Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2013, Article ID 896381, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/896381
Clinical Study

Pain during Removal of Carious Lesions in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

1Pediatric Dentistry, University Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2Rehabilitation Sciences Post Graduation Program, University Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Rua Vergueiro, 235/249, Liberdade, 01504-001 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
3Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
4Dental Clinic Post Graduation Program, University Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil

Received 5 May 2013; Revised 29 September 2013; Accepted 13 November 2013

Academic Editor: Athena Papas

Copyright © 2013 Lara Jansiski Motta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Balciuniene, R. Sabalaite, and I. Juskiene, “Chemomechanical caries removal for children,” Stomatologija, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 40–44, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  2. L. E. Bertassoni and G. W. Marshall, “Papain-gel degrades intact nonmineralized type I collagen fibrils,” Scanning, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 253–258, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. K. Bussadori, L. C. Castro, and A. C. Galvão, “Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Kumar, M. Nayak, K. L. Prasad, and N. Gupta, “A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie—a papain gel,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 697, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Mickenautsch, V. Yengopal, and A. Banerjee, “Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. K. Bussadori, C. C. Guedes, J. C. Bachiega, T. O. Santis, and L. J. Motta, “Clinical and radiographic study of chemical-mechanical removal of caries using papacárie: 24-month follow up,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 251–254, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. K. Bussadori, C. C. Guedes, M. L. Hermida Bruno, and D. Ram, “Chemo-mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using a papain gel: case report,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 177–180, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Mathre, S. Kumar, S. Sinha, and B. M. N. Ahmed, “Chemo-mechanical method of caries removal: a brief review,” International Journal of Clinical Dental Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 52–57, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Jawa, S. Singh, R. Somani, S. Jaidka, K. Sirkar, and R. Jaidka, “Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 73–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. M. S. Kotb, A. A. Abdella, M. A. El Kateb, and A. M. Ahmed, “Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Piva, F. A. Ogliari, R. R. de Moraes, F. Corá, S. Henn, and L. Correr-Sobrinho, “Papain-based gel for biochemical caries removal: influence on microtensile bond strength to dentin,” Brazilian Oral Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 364–370, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. A. Aguirre Aguilar, T. E. Rios Caro, J. Huaman Saavedra et al., “Atraumatic restorative treatment: a dental alternative well-received by children,” Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 148–152, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  13. T. E. R. Caro, A. A. A. Aguilar, J. H. Saavedra et al., “Comparison of operative time, costs and self-reported pain in children treated with atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative treatment,” Medical Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 159–163, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. M. Carrillo, M. H. Tanaka, M. F. Cesar, M. A. F. Camargo, Y. Juliano, and N. F. Novo, “Use of papain gel in disabled patients,” Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. M. De Menezes Abreu, S. C. Leal, J. Mulder, and J. E. Frencken, “Dental anxiety in 6-7-year-old children treated in accordance with conventional restorative treatment, ART and ultra-conservative treatment protocols,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 410–416, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. M. de Menezes Abreu, S. C. Leal, J. Mulder, and J. E. Frencken, “Pain experience after conventional, atraumatic, and ultraconservative restorative treatments in 6- to 7-yr-old children,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. K. Kochhar, N. Srivastava, I. Pandit, N. Gugnani, and M. Gupta, “An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. L. Wong and C. M. Baker, “Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales,” Pediatric Nursing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Whaley and D. L. N. Wong, Nursing Care of Infants and Children, Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 3rd edition, 1987.
  20. C. T. Chambers, J. Hardial, K. D. Craig, C. Court, and C. Montgomery, “Faces scales for the measurement of postoperative pain intensity in children following minor surgery,” Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 277–285, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. A. Stanford, C. T. Chambers, and K. D. Craig, “The role of developmental factors in predicting young children's use of a self-report scale for pain,” Pain, vol. 120, no. 1-2, pp. 16–23, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. L. von Baeyer, “Children's self-reports of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations and interpretation,” Pain Research & Management, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Ericson, E. Kidd, D. McComb, I. Mjör, and M. J. Noack, “Minimally invasive dentistry—concepts and techniques in cariology,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. C. Peters, M. H. Flamenbaum, N. M. Eboda, R. J. Feigal, and M. R. Inglehart, “Chemomechanical caries removal in children: efficacy and efficiency,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 137, no. 12, pp. 1658–1666, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. N. P. Coirêa, R. D. O. Rocha, L. E. R. Filho, A. Muench, and C. R. M. D. Rodrigues, “Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 187–192, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus