Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Cell Biology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 516789, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/516789
Review Article

Integrin Trafficking and Tumor Progression

Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA

Received 27 July 2011; Accepted 12 September 2011

Academic Editor: Jun Chung

Copyright © 2012 Sejeong Shin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Integrins are major mediators of cancer cell adhesion to extracellular matrix. Through this interaction, integrins play critical roles in cell migration, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to apoptosis during tumor progression. Recent studies highlight the importance of integrin trafficking, endocytosis and recycling, for the functions of integrins in cancer cells. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of integrin trafficking is pivotal for understanding tumor progression and for the development of anticancer drugs.

1. Integrins and Cancer

Most of the cells in multicellular organisms are surrounded by a complex mixture of nonliving materials that make up the extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM of vertebrates is composed of complex mixtures of proteins (collagens, laminins, fibronectin, etc.) and proteoglycans (chondroitin sulfate, keratan sulfate, etc.) [1, 2]. ECM plays a significant role in regulating numerous cellular functions, including cell shape, adhesion, migration, proliferation, polarity, differentiation, and apoptosis [1]. In pathological conditions such as cancer, increased synthesis of certain ECM components and/or increased breakdown with consequent generation of ECM cleavage products can contribute to cancer growth and progression [3].

Cells attach to the ECM by means of integrins. Integrins are transmembrane glycoproteins that are composed of a set of noncovalently associated α and β subunits. There are at least 18α and 8β subunits capable of forming more than 24αβ heterodimers that account for the structural and functional diversity of the integrin family [46]. Integrins consist of a large extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail [7]. The extracellular portion of integrins binds to ECM proteins, and the intracellular portion binds to cellular cytoskeletal elements such as actin filaments. This connection reinforces tissue integrity and cell adhesion and stabilizes cell protrusions during migration. The connection also constitutes a signaling platform through which integrins can relay information for major processes such as transcriptional control, cell death, proliferation, and cell migration [8, 9]. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that alterations in the adhesion properties of neoplastic cells endow them with an invasive and migratory phenotype. Indeed, changes in the expression and/or function of integrins have been implicated in all steps of tumor progression, including detachment of tumor cells from the primary site, invasion of ECM, intravasation into the blood stream, dissemination through the circulation, extravasation into distant target organs, and formation of the secondary lesions [5, 1013].

Although at least 24αβ integrin heterodimers are known, α5β1, α6β4, αvβ3, and αvβ6 integrins have been extensively studied in cancer and their expression is correlated with cancer progression in various tumor types [1418]. Upregulation of these integrins renders cancer cells more motile, invasive, and resistant to anticancer drugs [5, 18]. Unlike these integrins, expression levels of some integrins, such as α2β1 and α1β1, decrease in tumor cells, which potentially increase tumor cell dissemination [1821]. In addition to changes in expression, changes in the function of these integrins also play a critical role in cancer progression.

2. Integrin Trafficking

The way in which integrins are trafficked by the endosomal pathway is now recognized to influence their function [6, 22]. Certain integrin heterodimers are continually internalized from the plasma membrane into endosomal compartments and subsequently recycled back to the cell surface, which indicates that the endocytic and recycling pathways have the potential to exert minute-to-minute control over integrin function. Abundant evidence suggests that integrin trafficking regulates cell adhesion to ECM, establishes and maintains cell polarity, redefines signaling pathways, and controls migration [6, 23]. Therefore, transcriptional changes, mutational alterations, and deregulated cellular signaling changing endocytosis and recycling of integrins confer invasive and metastatic properties to tumor cells.

Integrin trafficking is regulated by members of the Ras-associated binding (Rab) family of small GTPases, which function as molecular switches regulating vesicular transport in eukaryotic cells [24, 25] (Figure 1). Through their indirect interactions with coat components, motors, and other proteins, the Rab GTPases serve as multifaceted organizers of almost all membrane trafficking processes including integrin trafficking [25, 26]. Approximately 70 types of Rab GTPases have now been identified in humans [27]. Among these, several Rab GTPases regulate endocytosis and recycling of integrins. For example, Rab21 mediates integrin endocytosis (Figure 1). In addition, Rab11 mediates slow integrin recycling through recycling endosomes, whereas Rab4 mediates fast integrin recycling directly from early endosomes (Figure 1) [25].

516789.fig.001
Figure 1: The roles of Rab GTPases involved in integrin trafficking. Integrins can be internalized by a clathrin-dependent, caveolin-dependent, or clathrin- and caveolin-independent pathway. For example, some integrins are internalized by a Rab21 and clathrin-independent pathway. Once internalized, integrins can be recycled back to the plasma membrane by a Rab4-dependent manner or can be transported to the perinuclear recycling compartment. Rab11 family members (Rab11 and Rab25) regulate recycling of integrins from perinuclear recycling compartment.

The pathophysiological roles of Rab GTPases in human malignancies have been less studied compared to members of the Ras and Rho GTPase families. However, more attention has been paid to the roles of Rab GTPases in cancer in recent years, and several members of the Rab family such as Rab11 and Rab25 have been shown to be aberrantly expressed in various cancer types [25, 28, 29]. Because of the important roles of Rab GTPases in integrin trafficking, deregulation of Rab GTPases is closely related to cancer development and progression [24, 25, 29].

2.1. Integrin Endocytosis

There are several major endocytosis mechanisms, including clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated endocytosis, and clathrin- and caveolin-independent endocytosis [3033]. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is mediated by small vesicles that have a morphologically characteristic crystalline coat made up of a complex of proteins associated with the cytosolic protein clathrin [33]. Clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) are found in virtually all cells and form domains of the plasma membrane termed clathrin-coated pits. Clathrin-coated pits can concentrate large extracellular molecules and receptors responsible for the receptor-mediated endocytosis of ligands, for example, low-density lipoprotein, transferrin, growth factors, and antibodies [30, 33]. In contrast, caveolae-mediated endocytosis is mediated by small flask-shape pits, caveolae, in the membrane. Caveolae are the most common reported non-clathrin-coated plasma membrane buds which exist on the surface of many, but not all cell types [33]. They consist of the cholesterol-binding protein caveolin (Vip21) with a bilayer enriched in cholesterol and glycolipids [30]. Clathrin- and caveolin-independent endocytosis includes macropinocytosis and circular dorsal ruffles [9, 30, 33]. Clathrin-dependent endocytosis and caveolin-dependent endocytosis require dynamin and exhibit small vesicles. However, macropinocytosis does not require dynamin and displays highly ruffled structures. Like macropinocytosis, circular dorsal ruffles show highly ruffled structures, but this endocytosis is dependent on dynamin.

Integrins are known to be endocytosed by clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated endocytosis, and clathrin- and caveolin-independent endocytosis (Table 1). It is probable that a given type of integrin heterodimer follows more than one route to internalization depending on regions within a cell, cell conditions, and cell type [6, 34]. For instance, a subpopulation of integrin α5β1 is internalized into clathrin-coated structures near focal complexes at the cell front, whereas the bulk of integrin α5β1 follows a nonclathrin pathway from other parts of the cell surface [34].

tab1
Table 1: Mechanisms of the internalization and recycling of integrins α5β1, α6β4, αvβ3, and αvβ6.

Deregulation of integrin endocytosis is closely related to cancer development and progression [9, 30]. For example, chromosomal deletion and loss of Rab21, a regulator of endocytic trafficking of integrins, has been found in cancer that leads to the accumulation of multinucleate cells in cancer. The correlation with multinucleate cells is thought to reflect the requirement of Rab21-mediated integrin endocytosis for correct cytokinesis [35]. Rab21 also enhances cancer cell adhesion and migration by regulating integrin endocytosis [36].

2.2. Integrin Recycling

Once internalized, integrins are predominantly recycled back to the plasma membrane, although a fraction of integrin α5β1 has been shown to traffic to lysosomes for degradation during migration [6, 37]. Following endocytosis, integrins travel to early endosomes from which they can either be returned directly to the plasma membrane in a Rab4-dependent manner (the short loop) or further trafficked to the perinuclear recycling compartment (PNRC) before recycling through Rab11-dependent mechanisms (the long loop) (Table 1). Rab11 GTPase functions have been linked to tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Rab11 is upregulated during skin carcinogenesis [38] and is linked to Barrett’s dysplasia [39]. However, the function of the Rab11 family member Rab25 (or Rab11C) is controversial. Rab25 shows highly restricted expression under normal physiological conditions but is upregulated in invasive cancer cell lines and metastatic tumor cells [40], and its elevated expression is further linked to the aggressiveness of breast and ovarian cancers [28]. Rab25 is a determinant of tumor progression, and the aggressiveness of epithelial cancers and is strongly associated with decreased survival [28]. In contrast, recent studies showed that Rab25 expression is decreased in human colon cancers and triple-negative (negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Her2/Neu) breast cancers, and Rab25 functions as a tumor suppressor in these cancers [4143]. The key roles of Rab GTPases in tumorigenesis and tumor progression are closely related to integrin recycling. For example, Rab25 contributes to tumor progression by directing the localization of integrin-recycling vesicles and thereby enhancing the ability of tumor cells to invade the extracellular matrix [44].

3. Trafficking of Integrin α5β1

Integrin α5β1 is a receptor for fibronectin and contributes to cancer cell invasion, metastasis, resistance to anticancer drugs, and decreased survival in patients [17, 45].

Integrin α5β1 is internalized by clathrin-dependent, caveolin-dependent, and clathrin- and caveolin-independent mechanisms. For clathrin-dependent endocytosis, α5β1 integrin binds to NUMB, an endocytic protein that influences clathrin-coated pit assembly [46]. Integrin α5β1 can also internalize with tetraspanin protein, which interacts with AP-2, an adaptor for clathrin-mediated endocytosis [47]. Clathrin-dependent internalization of α5β1 integrin with NUMB or tetraspanin has a profound effect on cell migration. In addition, α5β1 integrin can undergo Rab21- and clathrin-independent endocytosis that is required for successful cytokinesis [35]. In some cell types, integrin α5β1 localizes to caveolae for caveolin-mediated endocytosis [6, 48]. Caveolin-dependent endocytosis of integrin α5β1 is critical for fibronectin turnover [48].

Internalized integrin α5β1 is transported through Rab4-positive early endosomes and arrives at the Rab11-positive perinuclear recycling compartment [49]. Akt-mediated glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3 phosphorylation is known to deliver α5β1 from the Rab11 compartment to the plasma membrane [50]. One of the Rab11 effectors, Rab11 FIP1/RCP, associates with integrin α5β1 and regulates recycling of this integrin [51]. Rab-coupling protein (RCP) provides a scaffold that promotes the physical association and coordinated trafficking of α5β1 and epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR1). This association drives migration of tumor cells into three-dimensional matrices [51]. Recently, it was shown that mutant p53 can promote invasion, loss of directionality of migration, and metastatic behavior by regulating the interaction of α5β1 integrin to Rab-coupling protein, which enhances α5β1 trafficking and signaling [52]. Since Rab25 (Rab11C, Rab11 family member) binds to Rab11 FIP1/RCP, it is hypothesized that interaction between them may control integrin α5β1 trafficking. Recently, it has been shown that Rab25 associates with α5β1 integrin to enhance migration and invasion of cells in three-dimensional microenvironments and directs α5β1 integrin recycling to dynamic ruffling protrusions at the leading edge of migrating cells, which promotes invasive migration [29, 44]. In addition to Rab11 and Rab25, Rab21 is required for carcinoma-associated fibroblasts to promote invasion by cancer cells and facilitates integrin α5β1 accumulation for force-mediated matrix remodeling at the plasma membrane [53]. It has also been shown that Rab21-dependent recycling of integrin α5β1 is critical for proper activation of RhoA during cytokinesis [35].

Although most endocytosed integrin α5β1 is known to recycle back to plasma membrane, a subset of this integrin moves to lysosomes for degradation [37]. This process is very slow, but it is important for α5β1-dependent cell motility [37].

4. Trafficking of Integrin α6β4

Integrin α6β4 is a receptor for laminin. Overexpression of α6β4 integrin was seen in several types of cancers including breast cancer and correlated with tumor invasion, increased tumor size and grade, and a poor prognosis [5457].

We showed that integrin α6β4 integrin recycles back to the plasma membrane via the Rab11-positive perinuclear recycling compartment [58]. Hypoxia stimulated carcinoma invasion by promoting Rab11 trafficking of integrin α6β4, which is dependent on hypoxia-inhibited glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3 signaling [58].

5. Trafficking of Integrin αvβ3

Integrin αvβ3 is a receptor for fibronectin and vitronectin. Integrin αvβ3 is expressed in a variety of tumors such as melanoma, prostate cancer, and breast cancer [59]. Integrin αvβ3 is overexpressed in activated endothelial cells during tumor-induced angiogenesis, whereas it is absent on quiescent endothelial cells and normal tissues. It is known that integrin αvβ3 promotes cancer cell survival, migration, invasion, and metastasis [4, 60, 61].

Integrin αvβ3 is endocytosed via clathrin-dependent, caveolin-dependent, or clathrin- and caveolin-independent mechanisms. NUMB is an alternative clathrin adaptor and can interact with β3 integrin, which controls αvβ3 integrin endocytosis and cell migration [46]. In some cell types, integrin αvβ3 is internalized by caveolin-dependent mechanisms [62]. In this case, MT1-MMP is clustered together with caveolin-1 and αvβ3 integrin at motility-associated structures, resulting in increased proteolytic activity, which is important for cell migration and invasion [62]. A recent study shows that upon growth factors stimulation, integrin β3 abruptly redistributes to circular dorsal ruffles where it is internalized through macropinocytosis, which plays an important role in growth factor-induced cell migration [63].

Internalized integrin αvβ3 recycles back to the plasma membrane via Rab4-dependent mechanisms or the Rab11-positive perinuclear recycling compartment [23]. Following treatment with PDGF, integrin αvβ3 was rapidly recycled directly back to the plasma membrane from early endosomes via a Rab4-dependent mechanism without the involvement of Rab11 [49]. The PKC-related kinase PKD1 influences cell migration by this fast recycling of integrin αvβ3. It is known that PKD1 directly interacts with β3 integrin and this interaction promotes fast recycling of αvβ3 integrin from recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane upon growth factor stimulation [64]. Activation of VEGFR1 also enhances a Rab4A-dependent pathway that transports αvβ3-integrin from early endosomes to the plasma membrane [65]. Recent studies link PKD and VEGF signaling in which VEGF-A induces recycling of integrin αvβ3 in a PKD1-dependent manner [66]. Because of the involvement of Rab4 in the recycling of αvβ3 integrin, inhibition of Rab4 effector protein (Rab IP4) blocks integrin recycling, leading to inhibition of cell adhesion and cell spreading [67]. Another study suggests that supervillin, an actin and myosin binding protein, regulates rapid β3 integrin recycling through collaboration with Rab4 and Rab5 [68]. The short-loop recycling of integrin αvβ3 via Rab4 does not directly contribute to migration by moving αvβ3 to the cell front, but by antagonizing α5β1 recycling, which, in turn, influences the cell’s decision to migrate with persistence or to move randomly [69]. Integrin αvβ3 is also recycled to the plasma membrane in a Rab11-dependent manner (long loop recycling) in which Akt promotes this recycling by phosphorylating and inactivating GSK-3 [50].

6. Trafficking of Integrin αvβ6

Integrin αvβ6 is a receptor for fibronectin, vitronectin, and tenascin. Integrin αvβ6 is usually expressed at low or undetectable levels in most healthy adult epithelia but is upregulated in many cancers such as colon cancer [70]. The expression of integrin αvβ6 inhibits apoptosis and promotes tumor cell invasion and metastasis, which is often associated with a more aggressive disease outcome and a poor prognosis [18, 70].

Recently, the mechanism of endocytosis of integrin αvβ6 was revealed. Integrin αvβ6 is internalized by a clathrin-dependent mechanism by interaction with HS1-associated protein X1 (HAX1) [71]. HAX1 is found in clathrin-coated vesicles, and the cytodomain of β6 integrin interacts with HAX1 and is endocytosed, which increases carcinoma migration and invasion [71].

7. Conclusion and Future Direction

Integrins are key regulators of cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Therefore, deregulation of their expression and altered functions play critical roles in cancer progression by enhancing cancer cell invasion, metastasis, and survival. There are now clear indications that integrin trafficking is important to modulate integrin distribution and function. However, more studies are needed to define the molecular mechanisms of integrin trafficking in tumor progression. Many questions remain to be answered. One important question is whether endosomal integrins can signal cell proliferation and migration. It is known that unligated integrins can positively or negatively regulate tumor cell survival and metastasis, and, therefore, signaling arising from endosomal compartments may be important for tumor cell survival. Another question is how trafficking of specific integrins affects other integrins. For instance, it has been shown that rapid recycling of αvβ3 via the Rab4 pathway antagonizes the Rab11-mediated α5β1 recycling, which influences the cell's decision to migrate with persistence or to move randomly [69]. Because of the critical roles of integrins in cancer progression, integrins are potential targets for the development of targeted anticancer therapeutics. Understanding the mechanism of integrin trafficking will provide valuable information for the development of new anticancer drugs and clues to increase the efficacy of current anticancer therapeutics.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Belinda Peace for editing the paper and Glenn Doerman for the graphics. This work was supported by start-up fund from the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Marlene Harris-Ride Cincinnati Breast Cancer Pilot Grant Program.

References

  1. C. Jean, P. Gravelle, J. J. Fournie, and G. Laurent, “Influence of stress on extracellular matrix and integrin biology,” Oncogene, vol. 30, no. 24, pp. 2697–2706, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. C. C. Dufort, M. J. Paszek, and V. M. Weaver, “Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 308–319, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. S. M. Pupa, S. Ménard, S. Forti, and E. Tagliabue, “New insights into the role of extracellular matrix during tumor onset and progression,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 259–267, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. D. Cox, M. Brennan, and N. Moran, “Integrins as therapeutic targets: lessons and opportunities,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 804–820, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. N. Makrilia, A. Kollias, L. Manolopoulos, and K. Syrigos, “Cell adhesion molecules: role and clinical significance in cancer,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1023–1037, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. P. T. Caswell, S. Vadrevu, and J. C. Norman, “Integrins: masters and slaves of endocytic transport,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 843–853, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. B. H. Luo, C. V. Carman, and T. A. Springer, “Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 25, pp. 619–647, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. F. Ulrich and C. P. Heisenberg, “Trafficking and cell migration,” Traffic, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 811–818, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. A. G. Ramsay, J. F. Marshall, and I. R. Hart, “Integrin trafficking and its role in cancer metastasis,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 567–578, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. B. Felding-Habermann, T. E. O'Toole, J. W. Smith et al., “Integrin activation controls metastasis in human breast cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1853–1858, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. R. C. Bates, D. I. Bellovin, C. Brown et al., “Transcriptional activation of integrin β6 during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition defines a novel prognostic indicator of aggressive colon carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 339–347, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. M. Mercurio, I. Rabinovitz, and L. M. Shaw, “The α6β4 integrin and epithelial cell migration,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 541–545, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. C. Brooks, S. Strömblad, L. C. Sanders et al., “Localization of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-2 to the surface of invasive cells by interaction with integrin αvβ3,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 683–693, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Nip, H. Shibata, D. J. Loskutoff, D. A. Cheresh, and P. Brodt, “Human melanoma cells derived from lymphatic metastases use integrin α(v)β3 to adhere to lymph node vitronectin,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1406–1413, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Friedrichs, P. Ruiz, F. Franke, I. Gille, H. J. Terpe, and B. A. Imhof, “High expression level of α6 integrin in human breast carcinoma is correlated with reduced survival,” Cancer Research, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 901–906, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. P. McCabe, S. De, A. Vasanji, J. Brainard, and T. V. Byzova, “Prostate cancer specific integrin αvβ3 modulates bone metastatic growth and tissue remodeling,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 42, pp. 6238–6243, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  17. M. Adachi, T. Taki, M. Higashiyama, N. Kohno, H. Inufusa, and M. Miyake, “Significance of integrin α5 gene expression as a prognostic factor in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 96–101, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. S. Desgrosellier and D. A. Cheresh, “Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–22, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. A. Kren, V. Baeriswyl, F. Lehembre et al., “Increased tumor cell dissemination and cellular senescence in the absence of β1-integrin function,” EMBO Journal, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2832–2842, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. N. E. Ramirez, Z. Zhang, A. Madamanchi et al., “The α2β1 integrin is a metastasis suppressor in mouse models and human cancer,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 226–237, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. E. Matilla, T. Pellinen, J. Nevo, K. Vuoriluoto, A. Arjonen, and J. Ivaska, “Negative regulation of EGFR signalling through integrin-α1β1-mediated activation of protein tyrosine phosphatase TCPTP,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. T. Pellinen and J. Ivaska, “Integrin traffic,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 18, pp. 3723–3731, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. P. T. Caswell and J. C. Norman, “Integrin trafficking and the control of cell migration,” Traffic, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. W. J. Chia and B. L. Tang, “Emerging roles for Rab family GTPases in human cancer,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1795, no. 2, pp. 110–116, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Stenmark, “Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 513–525, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. M. C. Jones, P. T. Caswell, and J. C. Norman, “Endocytic recycling pathways: emerging regulators of cell migration,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 549–557, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. S. Mitra, K. W. Cheng, and G. B. Mills, “Rab GTPases implicated in inherited and acquired disorders,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. K. W. Cheng, J. P. Lahad, W. L. Kuo et al., “The RAB25 small GTPase determines aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1251–1256, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. D. Subramani and S. K. Alahari, “Integrin-mediated function of Rab GTPases in cancer progression,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 312, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. Y. Mosesson, G. B. Mills, and Y. Yarden, “Derailed endocytosis: an emerging feature of cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 835–850, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. A. Sorkin and M. von Zastrow, “Endocytosis and signalling: intertwining molecular networks,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 609–622, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. B. D. Grant and J. G. Donaldson, “Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 597–608, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. G. J. Doherty and H. T. McMahon, “Mechanisms of endocytosis,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 78, pp. 857–902, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  34. P. Caswell and J. Norman, “Endocytic transport of integrins during cell migration and invasion,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 257–263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  35. T. Pellinen, S. Tuomi, A. Arjonen et al., “Integrin trafficking regulated by Rab21 is necessary for cytokinesis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 371–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. T. Pellinen, A. Arjonen, K. Vuoriluoto, K. Kallio, J. A. M. Fransen, and J. Ivaska, “Small GTPase Rab21 regulates cell adhesion and controls endosomal traffic of β1-integrins,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 173, no. 5, pp. 767–780, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. V. H. Lobert, A. Brech, N. M. Pedersen et al., “Ubiquitination of α5β1 integrin controls fibroblast migration through lysosomal degradation of fibronectin-integrin complexes,” Developmental Cell, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 148–159, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. C. Gebhardt, U. Breitenbach, K. H. Richter et al., “c-Fos-dependent induction of the small ras-related GTPase Rab11a in skin carcinogenesis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 243–253, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. R. Goldenring, G. S. Ray, and J. R. Lee, “Rab11 in dysplasia of Barrett's epithelia,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 72, no. 2-3, pp. 113–120, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. Wang, S. Goswami, K. Lapidus et al., “Identification and testing of a gene expression signature of invasive carcinoma cells within primary mammary tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 23, pp. 8585–8594, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  41. J. M. Cheng, L. Volk, D. K. M. Janaki, S. Vyakaranam, S. Ran, and K. A. Rao, “Tumor suppressor function of Rab25 in triple-negative breast cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 12, pp. 2799–2812, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  42. J. R. Goldenring and K. T. Nam, “Rab25 as a tumour suppressor in colon carcinogenesis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. K. T. Nam, H. J. Lee, J. J. Smith et al., “Loss of Rab25 promotes the development of intestinal neoplasia in mice and is associated with human colorectal adenocarcinomas,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 840–849, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. P. T. Caswell, H. J. Spence, M. Parsons et al., “Rab25 associates with α5β1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments,” Developmental Cell, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 496–510, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  45. Y. H. Soung, J. L. Clifford, and J. Chung, “Crosstalk between integrin and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in breast carcinoma progression,” BMB Reports, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 311–318, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. Nishimura and K. Kaibuchi, “Numb controls integrin endocytosis for directional cell migration with aPKC and PAR-3,” Developmental Cell, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  47. L. Liu, B. He, W. M. Liu, D. Zhou, J. V. Cox, and X. A. Zhang, “Tetraspanin CD151 promotes cell migration by regulating integrin trafficking,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 43, pp. 31631–31642, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. F. Shi and J. Sottile, “Caveolin-1-dependent β1 integrin endocytosis is a critical regulator of fibronectin turnover,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 121, no. 14, pp. 2360–2371, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. M. Roberts, S. Barry, A. Woods, P. Van der Sluijs, and J. Norman, “PDGF-regulated rab4-dependent recycling of αvβ3 integrin from early endosomes is necessary for cell adhesion and spreading,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 1392–1402, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. S. Roberts, A. J. Woods, T. C. Dale, P. van der Sluijs, and J. C. Norman, “Protein kinase B/Akt acts via glycogen synthase kinase 3 to regulate recycling of αvβ3 and α5β1 integrins,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1505–1515, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. T. Caswell, M. Chan, A. J. Lindsay, M. W. McCaffrey, D. Boettiger, and J. C. Norman, “Rab-coupling protein coordinates recycling of α5β1 integrin and EGFR1 to promote cell migration in 3D microenvironments,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 143–155, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. P. A. J. Muller, P. T. Caswell, B. Doyle et al., “Mutant p53 drives invasion by promoting integrin recycling,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 7, pp. 1327–1341, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. S. Hooper, C. Gaggioli, and E. Sahai, “A chemical biology screen reveals a role for Rab21-mediated control of actomyosin contractility in fibroblast-driven cancer invasion,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 392–402, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  54. W. Guo, Y. Pylayeva, A. Pepe et al., “β4 integrin amplifies ErbB2 signaling to promote mammary tumorigenesis,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 489–502, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. V. M. Weaver, S. Lelièvre, J. N. Lakins et al., “β4 integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium,” Cancer Cell, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. M. Mercurio and I. Rabinovitz, “Towards a mechanistic understanding of tumor invasion—Lessons from the α6β4 integrin,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. L. K. Diaz, M. Cristofanilli, X. Zhou et al., “β4 Integrin subunit gene expression correlates with tumor size and nuclear grade in early breast cancer,” Modern Pathology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1165–1175, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  58. S. O. Yoon, S. Shin, and A. M. Mercurio, “Hypoxia stimulates carcinoma invasion by stabilizing microtubules and promoting the Rab11 trafficking of the α6β4 integrin,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 2761–2769, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  59. P. G. Natali, C. V. Hamby, B. Felding-Habermann et al., “Clinical significance of α(v)β3 integrin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in cutaneous malignant melanoma lesions,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1554–1560, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. A. Nemeth, M. T. Nakada, M. Trikha et al., “Alpha-v integrins as therapeutic targets in oncology,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 632–646, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. P. Koistinen, M. Ahonen, V. M. Kähäri, and J. Heino, “αV integrin promotes in vitro and in vivo survival of cells in metastatic melanoma,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. B. G. Gálvez, S. Matías-Román, M. Yáñez-Mó, M. Vicente-Manzanares, F. Sánchez-Madrid, and A. G. Arroyo, “Caveolae are a novel pathway for membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase traffic in human endothelial cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 678–687, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  63. Z. Gu, E. H. Noss, V. W. Hsu, and M. B. Brenner, “Integrins traffic rapidly via circular dorsal ruffles and macropinocytosis during stimulated cell migration,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  64. A. J. Woods, D. P. White, P. T. Caswell, and J. C. Norman, “PKD1/PKCμ promotes αvβ3 integrin recycling and delivery to nascent focal adhesions,” EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2531–2543, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  65. M. C. Jones, P. T. Caswell, K. Moran-Jones et al., “VEGFR1 (Flt1) regulates Rab4 recycling to control fibronectin polymerization and endothelial vessel branching,” Traffic, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 754–766, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  66. L. di Blasio, S. Droetto, J. Norman, F. Bussolino, and L. Primo, “Protein kinase D1 regulates VEGF-A-induced alphavbeta3 integrin trafficking and endothelial cell migration,” Traffic, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1107–1118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  67. J. Vukmirica, P. Monzo, Y. Le Marchand-Brustel, and M. Cormont, “The Rab4A effector protein Rabip4 is involved in migration of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 47, pp. 36360–36368, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  68. Z. Fang, N. Takizawa, K. A. Wilson et al., “The membrane-associated protein, supervillin, accelerates F-actin-dependent rapid integrin recycling and cell motility,” Traffic, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 782–799, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  69. D. P. White, P. T. Caswell, and J. C. Norman, “αvβ3 and α5β1 integrin recycling pathways dictate downstream Rho kinase signaling to regulate persistent cell migration,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 515–525, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  70. A. Bandyopadhyay and S. Raghavan, “Defining the role of integrin αvβ6 in cancer,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 645–652, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. G. Ramsay, M. D. Keppler, M. Jazayeri et al., “HS1-associated protein X-1 regulates carcinoma cell migration and invasion via clathrin-mediated endocytosis of integrin αvβ 6,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 5275–5284, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus