Evaluating EML Modeling Tools for Insurance Purposes: A Case Study

Table 1

Data given by the client to Broker A and Broker B to use in their modelling.

Equipment	Service	𝑉 [m^3]	Operating 𝑉 [m^3]	Material	𝑇 [C]	𝑃 [Bar]	𝐷 [m]	𝐿 [m]	𝑁 of trays	Bottom 𝑉 [m^3]	Tray 𝑉 [m^3]
V2313	STRIPPER RECEIVER	43	22	C2–C5	35	10	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
D1538	COMPRESSOR SUCTION DRUM	30,2	15	C3 = 100%	15	7,7	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
V2505	FEED SURGE DRUM	47	24	C2–C5	35	15	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
T2302	STRIPPER	564	83,8	C3–C10	196	10	4,87	30,3	30	55,9	27,9
T2304	STABILIZER TOWER	119	23,9	C3	160	12	2,6	22,5	30	15,9	8

𝑉: Maximum capacity, Operating 𝑉: Estimated Operating Volume, Material: Compound composition within equipment, 𝑇: Temperature, 𝑃: Pressure, 𝐷: Diameter, 𝐿: Length, 𝑁 of trays: Number of trays in separation columns, Bottom 𝑉: Estimated volume on bottom of towers, Tray 𝑉: Sum of Estimated volume on each tray.