Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 795047, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/795047
Clinical Study

A Randomized Controlled Trail Comparing the Efficacy of 0.5% Centbucridine to 2% Lignocaine as Local Anesthetics in Dental Extractions

1Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Hizaam Street, P.O. Box 1263, Madinah Munawarah, Saudi Arabia
2Dental Public Health, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Hizaam Street, P.O. Box 1263, Madinah Munawarah, Saudi Arabia

Received 13 July 2011; Accepted 5 October 2011

Academic Editor: John D. Bartlett

Copyright © 2011 Samir Mansuri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. F. Malamed, Handbook of Local Anesthesia, Mosby Inc., 5th edition, 2004.
  2. P. P. Gupta, Y. C. Mishra, and B. N. Dhawan, “Comparision of Centbucridine and Lignocaine in dental surgery,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 106–111, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. P. Gupta, S. Nityanand, A. C. Shipstone, and B. N. Dhawan, “Experimental evaluation of potential neurotoxicity of 4-N-butylamino 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine hydrochloride (Centbucridine). A new local anaesthetic agent,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 339–343, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. K. Patnaik, S. N. Rastogi, and B. N. Dhawan, “Evaluation of local anaesthetic activity of 4-N-butylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine hydrochloride (Centbucridine). A 4-substituted polymethylenequinoline,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 327–329, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. P. Gupta, O. P. Asthana, and B. N. Dhawan, “Clinical evaluation of centbucridine in ophthalmic surgery,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 230–233, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Ghose, N. R. Biswar, G. K. Das, and A. Sethi, “Prospective randomized double mask controlled clinical trial to determine efficacy of multiple drop centbucridine as an ocular drop surface anesthetic,” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 466–470, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Dasgupta, B. A. Tendulkar, T. Paul, and R. S. Satoskar, “Comparative study of centbucridine and lignocaine for subarachnoid block,” Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 207–209, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. B. Samsi, R. A. Bhalerao, and S. C. Shah, “Evaluation of centbucridine as a local anesthetic,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 109–111, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. N. Vaccharajani, N. Parikh, T. Paul, and R. S. Satoskar, “Comparative study of Centbucridine and Lignocaine in dental extraction,” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 251–255, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  10. D. Arun, R. Khanna, and A. Patankar, “A comparative study between 0.5% Centbucridine HCL and 2% Lignocaine HCL with adrenaline (1 : 200 000),” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 221–223, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. P. Rood, “Adverse reaction to dental local anaesthetic injection—“allergy” is not the cause,” British Dental Journal, vol. 189, no. 7, pp. 380–384, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. W. Wilson, S. Deacock, I. P. Downie, and G. Zaki, “Allergy to local anaesthetic: the importance of thorough investigation,” British Dental Journal, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 120–122, 2000. View at Google Scholar