Hot Corrosion of SrTiO3 Perovskite in Na2SO4 + 50 wt.% V2O5 and Na2SO4 + 10 wt.% NaCl Environments at 900°C

Krishna Prasad, M.; Rao, K. Srinivasa; Reddy, Madhusudhan; Sreedhar, Gosipathala

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4763085

International Journal of Corrosion

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 4763085 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4763085

Hot Corrosion of SrTiO₃ Perovskite in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl Environments at 900°C

M. Krishna Prasad,¹K. Srinivasa Rao,²Madhusudhan Reddy,³and Gosipathala Sreedhar⁴

Academic Editor: Francisco Javier Perez Trujillo

Received23 Jan 2018

Accepted20 Mar 2018

Published22 May 2018

Abstract

This study examines the phase stability of perovskite SrTiO₃ in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C. Hot corrosion results show the formation of Sr₂VO₄, SrV₂O₆, and SrTiV₅O₁₁ phases in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment and Sr₃Ti₂O₇, Na₄TiO₄, and TiO₂ phases in Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environment. Morphological observations revealed the austerity of hot corrosion attack on SrTiO₃. The Sr²⁺ ions leached out from SrTiO₃ and reacted with corrosive environments. These observations clearly indicate the destabilization of SrTiO₃ in both environments.

1. Introduction

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are generally applied as thermal insulating layers on the hot metallic surfaces such as combustion engine parts, gas turbine blades, and aeroengine parts. TBCs can enhance the operating temperature and reduce the cooling requirements ensuing higher engine efficiency and part life of an engine [1–5]. In order to gratify the requirements of TBC materials, the properties such as low thermal conductivity, higher melting point, and matching thermal expansion coefficient with bond coat are needed. Another predominant factor for determining the durability of TBCs is the stability against hot corrosion. Hot corrosion occurs when the engine runs with low quality fuel which contains sodium, vanadium, and sulfur as impurities in it and also in chloride (marine) environments. The sodium and vanadium salts are having lower melting point (700–880°C) than gas turbine operating temperature (>1300°C). Hence, their salts can easily condensate in the form of Na₂SO₄, V₂O₅, and NaCl on the top coat of TBCs and undergo hot corrosion in two types (Types I and II). Type I generally occurs above the melting point of sodium sulphate (Tm 884°C) with Type II vice versa. In both the types, these salts react with ceramic top coat and show the way for destabilization and degradation of TBCs.

In recent years, 6–8 wt.% yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) has been widely used as a top coat material for TBC and much research has been involved in understanding the hot corrosion behavior of YSZ in corrosive environments. The authors reported that these molten salts could cause several microcracks and spallation of the coating [6–9]. Particularly, in vanadium containing environments, YSZ is found to be unstable and forms YVO₄ and m’-ZrO₂ (destabilization). Destabilization causes the volume change and leads to spallation of the coating.

Therefore, there is a need to develop alternate materials to enhance the hot corrosion stability of the coating. The candidate materials, such as garnets (Y₃Al₅O₁₂), La, Sm, Nd, Yb, and Gd doped ZrO₂, YSZ-Ta₂O₅, monazite (LaPO₄), and lanthanum aluminates (LaMgAl₁₁O₁₉) were developed in recent years and their stability was examined [10–14]. Perovskite (ABO₃) based ceramics (SrZrO₃, SrCeO₃, and BaZrO₃) have also drawn much attention towards TBCs due to their low thermal conductivity, higher melting point, and matching thermal expansion coefficient with bond coat material. Particularly, the SrTiO₃ has higher melting point of 2080°C, thermal expansion coefficient 10⁻⁵ K⁻¹ (1727°C), and thermal conductivity in the range of 11 to 2.5 W·m⁻¹ K⁻¹ (25°C to 1100°C). But the review of literature showed that the published work on SrTiO₃ is mostly devoted to understanding the thermophysical properties [15–20]. However, the literature on hot corrosion behavior of SrTiO₃ is sparse and reactions between SrTiO₃ and molten melts remain unclear. Therefore, further studies are needed to understand the hot corrosion behavior of SrTiO₃.

Hence, the present work is focused on studying the phase stability of perovskite type SrTiO₃ in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Strontium titanate powders were synthesized via hydrothermal route [21] using strontium hydroxide (99%, Alfa Aesar) and titanium tetrachloride (99.9%, Fisher Scientific) as precursor materials. To make the pellets, obtained strontium titanate powders were pressed with 370 MPa pressure using a uniaxial die (1.3 cm internal diameter). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was used as a binder (1 : 10 ratio) in the preparation of strontium titanate pellets. Compacted pellets were kept in a furnace at 500°C for 48 h to remove the binder. Then these pellets were heat treated at 900°C for 48 h.

2.2. Hot Corrosion Tests

A mixture of Na₂SO₄ and V₂O₅ salts in 1 : 1 weight ratio and another mixture of Na₂SO₄ and NaCl salts in 9 : 1 weight ratio were prepared and dissolved separately in distilled water for getting 50 wt.% of each salt solution. Samples were preheated at 200°C for 30 min to achieve good adhesion of salts. Salt solution was applied on all sides of surface using camel hair brush. Salt coated samples were kept in a furnace and heated at 120°C for 2 h to remove the moisture. The samples were weighed to determine the salt coverage and found in the range of 20–30 mg/cm². Then these salt coated samples were kept in an alumina boat and heated at 900°C for 100 h in air. After hot corrosion, samples were taken out and washed with running water and dried.

2.3. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Before and after hot corrosion, the nature of phases was investigated by X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, D8 advance) with Cu Kα radiation with a scan rate of 6°/min. All the phases were identified using the JCPDS-PCPDFWIN software package.

2.4. Morphological Analysis

The surface morphologies and elemental analysis of samples were examined by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM-ZEISS-SUPRA 55VP) attached with EDX (OXFORD instruments).

3. Results

3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the SrTiO₃ sample (A) before hot corrosion and after subjecting to hot corrosion at 900°C in (B) Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment and (C) Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environment. Before hot corrosion, it is observed that SrTiO₃ is in cubic phase (JCPDS-79-0176). After exposure to hot corrosion in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment (Figure 1(B)), additional phases such as Sr₂VO₄, SrV₂O₆, and SrTiV₅O₁₁ (JCPDS-81-0854, 28-1267, and 48-0540, resp.) were identified. After exposure to hot corrosion in Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environment (Figure 1(C)), additional phases such as Sr₃Ti₂O₇ (JCPDS-78-2479), Na₄TiO₄ (JCPDS-42-0513), and TiO₂ were identified. It is worthwhile to mention that SrTiO₃ phase is found to be unstable in both Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C. Succinctly, this indicates destabilization of SrTiO₃.

3.2. Morphological and Microchemical Analysis

Surface morphology of SrTiO₃ sample before and after exposure to hot corrosion in both Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C was examined to identify the severity of hot corrosion attack. Figure 2 shows the macroscopic view of the SrTiO₃ before and after exposure to hot corrosion. Figure 2(a) (before hot corrosion) reveals that surface is free from cracks and scales. Nonuniform and severe hot corrosion attack was noticed on the surfaces which were subjected to hot corrosion in both Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ (Figure 2(b)) and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments (Figure 2(c)) at 900°C.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3 shows the surface morphology of SrTiO₃ before subjecting to hot corrosion. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the lower and higher magnification FESEM images of SrTiO₃. Figure 3(b) shows the spherical shape morphology. EDX analysis was performed to identify the chemical compositions at region 1 (Figure 3(b)) and the data is presented in Table 1. Region 1 is composed of Sr, Ti, and O (corresponding to SrTiO₃). These results are in good agreement with the XRD results (Figure 1(A)). The surface morphology of SrTiO₃ after subjecting to hot corrosion in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment at 900°C reveals the octahedron shape morphology (Figure 4(a)). Higher magnification image of Figure 4(a) is shown in Figure 4(b) and EDX analysis was done at region 1 (data is presented in Table 1). Region 1 is composed of Sr, Ti, and O (corresponding to SrTiO₃). Spherical type of morphology of strontium titanate changes onto octahedral shape when treated in sulphate solution of venadate at 900°C. Figure 4(c) shows irregular shape morphology. EDX point analysis was carried out at region 1 (data is presented in Table 1) and this location is composed of Sr, V, and O (corresponding to strontium vanadates). Figure 5 shows the severity of hot corrosion on SrTiO₃ after exposure to Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment and it shows the porous layer and corrosion products on the surface of SrTiO₃.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(c)

The surface morphology of SrTiO₃ after exposure to Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C is shown in Figure 6. Lower magnification image (Figure 6(a)) reveals that nonuniform, severe hot corrosion and groove attack were observed in Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environment. Higher magnification image (Figure 6(b)) reveals the plate type of morphology. EDX analysis was carried out at region 1 (data is presented in Table 1) in Figure 6(b) and this location is composed of Sr, Ti, and O (corresponding to Sr₃Ti₂O₇). Similar type of morphology for Sr₃Ti₂O₇ has also been observed by previous author [22].

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

The phase stability of SrTiO₃ against hot corrosion is being studied in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C. Though SrTiO₃ is an oxide, it underwent destabilization in both environments. Massive hot corrosion attack is being observed on surface of SrTiO₃ after being subjected to both environments at 900°C. Significant literature is available for SrO-V₂O₅ binary systems but not for SrO-NaVO₃. It is reasonable to predict the chemical reaction between SrTiO₃ and NaVO₃ using SrO-V₂O₅ [23, 24] and SrO-VO₂-V₂O₅ phase diagrams [25]. First, SrTiO₃ decomposed into SrO and TiO₂ phases by leaching of Sr²⁺ ions from SrTiO₃ due to the presence of corrosive environments (see (1)). When the temperature reaches 630°C in furnace, NaVO₃ forms and acts as good solvent medium for oxides. At this stage, the reactions between sodium vanadate and oxides are faster.

Habibi et al. [14] have also reported that the liquid NaVO₃ will increase the atom mobility of oxide elements. SrO reacts with NaVO₃ liquid melt and forms SrV₂O₆ (see (2)). Again Na₂O reacts separately with V₂O₅ and SO₃ and forms NaVO₃ and Na₂SO₄, respectively. This reaction is cyclic. SrO and TiO₂ can also react with NaVO₃ and form SrTiV₅O₁₁. At 900°C, SrO reacts with NaVO₃ and forms the Sr₂VO₄ phase (see (3)). This phase is identified as predominant corrosion product phase in XRD (Figure 1(B)). The above sequence of reactions describes the formation mechanism of corrosion products. Higher magnification image of SrTiO₃ (Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ at 900°C) (Figure 5) shows the severe hot corrosion and corrosion products on it. Due to damage caused by Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅, a porous layer and corrosion products were formed and observed in the Figure 5. This reveals the severity of hot corrosion on SrTiO₃ in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment.

The Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environment also caused the leaching Sr²⁺ ions and subsequently formation of SrO and reacts with chloride to form SrCl₂ (see (4)). In general thermodynamic stability of oxides is higher than the chlorides. Hence formed chlorides are further transformed into oxides (see (5)). Further they reacted with themselves and formed Sr₃Ti₂O₇ at 900°C (see (6)). Tilley [26] has studied the Sr-Ti-O system at 1100–1473°C and reported the formation of three phases such as Sr₂TiO₄, Sr₃Ti₂O₇, and SrTiO₃. Jacob and Rajitha [27] have studied the pseudo-binary system (SrO + TiO₂) at 775 to 977°C and reported the thermodynamics properties of Sr₂TiO₄, Sr₃Ti₂O₇, Sr₄Ti₃O₁₀, and SrTiO₃ using solid state galvanic cells (see (6)). Based on the previous works [22, 27] the reaction between SrO and TiO₂ can be expressed as follows:

The TiO₂ phase can react with Na₂O to form Na₄TiO₄ (see (7)). There has been no previous work on hot corrosion behavior of SrTiO₃ in NaCl medium. The possible role of Na₂O against SrO and TiO₂ phases is discussed here. According to Coulomb’s law (lattice energy depends on the ionic radii and charges of the ions) the compounds with +2 ions have more lattice energy than the compounds with +1 ion. In addition to this, Ti atoms are having smaller ionic radius (94 pm) than that of Sr atoms (112 pm) [28]. Hence, the Ti-O structured atoms would be expected to have larger lattice energy which gives higher attractive force towards Na₂O. Based on our above discussions the order of lattice energy can be expressed as

The lattice energy of TiO₂ (12150 kJ/mole) is more than that of SrO (3223 kJ/mole) [29]. As per theory, the lattice energy is directly proportional to the phase stability of the compound, which indicates the less stability for SrO at 900°C. But, in the case of TiO₂, it needs higher energy to separate the Ti²⁺ and O²⁻ ions. As we discussed earlier, the strong electrical attraction between the Na⁺ (Na₂O) and TiO₂ ions might cause the formation of Na₄TiO₄ phase (see (7)). These discussions are well in agreement with XRD (Figure 1(C)) results. This is the possible reason why the reaction between TiO₂ and NaCl was highly favored compared with that with SrO. According to the binary phase diagrams of Na₂O-TiO₂ [30, 31], Na₄TiO₄ melts at 850°C and this was the reason for Na₄TiO₄ being identified as minor corrosion product compared to that of Sr₃Ti₂O₇ in XRD (Figure 1(C)).

5. Conclusions

The hot corrosion behavior of perovskite type SrTiO₃ was studied in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C for 100 h.(1)SrTiO₃ has been found to be unstable in both Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ and Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environments at 900°C.(2)The Sr²⁺ ion leaches from its own phase and reacts with NaVO₃ to form Sr₂VO₄, SrV₂O₆ and SrTiV₅O₁₁ in Na₂SO₄ + 50 wt.% V₂O₅ environment.(3)The Na₂SO₄ + 10 wt.% NaCl environment also caused the leaching of Sr²⁺ ions. The SrO reacted with TiO₂ and formed Sr₃Ti₂O₇. The reaction between Na₂O and TiO₂ caused the formation of Na₄TiO₄.(4)This study clearly indicates the destabilization of SrTiO₃ in both mediums.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The author Dr. G. Sreedhar would like to acknowledge the DST, India, for sponsoring Project SB/EMEQ-036/2014 (GAP 09/15).

References

N. P. Padture, M. Gell, and E. H. Jordan, “Thermal barrier coatings for gas-turbine engine applications,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5566, pp. 280–284, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Wortman, B. A. Nagaraj, and E. C. Duderstadt, “Thermal barrier coatings for gas turbine use,” Materials Science and Engineering: A Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing, vol. 120-121, no. 2, pp. 433–440, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Clarke and S. R. Phillpot, “Thermal barrier coating materials,” Materials Today, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 22–29, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Miller, “Current status of thermal barrier coatings - An overview,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Uzun, I. Çevik, and M. Akçil, “Effects of thermal barrier coating on a turbocharged diesel engine performance,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 116-119, pp. 505–507, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Kisi and C. J. Howard, “Crystal structures of zirconia phases and their inter-relation,” Key Engineering Materials, no. 153-154, pp. 1–36, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sreedhar and V. S. Raja, “Hot corrosion behavior of YSZ/Al₂O₃ dispersed NiCrAlY plasma-sprayed coatings in Na₂SO₄-10 wt.% NaCl melt,” Corrosion Science, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2592–2602, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Jones and C. E. Williams, “Hot corrosion studies of zirconia ceramics,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 32, no. 1-4, pp. 349–358, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Park, J. Kim, M. Kim, H. Song, and C. Park, “Microscopic observations of degradations of yttria and ceria stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings under hot corrosion,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 190, pp. 357–365, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Xialong, Z. Yu, G. Lijion, Z. Binglin, W. Ying, and C. Xueqiong, “Hot corrosion behaviour of plasma sprayed YSZ/LaMgAl₁₁O₁₅ composite coatings in molten sulfate-vanadate salt,” Corrosion Science, vol. 53, pp. 2335–2343, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Wu, X. Wei, N. P. Padture et al., “Low thermal conductivity rare earth zirconates for potential thermal barrier coating applications,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 3031–3035, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Vassen, X. Cao, F. Tietz, D. Basu, and D. Stöver, “Zircoantes as new material for thermal barrier coatings,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 2023–2028, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Su, R. W. Trice, K. T. Faber, H. Wang, and W. D. Porter, “Thermal conductivity, phase stability, and oxidation resistance of Y₃Al₅O₁₂(YAG)/Y₂O₃-ZrO₂ (YSZ) thermal barrier coatings,” Oxidation of Metals, vol. 61, no. 3-4, pp. 253–271, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Habibi, L. Wang, J. Liang, and S. M. Guo, “An investigation on hot corrosion behavior of YSZ-Ta₂O₅ in Na₂SO₄+V₂O₅ salt at 1100°C,” Corrosion Science, vol. 75, pp. 409–414, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yamanaka, K. Kurosaki, T. Oyama et al., “Thermophysical properties of perovskite-type strontium cerate and zirconate,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1496–1499, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ma, D. E. Mack, R. Vaben, and D. Stover, “Perovskite-type strontium zircoante as a new material for thermal barrier coatings,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 2630–2635, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Heimburg, W. Beele, K. Kempter et al., “Process for producing a ceramic thermal barrier layer for gas turbine engine component,” U.S. Patent 6602553 B2, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
C. J. Howard and H. T. Stokes, “Structures and phase transformations in perovskites-A group theoretical approach,” Acta Crystallographica Section A, vol. 61, pp. 93–111, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
B. J. Kennedy, C. J. Howard, and B. C. Chakoumakos, “hakoumakos, High temperature phase transitions in SrZrO₃,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 4023–4027, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhao and D. J. Weidner, “Thermal expansion of SrZrO₃ and BaZrO₃perovskites,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 294–301, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chen, X. Jiao, D. Chen, and Y. Zhao, “Effects of precursors on hydrothermally synthesized SrTiO₃ powders,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2119–2126, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. F. Wei, X. L. Chen, F. M. Wang, W. C. Li, M. He, and Y. Zhang, “Phase relations in the ternary system SrO-TiO₂-B₂O₃,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 327, no. 1-2, pp. L10–L13, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sreedhar, M. M. Alam, and V. S. Raja, “Hot corrosion behavior of plasma sprayed YSZ/Al₂O₃dispersed NiCrAlY coatings on Inconel-718 super alloy,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 291–299, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-S. Park, J. Luo, L. Adijanto, J. M. Vohs, and R. J. Gorte, “The stability of lanthanum strontium vanadate for solid oxide fuel cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 222, pp. 123–128, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Kaul, Experimental investigation of new low-dimensional spin systems in vanadium oxides, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2005.
R. J. D. Tilley, “An electron microscope study of perovskite-related oxides in the SrTiO system,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. T. Jacob and G. Rajitha, “Thermodynamic properties of strontium titanates: Sr₂TiO₄, Sr₃Ti₂O₇, Sr₄Ti₃O₁₀and SrTiO₃,” The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Dean, Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, New York, USA, 15th edition, 1972.
H. D. B. Jenkins, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Florida, USA, 79th edition, 1998.
R. S. Roth, T. Negas, and L. P. Cook, “Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, Columbus,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 5, article 88, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Tathavadkar and A. Jha, “The effect of molten sodium titanate and carbonate salt mixture on the alkali roasting of ilmenite and rutile minerals,” in Proceedings of VII International conference on molten slags fluxes and salts, pp. 255–262, SAIMM, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 M. Krishna Prasad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

973

Downloads

1098

Citations