Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2011, Article ID 214751, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/214751
Research Article

Effect of Cavity Design on the Strength of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations: An Empirical and FEM Analysis

1Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, Madras 600077, India
2Bioengineering Laboratory, Engineering Design Department, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Madras 600036, India

Received 31 July 2011; Revised 15 September 2011; Accepted 18 September 2011

Academic Editor: Louis M. Lin

Copyright © 2011 V. Susila Anand et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. B. Fonseca, A. J. Fernandes-Neto, L. Correr-Sobrinho, and C. J. Soares, “The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 277–284, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. A. Porte, F. Lutz, M. R. Lund, M. L. Swartz, and M. A. Cochran, “Cavity designs for composite resins,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 50–56, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Wilson, “Effects of design features and restorative techniques on marginal leakage of MO composites: an in vitro study,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 155–159, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. J. Bronner, “Engineering principles applied to cl II cavities,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 10, pp. 115–119, 1930. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. B. Gabel, “The amalgam proximoocclusal restoration in deciduous molars,” Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 11, pp. 52–55, 1944. View at Google Scholar
  6. W. B. Brown, “A mechanical basis for the preparation of class II cavities for amalgam in deciduous molars,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 38, pp. 417–423, 1949. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. F. Weiland, “An engineer's evaluation of Class II cavity preparations for silver amalgam restorations in primary teeth,” Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 1951. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. L. Morin, W. H. Douglas, M. Cross, and R. Delong, “Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement,” Dental Materials, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. A. Noonan, “The use of photoelasticity in a study of cavity preparations,” Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 24–28, 1949. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. C. Haskins, DC Haack, and R. L. Ireland, “A study of stress pattern variations in Class II cavity restorations as a result of different cavity design,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 33, pp. 757–766, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. B. Mahler and F. A. Peyton, “Photoelasticity as a research technique for analyzing stresses in dental structures,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 831–838, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. E. Granath, “Photoelastic model experiments on Class II cavity restorations of dental amalgam,” Odontologisk Revy, vol. 16, supplement 9, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. G. Craig, M. K. El-Ebrashi, P. J. LePeak, and F. A. Peyton, “Experimental stress analysis of dental restorations. Part I. Two-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis of inlays,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 277–291, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. E. Granath and R. Hiltscher, “Strength of edge of class II cavity restorations in relation to buccolingual shape of cavity,” Odontologisk Revy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. W. Fisher, A. A. Caputo, H. T. Shillingburg, and M. G. Duncanson, “Photoelastic analysis of inlay and onlay preparations,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. A. M. Brekelmans, H. W. Porte, and T. J. J .H. Sloof, “A new method to analyse the mechanical behaviour of skeletal parts,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 43, pp. 301–317, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  17. W. A. Vale, “Cavity preparation,” Irish Dentist Reviews, vol. 2, pp. 33–41, 1956. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Shi, A. S. L. Fok, and A. Qualtrough, “A two-stage shape optimization process for cavity preparation,” Dental Materials, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1444–1453, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. P. Hubsch, J. Middleton, and J. Knox, “The influence of cavity shape on the stresses in composite dental restorations: a finite element study,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 343–349, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. H. Hembree Jr., “Microleakage of composite resin restorations with different cavosurface designs,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 171–174, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Nordbo, J. Leirskar, and F. R. von der Fehr, “Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: 3 year results,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 155–159, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Nordbo, J. Leirskar, and F. R. Von Der Fehr, “Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years,” Quintessence International, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Horsted-Bindslev, B. Heyde-Peterson, P. Simonson, and V. Baelum, “Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 233–238, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  24. H. Li, X. Yun, J. Li et al., “Strengthening of a model composite restoration using shape optimization: a numerical and experimental study,” Dental Materials, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 126–134, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  25. S. E. Rasmussen, R. E. Patchin, D. B. Scott, and A. H. Heuer, “Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 154–164, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Mondelli, L. Steagall, A. Ishikiriama, M. F. de Lima Navarro, and F. B. Soares, “Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 419–422, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. J. Malcolm and J. A. A. Hood, “The effect of cast restorations in reducing cuspal flexibility of restored teeth,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 56, p. D207, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. R. Grimaldi and J. A. A. Hood, “Lateral deformation of tooth crown under axial and cuspal loading,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 52, p. 584, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. J. Soares, L. R. M. Martins, R. B. Fonseca, L. Correr-Sobrinho, and A. J. Fernandes Neto, “Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 421–429, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus