Research Article
Precision of Fit of Titanium and Cast Implant Frameworks Using a New Matching Formula
Table 8
Comparison of the best-fit results in μm for centroid vertical gaps generated by the fixed and unfixed coordinate system best-fit matching methods.
(a) |
| Centroid Z gap data base | Fixed cast | Unfixed cast | Fixed titan. | Unfixed titan. |
| 1 | 12.1 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 2 | 31.7 | 19.3 | 8.7 | 4.4 | 3 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4 | 29.9 | 17.2 | 8.6 | 4.8 | 5 | 18.5 | 12.1 | 4.4 | 3.0 | 6 | | | 1.9 | 1.5 | 7 | | | 2.1 | 1.2 | 8 | | | 0.9 | 0.9 | 9 | | | 1.3 | 0.9 | 10 | | | 2.3 | 1.9 |
|
|
(b) Descriptive statistics |
| | Count | Mean | Std. dev. | Std. error |
| Fixed cast | 5 | 21.00 | 9.306 | 4.162 | Unfixed cast | 5 | 13.44 | 5.221 | 2.335 |
| Fixed titan. | 10 | 3.73 | 2.812 | 0.889 | Unfixed titan. | 10 | 2.44 | 1.462 | 0.462 |
|
|
(c) Paired -test: hypothesized difference = 0 |
| | Mean diff. | DF | t value | value |
| Fixed cast; unfixed cast | 7.56 | 4 | 3.225 | 0.0321 | Fixed titan; unfixed titan. | 1.29 | 9 | 2.671 | 0.0256 |
|
|