Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2009, Article ID 986873, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/986873
Research Article

The Efficiency of Operating Microscope Compared with Unaided Visual Examination, Conventional and Digital Intraoral Radiography for Proximal Caries Detection

1Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey
2Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey
3Department of Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey

Received 25 June 2008; Revised 12 September 2008; Accepted 25 November 2008

Academic Editor: Roland Frankenberger

Copyright © 2009 Ilkay Peker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Hintze, A. Wenzel, B. Danielsen, and B. Nyvad, “Reliability of visual examination, fiber-optic transillumination, and bitewing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces,” Caries Research, vol. 32, pp. 204–209, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. L. Kogen, R. G. Stephens, J. A. Reid, and A. Donner, “Can radiographic criteria be used to distinguish between cavitated and noncavitated approximal enamel caries?,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Bille and A. Thylstrup, “Radiographic diagnosis and clinical tissue changes in relation to treatment of approximal carious lesions,” Caries Research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  4. N. B. Pitts, “The use of bitewing radiographs in the management of dental caries: scientific and practical considerations,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  5. E. S. Akpata, M. R. Farid, K. al-Saif, and E. A. U. Roberts, “Cavitation at radiolucent areas on proximal surfaces of posterior teeth,” Caries Research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 313–316, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. H. Forgie, C. M. Pine, C. Longbottom, and N. B. Pitts, “The use of magnification in general dental practice in Scotland—a survey report,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 497–502, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. H. Forgie, C. M. Pine, and N. B. Pitts, “The assessment of an intra-oral video camera as an aid to occlusal caries detection,” International Dental Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  8. I. Tsesis, Y. Shoshani, N. Givol, R. Yahalom, Z. Fuss, and S. Taicher, “Comparison of quality of life after surgical endodontic treatment using two techniques: a prospective study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 367–371, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. H. Erten, M. B. Uçtasli, Z. Z. Akarslan, O. Uzun, and E. Baspinar, “The assessment of unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope for the detection of occlusal caries lesions,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 190–194, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. H. Erten, M. B. Uçtasli, Z. Z. Akarslan, O. Uzun, and M. Semiz, “Restorative treatment decision making with unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. A. M. Kidd, A. Banerjee, S. Ferrier, C. Longbottom, and Z. Nugent, “Relationships between a clinical-visual scoring system and two histological techniques: a laboratory study on occlusal and approximal carious lesions,” Caries Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 125–129, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. H. Hintze, A. Wenzel, and M. Frydenberg, “Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 170–175, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. J. ten Bosch and B. Angmar-Månsson, “Characterization and validation of diagnostic methods,” Monographs in Oral Science, vol. 17, pp. 174–189, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. E. H. Verdonschot, A. Wenzel, and E. M. Bronkhorst, “Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 269–272, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. R. Henderson, “Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 521–539, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  16. H. M. Alwas-Danowska, A. J. M. Plasschaert, S. Suliborski, and E. H. Verdonschot, “Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 129–134, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. K. Syriopoulos, G. C. H. Sanderink, X. L. Velders, F. C. van Ginkel, and P. F. van der Stelt, “The effects of developer age on diagnostic accuracy: a study using assessment of endodontic file length,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 311–315, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. K. Syriopoulos, G. C. H. Sanderink, X. L. Velders, and P. F. van der Stelt, “Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 312–318, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. Bloemendal, H. C. W. de Vet, and L. M. Bouter, “The value of bitewing radiographs in epidemiological caries research: a systematic review of the literature,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 255–264, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  20. V. Machiulskiene, B. Nyvad, and V. Baelum, “Comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year old Lithuanian children,” Caries Research, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 340–348, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. S. Hopcraft and M. V. Morgan, “Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 212–218, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  22. Y. Kinomoto, F. Takeshige, M. Hayashi, and S. Ebisu, “Optimal positioning for a dental operating microscope during nonsurgical endodontics,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 860–862, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. M. Kielbassa, S. Paris, A. Lussi, and H. Meyer-Lueckel, “Evaluation of cavitations in proximal caries lesions at various magnification levels in vitro,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 817–822, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. L. Forner Navarro, M. C. Llena Puy, and F. García Godoy, “Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. E261–E265, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Haak, M. J. Wicht, M. Hellmich, A. Gossmann, and M. J. Noack, “The validity of proximal caries detection using magnifying visual aids,” Caries Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 249–255, 2002. View at Google Scholar