Research Article

Comparison of the Efficiency of Ultraviolet/Zinc Oxide (UV/ZnO) and Ozone/Zinc Oxide (O3/ZnO) Techniques as Advanced Oxidation Processes in the Removal of Trimethoprim from Aqueous Solutions

Table 4

Comparison of removal efficiency of antibiotics in aqueous solution by advanced oxidation processes.

AntibioticEnvironmentProcessOperation conditionsRemoval efficiencyReference

TrimethoprimSynthetic water modelUV/ZnO, O3/ZnOOzonation rate = 0.6 g/L, ZnO = 500 mg/L, low-pressure UV (6 W, 254 nm)91%, 94%This study
TrimethoprimSpiked STP effluentO30.1–0.3 mM O3, pH = 7.285%[50]
Trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin2.5 mM phosphate buffer saline, pH = 7O3/H2O2/UVO3 = 0.1 mM H2O2 = 0.05–0.1 mM, medium pressure>90%[51]
CiprofloxacinUltrapure waterUV/TiO2Dose catalyst (0.35 g/L), low-pressure UV100% in 45 min[52]
MetronidazoleComplex aqueous matrixUV/TiO2TiO2 = 1.5 g/L, UV light intensity = 6.5 mW cm−288% in 30 min[53]
TetracyclineDeionized waterUS/ZnO + nanocompositeZnO/NC = 4.88 mg, US frequency and power 37 kHz and 256 W87.6% in 45 min[54]
Ciprofloxacin and trimethoprimUltrapure waterUV/O32–20 mM O3, medium-pressure polychromatic UV lamp∼100%[51]
CiprofloxacinSynthetic and simulated wastewater samplesO3/CaO2CaO2 = 0.025 mg/L, temperature = 25°C, ozonation rate = 1 g/min95.6% and 85.4%[55]
CiprofloxacinSynthetic water modelO3/UV/ZnOOzonation rate = 4 L/min, UV lamp 6 W and low pressure, ZnO = 0.3 g/L96% in 30 min[44]