International Journal of Dentistry

International Journal of Dentistry / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Contemporary Endodontic Treatment

View this Special Issue

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 814789 |

Denzil Valerian Albuquerque, Jojo Kottoor, Natanasabapathy Velmurugan, "A New Anatomically Based Nomenclature for the Roots and Root Canals—Part 2: Mandibular Molars", International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2012, Article ID 814789, 9 pages, 2012.

A New Anatomically Based Nomenclature for the Roots and Root Canals—Part 2: Mandibular Molars

Academic Editor: Igor Tsesis
Received29 Sep 2011
Accepted14 Oct 2011
Published08 Feb 2012


Several terminologies have been employed in the dental literature to describe the roots and root canal systems of mandibular molars with no consensus being arrived at, thus far. The anatomical relation of roots and their root canals were identified and a naming system was formulated. The proposed nomenclature attempts to make certain essential modifications to the traditional approach to accommodate the naming of various aberrations presented in mandibular molars. A simple, yet extensive nomenclature system has been proposed that appropriately names the internal and external morphology of mandibular molars.

1. Introduction

Nomenclature refers to a set of terms used in communication by persons in the same profession that enables them to better understand one another. The comprehension of these terms aids in diagnosing and treating disease and defects of the teeth [1]. The mandibular first molar, the earliest permanent posterior tooth to erupt, is considered to be the most frequently involved tooth in endodontic procedure [2]. In its typical form, it is described as a two rooted tooth containing either three or four canals. Most commonly, mandibular molars present with two principle roots, the mesial and the distal [3, 4]. The mesial root commonly presents with two principle canals, the mesiobuccal (MB) and the mesiolingual (ML). The distal root however has two common canal configurations wherein it may contain a single canal termed as the distal (D) or may contain two separate canals, the distobuccal (DB) and the distolingual (DL). Thus, in the distal root the principle canals could either be the distal (D) or the distobuccal (DB) and distolingual (DL), as the case may be [3].

As with any tooth anatomy, mandibular molars have also been reported with numerous variations with regards to their root and root canal morphology. Variations in their root anatomy have ranged from 2 roots, as described earlier, to as many as 4 distinct roots [46], while canal variations have ranged from a single root canal to as many as seven root canals [711]. A literature search revealed that multiple atypical and diverse terms have been used in the dental literature to describe the same morphologic variation in these teeth (Table 1). Alternatively, the same names have also been used to name two nonidentical anatomical variations. For instance, a canal located between the DB and DL canal has been alternately termed as the middle distal, distal, and the third distal canal [7, 12]. Additionally, canals located in similar anatomical positions have been differentiated by using numbers as suffixes to a common name, analogous to the traditional names of their maxillary counterparts, as MB1, MB2, ML1, ML2 [7]. Also, few authors have described the variation of multiple canals within a root by merely mentioning the number of canals (e.g., 2 mesial or 3 distal canals, 2DB canals, etc.) [9, 13]. The numbers convey only the presence of an additional canal(s) with no descriptive information of the variant canal system. Of the various terminologies, the use of numbers (MB1, MB2, ML1, ML2, DB1, DB2 or 2 mesial, etc.) [14] to denote additional canals is very unusual for nomenclature. The outcome is that there is a lack of clarity in communication of the various aberrations presented in mandibular molars. This highlights the need as well as the importance of a nomenclature that takes these factors into consideration for enhanced communication, improved education, and understanding of the variations in the roots and their canal systems.

Root nomenclatureRoot canal nomenclatureReference

M, DB, MD, DLMB, ML, DB, MD, DL, [5]
M, DMB, ML, MD, DB, DL [15]
M, DB, DLMB, ML, DB, DL, MD or third distal [12]
M, DMB, MM, ML, D [16]
M, DMB, MM, ML, DB, DL [13]
M, DM, D [11]
Radix entomolaris [17]
Radix paramolaris [18]
MB, ML, DMB1, MB2, ML1, ML2, DB, D, DL [7]
MB, ML, DB, DLML, MB, DL, MD, DB1, DB2 [10]
M, DB, DL2 mesial, 3 distal [19]
M, D4 mesial canals, 1 distal canal [20]
Mesiocentral canal [21]
M, DMB, ML, 3rd mesial, DB, DL [22]
M, DB, DLMB, ML, 2DB, 1DL [9]

M—mesial, MB—mesiobuccal, ML—mesiolingual, MM—middle mesial, D—distal, DB—distobuccal, DL—distolingual, MD—middle distal.

To date, no nomenclature system has been presented that simultaneously considers the relationship of the root and the root canal anatomy of mandibular molars. Thus, though there appears to be a general agreement with regards to the presence of internal and external morphological aberrations, no consensus has been arrived at for their nomenclature. The aim of this paper is to propose a new nomenclature to allow for a comprehensive anatomical description of the roots and root canals in mandibular molars.

2. Root and Root Canal Nomenclature

2.1. Nomenclature for Root Canals
(1)Identification of the principle canals in two rooted mandibular molars.(i)Most commonly the mandibular molars present with two principle roots, the mesial and the distal.(ii)In the principle mesial root, the principle mesiobuccal (MB) or mesiolingual (ML) canal is the canal whose orifice is located most mesially and buccally or mesially and lingually, respectively (Figure 1(a)).(iii)When the principle distal root contains a single canal whose orifice is located centrally, it is identified as the principle distal (D) canal (Figure 1(a)).(iv)However, when the distal root presents with its most common variation of two canals, both canals would be considered as the principle canals. They would be identified based on their respective anatomical positions and named as the distobuccal (DB) and distolingual (DL) canals (Figure 1(b)).(v)Also, the path of entrance of the canal at the level of the orifice can be used to identify the principle canals (MB, ML, D, DB, or DL), whereby the name of the canal is opposite to its path of entrance into the canal orifice.(2)An additional canal in two rooted mandibular molars.(i)When an additional canal is located between the two principle canals of the same root, the prefix “middle”, denoted as “M”, is added to describe its anatomical position between the two principle canals. The name of the additional canal would also include its mesio-distal position within the tooth, that is, “mesial” or “distal”. Thus, the canal would be named as middle mesial (MM) or middle distal (MD) canal (Figures 1(c), 5(e), and 5(f)).(3)Multiple additional canals in two rooted mandibular molars.(i)If two additional canals are contained within the same principle root(s) (i.e., 4 canals in the same root), the additional canals would be named based on their buccolingual position in relation to the nearest principle canal. The term “bucco-” or “linguo-” would be added as a prefix to the names of the principle canals that the additional canals are anatomically adjacent to. For instance, if the distal root contains four canals, all located in a similar buccolingual plane, the names of the canals would be distobuccal (DB), linguo-distobuccal (L-DB), bucco-distolingual (B-DL), and distolingual (DL) (Figure 1(d)).
2.2. Root Variations

(1)Two-rooted mandibular molars(i)If all canals are located within the two principle roots, no further modification of the nomenclature is required. Thus, when the canals are named without any mention of the roots, it would signify that the canals are located in their respective principle roots. For instance, a two-rooted mandibular molar containing four principle canals would retain their names as MB, ML, DL, and DB (Figure 2(a)).(2)Three-rooted mandibular molars(i)In cases when two roots are located in place of the single principle root of that region, with each such root containing a single canal, the name(s) of the roots and their canals would be as per the anatomically based criteria mentioned above. This root variation is communicated by adding the suffix “R” to the abbreviated name of the canal.(ii)“R” should be used as a suffix only to signify the root(s) other than the principle roots and when the variant root(s) contains only a single canal.(iii)Thus, a three-rooted mandibular molar with two roots located distally (mesial, distobuccal, and distolingual roots) with four canals, the root, and canal configuration would be denoted as MB, ML, DBR, DLR (Figure 2(b)). (3)Four-rooted mandibular molars (i)In cases when there are three roots in place of the single principle root of that region, with each such root containing a single canal, the canals are named as per their anatomical position as mesiobuccal, middle mesial, and mesiolingual for the mesial or distobuccal, middle distal, and distolingual for the distal. Additionally, to communicate the root variation, the suffix “R” is added to their canal name. The root and canal nomenclature for this configuration would be denoted as MBR, MMR, MLR or DBR, MDR, DLR for the mesial and the distal, respectively (Figure 2(c)).(4)Three- or four-rooted mandibular molars with multiple canals in the additional roots.(i)In cases when any of the additional root(s) contains 2 or more canals, the name of each canal in the additional root would be based on its anatomical position within that root. The prefix bucco- (B), linguo- (L), or middle (M) would be used, as is applicable, for the naming these canals.(ii)However, each of the canals in this additional root would be denoted by the suffix “r”, instead of the previously mentioned “R”. The suffix “r” would communicate their location within the same additional root. The root which contains these canals would be inferred from the common denominator “r”. Thus, two canals in the same buccolingual plane of an additional distobuccal root would be named as L-DBr and DBr (Figure 2(d)).

For ease of communication, the cited illustrations for description have been purposefully explained with relation to the distal roots and canals. However, the same criteria would also apply when morphological variations are present in the mesial roots and canals. Also, when additional canals and roots are present, they have been described to be in the same buccolingual plane as this is the pattern that mandibular molars most often demonstrate.

2.3. Modifications for Rare Anatomical Variations
(i)In cases when only a single canal is located in the mesial root of a mandibular molar, the canal is named as “mesial”, denoted as “M” (Figure 3(a)).(ii)In case of a single rooted mandibular molar with a single canal, we propose that it be named as “central” canal, denoted as “Cn” (Figure 3(b)). This name appropriately describes the central location of a single canal within a solitary root.(iii)In cases of C-shaped canals, the prefix “C” is added to the canal name. The canal name is expanded to include the path of the C-shaped canal. For instance, a C-shaped configuration involving the ML and DB canal, with an independent MB canal, its root and canal configuration would be C-ML-DB, MB (Figure 3(c)). This naming pattern would also shed light on the possibility of fused roots that contain the C-shaped canal.(iv)When a tooth contains a single canal which is C-shaped, it is termed as C-shaped central canal and denoted as “C-Cn”. The shape, position, and extent of the canal are also included in its name, in the same order. For instance, C-Cn-MB-ML would signify a C-shaped central canal extending from the MB to the ML (Figures 3(d), 5(c), and 5(d)).

The proposed formula for naming of a root and root canal of mandibular molars, according to the present nomenclature is XR, where “X” is the anatomical location of the canal and “R” denotes an additional root. However, when multiple canals are located in an additional root, the formula is modified to XPr, where “X” is the anatomical position of the canals in relation to the principle canal (P) and “r” denotes the additional root that contains the multiple canals. The proposed formulas, “XR” and “XPr, for naming of roots and root canals are applicable to various root and root canal configurations of mandibular molars, except in cases of the rare anatomical variations cited.

3. Discussion

A name based on an anatomical position provides its most appropriate description. Terms that have over time gained popularity because of their simplicity are often inappropriate and imprecise. Such terms fail to anatomically describe the locations of the canals and have no parallel in scientific terminology. The present nomenclature is based on the use of anatomic terms to name the roots and their canals. This is in line with the traditional approach which employs similar anatomically based terminologies. However, in addition to the traditionally accepted terms, the proposed additional specifications help to precisely name roots and canals, inclusive of rare morphologic variations, based on anatomical considerations. This maintains the simplicity of the terms used and further widens the scope of their application and acceptance. According to Weine [23], the name of a canal is opposite to its path of entrance at the level of the canal orifice. In certain situations though, this may not be completely reliable as a criterion for naming canals. For instance, when a middle mesial canal is fusing with either the MB or the ML canal, their paths of entrance into the canal at the orifice level may vary or be more or less in the same direction. Also, multiple canals in the same root may not have a distinctively different path of entrance than their adjacent canals. This allows room for confusion when canals are named only based on their paths of entrance at the orifice level. However, as stated previously, the path of entrance of canals at the level of the orifice could be used in conjunction with their anatomical positions to locate and identify the principle canals.

Reeh [7] described the endodontic management of a two-rooted mandibular molar with seven root canals which were named as MB1, MB2, ML1, ML2, DB, D, and DL (Figure 4(a)). Although traditionally the term distal (D) has been used to describe a single canal in the principle distal root, the author termed the canal located midway between the DB and the DL canals as the distal canal. Also, the canals between the MB and the ML canals were identified using numbers as the “MB2” and “ML2” canals. This underscores the lack of clarity in the traditional approach of naming the canals of the mandibular molar based on their location. As per the proposed classification, the root and root canal morphology would be named as MB, L-MB, B-ML, ML, DB, MD, and DL (Figure 4(b)), which clearly defines the anatomical positions of these canals.

The prognosis of an endodontically treated tooth depends mainly on the adequate cleaning and shaping of the various aberrations of the root and canal system. Thus, giving adequate importance to both, the roots and their canal systems, is imperative for long-term success of endodontic treatment. The proposed system enables better communication of the root configuration of the tooth by positively including the information of the additional root(s) in the nomenclature. For instance, a mandibular first molar with four roots (MB, ML, DB, DL) containing six canals were named as MB, ML, DB1, DB2, MD, and DL [10] (Figure 4(c)). According to the proposed nomenclature, the root and canal configuration would be MBR, MLR, DLR, DBr, M-DBr, and L-DBr (Figure 4(d)). It distinctly communicates that the MB, ML, and DL canals are individual canals in their respective roots, while the DB root has three distinct canals. These instances point out to the usefulness of the proposed classification in giving a clear picture of the existing root and canal aberrancies in mandibular molars.

In the proposed nomenclature, no specific mention has been made of the terms radix entomolaris (RE) [17] or radix paramolaris (RP) [18]. It is the view of the authors that each variation should be identified based on its anatomical description and without using individual names to specify each variation. Additionally, numerous other morphological variations that cannot be identified as the RE or RP have also been reported but without any specific names or a defined set of criteria for their naming. Thus, identifying these root variations as an additional DL or an MB root, along with the canal configuration it presents, is straightforward and appropriate (Figures 2(d), 4(d), 5(a), and 5(b)).

The salient features of the proposed nomenclature are its anatomical basis for location and naming of roots and canals and consideration of the root to canal relationship. It is elaborate to cover various aberrations of the root and root canal anatomy yet is simple, self explanatory, easy to understand and communicate. A certain paradigm shift has been adopted for the proposed nomenclature, but a genuine effort has been made to use the traditional naming system wherever feasible to allow for an accurate anatomical description of roots and their canals. Also, an attempt has been made to include various previously reported root and canal variations in mandibular molars within the purview of the proposed nomenclature [7, 10]. Nevertheless, given the nature of unpredictability in the endodontic field, certain aberrations could be reported in the future that may not have been covered under the scope of the present nomenclature. However, minor modifications in the form of additional criteria would enable their inclusion within the proposed nomenclature.

4. Conclusion

The proposed naming system is an anatomically based nomenclature which takes into account the root-to-root-canal relationship in mandibular molars.


  1. T. M. Roberson and C. M. Sturdevant, “Fundamentals in tooth preparation,” in Studevants’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, T. M. Roberson, H. O. Heymann, and E. J. Swift Junior, Eds., pp. 269–309, Mosby Elsevier, St Louis, Mo, USA, 4th edition, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. C. Burns and E. J. Herbranson, “Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation,” in Pathways of the Pulp, S. Cohen and R. C. Burns, Eds., pp. 173–229, Mosby, St Louis, Mo, USA, 8th edition, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  3. F. J. Vertucci, J. E. Haddix, and L. R. Britto, “Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation,” in Pathways of the Pulp, S. Cohen and K. M. Hargreaves, Eds., pp. 148–232, Mosby, St Louis, Mo, USA, 9th edition, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. Friedman, J. Moshonov, and A. Stabholz, “Five root canals in a mandibular first molar,” Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 226–228, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. J. Lee, K. H. Jang, L. S. W. Spangberg et al., “Three-dimensional visualization of a mandibular first molar with three distal roots using computer-aided rapid prototyping,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 668–674, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Schäfer, D. Breuer, and S. Janzen, “The prevalence of three-rooted mandibular permanent first molars in a German population,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 202–205, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. S. Reeh, “Seven canals in a lower first molar,” Journal of endodontics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 497–499, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. L. R. G. Fava, I. Weinfeld, F. P. Fabri, and C. R. Pais, “Four second molars with single roots and single canals in the same patient,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 138–142, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Kimura and K. Matsumoto, “Mandibular first molar with three distal root canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 468–470, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Ghoddusi, N. Naghavi, M. Zarei, and E. Rohani, “Mandibular first molar with four distal canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1481–1483, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Krithikadatta, J. Kottoor, C. S. Karumaran, and G. Rajan, “Mandibular first molar having an unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: a case report,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1712–1716, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. B. Barletta, S. R. Dotto, M. S. Reis, R. Ferreira, and R. M. Travassos, “Mandibular molar with five root canals,” Australian Endodontic Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 129–132, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  13. D. Baugh and J. Wallace, “Middle mesial canal of the mandibular first molar: a case report and literature review,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 185–186, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. O. V. De Pablo, R. Estevez, M. Péix Sánchez, C. Heilborn, and N. Cohenca, “Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1919–1931, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Kottoor, R. Sudha, and N. Velmurugan, “Middle distal canal of the mandibular first molar: a case report and literature review,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 714–722, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. H. La, D. H. Jung, E. C. Kim, and K. S. Min, “Identification of independent middle mesial canal in Mandibular first molar using cone-beam computed tomography imaging,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 542–545, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. J. G. De Moor, C. A. J. G. Deroose, and F. L. G. Calberson, “The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 789–799, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. L. Calberson, R. J. De Moor, and C. A. Deroose, “The radix entomolaris and paramolaris: clinical approach in endodontics,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 58–63, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. E. Quackenbush, “Mandibular molar with three distal root canals,” Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48–49, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  20. E. G. Kontakiotis and G. N. Tzanetakis, “Four canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar. A case report under the operating microscope,” Australian Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 84–88, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. F. Navarro, A. Luzi, A. A. García, and A. H. García, “Third canal in the mesial root of permanent mandibular first molars: review of the literature and presentation of 3 clinical reports and 2 in vitro studies,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. E605–E609, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. Holtzmann, “Root canal treatment of a mandibular first molar with three mesial root canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 422–423, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  23. F. S. Weine, Endodontic Therapy, Mosby Elsevier, St Louis, Mo, USA, 5th edition, 1996.

Copyright © 2012 Denzil Valerian Albuquerque et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles