Research Article

Effects of Hand Vibration on Motor Output in Chronic Hemiparesis

Table 2

Spearman correlation coefficients of motor output versus motor function and sensory evaluation.

MEP amplitudeMVCd/dtmax
TestsBefore vibrationDuring vibrationBefore vibrationDuring vibrationBefore vibrationDuring vibration

MEP amplitude
 During vibration0.87
MVC
 Before vibration0.710.68
 During vibration0.660.690.96
d/d
 Before vibration0.710.58*0.900.82
 During vibration0.670.60*0.770.780.73
Spasticity and hand function
 FM hand0.870.810.740.710.770.56*
 Spasticity−0.69−0.62*−0.61*−0.64−0.67−0.64
 BB hemi.0.880.850.730.720.760.64
 NHP hemi.−0.82−0.66−0.76−0.75−0.81−0.69
Sensory evaluation
 Proprioception0.080.230.360.470.260.18
 Tuning fork 128 Hz−0.070.180.350.360.340.23
 Semmes Weinstein−0.03−0.26−0.21−0.310.02−0.11
 Vibration threshold0.05−0.17−0.11−0.08−0.060.05

MEP, motor evoked potential; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction; d/d, maximal rate of force production; FM, Fugl-Meyer; BB, Box and Block; NHP, Nine Hole Peg. Correlations with MEP: ; correlations without MEP: .
; ; .