Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2012, Article ID 576238, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/576238
Clinical Study

Biological Principles and Physiology of Bone Regeneration under the Schneiderian Membrane after Sinus Lift Surgery: A Radiological Study in 14 Patients Treated with the Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Cavitational Sinus Lift (Intralift)

1Center for Facial Esthetics Vienna, Brauhausgasse 12-14, 1050 Vienna, Austria
2Implantology Clinic Ratingen, Lintorfer Straße 7, 40878 Ratingen, Germany
3Implantology Clinic Kaiserswerth, Kaiserswerther Markt 25, 40489 Düsseldorf, Germany

Received 16 March 2012; Accepted 18 April 2012

Academic Editor: Silvio Taschieri

Copyright © 2012 A. Troedhan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Puranen, “Reorganization of fresh and preserved bone transplants. An experimental study in rabbits using tetracycline labelling,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 92, supplement, pp. 1–75, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Bohr, H. O. Ravn, and H. Werner, “The osteogenic effect of bone transplants in rabbits,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Series B, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 866–873, 1968. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Skoog, “The use of periosteum and Surgicel for bone restoration in congenital clefts of the maxilla. A clinical report and experimental investigation,” Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–130, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Engdahl, “Bone regeneration in maxillary defects. An experimental investigation on the significance of the periosteum and various media (blood, surgicel, bone marrow and bone grafts) on bone formation and maxillary growth,” Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 8, pp. 1–79, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. C. Hobar, J. A. Masson, R. Wilson, and J. Zerwekh, “The importance of the dura in craniofacial surgery,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 217–225, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Celik, T. Turan, and F. Kabukcuoglu, “Bone induction capacity of the periosteum and neonatal dura in the setting of the zygomatic arch fracture model,” Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, vol. 5, pp. 301–308, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. T. Ortak, R. Özdemir, A. Uysal et al., “Osteogenic capacities of periost grafts, periost flaps and prefabricated periosteal flaps: experimental study,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 594–600, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Lundgren, S. Andersson, F. Gualini, and L. Sennerby, “Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 165–173, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Srouji, T. Kizhner, D. Ben David, M. Riminucci, P. Bianco, and E. Livne, “The schneiderian membrane contains osteoprogenitor cells: in vivo and in vitro study,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 138–145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Srouji, D. Ben-David, R. Lotan, M. Riminucci, E. Livne, and P. Bianco, “The innate osteogenic potential of the maxillary sinus (Schneiderian) membrane: an ectopic tissue transplant model simulating sinus lifting,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 793–801, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. J. Boyne, L. C. Lilly, R. E. Marx et al., “De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1693–1707, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Stübinger, C. Landes, O. Seitz, H. F. Zeilhofer, and R. Sader, “Ultrasonic bone cutting in oral surgery: a review of 60 cases,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Troedhan, A. Kurrek, and M. Wainwright, “Ultrasonic piezotome surgery: is it a benefit for our patients and does it extend surgery time? A retrospective comparative study on the removal of 100 impacted mandibular 3rd molars,” Open Journal of Stomatology, vol. 1, pp. 179–184, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. C. Troedhan, A. Kurrek, M. Wainwright, and S. Jank, “Hydrodynamic ultrasonic sinus floor elevation—an experimental study in sheep,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1125–1130, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Jank, A. Kurrek, M. Wainwright, V. E. Bek, and A. Troedhan, “Rupture length of the sinus membrane after 1.2 mm puncture and surgical sinus elevation: an experimental animal cadaver study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 568–572, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Velázquez-Cayón, M.-M. Romero-Ruiz, D. Torres-Lagares et al., “Hydrodynamic ultrasonic maxillary sinus lift: review of a new technique and presentation of a clinical case,” Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 271–275, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Wainwright, A. Troedhan, and A. Kurrek, “The IntraLift: a new minimal invasive ultrasonic technique for sinus grafting procedures, implants,” International Journal of Implantology, vol. 3, pp. 30–34, 2007. View at Google Scholar