanke, and J. M. Lahti, “Chapter 4. The connections between neural crest development and neuroblastoma,” in Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 94, pp. 77–127, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. C. Holland, “Progenitor cells and glioma formation,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 683–688, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. X. Fan, L. G. Salford, and B. Widegren, “Glioma stem cells: evidence and limitation,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 214–218, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Dai and E. C. Holland, “Glioma models,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1551, no. 1, pp. M19–M27, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. C. Holland, W. P. Hively, R. A. DePinho, and H. E. Varmus, “A constitutively active epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with disruption of G1 cell-cycle arrest pathways to induce glioma-like lesions in mice,” Genes and Development, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 3675–3685, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  9. W. A. Weiss, M. J. Burns, C. Hackett et al., “Genetic determinants of malignancy in a mouse model for oligodendroglioma,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1589–1595, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. Galli, E. Binda, U. Orfanelli et al., “Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 19, pp. 7011–7021, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  11. X. Yuan, J. Curtin, Y. Xiong et al., “Isolation of cancer stem cells from adult glioblastoma multiforme,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 58, pp. 9392–9400, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. K. Singh, C. Hawkins, I. D. Clarke et al., “Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells,” Nature, vol. 432, no. 7015, pp. 396–401, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. M. Park, J. Jung, J. Masjkur et al., “Hes3 regulates cell number in cultures from glioblastoma multiforme with stem cell characteristics,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, article 1095, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Kondo and M. Raff, “Oligodendrocyte precursor cells reprogrammed to become multipotential CNS stem cells,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5485, pp. 1754–1757, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Dai, J. C. Celestino, Y. Okada, D. N. Louis, G. N. Fuller, and E. C. Holland, “PDGF autocrine stimulation dedifferentiates cultured astrocytes and induces oligodendrogliomas from and oligoastrocytomas neural progenitors and astrocytes in vivo,” Genes and Development, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 1913–1925, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. A. Reynolds and S. Weiss, “Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system,” Science, vol. 255, no. 5052, pp. 1707–1710, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  17. C. S. Potten, G. Owen, and D. Booth, “Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 2381–2388, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  18. P. Karpowicz, C. Morshead, A. Kam et al., “Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 721–732, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Campisi, “Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 75, pp. 685–705, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Li and W. B. Neaves, “Normal stem cells and cancer stem cells: the niche matters,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4553–4557, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. J. Gilbertson and J. N. Rich, “Making a tumour's bed: glioblastoma stem cells and the vascular niche,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 733–736, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Reya, S. J. Morrison, M. F. Clarke, and I. L. Weissman, “Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6859, pp. 105–111, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. J. Morrison and J. Kimble, “Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7097, pp. 1068–1074, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. J. Snippert and H. Clevers, “Tracking adult stem cells,” EMBO Reports, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. W. Miller, J. L. Young Jr., and B. Novakovic, “Childhood cancer,” Cancer, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 395–405, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  26. R. T. Greenlee, T. Murray, S. Bolden, and P. A. Wingo, “Cancer statistics, 2000,” Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 7–33, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. M. Linabery and J. A. Ross, “Trends in childhood cancer incidence in the U.S. (1992–2004),” Cancer, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 416–432, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. A. Siebzehnrubl, B. A. Reynolds, A. Vescovi, D. A. Steindler, and L. P. Deleyrolle, “The origins of glioma: e pluribus unum?” Glia, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1135–1147, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. R. Fearon, S. R. Hamilton, and B. Vogelstein, “Clonal analysis of human colorectal tumors,” Science, vol. 238, no. 4824, pp. 193–197, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. K. Nicolis, “Cancer stem cells and “stemness” genes in neuro-oncology,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 217–229, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. A. Siebzehnrubl, I. Jeske, D. Müller et al., “Spontaneous in vitro transformation of adult neural precursors into stem-like cancer cells,” Brain Pathology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 399–408, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Hiyama, Y. Hirai, S. Kyoizumi et al., “Activation of telomerase in human lymphocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 3711–3715, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H. A. Pickett, J. D. Henson, A. Y. M. Au, A. A. Neumann, and R. R. Reddel, “Normal mammalian cells negatively regulate telomere length by telomere trimming,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 4684–4692, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. A. Langford, M. A. Piatyszek, R. Xu, S. C. Schold Jr., and J. W. Shay, “Telomerase activity in human brain tumours,” The Lancet, vol. 346, no. 8985, pp. 1267–1268, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. T. Jordan, M. L. Guzman, and M. Noble, “Cancer stem cells,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 12, pp. 1253–1261, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. A. Emmenegger and R. J. Wechsler-Reya, “Stem cells and the origin and propagation of brain tumors,” Journal of Child Neurology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1172–1178, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. F. Laigle-Donadey, F. Doz, and J.-Y. Delattre, “Brainstem gliomas in children and adults,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 662–667, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. P. A. Leach, E. J. Estlin, D. J. Coope, J. A. Thorne, and I. D. Kamaly-Asl, “Diffuse brainstem gliomas in children: should we or shouldn't we biopsy?” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 619–624, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Grill, G. Bergthold, and C. Ferreira, “Pediatric ependymomas: will molecular biology change patient management?” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 638–642, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. B. A. Kohler, E. Ward, B. J. McCarthy et al., “Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 714–736, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. E. Bristol, “Low-grade glial tumors: are they all the same?” Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Dorey and E. Amaya, “FGF signalling: diverse roles during early vertebrate embryogenesis,” Development, vol. 137, no. 22, pp. 3731–3742, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Piccolo, Y. Sasai, B. Lu, and E. M. De Robertis, “Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4,” Cell, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 589–598, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Kerosuo and M. Bronner-Fraser, “What is bad in cancer is good in the embryo: importance of EMT in neural crest development,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 320–332, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. A. Mani, W. Guo, M.-J. Liao et al., “The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 704–715, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. G. Hollier, K. Evans, and S. A. Mani, “The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells: a coalition against cancer therapies,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. Albino, A. Brizzolara, S. Moretti et al., “Gene expression profiling identifies eleven DNA repair genes down-regulated during mouse neural crest cell migration,” International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. F. Crane and P. A. Trainor, “Neural crest stem and progenitor cells,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 22, pp. 267–286, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. H. Axelson, “The Notch signaling cascade in neuroblastoma: role of the basic helix-loop-helix proteins HASH-1 and HES-1,” Cancer Letters, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. A. Mohlin, C. Wigerup, and S. Påhlman, “Neuroblastoma aggressiveness in relation to sympathetic neuronal differentiation stage,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 276–282, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. C. Noctor, V. Martinez-Cerdeño, L. Ivic, and A. R. Kriegstein, “Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 136–144, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. R. Costa, M. Götz, and B. Berninger, “What determines neurogenic competence in glia?” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 47–59, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Kriegstein and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 32, pp. 149–184, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. L. Ever and N. Gaiano, “Radial 'glial' progenitors: neurogenesis and signaling,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. E. Hunter and M. E. Hatten, “Radial glial cell transformation to astrocytes is bidirectional: regulation by a diffusible factor in embryonic forebrain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 2061–2065, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. Keilani and K. Sugaya, “Reelin induces a radial glial phenotype in human neural progenitor cells by activation of Notch-1,” BMC Developmental Biology, vol. 8, article 69, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Gaiano and G. Fishell, “The role of Notch in promoting glial and neural stem cell fates,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 25, pp. 471–490, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. Pierfelice, L. Alberi, and N. Gaiano, “Notch in the vertebrate nervous system: an old dog with new tricks,” Neuron, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 840–855, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Y. Zhou, J. B. Atkins, S. B. Rompani et al., “The mammalian golgi regulates numb signaling in asymmetric cell division by releasing ACBD3 during mitosis,” Cell, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 163–178, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. Cayre, P. Canoll, and J. E. Goldman, “Cell migration in the normal and pathological postnatal mammalian brain,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 41–63, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. C. Lee, M. Mayer-Proschel, and M. S. Rao, “Gliogenesis in the central nervous system,” Glia, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 105–121, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  62. Y. Liu and M. S. Rao, “Glial progenitors in the CNS and possible lineage relationships among them,” Biology of the Cell, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 279–290, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Kakita and J. E. Goldman, “Patterns and dynamics of SVZ cell migration in the postnatal forebrain: monitoring living progenitors in slice preparations,” Neuron, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 461–472, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Zerlin, A. Milosevic, and J. E. Goldman, “Glial progenitors of the neonatal subventricular zone differentiate asynchronously, leading to spatial dispersion of glial clones and to the persistence of immature glia in the adult mammalian CNS,” Developmental Biology, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 200–213, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. M. Gensert and J. E. Goldman, “Heterogeneity of cycling glial progenitors in the adult mammalian cortex and white matter,” Journal of Neurobiology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 75–86, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Zerlin and J. E. Goldman, “Interactions between glial progenitors and blood vessels during early postnatal corticogenesis: blood vessel contact represents an early stage of astrocyte differentiation,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 387, no. 4, pp. 537–546, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  67. T. N. Phoenix, D. S. Currle, G. Robinson, and R. J. Gilbertson, “Review: developmental origins of neural tumours: old idea, new approaches,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 222–227, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  68. N. M. Walton, G. E. Snyder, D. Park, F. Kobeissy, B. Scheffler, and D. A. Steindler, “Gliotypic neural stem cells transiently adopt tumorigenic properties during normal differentiation,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 280–289, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. B. Scheffler, N. M. Walton, D. D. Lin et al., “Phenotypic and functional characterization of adult brain neuropoiesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 26, pp. 9353–9358, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. F. Doetsch, I. Caille, D. A. Lim, J. M. Garcia-Verdugo, and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “Subventricular zone astrocytes are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain,” Cell, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 703–716, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. B. Seri, D. G. Herrera, A. Gritti et al., “Composition and organization of the SCZ: a large germinal layer containing neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 16, supplement 1, pp. i103–i111, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  72. J. Jiao and F. C. Dong, “Induction of neurogenesis in nonconventional neurogenic regions of the adult central nervous system by niche astrocyte-produced signals,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1221–1230, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. L. de Filippis and E. Binda, “Concise review: self-renewal in the central nervous system: neural stem cells from embryo to adult,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 298–308, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  74. F. T. Merkle, A. D. Tramontin, J. M. García-Verdugo, and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “Radial glia give rise to adult neural stem cells in the subventricular zone,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 50, pp. 17528–17532, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. V. Pfenninger, T. Roschupkina, F. Hertwig et al., “CD133 is not present on neurogenic astrocytes in the adult subventricular zone, but on embryonic neural stem cells, ependymal cells, and glioblastoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 5727–5736, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. D. Corbeil, A. Joester, C. A. Fargeas et al., “Expression of distinct splice variants of the stem cell marker prominin-1 (CD133) in glial cells,” Glia, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 860–874, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. E. L. Jackson and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “Characterization of adult neural stem cells and their relation to brain tumors,” Cells Tissues Organs, vol. 188, no. 1-2, pp. 212–224, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Q. Shen, S. K. Goderie, L. Jin et al., “Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5675, pp. 1338–1340, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. E. Wurmser, T. D. Palmer, and F. H. Gage, “Cellular interactions in the stem cell niche,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5675, pp. 1253–1255, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  80. Z. Mirzadeh, F. T. Merkle, M. Soriano-Navarro, J. M. Garcia-Verdugo, and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “Neural stem cells confer unique pinwheel architecture to the ventricular surface in neurogenic regions of the adult brain,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 265–278, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. D. A. Lim, A. D. Tramontin, J. M. Trevejo, D. G. Herrera, J. M. García-Verdugo, and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “Noggin antagonizes BMP signaling to create a niche for adult neurogenesis,” Neuron, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 713–726, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. G. Mudò, N. Belluardo, A. Mauro, and K. Fuxe, “Acute intermittent nicotine treatment induces fibroblast growth factor-2 in the subventricular zone of the adult rat brain and enhances neuronal precursor cell proliferation,” Neuroscience, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 470–483, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. N. Belluardo, G. Mudo', A. Bonomo, V. Di Liberto, M. Frinchi, and K. Fuxe, “Nicotine-induced fibroblast growth factor-2 restores the age-related decline of precursor cell proliferation in the subventricular zone of rat brain,” Brain Research, vol. 1193, pp. 12–24, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. Carlén, K. Meletis, C. Göritz et al., “Forebrain ependymal cells are Notch-dependent and generate neuroblasts and astrocytes after stroke,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 259–267, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. T. Garzón-Muvdi and A. Quiñones-Hinojosa, “Neural stem cell niches and homing: recruitment and integration into functional tissues,” ILAR Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3–23, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  86. A. Aguirre, M. E. Rubio, and V. Gallo, “Notch and EGFR pathway interaction regulates neural stem cell number and self-renewal,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7313, pp. 323–327, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. O. J. Becher, D. Hambardzumyan, E. I. Fomchenko et al., “Gli activity correlates with tumor grade in platelet-derived growth factor-induced gliomas,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 2241–2249, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. E. E. Bar, A. Chaudhry, A. Lin et al., “Cyclopamine-mediated Hedgehog pathway inhibition depletes stem-like cancer cells in glioblastoma,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2524–2533, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. E. Angot, K. Loulier, K. T. Nguyen-Ba-Charvet, A.-P. Gadeau, M. Ruat, and E. Traiffort, “Chemoattractive activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the adult subventricular zone modulates the number of neural precursors reaching the olfactory bulb,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2311–2320, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. Y.-G. Han, N. Spassky, M. Romaguera-Ros et al., “Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia are required for the formation of adult neural stem cells,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 277–284, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. K. Lai, B. K. Kaspar, F. H. Gage, and D. V. Schaffer, “Sonic hedgehog regulates adult neural progenitor proliferation in vitro and in vivo,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. P. J. Horner and T. D. Palmer, “New roles for astrocytes: the nightlife of an 'astrocyte'. La vida loca!,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 597–603, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. Robel, B. Berninger, and M. Götz, “The stem cell potential of glia: lessons from reactive gliosis,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 88–104, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. C. Simon, M. Götz, and L. Dimou, “Progenitors in the adult cerebral cortex: cell cycle properties and regulation by physiological stimuli and injury,” Glia, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 869–881, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. A. Buffo, I. Rite, P. Tripathi et al., “Origin and progeny of reactive gliosis: a source of multipotent cells in the injured brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 3581–3586, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. C. Nunes, N. S. Roy, H. M. Keyoung et al., “Identification and isolation of multipotential neural progenitor cells from the subcortical white matter of the adult human brain,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 439–447, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. A. Arvidsson, T. Collin, D. Kirik, Z. Kokaia, and O. Lindvall, “Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 963–970, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Courtès, J. Vernerey, L. Pujadas et al., “Reelin controls progenitor cell migration in the healthy and pathological adult mouse brain,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e20430, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. L. Sun, J. Lee, and H. A. Fine, “Neuronally expressed stem cell factor induces neural stem cell migration to areas of brain injury,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, no. 9, pp. 1364–1374, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. H. Yang, G. D. Feng, C. Olivera, X. Y. Jiao, A. Vitale et al., “Sonic hedgehog released from scratch-injured astrocytes is a key signal necessary but not sufficient for the astrocyte de-differentiation,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 156–166, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. A. L. Vescovi, E. A. Parati, A. Gritti et al., “Isolation and cloning of multipotential stem cells from the embryonic human CNS and establishment of transplantable human neural stem cell lines by epigenetic stimulation,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 71–83, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. G. Tabatabai and M. Weller, “Glioblastoma stem cells,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 343, no. 3, pp. 459–465, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. L. P. Deleyrolle and B. A. Reynolds, “Identifying and enumerating neural stem cells: application to aging and cancer,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 175, pp. 43–51, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. S. Armando, A. Lebrun, J.-P. Hugnot, C. Ripoll, M. Saunier, and L. Simonneau, “Neurosphere-derived neural cells show region-specific behaviour in vitro,” NeuroReport, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 1539–1542, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. S. A. Louis, R. L. Rietze, L. Deleyrolle et al., “Enumeration of neural stem and progenitor cells in the neural colony-forming cell assay,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 988–996, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. N. D. Bull and P. F. Bartlett, “The adult mouse hippocampal progenitor is neurogenic but not a stem cell,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 47, pp. 10815–10821, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. D. Beier, P. Hau, M. Proescholdt et al., “CD133+ and CD133- glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 4010–4015, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. M. Ehtesham, A. Sarangi, J. G. Valadez et al., “Ligand-dependent activation of the hedgehog pathway in glioma progenitor cells,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 39, pp. 5752–5761, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. J. G. Valadez, V. K. Grover, M. D. Carter et al., “Identification of Hedgehog pathway responsive glioblastomas by isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation,” Cancer Letters, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 297–306, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. L. Gabay, S. Lowell, L. L. Rubin, and D. J. Anderson, “Deregulation of dorsoventral patterning by FGF confers trilineage differentiation capacity on CNS stem cells in vitro,” Neuron, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 485–499, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. C. M. Morshead, P. Benveniste, N. N. Iscove, and D. Van Der Kooy, “Hematopoietic competence is a rare property of neural stem cells that may depend on genetic and epigenetic alterations,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 268–273, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. S.-P. Han, J.-H. Kim, M.-E. Han et al., “SNAI1 is involved in the proliferation and migration of glioblastoma cells,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 489–496, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. C. Foroni, R. Galli, B. Cipelletti et al., “Resilience to transformation and inherent genetic and functional stability of adult neural stem cells ex vivo,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 3725–3733, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. D. Ferrari, E. Binda, L. de Filippis, and A. L. Vescovi, “UNIT 2D.6. Isolation of neural stem cells from neural tissues using the neurosphere technique,” in Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. A. W. Craft and L. Parker, “Poor prognosis neuroblastoma: is screening the answer?” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 66, no. 18, pp. S96–S101, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  116. T. Sawada, “Past and future of neuroblastoma screening in Japan,” The American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 320–326, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  117. S. J. Morrison, S. E. Perez, Z. Qiao et al., “Transient notch activation initiates an irreversible switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis by neural crest stem cells,” Cell, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 499–510, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  118. D. Han, J. S. Zager, G. Han et al., “The unique clinical characteristics of melanoma diagnosed in children,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3888–3895, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. K. K. Matthay, R. E. George, and A. L. Yu, “Promising therapeutic targets in neuroblastoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2740–2753, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. N. R. Nichols, “Ndrg2, a novel gene regulated by adrenal steroids and antidepressants, is highly expressed in astrocytes,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1007, pp. 349–356, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. R. A. Ross and B. A. Spengler, “Human neuroblastoma stem cells,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 241–247, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. J. D. Walton, D. R. Kattan, S. K. Thomas et al., “Characteristics of stem cells from human neuroblastoma cell lines and in tumors,” Neoplasia, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 838–845, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. N. J. S. Kehoe, R. P. Reid, and J. C. Semple, “Solitary benign peripheral-nerve tumours: review of 32 years'experience,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 497–500, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  124. D. N. Louis, H. Ohgaki, O. D. Wiestler et al., “The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 97–109, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. N. Sanai and M. S. Berger, “Operative techniques for gliomas and the value of extent of resection,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 478–486, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. D. A. Hardesty and N. Sanai, “The value of glioma extent of resection in the modern neurosurgical era,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 3, article 140, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  127. V. Barresi, F. R. Buttarelli, E. Vitarelli E, A. Arcella, M. Antonelli, and F. Giangaspero, “Caveolin-1 expression in diffuse gliomas: correlation with the proliferation index, epidermal growth factor receptor, p53, and 1p/19q status,” Human Pathology, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1738–1746, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. K. Watanabe, K. Sato, W. Biernat et al., “Incidence and timing of p53 mutations during astrocytoma progression in patients with multiple biopsies,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 523–530, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  129. T. D. Bourne and D. Schiff, “Update on molecular findings, management and outcome in low-grade gliomas,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 695–701, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. H. Ohgaki and P. Kleihues, “The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 764–772, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. A. Lai, S. Kharbanda, W. B. Pope et al., “Evidence for sequenced molecular evolution of IDH1 mutant glioblastoma from a distinct cell of origin,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 34, pp. 4482–4490, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. Y. Jiao, P. J. Killela, Z. J. Reitman et al., “Frequent ATRX, CIC, and FUBP1 mutations refine the classification of malignant gliomas,” Oncotarget, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 709–722, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  133. K. E. Yen, M. A. Bittinger, S. M. Su, and V. R. Fantin, “Cancer-associated IDH mutations: biomarker and therapeutic opportunities,” Oncogene, vol. 29, no. 49, pp. 6409–6417, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. P. Kleihues and H. Ohgaki, “Primary and secondary glioblastomas: from concept to clinical diagnosis,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  135. D. Basanta, J. G. Scott, R. Rockne, K. R. Swanson, and A. R. A. Anderson, “The role of IDH1 mutated tumour cells in secondary glioblastomas: an evolutionary game theoretical view,” Physical Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 015016, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. S. Larjavaara, R. Mäntylä, T. Salminen et al., “Incidence of gliomas by anatomic location,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 319–325, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. C. Xue, J. Wyckoff, F. Liang et al., “Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression results in increased tumor cell motility in vivo coordinately with enhanced intravasation and metastasis,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 192–197, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. S. Giampieri, C. Manning, S. Hooper, L. Jones, C. S. Hill, and E. Sahai, “Localized and reversible TGFβ signalling switches breast cancer cells from cohesive to single cell motility,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1287–1296, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. S. Floor, W. C. G. Van Staveren, D. Larsimont, J. E. Dumont, and C. Maenhaut, “Cancer cells in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumor-propagating-cancer stem cells: Distinct, overlapping or same populations,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 46, pp. 4609–4621, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. R. I. Smee, K. Broadley, J. R. Williams, N. S. Meagher, and G. P. Bridger, “Retained role of surgery for olfactory neuroblastoma,” Head and Neck, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1486–1492, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. D. Tural, O. Yildiz, F. Selcukbiricik et al., “Olfactory neuroblastomas: an experience of 24 years,” Oncology, vol. 2011, Article ID 451086, 7 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. A. M. Zanation, A. Ferlito, A. Rinaldo et al., “When, how and why to treat the neck in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma: a review,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 267, no. 11, pp. 1667–1671, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  143. J. Kroonen, J. Nassen, Y.-G. Boulanger et al., “Human glioblastoma-initiating cells invade specifically the subventricular zones and olfactory bulbs of mice after striatal injection,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 574–585, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. M. D. Taylor, H. Poppleton, C. Fuller et al., “Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma,” Cancer Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 323–335, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. J. Zhang, R. Babu, R. E. McLendon, A. H. Friedman, and C. Adamson, “A comprehensive analysis of 41 patients with rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors of the fourth ventricle,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 335–341, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. F. J. Sim, H. M. Keyoung, J. E. Goldman et al., “Neurocytoma is a tumor of adult neuronal progenitor cells,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 48, pp. 12544–12555, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. A. Bertalanffy, K. Roessler, O. Koperek, E. Gelpi, D. Prayer, and E. Knosp, “Recurrent central neurocytomas,” Cancer, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 135–142, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. H. W. Yang, L. G. Menon, P. M. Black, R. S. Carroll, and M. D. Johnson, “SNAI2/Slug promotes growth and invasion in human gliomas,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, article 301, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. J. Myung, B.-K. Cho, Y.-S. Kim, and S.-H. Park, “Snail and Cox-2 expressions are associated with WHO tumor grade and survival rate of patients with gliomas,” Neuropathology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 224–231, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. M. Salvati, E. Caroli, G. Rocchi, A. Frati, C. Brogna, and E. R. Orlando, “Post-traumatic glioma. Report of four cases and review of the literature,” Tumori, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 416–419, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  151. C. Yang, R. R. Iyer, A. C. Yu et al., “beta-Catenin signaling initiates the activation of astrocytes and its dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of astrocytomas,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 18, pp. 6963–6968, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. X. Liu, L. Wang, S. Zhao, X. Ji, Y. Luo, and F. Ling, “β-Catenin overexpression in malignant glioma and its role in proliferation and apoptosis in glioblastma cells,” Medical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 608–614, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. A. Gong and S. Huang, “FoxM1 and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in glioma stem cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 22, pp. 5658–5662, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. P. Pu, Z. Zhang, C. Kang et al., “Downregulation of Wnt2 and β-catenin by siRNA suppresses malignant glioma cell growth,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 351–361, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. C. Yang, S. Rahimpour, A. C. Yu, R. R. Lonser, and Z. Zhuang, “Regulation and dysregulation of astrocyte activation and implications in tumor formation,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 22, pp. 4201–4211, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. M. C. Guadamillas, A. Cerezo, and M. A. del Pozo, “Overcoming anoikis—pathways to anchorageindependent growth in cancer,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 124, no. 19, pp. 3189–3197, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. S. Belachew, R. Chittajallu, A. A. Aguirre et al., “Postnatal NG2 proteoglycan-expressing progenitor cells are intrinsically multipotent and generate functional neurons,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 169–186, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. B. Lang, H. L. Liu, R. Liu, G. D. Feng, X. Y. Jiao, and G. Ju, “Astrocytes in injured adult rat spinal cord may acquire the potential of neural stem cells,” Neuroscience, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 775–783, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. H. Ohgaki and P. Kleihues, “Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. M. P. W. A. Houben, J. W. W. Coebergh, J. M. Birch, C. C. Tijssen, C. M. Van Duijn, and R. J. Q. McNally, “Space-time clustering patterns of gliomas in the Netherlands suggest an infectious aetiology,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 41, no. 18, pp. 2917–2923, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. G. T. R. Monteiro, R. A. Pereira, R. J. Koifman, and S. Koifman, “Head injury and brain tumours in adults: a case-control study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 917–921, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. Z.-C. Ye and H. Sontheimer, “Glioma cells release excitotoxic concentrations of glutamate,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 17, pp. 4383–4391, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  163. A. Rosati, S. Marconi, B. Pollo et al., “Epilepsy in glioblastoma multiforme: correlation with glutamine synthetase levels,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 319–324, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. E. Crocetti, A. Trama, C. Stiller et al., “Epidemiology of glial and non-glial brain tumours in Europe,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1532–1542, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Jan de Weille. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.