Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Volume 2012, Article ID 103727, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/103727
Research Article

A Priori Direct Numerical Simulation Modelling of the Curvature Term of the Flame Surface Density Transport Equation for Nonunity Lewis Number Flames in the Context of Large Eddy Simulations

School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

Received 15 March 2012; Accepted 8 May 2012

Academic Editor: Mahesh T. Dhotre

Copyright © 2012 Mohit Katragadda and Nilanjan Chakraborty. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. S. Cant, S. B. Pope, and K. N. C. Bray, “Modelling of flamelet surface-to-volume ratio in turbulent premixed combustion,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 809–815, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Candel, D. Veynante, F. Lacas, E. Maistret, N. Darabhia, and T. Poinsot, “Coherent flamelet model: applications and recent extensions,” in Recent Advances in Combustion Modelling, B. E. Larrouturou, Ed., pp. 19–64, World Scientific, Singapore, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Boger, D. Veynante, H. Boughanem, and A. Trouvé, “Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 917–925, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Charlette, A. Trouvé, M. Boger, and D. Veynante, “A flame surface density model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed flames,” in Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the British, German and French Sections of the Combustion Institute, Nancy, France, 1999.
  5. E. R. Hawkes, Large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion [Ph.D. thesis], Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, U.K., 2000.
  6. E. R. Hawkes and R. S. Cant, “A flame surface density approach to large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. R. Hawkes and R. S. Cant, “Implications of a flame surface density approach to large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 1617–1629, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Knikker, D. Veynante, and C. Meneveau, “A dynamic flame surface density model for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. L91–L94, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Chakraborty, Fundamental study of turbulent premixed combustion using direct numerical simulation (DNS) [Ph.D. thesis], Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, U.K., 2005.
  10. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “A priori analysis of the curvature and propagation terms of the flame surface density transport equation for large eddy simulation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 19, no. 10, Article ID 105101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Chakraborty and M. Klein, “A priori direct numerical simulation assessment of algebraic flame surface density models for turbulent premixed flames in the context of large eddy simulation,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 20, no. 8, Article ID 085108, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “Direct numerical simulation analysis of the flame surface density transport equation in the context of large eddy simulation,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1445–1453, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. E. Hernandez-Perez, F. T. C. Yuen, C. P. T. Groth, and O. L. Gulder, “LES of a laboratory-scale turbulent premixed Bunsen flame using FSD, PCM-FPI and thickened flame models,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1365–1371, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Katragadda and N. Chakraborty, “Effects of Lewis number on flame surface density transport in the context of large eddy simulation,” in Proceedings of the 5th European Combustion Meeting, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, June 2011.
  15. M. Mizomoto, Y. Asaka, S. Ikai, and C. K. Law, “Effects of preferential diffusion on the burning intensity of curved flames,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1933–1939, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. G. Im and J. H. Chen, “Preferential diffusion effects on the burning rate of interacting turbulent premixed hydrogen-air flames,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 246–258, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. I. Sivashinsky, “Instabilities, pattern formation, and turbulence in flames,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 15, pp. 179–199, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Clavin and F. A. Williams, “Effects of molecular diffusion and thermal expansion on the structure and dynamics of turbulent premixed flames in turbulent flows of large scale and small intensity,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 116, pp. 251–282, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  19. P. A. Libby, A. Linan, and F. A. Williams, “Strained premix laminar flames with nonunity Lewis numbers,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 1–6, pp. 257–293, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. G. Abdel-Gayed, D. Bradley, M. N. Hamid, and M. Lawes, “Lewis number effects on turbulent burning velocity,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 505–512, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. T. Ashurst, N. Peters, and M. D. Smooke, “Numerical simulation of turbulent flame structure with non-unity Lewis number,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 4–6, pp. 339–375, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. C. Haworth and T. J. Poinsot, “Numerical simulations of Lewis number effects in turbulent premixed flames,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 244, pp. 405–436, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. J. Rutland and A. Trouvé, “Direct simulations of premixed turbulent flames with nonunity Lewis numbers,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 94, no. 1-2, pp. 41–57, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Trouvé and T. Poinsot, “The evolution equation for the flame surface density in turbulent premixed combustion,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 278, pp. 1–31, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “Influence of Lewis number on curvature effects in turbulent premixed flame propagation in the thin reaction zones regime,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 17, no. 10, Article ID 105105, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “Effects of Lewis number on turbulent scalar transport and its modelling in turbulent premixed flames,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 49, no. 13-14, pp. 2158–2172, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Chakraborty and M. Klein, “Influence of Lewis number on the surface density function transport in the thin reaction zone regime for turbulent premixed flames,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 20, no. 6, Article ID 065102, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “Effects of Lewis number on turbulent scalar transport and its modelling in turbulent premixed flames,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 156, no. 7, pp. 1427–1444, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “Effects of Lewis number on flame surface density transport in turbulent premixed combustion,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 158, no. 9, pp. 1768–1787, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Peters, P. Terhoeven, J. H. Chen, and T. Echekki, “Statistics of flame displacement speeds from computations of 2-D unsteady methane-air flames,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 833–839, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Echekki and J. H. Chen, “Analysis of the contribution of curvature to premixed flame propagation,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 308–311, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. H. Chen, A. Choudhary, B. de Supinski et al., “Terascale direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion using S3D,” Computational Science & Discovery, vol. 2, no. 1, Article ID 015001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Chakraborty and S. Cant, “Unsteady effects of strain rate and curvature on turbulent premixed flames in an inflow-outflow configuration,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 137, no. 1-2, pp. 129–147, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. Chakraborty and R. S. Cant, “Effects of strain rate and curvature on surface density function transport in turbulent premixed flames in the thin reaction zones regime,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 17, no. 6, Article ID 065108, pp. 1–15, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. N. Chakraborty, E. R. Hawkes, J. H. Chen, and R. S. Cant, “The effects of strain rate and curvature on surface density function transport in turbulent premixed methane-air and hydrogen-air flames: a comparative study,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 154, no. 1-2, pp. 259–280, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. W. Jenkins and R. S. Cant, “DNS of turbulent flame kernels,” in Proceedings of the 2nd AFOSR Conference on DNS and LES, pp. 192–202, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
  37. T. J. Poinsot and S. K. Lele, “Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 104–129, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. A. Wray, “Minimal storage time advancement schemes for spectral methods,” Technical Report MS 202 A-1, NASA Ames Research Center, California, Calif, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  39. R. S. Rogallo, “Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence,” NASA Technical Memorandum 91416, NASA Ames Research Center, California, Calif, USA, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  40. G. K. Batchelor and A. A. Townsend, “Decay of turbulence in final period,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 194, no. 1039, pp. 527–543, 1948. View at Google Scholar
  41. N. Peters, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
  42. D. C. Haworth, R. J. Blint, B. Cuenot, and T. J. Poinsot, “Numerical simulation of turbulent propane-air combustion with nonhomogeneous reactants,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 395–417, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. Charlette, C. Meneveau, and D. Veynante, “A power-law flame wrinkling model for LES of premixed turbulent combustion—part I: non-dynamic formulation and initial tests,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 131, no. 1-2, pp. 159–180, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. N. Swaminathan and K. N. C. Bray, “Effect of dilatation on scalar dissipation in turbulent premixed flames,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 549–565, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. Swaminathan and R. W. Grout, “Interaction of turbulence and scalar fields in premixed flames,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 18, no. 4, Article ID 045102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. I. Han and K. Y. Huh, “Roles of displacement speed on evolution of flame surface density for different turbulent intensities and Lewis numbers in turbulent premixed combustion,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 152, no. 1-2, pp. 194–205, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. W. Grout, “An age extended progress variable for conditioning reaction rates,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 19, no. 10, Article ID 105107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. N. Chakraborty and N. Swaminathan, “Effects of Lewis number on scalar dissipation transport and its modeling in turbulent premixed combustion,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 182, no. 9, pp. 1201–1240, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. Chakraborty and N. Swaminathan, “Effects of Lewis number on scalar variance transport in premixed flames,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 87, no. 2-3, pp. 261–292, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, A. D. Gosman, and C. Fureby, “Application of a flame-wrinkling LES combustion model to a turbulent mixing layer,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 899–907, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Tabor and H. G. Weller, “Large eddy dimulation of premixed turbulent combustion using Ξ flame surface wrinkling model,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. E. R. Hawkes and R. S. Cant, “Physical and numerical realizability requirements for flame surface density approaches to large-eddy and Reynolds averaged simulation of premixed turbulent combustion,” Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 699–720, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus