Table 5: Comparison of results of and at different Prandtl numbers.

Kuo [51]Na and Habib [12]Present study

0.720.6760−0.50460.6760−0.50460.6760−0.5046
0.600.6947−0.47210.6946−0.47250.6947−0.4721
0.500.7132−0.44110.7131−0.44200.7132−0.4411
0.400.7356−0.40530.7354−0.40660.7356−0.4053
0.300.7636−0.36230.7633−0.36410.7636−0.3623
0.200.8015−0.30780.8009−0.31010.8015−0.3078
0.100.8600−0.22980.8590−0.23260.8600−0.2298
0.060.8974−0.18340.8961−0.18640.8974−0.1834
0.040.9233−0.15260.9221−0.15560.9233−0.1526
0.010.9845−0.08320.9887−0.08170.9885−0.0832
1.000.6421−0.56710.6421−0.56710.6421−0.5671
1.100.6323−0.58620.6323−0.58600.6323−0.5862
1.200.6233−0.60400.6234−0.60360.6233−0.6040
1.300.6151−0.62080.6152−0.62020.6151−0.6208
1.400.6075−0.63650.6076−0.63580.6075−0.6365
1.500.6005−0.65150.6006−0.65060.6005−0.6515
1.600.5939−0.66560.5940−0.66460.5939−0.6656
1.700.5877−0.67920.5879−0.67800.5877−0.6792
1.800.5819−0.69210.5821−0.69080.5819−0.6921
1.900.5764−0.70450.5767−0.70310.5764−0.7045
2.000.5712−0.71640.5715−0.71490.5712−0.7164
2.000.5712−0.71640.5713−0.71650.5712−0.7164
3.000.5308−0.81540.5312−0.81450.5308−0.8154
4.000.5029−0.89140.5036−0.88980.5029−0.8914
5.000.4817−0.95390.4827−0.95170.4817−0.9539
6.000.4648−1.00730.4660−1.00470.4648−1.0073
7.000.4507−1.05420.4522−1.05120.4507−1.0542
8.000.4387−1.09610.4405−1.09300.4387−1.0961
9.000.4283−1.13420.4304−1.13090.4283−1.1342
10.000.4191−1.16920.4215−1.16580.4191−1.1692