International Journal of Cell Biology

International Journal of Cell Biology / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Advances in Hyaluronan Biology: Signaling, Regulation, and Disease Mechanisms

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 614297 | 10 pages |

Regulatory T Cells Resist Cyclosporine-Induced Cell Death via CD44-Mediated Signaling Pathways

Academic Editor: Rony Seger
Received27 Sep 2014
Revised19 Jan 2015
Accepted19 Jan 2015
Published10 Sep 2015


Cyclosporine A (CSA) is an immunosuppressive agent that specifically targets T cells and also increases the percentage of pro-tolerogenic CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) through unknown mechanisms. We previously reported that CD44, a receptor for the extracellular matrix glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan (HA), promotes Treg stability in IL-2-low environments. Here, we asked whether CD44 signaling also promotes Treg resistance to CSA. We found that CD44 cross-linking promoted Foxp3 expression and Treg viability in the setting of CSA treatment. This effect was IL-2 independent but could be suppressed using sc-355979, an inhibitor of Stat5-phosphorylation. Moreover, we found that inhibition of HA synthesis impairs Treg homeostasis but that this effect could be overcome with exogenous IL-2 or CD44-cross-linking. Together, these data support a model whereby CD44 cross-linking by HA promotes IL-2-independent Foxp3 expression and Treg survival in the face of CSA.

1. Introduction

In healthy individuals, immunologic tolerance is maintained by populations of regulatory cells, including Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg). Treg are a subset of T cells that suppress autoreactive effector T cells (Teff). The absence or depletion of Treg leads to multisystemic autoimmunity in mice and humans [1]. In addition, adoptive transfer of Treg can rescue the healthy phenotype [2, 3].

Treg rely on Interleukin 2 (IL-2) for their suppressive function [4]. IL-2 promotes Foxp3 expression and Treg suppressor functions via signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (Stat5) signaling [510]. However, Foxp3 suppresses autocrine IL-2 production [6], such that Treg rely on other cell types, particularly activated Teff cells, as a source of IL-2. Along with effects on Treg, IL-2 activates Teff lymphocytes as well and promotes their proliferation.

In addition to IL-2, other factors are also known to support Treg maintenance in vivo and Treg are present in IL-2−/− as well as CD25−/− mice, though both strains do develop autoimmunity [11]. Furthermore, ambient IL-2 levels in circulation and in peripheral tissues [1214] are often a fraction of what Treg require in culture. Finally, while Treg in culture are anergic, in vivo their proliferation rate is high [15, 16]. Together, these data suggest that additional factors exist that support Treg maintenance in vivo.

Cyclosporine A (CSA) is an immunosuppressive agent that inhibits T cell proliferation by suppressing IL-2 synthesis [17]. CSA inhibits calcineurin-dependent IL-2 production by forming a complex with cyclophilin that inhibits calcineurin phosphatase induced upon T cell activation [18]. In turn, the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) remains in a phosphorylated state and, subsequently, cannot upregulate IL-2 gene expression [19].

The effectiveness of CSA treatment may reflect, in part, changes in the ratio of Treg to Teff cells [20]. Previous clinical and in vivo studies have found that treatment with CSA can promote Foxp3 expression in Treg [21, 22]. In vivo human data likewise suggests that CSA treatment results in higher levels of circulating Treg than in healthy donors [23]. These data suggest that Treg may have a survival advantage in certain contexts over Teff cells in the face of CSA. However, the mechanisms that underlie the relative sparing of Treg in the setting of CSA treatment are unclear.

One tissue factor known to promote Treg homeostasis in low-IL-2 environments is hyaluronan (HA), an extracellular matrix (ECM) glycosaminoglycan. We and others have demonstrated that high molecular weight HA (HMW-HA) (>1 × 106 kDa), characteristic of healing, and uninjured tissues [24] promote the function and persistence of Treg [2527]. These effects are dependent on HA polymer length and cross-linking of the primary HA receptor, CD44 [28], the expression of which is elevated on Treg [25]. In light of these data, we have proposed that HMW-HA cross-links CD44 and thereby provides Treg with homeostatic signals in injured and healing tissues [26].

We previously reported that CD44 cross-linking allows Treg to resist CSA-mediated cell death [28]. However, the underlying mechanisms remained unclear, as both Foxp3 and CSA are well known to efficiently suppress IL-2 production [6, 18].

Here, we have evaluated the hypothesis that CD44 cross-linking bypasses CSA treatment by recapitulating aspects of IL-2R signaling in the absence of IL-2. We found that CD44 cross-linking promotes Foxp3 expression in an IL-2-independent but Stat5-dependent manner. Moreover, we report that inhibition of HA synthesis impairs Treg homeostasis but that this effect could be overcome with exogenous IL-2 or CD44-cross-linking. Together, these data support a model whereby CD44 cross-linking by HA promotes IL-2-independent and Stat5-dependent Foxp3 expression and Treg survival in the face of CSA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice

Foxp3-GFP C57BL/6 mice were the kind gift of Dr. Alexander Rudensky. CD25 deficient C57BL/6 (CD25−/−) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Foxp3-GFP mice were crossed with CD25−/− mice to generate Foxp3-GFP.CD25−/− mice at our institution. All mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free AAALAC-accredited animal facilities at the BRI and Stanford University and handled in accordance with institutional guidelines.

2.2. Isolation of Leukocyte Populations

Mouse leukocyte populations were isolated from inguinal, axial, and brachial lymph nodes and spleen cells from 6- to 8- week-old mice. CD4+ T cell populations were isolated using a CD4+ Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Foxp3/GFP+ and Foxp3/GFP-T-cells were then isolated using either a FACS-Vantage Flow Cytometer Cell Sorter or BD FACS Aria. Purity of the resulting cell fractions was reliably >99.9% Foxp3/GFP+.

2.3. Reagents and Cell Lines

Hyaluronan of 1.5 × 106 kDa molecular weight (HMW-HA) was provided by Genzyme. Cyclosporine A (CSA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Recombinant mouse IL-2R alpha antibody (R&D Systems), IL-2 (Chiron), and neutralizing antibody against CD25 (3C7, BioLegend) were used. HMW-HA conjugated to BSA was used for plate-bound HMW-HA activation studies, as described previously [29].

2.4. Flow Cytometry Analysis

CD44 cross-linking of Treg was performed as follows: 1 × 106 cells/well were cultured in a 96-well round-bottom tissue culture plate. Cells were then treated under different stimulation conditions as follows: media alone, IL-2 (100 IU/mL), and/or plate-bound anti-mouse CD44 Ab (10 μg/mL, IM7, BD). Alternatively, for analysis following HMW-HA treatment, 1 × 106 cells/well in 96-well round-bottom tissue culture plates were serum starved for 2.5 hours before the assay. The cells were then resuspended in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 100 μg/mL Penicillin, 100 U/mL Streptomycin, 50 μM βme, 2 mM glutamine, and 1mM sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen) prior to transfer to plates previously coated with 50 μg/mL BSA-conjugated HMW-HA. On the third day, cells were harvested and washed prior to analysis. Where indicated, the following reagents were incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator with the cells 30 minutes prior to cross-linking CD44: CSA (50 ng/mL or at concentrations indicated) and neutralizing Ab against CD25 (100 μg/mL; R&D Systems, Cat number AB-223-NA).

Flow cytometry experiments used the following fluorochrome-labeled antibodies: CD3e (145-2C11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD25 (PC61.5), and CD44 (IM7) from BD-Biosciences and eBioscience. Labeled cells resuspended in FACS buffer were analyzed on a LSRII flow cytometer. Analysis was performed using CELLQuest (BD) and FlowJo (Treestar Inc., Ashland, OR) software. Of note, all FACS plots and MFI values shown were gated on live cells unless otherwise noted.

2.5. Murine Treg Activation Assays

96-well flat bottom tissue culture plates were precoated with anti-CD3 Ab (0.5 μg/mL) and anti-CD44 Ab (1 μg/mL) where relevant. Soluble anti-CD28 Ab was used at 0.5 μg/mL. Coating with HMW-HA was treated as a second step. Plates were washed with PBS and then either 100 μL of 100 μg/mL HMW-HA or 100 μL of 10% BSA in PBS was added and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. Plates were again washed with PBS prior to the addition of 150,000 CD4+CD25+ Treg in RPMI-10 complete medium. Where noted, CSA (50 ng/mL) or soluble IL-2Rα (5 μg/mL) was added at the inception of the experiment. No exogenous IL-2 was added unless otherwise noted. After three days Treg were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Graphs were prepared using JMP software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA). Significance was assessed using paired t tests or ANOVA unless otherwise noted.

3. Results

3.1. CSA Increases Treg Percentages in a CD44 Dependent Manner

To evaluate CSA effects on Treg viability and Foxp3 expression, we used tissues isolated from transgenic mice expressing GFP in concert with Foxp3. We purified CD4+ T cells from these animals and activated them in culture for 72 hours. Our goal was to test whether CSA increased the fraction of Foxp3+ Treg among total CD4+ cells in vitro, as has been reported in vivo [21, 22].

We observed that CSA treatment significantly increased the percentage of Foxp3+ Treg among total CD4+ T cells. This effect was significant at a range of CSA concentrations but was most pronounced at moderate CSA levels (50 μg/mL) (Figure 1(a)). This effect is due to increased cell death among the GFP/Foxp3−, conventional T cell fraction and not the GFP/Foxp3+ Treg fraction (data not shown).

No such increase in the GFP/Foxp3 fraction was seen in cells isolated from CD44−/− mice (Figure 1(b)). We also observed that CD44-cross-linking heightened the percentage of Foxp3+ Treg, even at high concentrations of CSA (Figure 1(c)). These data indicate that (1) Treg are relatively resistant to CSA, compared to Teff cells, (2) that this resistance is CD44 dependent, and (3) can be magnified by CD44 cross-linking.

3.2. Both CD44 Cross-Linking and IL-2 Promote Foxp3 Expression and Treg Persistence Despite CSA Treatment

The effects of CD44 cross-linking on Foxp3 levels were analogous to what one might expect to see with IL-2 supplementation. We therefore directly compared the effects of CD44 cross-linking and IL-2 supplementation on Treg cultured in the setting of CSA. To this end, we freshly isolated CD4+GFP/Foxp3+ Treg from GFP/Foxp3 transgenic mice and activated these for three days in the absence or presence of CSA.

We observed that Foxp3 and CD25 expression was abrogated by treatment with CSA but that both CD44 cross-linking and supplementation with 100 IU/mL of IL-2 maintained Foxp3 expression. Indeed, CD44 cross-linking and IL-2 supplementation were roughly equivalent in their ability to promote Treg homeostasis in the setting of CSA (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Of note, this beneficial effect of CD44 cross-linking on Foxp3 levels was predicated on the concomitant presence of TCR signals; CD44 cross-linking in the absence of aCD3/28 did not promote resistance to CSA (data not shown).

As with our observation using total CD4+ T cells in Figure 1, CD44 cross-linking on purified Treg likewise supported maintenance of Foxp3 expression across a range of CSA concentrations (Figure 2(c)). In addition, we saw comparable effects when we assessed Treg viability upon CSA treatment, as measured by 7-AAD and Annexin V staining. However, CSA treatment of Treg in the absence of CD44 cross-linking led to a significant decrease in viability (Figure 2(d)).

Together, these data indicate that CD44 cross-linking and IL-2 supplementation exert parallel effects on Treg, allowing them to escape cell death caused by treatment with CSA.

3.3. CD44 Cross-linking Promotes Foxp3 Expression in an IL-2-Independent Manner

We previously reported that CD44 cross-linking by HMW-HA promoted Treg maintenance in the absence of exogenous IL-2 [26, 28]. As part of those studies, we observed that CD44 cross-linking allowed Treg to resist CSA-mediated cell death [28]. We had proposed that CD44 cross-linking promoted increased IL-2 production by Treg.

However, this interpretation of the data was problematic for several reasons. First, Foxp3 is known to efficiently suppress IL-2 production [6]. While we did detect IL-2 in Treg cultures [28], this may be better explained by the propensity of some GFP/Foxp3+ Treg to revert to being GFP/Foxp3− Teff cells capable of producing IL-2 [30]. Indeed, upon intracellular staining of these cells for IL-2, we observed that the IL-2 producing cells were uniformly GFP/Foxp3− (data not shown). Second, CSA also suppresses IL-2 production by both Treg and Teff alike in an efficient manner [18]. Consistent with this, the level of IL-2 we detected in these cultures by ELISA, in the 5–20 pg/mL range, would be insufficient to support Treg homeostasis. We therefore sought to better ascertain whether CD44-mediated support of Treg homeostasis was indeed IL-2 independent.

We first neutralized any IL-2 that might be produced in our Treg activation cultures by adding recombinant CD25 (rCD25), the high affinity IL-2 receptor, or antibodies directed at IL-2. However, these reagents did not completely negate the beneficial effect of CD44 cross-linking on Foxp3 expression (Figure 3(a)).

We then obtained CD4+GFP/Foxp3+ Treg from transgenic GFP/Foxp3 mice lacking CD25, the high affinity IL-2 receptor (GFP/FoxP3.CD25−/− mice). We found that the absence of CD25 had minimal impact on CD44-mediated Foxp3 expression, as the wild type B6 mice and CD25−/− Treg cells had almost equal Foxp3 expression levels (Figure 3(b)).

Because IL-2 effects on Treg homeostasis are dose-dependent, we next tested whether CD44 cross-linking effects were additive with IL-2 supplementation from 0–20 IU/mL (0–4000 pg/mL). We found that the effects of CD44 cross-linking on Foxp3 persistence were most pronounced at low levels of IL-2 and that CD44 cross-linking was functionally equivalent to adding high levels of IL-2 (10–20 IU/mL, equivalent to 2000–4000 pg/mL) to these cultures (Figure 3(c)).

Together, these data support the conclusion that CD44 cross-linking potentiates Foxp3 expression of Treg in an IL-2 and CD25 independent manner.

3.4. Inhibition of HA Synthesis Impairs Treg Homeostasis Which Can Be Overcome with Exogenous IL-2 or CD44-Cross-Linking

We next determined whether the effect of CD44 cross-linking on Foxp3 expression could be induced by its natural ligand HA and whether this source of HA was paracrine or autocrine in origin.

To test this, we incubated CD4+/Foxp3+ Treg for 72 hours in the presence of HMW-HA, plate-bound CD44 antibody, or IL-2, and examined Foxp3 expression. We observed that cross-linking CD44 receptor through either plate-bound CD44 antibody or HMW-HA promoted Foxp3 expression in CD4+ Tregs in a manner similar to IL-2 (Figure 4(a)).

To evaluate whether the HA that promoted Foxp3 expression was paracrine or autocrine in nature, we abrogated endogenously produced HA in CD4+ Treg by culturing them in the presence of 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU), a specific hyaluronan synthase inhibitor [31]. Activated Treg cultured with 4-MU were unable to maintain Foxp3 expression over 72 hours (Figure 4(b)). As expected, IL-2 supplementation could completely rescue Foxp3 expression. Moreover, when these cells were cultured with anti-CD44 antibody, Foxp3 expression was maintained at levels similar to controls. These observations were confirmed in multiple experimental replicates (Figure 4(c)). Taken together, these results demonstrate that both endogenous and exogenous HA can potentiate Foxp3 expression and that the loss of HA production can be compensated for by cross-linking of the HA receptor, CD44.

3.5. CD44-Mediated Foxp3 Expression Is Stat5-Dependent

Many of the cytokines known to support Treg homeostasis, including IL-2, signal through Stat5. We therefore evaluated whether the promotion of Foxp3 persistence by CD44 cross-linking is mediated by Stat5 signaling.

We observed that the ability of CD44 cross-linking to promote Foxp3 expression was lost upon treatment with sc-355979, a selective inhibitor of pStat5 (Figure 5(a)). This capacity of sc-355979 to overcome CD44-mediated Foxp3 expression was dose dependent (Figure 5(b)). Finally, whereas CSA treatment alone did not affect Foxp3 expression induced by CD44, combined treatment with CSA and pStat5 inhibition did impair CD44-mediated Foxp3 expression (Figure 5(c)).

Taken together, these results indicate that the CD44-mediated promotion of Foxp3 expression and the ability of CD44 cross-linking to bypass CSA treatment depend on Stat5 activation.

4. Discussion

Cyclosporine (CSA) is a widely used immunosuppressant that selectively targets T cells, thereby preventing antigen-specific immune processes like transplant rejection [32, 33]. There are data that suggest that CSA may selectively spare Treg and it may be that this contributes to CSA efficacy [2022]. Here, we have identified a novel, CD44-mediated and IL-2 independent mechanism for how Treg may escape CSA suppression.

A role for CD44 in Treg persistence in the face of CSA would be consistent with other lines of evidence supporting a role for CD44 in homeostasis. We previously published that CD44 and HMW-HA promote Treg homeostasis in low IL-2 environments [2527] and it was recently reported that complexes of CD44 and Galectin-9 promote the stability and function of Treg in a SMAD2/3 signaling dependent manner [34]. CD44 also contributes to Treg function [25, 27, 29] and the capacity to bind HMW-HA is known to characterize the most potent subset of Treg [25]. Of note, CD44 cross-linking did not rescue GFP/Foxp3−, conventional T cells from CSA effects in our hands. We speculate that this may reflect the fact that these cells are typically CD44lo. Also of note, it is highly unlikely that expansion of Treg is responsible for this effect given that it is generally accepted that Treg do not expand in vitro in the absence of high dose IL-2 and potent antigenic signals. Induction of Treg from conventional T cells is also highly unlikely given the absence of high dose IL-2, potent antigenic signals, and TGFβ [6].

The constitutive expression of CD44 may also promote homeostasis of additional T cell subsets. For example, CD44 has been implicated in the homeostasis of memory T cells, which are also [35]. In addition to total CD44 levels, the distribution of CD44 on the cell surface, and the make-up of CD44 variant isoforms could also impact T cell homeostasis.

These data may be relevant to understanding seemingly contradictory data indicating that CSA does not uniformly spare Treg (reviewed in [36]). Specifically, there are some reports that CSA inhibits Foxp3 mRNA expression [37] and induces the reversion of Treg to pro-inflammatory phenotypes [38]. Similarly, in vivo studies in which mice underwent MHC-mismatch bone marrow transplantation demonstrated that CSA treatment impaired expansion of Treg and reduced overall Foxp3 expression [39]. More recently, it was shown that CSA treatment preferentially inhibits antigen-specific Treg [40]. Miroux and colleagues found that CSA decreased both the activity and proliferation of Treg [41]. Our data suggest that the dose of CSA may impact the ability of Treg to resist CSA. Consistent with this, Kawai and colleagues demonstrated that in vivo administration of CSA inhibits the proliferation of Treg at high doses, but not so at low doses [42]. Besides this, our data also support roles for antigenic signals, co-stimulation though CD44, and therefore the local inflammatory milieu as factors that influence Treg susceptibility to suppression by CSA.

Our data support a role for CD44-mediated, IL-2 independent, promotion of Treg resistance to CSA and implicate Stat5 signaling in this effect [4, 43]. Stat5 signaling is known to be essential for both the maintenance of Foxp3 expression and the suppressive function of Treg in vivo [44, 45]. This is underscored by the observation that Stat5 knockout mice exhibit a loss of Treg [46]. Additionally, overexpression of Stat5 in IL-2 knockout mice can restore in vivo Treg numbers [46]. However, avenues for Stat5 signaling not directly involving IL-2 are likely to be important for Treg homeostasis. Our current efforts are therefore focused on determining whether CD44 cross-linking directly phosphorylates Stat5 or, alternatively, whether these effects are indirectly mediated.

5. Conclusions

We have identified a role for CD44, a receptor for HA, in promoting Treg resistance to CSA. This effect is IL-2 independent but can be suppressed by inhibition of Stat5 phosphorylation. Moreover, we find that inhibition of HA synthesis impairs Treg homeostasis but that this effect can be overcome with exogenous IL-2 or CD44-cross-linking. Together, these data support a model whereby CD44 cross-linking by HA promotes IL-2-independent Foxp3 expression and Treg survival in the face of CSA.


ECM:Extracellular matrix
HMW-HA:High-molecular-weight hyaluronan
Treg:Foxp3+ regulatory T cell.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants 5 T32 AI07290 (to Shannon M. Ruppert); R01 DK096087-01, R01 HL113294-01A1, and U01 AI101984 (to Paul L. Bollyky).


  1. R. S. Wildin, F. Ramsdell, J. Peake et al., “X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy,” Nature Genetics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 18–20, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. N. Huter, G. A. Punkosdy, D. D. Glass, L. I. Cheng, J. M. Ward, and E. M. Shevach, “TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ regulatory T cells rescue scurfy mice,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1814–1821, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. K. Selvaraj and T. L. Geiger, “Mitigation of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by TGF-β induced Foxp3+ regulatory T lymphocytes through the induction of anergy and infectious tolerance,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 2830–2838, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Y. Wuest, J. Willette-Brown, S. K. Durum, and A. A. Hurwitz, “The influence of IL-2 family cytokines on activation and function of naturally occurring regulatory T cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 973–980, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Q. Chen, Y. C. Kim, A. Laurence, G. A. Punkosdy, and E. M. Shevach, “IL-2 controls the stability of Foxp3 expression in TGF-β-induced Foxp3+ T cells in vivo,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 11, pp. 6329–6337, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Sakaguchi, R. Setoguchi, H. Yagi, and T. Nomura, “Naturally arising Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in self-tolerance and autoimmune disease,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 305, pp. 51–66, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. Setoguchi, S. Hori, T. Takahashi, and S. Sakaguchi, “Homeostatic maintenance of natural Foxp3+ CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells by interleukin (IL)-2 and induction of autoimmune disease by IL-2 neutralization,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 723–735, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Zorn, E. A. Nelson, M. Mohseni et al., “IL-2 regulates FOXP3 expression in human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells through a STAT-dependent mechanism and induces the expansion of these cells in vivo,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1571–1579, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. de la Rosa, S. Rutz, H. Dorninger, and A. Scheffold, “Interleukin-2 is essential for CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell function,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2480–2488, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. Liao, J.-X. Lin, L. Wang, P. Li, and W. J. Leonard, “Modulation of cytokine receptors by IL-2 broadly regulates differentiation into helper T cell lineages,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 551–559, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. R. Malek, A. Yu, L. Zhu, T. Matsutani, D. Adeegbe, and A. L. Bayer, “IL-2 family of cytokines in T regulatory cell development and homeostasis,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 635–639, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. M. Anderson, T. C. Dumsha, N. J. McDonald, and J. K. Spitznagel Jr., “Evaluating IL-2 levels in human pulp tissue,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 651–655, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. O. Lesur, A. Kokis, C. Hermans, T. Fülöp, A. Bernard, and D. Lane, “Interleukin-2 involvement in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: relationship with polymorphonuclear neutrophil apoptosis and patient survival,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 3814–3822, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. M. Phillips, “Measurement of total and bioactive interleukin-2 in tissue samples by immunoaffinity-receptor affinity chromatography,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 200–204, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. N. Akbar, M. Vukmanovic-Stejic, L. S. Taams, and D. C. Macallan, “The dynamic co-evolution of memory and regulatory CD4+ T cells in the periphery,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 231–237, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Vukmanovic-Stejic, Y. Zhang, A. N. Akbar, and D. C. Macallan, “Measurement of proliferation and disappearance of regulatory T cells in human studies using deuterium-labeled glucose,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 707, pp. 243–261, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. G. Kang, D. Zhang, N. Degauque, C. Mariat, S. Alexopoulos, and X. X. Zheng, “Effects of cyclosporine on transplant tolerance: the role of IL-2,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1907–1916, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Liu, J. D. Farmer Jr., W. S. Lane, J. Friedman, I. Weissman, and S. L. Schreiber, “Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes,” Cell, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 807–815, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C.-W. Chow, M. Rincón, and R. J. Davis, “Requirement for transcription factor NFAT in interleukin-2 expression,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2300–2307, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Gao, Y. Lu, B. El Essawy, M. Oukka, V. K. Kuchroo, and T. B. Strom, “Contrasting effects of cyclosporine and rapamycin in de novo generation of alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells,” The American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1722–1732, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. F. Knol, I. M. Haeck, A. A. van Kraats et al., “Modulation of lymphocyte function In Vivo via inhibition of calcineurin or purine synthesis in patients with atopic dermatitis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 132, no. 10, pp. 2476–2479, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. Y. Li, Q. Wu, Z. Yan et al., “Prevention of acute GVHD in mice by treatment with Tripterygium hypoglaucum Hutch combined with cyclosporin A,” Hematology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 352–359, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. Meloni, M. Morosini, N. Solari et al., “Peripheral CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell expansion in lung transplant recipients is not affected by calcineurin inhibitors,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 6, no. 13-14, pp. 2002–2010, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Stern, A. A. Asari, and K. N. Sugahara, “Hyaluronan fragments: an information-rich system,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 699–715, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Firan, S. Dhillon, P. Estess, and M. H. Siegelman, “Suppressor activity and potency among regulatory T cells is discriminated by functionally active CD44,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 619–627, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. L. Bollyky, B. A. Falk, R. P. Wu, J. H. Buckner, T. N. Wight, and G. T. Nepom, “Intact extracellular matrix and the maintenance of immune tolerance: high molecular weight hyaluronan promotes persistence of induced CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 567–572, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. L. Bollyky, J. D. Lord, S. A. Masewicz et al., “Cutting edge: high molecular weight hyaluronan promotes the suppressive effects of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 744–747, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. L. Bollyky, B. A. Falk, S. A. Long et al., “CD44 costimulation promotes FoxP3+ regulatory T cell persistence and function via production of IL-2, IL-10, and TGF-beta,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 2232–2241, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Liu, L. Soong, G. Liu, R. König, and A. K. Chopra, “CD44 expression positively correlates with Foxp3 expression and suppressive function of CD4+ Treg cells,” Biology Direct, vol. 4, article 40, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Koenecke, N. Czeloth, A. Bubke et al., “Alloantigen-specific de novo-induced Foxp3+ Treg revert in vivo and do not protect from experimental GVHD,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 3091–3096, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. I. Kakizaki, K. Kojima, K. Takagaki et al., “A novel mechanism for the inhibition of hyaluronan biosynthesis by 4-methylumbelliferone,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 32, pp. 33281–33289, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Glazier, P. J. Tutschka, E. R. Farmer, and G. W. Santos, “Graft-versus-host disease in cyclosporin A-treated rats after syngeneic and autologous bone marrow reconstitution,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. E. K. Gao, D. Lo, R. Cheney, O. Kanagawa, and J. Sprent, “Abnormal differentiation of thymocytes in mice treated with cyclosporin A,” Nature, vol. 336, no. 6195, pp. 176–179, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. Wu, T. Thalhamer, R. F. Franca et al., “Galectin-9-CD44 interaction enhances stability and function of adaptive regulatory T cells,” Immunity, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 270–282, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. B. J. G. Baaten, C.-R. Li, M. F. Deiro, M. M. Lin, P. J. Linton, and L. M. Bradley, “CD44 regulates survival and memory development in Th1 cells,” Immunity, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 104–115, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. A. de Serres, M. H. Sayegh, and N. Najafian, “Immunosuppressive drugs and tregs: a critical evaluation!,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1661–1669, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. C. Baan, B. J. Van Der Mast, M. Klepper et al., “Differential effect of calcineurin inhibitors, anti-CD25 antibodies and rapamycin on the induction of FOXP3 in human T cells,” Transplantation, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 110–117, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Miroux, O. Moralès, A. Carpentier et al., “Inhibitory effects of cyclosporine on human regulatory T cells in vitro,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 3371–3374, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Zeiser, V. H. Nguyen, A. Beilhack et al., “Inhibition of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell function by calcineurin-dependent interleukin-2 production,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 390–399, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Wu, L. Zhang, K. Xu et al., “Immunosuppressive drugs on inducing Ag-specific CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells during immune response in vivo,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. Miroux, O. Morales, K. Ghazal et al., “In vitro effects of cyclosporine a and tacrolimus on regulatory T-cell proliferation and function,” Transplantation, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Kawai, H. Kitade, C. Mathieu, M. Waer, and J. Pirenne, “Inhibitory and stimulatory effects of cyclosporine A on the development of regulatory T cells in vivo,” Transplantation, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 1073–1077, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. D. Goldstein, R. S. Balderas, and G. Marodon, “Continuous activation of the CD122/STAT-5 signaling pathway during selection of antigen-specific regulatory T cells in the murine thymus,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID e19038, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. M. Thornton, “Signal transduction in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells: CD25 and IL-2,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 921–927, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. R. Malek, “The biology of interleukin-2,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 453–479, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Antov, L. Yang, M. Vig, D. Baltimore, and L. van Parijs, “Essential role for STAT5 signaling in CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cell homeostasis and the maintenance of self-tolerance,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 7, pp. 3435–3441, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Shannon M. Ruppert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

3008 Views | 583 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.